Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Spiral I Acquisition Strategy Mike Hecker 16 November 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Charles Nola Lisa Blue June 21, 2006 Charles Nola Lisa Blue June 21, 2006 Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) Upper Stage Avionics & Software Acquisition Planning.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
IS4799 Information Systems and Cybersecurity Capstone Project
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew and Cargo Program Overview June 17, 2009 Doug Cooke.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
NASA AGENCY REPORT Dr. Eric J. Lindstrom Physical Oceanography Program Scientist Earth Science Division Science Mission Directorate MARCH 12, 2007.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Future of Space Exploration Orion, Ares and Beyond.... AIAA / NSC / JPL Town Hall Meeting 26 April 2007.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Update 2004 MAPLD International Conference Jim Nehman Deputy Associate Administrator Development Programs.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status with a Focus on Insight / Oversight Approach to the COMSTAC.
November 30, 2006 Space Telescope Science Institute Conference Scott “Doc” Horowitz Associate Administrator NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
Summary Description of Previous Studies Study NameDateSummary Description Exploration Office Case Studies NASA's Office of Exploration did four.
ESMD Education Presentation to Space Grant Directors March 2007 Jerry Hartman Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Education Lead.
Human Exploration Slide 1 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah March 4, 2005 Linda Fuhrman
Lunar Colony Design Challenge January 14, 2004 Indeed it is the nature of humanity to explore beyond our horizons. Humanity explores in order to discover,
Future Space Exploration A Summary of “The Global Exploration Roadmap”, International Space Exploration Coordination Group, August 2013 Summarized by:
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
New 5000 Documents 14 May 2001 New 5000 Documents 14 May 2001 Defense Systems Management College Acquisition Policy Department.
ESMD Systems Integration Workshop SI Strategy & Implementation Plan Doug Cooke Craig Cornelius 15 December 2004.
Commercial Space Vehicles Lessons Learned Needs Workshop Bette Siegel, Ph.D. ESMD Bette Siegel, Ph.D. ESMD September 18, 2006.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
Lynn Garrison MSFC SBIR Program Manager NASA’s Mission To understand and protect our home planet To explore the Universe and Search for Life To Inspire.
Carl G. Ray Program Executive Small Business Innovation Research Small Business Technology Transfer SBIRSBIR To increase small business participation.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Probabilistic Technology Initiative for NASA Pam Caruso Technical Assistant to the Director, Engineering NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Presented to.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
Alpha Contracting Sole Source Negotiations between Government and Industry (13 CFR (c)(2))
1 1 Defense Acquisition Guidebook Progress Update March 27, 2012.
0 Space Exploration and International Cooperation Gilbert R. Kirkham Office of External Relations June 2004.
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
ISS Commercial Resupply Services Michael Suffredini ISS Program Manager June 17 th, 2009 Augustine Committee UPDATED: Corrected page 10 (replaced “first.
1 June 10, 2004 Gary L. Wentz, Jr. Deputy Manager, MSFC Office of Exploration Systems MSFC Office for Exploration Systems.
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F University of Maryland Dan Crichton March 27,
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
1 1 The FAA's ECSS Acquisition — An Innovative Approach to Procuring Enterprise-Wide Support Services Breakout Session # 782 Scott M. Bukovec Senior Contracting.
The Year in Review 2016 Humans to Mars Report. Mars Science Paving the Way Notable Discoveries – The Past 5 Years Mars was once a habitable environment.
Bringing Digital Technology Back to Earth ISCe2005 Presented by Ken Dozier USC Viterbi School of Engineering NASA Far West Technology Transfer Center.
National Goals and Objectives
System Engineering Considerations (See Chapters 3 and 9)
Life Cycle Logistics.
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
h t t p : / / w w w . u s c . e d u / g o / t t c
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
The Department of Defense Acquisition Process
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
Presentation transcript:

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Spiral I Acquisition Strategy Mike Hecker 16 November 2004

2 Agenda  Exploration Systems’ Objectives  Nation’s Vision for Exploration  Definition of Spirals  Program Life Cycle Management and NSSAP  Spiral I Objectives  Requirements  Acquisitions within Spiral I  Pre-Acquisition Activities Supporting Spiral I  FY05 Acquisitions  CEV RFP  Commercial Earth to Orbit Objective - Provide Insight into Current Acquisition Plans for Spiral I - Solicit Comments - Remind All that These are Preliminary Plans That Will Change Based on Feedback from NASA, Industry, and the Budget Process The Enclosed Information for Discussion Only and Does Not Represent a Draft or Final Strategy

