Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support Specialists DATA ANALYSIS GRADE K-5 Elementary Science Liaisons and Coaches iCAD Session 1 (Sept 2014)

Data can… provide feedback on the past and provide a basis to begin planning for the future What Kind of Information can Data Provide us? Department of Mathematics and Science

IMPORTANCE OF DATA Facilitate a clear understanding of the gaps between where the school or class is and where it wants to be. Show if school or class goals and objectives are being accomplished. Predict and prevent failures. Predict and ensure successes. Establish foundation for Continuous School Improvement/SIP. Data drives instruction, and professional development. Department of Mathematics and Science

Effective Use of Classroom Data Teaching Using Results Planning Student Learning Assessing Source: Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit

GRADE K-5 BASELINE AND PRETEST ASSESSMENT RESULTS ( ) DATA DISAGGREGATION Department of Mathematics and Science

Science Pretest Results K-5 (MDCPS ) GRADEStudents Tested % Below Mastery % At Mastery Average Performance KINDERGARTEN ,509 4,462 58% 60% 42% 40% 62% 61% FIRST ,249 5,657 90% 88% 10% 12% 47% 48% SECOND ,565 6,020 80% 78% 20% 22% 51% 53% THIRD ,269 6,784 96% 4% 41% 43% FOURTH ,563 6,760 94% 95% 6% 5% 44% 45% FIFTH ,672 21,681 93% 92% 7% 8% 46% 48%

Elementary Science Pretest Performance by Reporting Category ( ) GRADE LEVEL LIFE SCIENCE PHYSICAL SCIENCE EARTH & SPACE NATURE OF SCIENCE KINDER62%66%59% FIRST53%51%42% SECOND49%55%47% THIRD37%44%50%29% FOURTH % 47%42% 34% 37% FIFTH % 47% 52% 54% 43% 45% 36% 38%

Your thoughts….. What reporting category do you think showed the highest performance? Why? What reporting category do you think showed the lowest performance? Why? How do you think the students performed on the Fair Game benchmarks? Do you think they performed better than last year? DATA DISAGGREGATION (Baseline ) Department of Mathematics and Science

Grade 5 Baseline Assessment Results (District ) YearAssessmentStudent Tested Average % Correct Percent Proficient (70%) 2011Baseline24,14145%5% 2012Baseline23,07647%6% 2013Baseline22,67246%7% 2014Baseline21, 68148%8% Question Group Baseline 2011 Baseline 2012 Baseline 2013 Baseline 2014 Nature of Sc35%38%36%38% Earth Space42%45%43%45% Physical Sc51%53%52%54% Life Science46%47%45%47%

Benchmarks 2012 Results 2013 Results Difference ( ) (%) 2014 Results Difference ( ) (%) SC.3.L %34%-337%+3 SC.4.E %41%44%+3 SC.4.E %29%33%+4 SC.4.E %49%51%+2 SC.4.E %38%-342%+4 SC.4.L %43%-346%+3 SC.4.L %49%-252%+3 SC.5.N %30%-232%+2 SC.5.N % -035%0 SC.5.N %48%-250%+2 SC.5.E % -059%+1 SC.5.E % -056%+1 SC.5.E %36%37%+1 Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results

Benchmarks 2012 Results 2013 Results Difference ( ) (%) 2014 Results Difference ( ) (%) SC.5.E.7.342%39%-340%+1 SC.5.P.8.156%57%+157%0 SC.5.P.8.355%51%-454%+3 SC.5.P.9.144% 046%+2 SC.5.P %74% -279%+5 SC.5.P %51% 49%-2 SC.5.P %46% 48%+2 SC.5.P %49% +151%+2 SC.5.P %44% -248%+4 SC.5.L %54% 53% SC.5.L %42% -244%+2 SC.5.L %47% 47%0 Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 and 2013

Grade 5 Science Assessments Calendar ( ) Baseline: August 18 – Sept 5, 2014 Fall IA: Oct 27 – November 14, 2014 Winter IA: Jan 26 - February 13, 2015 FCAT 2015: (April 13 - May 8, 2015)

Interim Assessments (IA) for Grade 5 (All benchmarks will be assessed on Gr 5 Baseline, Fall and Winter assessments) Quarterly Science Benchmark Assessments (QSBA) for Grades K- 4 will assess benchmarks covered in each quarter: Quarters 1, 2, 3, 4 QSBA for K-4 will be administered at the end of each grading period. QSBA Quarter 1 Admin window: Oct 27 – Nov 14, 2014 Available: First QSBA available October 22, Department of Mathematics and Science

Grade 5 Science Interim cut scores are based on statistical regression analysis between students performance on Interim Assessment and scale scores on 2012 FCAT 2.0: Fall IA satisfactory cut score: 51% or higher Winter IA satisfactory cut score: 53% or higher (Cut Scores) Baseline Proficiency Level: 70% Gr. 5 Science Interims Cut Scores Department of Mathematics and Science

Your thoughts….. What reporting category do you think showed the highest performance? Why? What reporting category do you think showed the lowest performance? Why? How did our performance compare to the State, Broward and West Palm Beach? DATA DISAGGREGATION (FCAT 2014 Results) Department of Mathematics and Science

FCAT Science - Grade 5 Year Total Students Tested % Levels 3-5 Physical/ChemicalEarth/SpaceLife/EnvironmentalScientific Thinking Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible PointsAvg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct , %1669%1464%1070% , %1675%1471%1060% , %1669%1471%1070% , %1164%1369%1464% , %1070%1362%1457% , %1354%1362%1354% , %1450%1362%1258% , %1547%1250%1250% GRADE 5 SCIENCE FCAT RESULTS DISTRICT LEVEL

Performance by Reporting Categories (Gr 5 Science FCAT) (Retro)

Performance by achievement levels (Gr 5 Science FCAT )

Grade 5 FCAT Science Comparative Results for MDCPS, State, Broward & Palm Beach ( )

2014 FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT TEST® 2.0 (FCAT 2.0) NEXT GENERATION SUNSHINE STATE STANDARDS State Report of District Results Grade 05 SCIENCE Total Test Scores Mean Points Earned % in each Achievement LevelBy Content Area Grade District Number District Name Number of Students Mean Scale Score Percentage Passing (Achievement Levels 3 and Above) Nature of Science Earth and Space Science Physical Science Life Science 05Number of Points Possible STATE TOTALS195, BROWARD18, MIAMI DADE25, PALM BEACH12, Source: Florida Department of Education Gr 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Scale Score L L L L4 215 – 224 L

-School Performance Data, FCAT, Baseline and Interims Data Online Resources