NATIONAL EVALUATION OF THE SUPPORT FOR EXCELLENCE (SfE) PROGRAMME HOST Policy Research, PO Box 144, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1YS Telephone: 01403 211440;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C4EO Support for Regional Developments Gill Taylor Regional Associate 1.
Advertisements

The ENWORKS Partnership: A winning formula for effecting change in business.
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Context, Rationale and State of Play Presentation by Julie Sors European Commission Rotterdam,
Westminster Kingsway College QUALITY. Mission of Westminster Kingsway College: To support all of its students in realising their ambitions as learners.
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
1 The role of macro- regional strategies after 2013 The Commissions view (or rather the view of one official) David Sweet, DG Regional Policy, European.
NPA: Business Improvement Techniques Contributing to Effective Team Working.
PRD Group Maturity Matrix 31/07/08. Maturity Matrix Guidance Notes Aims of the Matrix The Maturity Matrix is a tool aimed to support groups during their.
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
National PRD Conference Influencing and Preparing for the Future 5 th June 2008.
Linda Wilson Support for Excellence Next steps. Next Steps Support for 129 established groups Recruitment of up to 36 new groups Target under-represented.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
EAST SUSSEX PRIMARY HEADS MEETING Development of Area Groups, Alliances and School to School support Margaret Coleman and Anne Radford 20th June 2014.
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
What type of support is available to meet our school-community integration goals and improve student outcomes?
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
Martin Schuurmans Chair EIT The EIT Sustainable Growth and Competitiveness through Innovation.
Closing Thoughts Reflections and implications for policy, systemic change and partnerships …in the context of the continuous change towards improvement.
First Evaluation of Good Governance for Medicines Programme Brief Summary of Findings.
Tomorrow’s Ireland...Today Quality Standards in Youth Work A work in progress.
Case Study: Learning Pathways for Housing Practitioners Martin McNally What do employers want? The clear articulation of needs.
Performance management guidance
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
Welcome Regional Skills Policy and Sector Skills Councils – An LSC Viewpoint 19 October Chris Minett Regional Skills Director.
A Research project undertaken by 157 Group and MEG.
Achieving Quality: Involving clients, staff and other stakeholders in quality audits Claire Tuffin, Head of Business Excellence.
Sue Huckson Program Manager National Institute of Clinical Studies Improving care for Mental Health patients in Emergency Departments.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Evaluation framework: Promoting health through strengthening community action Lori Baugh Littlejohns & Neale Smith David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer,
South West and Mid Wales Consortium Eifion Evans.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
20th November 2009 National Policy Dialogue 1 Role of State in a Developing Market Economy S.B. Likwelile.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Reflections on the Peer-to-Peer Learning Process Warren Van Wicklin (WBI consultant) December 1, 2009.
Housing and Work Incentives Dave Power Group Chief Executive - One Manchester Greater Manchester Chief Executive Lead – Employment & Skills
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
CHANGE READINESS ASSESSMENT Measuring stakeholder engagement and attitude to change.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Major Project Governance Assessment Toolkit Mark Ritchie, University of Edinburgh Pauline Woods-Wilson, Lancaster University Project and Change Management.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Quality and Effectiveness Framework for post-16 learning Edwyn Williams Head of Performance Improvement South-West & Mid Wales Area Team.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Powered down?. Every Child Matters: Children and young people have told us that 5 outcomes are key to well-being in childhood and later life – Being healthy,
Review of Social Marketing South East Region Presentation to Department of Health South East 5 August 2009 Hannah Corbett (South East.
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Human Resources Competency Framework
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
SABER: Systems Approach for Better Education Results SABER-Workforce Development Ireland Sue Leigh-Doyle 29 May 2012 Washington DC THE WORLD BANK.
Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA)
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
“The Anatomy of Grass root Capacity Building for Sustainable Management of Natural capital in the Nile Basin” -A Political Economy Approach Donald Kasongi.
PEER LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION PROGRAMME
To critically review aspects of your provision to an agreed criteria
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL EVALUATION OF THE SUPPORT FOR EXCELLENCE (SfE) PROGRAMME HOST Policy Research, PO Box 144, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1YS Telephone: ; Early findings and success factors Presentation from HOST Policy Research Professor David J Parsons

Early findings and success factors What is it looking at? What is it looking at? Where is the programme at? A state of play review Where is the programme at? A state of play review Where are PRD Groups now (self- assessed maturity)? Where are PRD Groups now (self- assessed maturity)? What helps PRD Groups to work well? What helps PRD Groups to work well?