3 Nation’s Vision for Space Exploration Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program to explore the solar system and beyond Extend human presence across the solar system, starting with a human return to the Moon by the year 2020, in preparation for human exploration of Mars and other destinations; Develop the innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both to explore and to support decisions about the destinations for human exploration; and Promote international and commercial participation in exploration to further U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests. THE FUNDAMENTAL GOAL OF THIS VISION IS TO ADVANCE U.S. SCIENTIFIC, SECURITY, AND ECONOMIC INTEREST THROUGH A ROBUST SPACE EXPLORATION PROGRAM

4 1. Return the Shuttle to safe flight as soon as practical, based on CAIB recommendations 2. Use Shuttle to complete ISS assembly 3. Retire the Shuttle after assembly complete (2010 target) 4. Focus ISS research to support exploration goals; understanding space environment and countermeasures 5. Meet foreign commitments 6. Undertake lunar exploration to support sustained human and robotic exploration of Mars and beyond 7. Series of robotic missions to Moon by 2008 to prepare for human exploration 8. Expedition to lunar surface as early as 2015 but no later than Use lunar activities to further science, and test approaches (including lunar resources) for exploration to Mars & beyond 10. Conduct robotic exploration of Mars to prepare for future expedition 11. Conduct robotic exploration across solar system to search for life, understand history of universe, search for resources 12. Conduct advanced telescope searches for habitable environments around other stars 13. Demonstrate power, propulsion, life support capabilities for long duration, more distant human and robotic missions 14. Conduct human expeditions to Mars after acquiring adequate knowledge and capability demonstrations 15. Develop a new Crew Exploration Vehicle; flight test before end of decade; human exploration capability by Separate cargo from crew as soon as practical to support ISS; acquire crew transport to ISS after Shuttle retirement 17. Pursue international participation 18. Pursue commercial opportunity for transportation and other services The Nation’s Vision

5 Key Elements of the Nation’s Vision  Objectives  Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program  Extend human presence across the solar system and beyond  Develop supporting innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures  Promote international and commercial participation in exploration  Major Milestones  2008: Initial flight test of CEV  2008: Launch first lunar robotic orbiter  : Robotic mission to lunar surface  2011 First Unmanned CEV flight  2014: First crewed CEV flight  : Jupiter Icy Moon Orbiter (JIMO)/Prometheus  : First human mission to the Moon

6 Constellation Spirals Crewed Access to Low Earth Orbit - Robotic Exploration, Lunar - Crewed Exploration, Lunar Extended Duration - Robotic Exploration, Mars -Crewed Exploration, Lunar Long Duration - Robotic Exploration, Mars -Other Potential Capabilities -Crewed Exploration, Mars Surface SPIRAL CAPABILITIES PRE-ACQUISITION ACTIVITIES ESRT PNST HSRT SYSTEM ENGINEERING ESRT: Exploration Systems Research & Technology PNST: Prometheus Nuclear Systems Technology HRST: Human System Research & Technology TBD STUDYDESIGN STUDY DESIGN PDR SRR ST UD Y OPERATE (SOMD) BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH BUILD, TEST COMMERCIAL SOLUTION BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH CDR DESIGNDESIGN DESIGN

7 Constellation Spirals  Constellation Spiral Definitions  Spiral 1  Provide precursor robotic exploration of the lunar environment  Deliver a lunar capable human transportation system for test and checkout in low Earth orbit  Spiral 2  Execute extended duration human lunar exploration missions  Extend precursor robotic technology demonstrations at Mars  Spiral 3  Execute a long-duration human lunar exploration campaign using the moon as a testbed to demonstrate systems (e.g., Lander, habitation, surface power) for future deployment at Mars  Spiral 4  Execute human exploration missions to the vicinity of Mars  Spiral 5  Execute initial human Mars surface exploration missions  To Meet Spiral Capabilities, Investments are Made in Two Areas: Spiral Systems and Pre-Acquisition Activities  Spiral Acquisitions  Systems that Deliver the Spirals End Capability  For Spiral I Capability of Low Earth Orbit Access, Includes CEV, launch vehicle, etc.  Pre-Acquisition Activities  Research, Technology Development, and Flight Demonstrations that Reduce Risk and Provide Technologies for Use by One of the Spiral Systems  The Customer for Pre-Acquisition Activities are not the End User, but Rather the Systems within a Spiral

8 Program Phases and Milestones NSSAP 0301 KeyDecisionPoints:JROCICD NSS Space Acq Policy PHASE B (Design Phase) Risk Reduction & Design Development PHASE A (Study Phase) Concept/ Architecture Dev PHASE C (Build, Test, Launch) Acquisition & Operations Support B A PDRSDR SRR SRR Pre-Systems AcquisitionSystems Acquisition Sustainment C Upgrade Decision MDA Option Buy Approval 1st Launch FOCIOC PHASE B Approval PHASE A Approval PHASE C ApprovalJROCCDD CDR T&E STRAT TEMP Pre KDP-A Activities Phase D Fabrication, Integration and test Phase E Operations CDR Pre Phase A Advanced Studies Phase A Mission Definition Phase B Preliminary Design NPG C JROCICD Phase C Final Design PDRSDR Formulation Implementation Program Plan & PCA FAD SRR SRRIPAOIPAOBC MNSCONOPS Final LvL 1 Draft LvL 2 Final LvL 2 Final LvL 3,4,5 IPAOIPAO Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Will Utilize NSSAP 0301 Phases and Nomenclature

9 Requirements  Working to Revision B of Exploration Systems Requirements  Exploration System-of-System Requirements  Exploration Crew Transport System Requirements  Spiral I  Spiral II  Spiral III  Crew Exploration Vehicle Concept of Operations  Using NSSAP Process, Current Set of Requirements are Basis for Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)  Requirements Defined to Level of Detail that Supports Concept Studies  Requirements Will Continue to Mature as Concept Studies Proceed  Finalized Requirements will be Documented, following Spiral 1 Systems Requirements Review, in an Concept Design Document (CDD) Prior to Entering Design Phase (~2006)  Spiral I Acquisition Strategy for Addressing Requirements  Ensure Extensibility by Using Future Spirals to Inform Current Development  Where Feasible, Use Spiral I & II Requirements as Threshold  Where Feasible, Establish Spiral III Requirements as Goal

10 Agenda  Exploration Systems’ Objectives  Nation’s Vision for Exploration  Definition of Spirals  Program Life Cycle Management and NSSAP  Spiral I Objectives  Requirements  Acquisitions within Spiral I  Pre-Acquisition Activities Supporting Spiral I  FY05 Acquisitions  CEV RFP  Commercial Earth to Orbit

11 DESIGN FY 04 FY 06 FY 08FY 12 FY 14 FY 10 STUDYDESIGN STUDY DESIGN BAA CEV LV GROUND SYSTEM IN-SPACE SYSTEMS BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH BUILD, TEST STUDY CEV BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH RFP Risk Reduction 2008 Demo OPERATE (SOMD) DESIGN Risk Reduction 2008 Demo DESIGN Non Traditional Approach ETO POTENTIAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE  CEV: Two Designs to PDR Followed by Downselect  ETO: Alternate Approach Incorporating Commercial Solution  CEV Launch Vehicle: Human Rated Lift  Ground System: Processing, Communications, Command & Control  In-Space Systems: Primarily Communications PHASE A: STUDY PHASE B: DESIGN PRE-SPIRAL ACTIVITIES PHASE C: BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH Spiral I Systems: Five Potential Acquisitions DESIGN

12 DESIGN FY 04 FY 06 FY 08FY 12 FY 14 FY 10 STUDYDESIGN STUDY DESIGN BAA CEV LV GROUND SYSTEM IN-SPACE SYSTEMS BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH BUILD, TEST STUDY CEV BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH CDR RFP DESIGN SRR PDR Risk Reduction 2008 Demo CEV un-crewed Flight OPERATE (SOMD) DESIGN Risk Reduction 2008 Demo DESIGN ETO POTENTIAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE PHASE A: STUDY PHASE B: DESIGN PRE-SPIRAL ACTIVITIES PHASE C: BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH Spiral I Study Phase  Spiral I is in Study Phase,  Continue Definition of Requirements  Culminates in System Requirements Review  Allocation of Spiral Requirements to Individual Elements Complete  Spiral Requirements Set in Capability Development Document (CDD)  Evaluate Whether or Not to Continue Non-Traditional ETO Approach  Design Phase Begins Non Traditional Approach