What is the evaluation looking at? PRD is new, challenging and (for some) radical … it needs a constructively critical review of the lessons emerging to guide better practice through: Reviewing the peer review process, including for: Reviewing the peer review process, including for: –Use as a quality improvement tool –Critical success factors –Effectiveness in validating self-assessment –Integrating FFE into self-assessment Considering the potential to contribute to raised standards as the sector moves towards self-regulation Considering the potential to contribute to raised standards as the sector moves towards self-regulation Assess the impact, sustainability and resource (and skills) needs of PRD Groups Assess the impact, sustainability and resource (and skills) needs of PRD Groups Consider the scope for scaling up PRD activity into a second and third year Consider the scope for scaling up PRD activity into a second and third year Establishing areas for improvement in programme structure and delivery Establishing areas for improvement in programme structure and delivery

Where is the programme at? I: Whats worked well? Just what is the current state of play of the programme – and what has the first year of funding and group formation achieved? Above target recruitment of PRD Groups (129 groups) Above target recruitment of PRD Groups (129 groups) Cross-sector participation mix: Cross-sector participation mix: –45% as FE groups (including VI Form College) –20% as AL groups –18% as private and voluntary sector Building on much of pre-SfE PR activity (31%) Building on much of pre-SfE PR activity (31%) Tapping new provider demand (590 providers) via brokerage Tapping new provider demand (590 providers) via brokerage Wide in-programme commitments to PRD as improvement tool Wide in-programme commitments to PRD as improvement tool Latent overlap with FFE (69 providers) Latent overlap with FFE (69 providers) Significant ongoing investments by providers Significant ongoing investments by providers Capacity building by participant providers (85% self-assessed as effective) Capacity building by participant providers (85% self-assessed as effective)

Where is the programme at? II: Whats worked less well? Consistency of programme co-ordination and communications Consistency of programme co-ordination and communications Funder–provider communications on evolving nature of programme Funder–provider communications on evolving nature of programme Start-up programme bureaucracy and funding release Start-up programme bureaucracy and funding release Resource demands of brokerage model Resource demands of brokerage model Early integration of programme (other stakeholders/QI agendas) Early integration of programme (other stakeholders/QI agendas) Unproven support model for meeting differentiated needs Unproven support model for meeting differentiated needs Lack (as yet) of clear developmental PRD model Lack (as yet) of clear developmental PRD model Lack of clarity on the D agenda Lack of clarity on the D agenda Lack of clarity (yet) on benefits and impact Lack of clarity (yet) on benefits and impact

Where are PRD Groups at?: Achieved capacity SfE providers (% of responding providers) where the group self-assesses what it has in place – mid April 2008

Where are PRD Groups at?: Part II Providers participating in approved groups (% of responding providers) who see group as …

What helps PRD Groups to work well? – Part I What are some of the key success factors for group formation and development which help PRD Groups (and the providers and practitioners that make them up)? Appropriate and committed partners (and reps in them) Appropriate and committed partners (and reps in them) Tangible commitment of executive managers in all partners Tangible commitment of executive managers in all partners Past positive track record of collaborative working Past positive track record of collaborative working Realising centrality of trusted/co-operative group working Realising centrality of trusted/co-operative group working Motivation of PRD manager practitioner members at all levels Motivation of PRD manager practitioner members at all levels Robust, well-resourced, open and trusted group leadership Robust, well-resourced, open and trusted group leadership Integrated action planning of all stages of the PRD process Integrated action planning of all stages of the PRD process Reflective practice at the heart of practice (and structures) Reflective practice at the heart of practice (and structures) Willingness to evaluate and adapt existing processes Willingness to evaluate and adapt existing processes

What helps PRD Groups to work well? - Part II What are some of the key success factors for PRD implementation and operation which help PRD Groups (and the providers and practitioners that make them up?) Effective and appropriate selection and resourcing of managers/reviewers Effective and appropriate selection and resourcing of managers/reviewers Recognising actual or perceived conflicts of interest Recognising actual or perceived conflicts of interest Effective mix of managers/senior practitioners in review teams Effective mix of managers/senior practitioners in review teams Agreed protocols for operation of review and feedback process Agreed protocols for operation of review and feedback process Effective, timely and practical training for reviewers Effective, timely and practical training for reviewers Systematic development of review agendas/briefs/outcomes Systematic development of review agendas/briefs/outcomes Clearly understood review timetables integrating reflection and feedback Clearly understood review timetables integrating reflection and feedback Allocation of time and resources for review hosts Allocation of time and resources for review hosts Clarity and resourcing of an agreed and appropriate dissemination strategy Clarity and resourcing of an agreed and appropriate dissemination strategy