13 DESIGN FY 04 FY 06 FY 08FY 12 FY 14 FY 10 STUDYDESIGN STUDY DESIGN BAA CEV LV GROUND SYSTEM IN-SPACE SYSTEMS BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH BUILD, TEST STUDY CEV BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH CDR RFP DESIGN SRR PDR Risk Reduction 2008 Demo CEV un-crewed Flight OPERATE (SOMD) DESIGN Risk Reduction 2008 Demo DESIGN Non Traditional Approach ETO POTENTIAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE PHASE A: STUDY PHASE B: DESIGN PRE-SPIRAL ACTIVITIES PHASE C: BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH Pre-Acquisition Activities in Support of Spiral I  Spiral I Technology Infusion  Content Determined by Gap Analysis of Capabilities Against Requirements  Technologies Targeted for Transition at CEV PDR  Safety Net  Final Adjustment in Portfolio  Fill Technology Areas Left Uncovered by Previous Competitions  System Integrator  Strategy Still in Development  Planning for RFP in Late FY05 ESRT/HSRT EFFORTS Technology Infusion BAA BAA SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION S. Integrator RFP ESRT/HSRT RESEARCH Safety Net ICP ICP

14 Agenda  Exploration Systems’ Objectives  Nation’s Vision for Exploration  Definition of Spirals  Program Life Cycle Management and NSSAP  Spiral I Objectives  Requirements  Acquisitions within Spiral I  Pre-Acquisition Activities Supporting Spiral I  FY05 Acquisitions  CEV RFP  Commercial Earth to Orbit

15 CEV Development Plan INDUSTRY INPUTS FY 2005FY 2006FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2007 FY REV A CONTINUING REFINEMENT CONCEPT DEVDESIGN DEVELOPMENT RISK REDUCTION VIA 2008 DEMONSTRATION CONCEPT DEVDESIGN DEVELOPMENT DOWN SELECT ACQUISTION AND OPERATION PHASE A: STUDY PHASE B: DESIGN PRE-PHASE A ACTIVITIES PHASE C: BUILD, TEST, LAUNCH SRR PDR SRR PDR MS A MS B MS C CEV RFP SOURCE SELECTION CEV CONTRACT GOVT INPUTS C HUMAN RATED LAUNCH VEHICLE SYSTEM ACQUISITION GROUND SYSTEM ACQUISITION OTHER REQUIRED ACQUISITIONS ALLOCATED REQUIREMENTS B SPIRAL I ACQ. STRATEGY -Development Plan - Contracting - Risk - Budget/Cost RFP Development -SOO/SOW - Clauses - Selection Plan PROGAM DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS DIRECTORATE MILESTONES RISK REDUCTION VIA 2008 DEMONSTRATION

16 CEV Development Plan  Purpose: Develop Capability for Crewed Access to Space  LEO Access by 2014 (Threshold)  Provide Capability for Extended Lunar Exploration (Threshold)  Provide Capability for Long Lunar Exploration (Objective)  Development Plan  Pre-Phase A (3 rd Quarter FY04 to 2 nd Quarter FY05)  Integrate Independent Government/Industry Analysis of Requirements  Determine Functional Requirements for the Combined CEV/Launch Vehicle/Ground System  Phase A: Study Phase (3 rd Quarter FY05 to 4 th Quarter FY06)  Award Two CEV Contracts with Two Objectives  Spiral I Architecture and Functional Requirements Analysis/CEV Design  Risk Reduction Demonstration for 2008  At SRR, Allocate Individual Requirements for CEV, Launch Vehicle, Ground System, Etc.  Phase B: Design (1 st Quarter FY07 to 3 rd Quarter FY08)  Continue with Two Contractors into CEV Design Phase  After PDR and 2008 Demonstration, Downselect to Single CEV Developer  Phase C: Build, Test, Launch (1 st Quarter FY09 to 4 th Quarter FY14)

17 Fee Structure  Award Fee  Fee Based on Contractor Compliance to Their Proposed Baseline  After Contract Award, Conduct Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)  Percentage of Award Based on Contractor Meeting Schedule and Cost  Possibly use SPI and CPI as Metric  Fee Allocation by Milestone Events  IBR, Initial Baseline Review  SRR, System Readiness Review  PDR, Preliminary Design Review  Completion of 2008 Demonstration  Unallocated Fee Can be Rolled Forward to Next Award Period at Program Manager’s Discretion  Fee Amount of 10-15% of Contract Value

18 Down Select and Period Of Performance  Two Options Under Consideration  Single RFP to 2014  Set up with Phase I/Phase II  Phased Downselect in 2008  Two RFPs  First RFP: Study/Design Phase ( )  Second RFP: Design/Build-Test-Fly ( )  For Either Approach  Demonstration is for Risk Reduction and “Past Performance” Data  Demonstration is not a Flyoff  Anticipate that Competition will be Limited to Two Contractors Performing Under First Contract/Phase I The government contemplates that viable and effective competition will be restricted to firms performing CEV contracts through flight demonstration. Firms not performing under NASA CEV contracts for Phase A/B, and opting to submit proposals for Phase C-E, will be required to submit PDR and flight demonstration "equivalent" packages to illustrate ability to successfully execute CEV deployment to low earth orbit in 2014.

19 Commercial Approach for Earth to Orbit  Objective  Pursue High Risk, High Payoff Strategy for Earth to Orbit (ETO) Access  Strategy  Use Space Act, Cooperative Agreement, Other Transaction, or other Partnering in Lieu of Traditional FAR Contract  Evaluate Progress Concurrent with System Requirements Review (2006) and Preliminary Design Review (2008)  If Commercial Solution Proves Viable, Then Descope CEV and CEV Launch Vehicle Requirements Accordingly  Regardless of Success of Commercial ETO, CEV Acquisition will Continue with appropriately descoped or adjusted requirements  Schedule  Decision on Whether or Not to Pursue a Commercial Solution will be Made Prior to Release of Draft CEV RFP (Jan 2005)  If Decision is Made to Pursue, Anticipate Solicitation in FY05

20 Conclusions  Acquisition Strategy is a Work in Progress  Expect Release of Draft Statement of Work for Comment in Early December  Continuing on Schedule for CEV RFP Release in March 2005  NASA will Post Periodic Updates to the Website at

21 Launch Vehicle  Objective  Pursue human rated launch vehicle to support CEV with potential evolution into cargo and heavy lift missions  Strategy  Pre-Phase A (3 rd Quarter FY04 to 3 nd Quarter FY05)  Integrate Independent Government/Industry Analysis of Requirements  Determine Functional Requirements for the Combined CEV/Launch Vehicle/Ground System  Phase A: Study Phase (4 rd Quarter FY05 to 4 th Quarter 2006)  Using BAA Award multiple Launch System Contracts to:  Provide Launch system requirements and concept support  Coordinate with CEV contractors and System Integrator in the allocation of individual requirements for CEV, Launch Vehicle, Ground System, Etc.  Support Spiral 1 level System Requirements Review  Phase B/C: Competitive award to complete Design (FY07)  Contract structure and scope to be developed during Phase A  Schedule  Draft RFP Release 2 nd -3 rd Quarter FY05  Contract award Phase A 4 th Quarter FY05  Launch Vehicle Design phase commence FY07 following Spiral 1 System Requirements Review

22 System Integrator  Objective  Create a Government/Industry team to provide systems engineering & integration functions necessary to complete the integration of complex multi-element systems  Strategy  Government team will provide systems engineering & integration functions necessary to complete Spiral 1 System-of-Systems design through SRR in FY2006(3 rd Q)  Government retains Total System Performance Responsibility  Contractor team will ramp up through Spiral 1 SRR and support Spiral 2 Pre-Phase A systems engineering functions  Schedule  Contract Award ~January 2006

23 Spiral I Technology Infusion  Objective  Technology infusion addressing key needed technologies for CEV and Spiral 1  Strategy  BAA Solicitation to be enabled through coordination with / input from Requirements Division, CE&R project activities and others (Technical Interchange Meeting planned for mid-December  Schedule  BAA to be issued in 2 nd Quarter FY 2005

24 Safety Net BAA  Objective  Addresses important missing technology areas, competency gaps, etc.  Strategy  Acquisition strategy still in development; requires close coordination with NASA Field Centers  Schedule  3 rd Quarter FY 2005