SPEARMAN HIGH SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN Melissa Eudy EDLD 5362.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
Advertisements

Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Long Range Technology Plan  Number of Campuses 4  Total Student Enrollment1,743  District Size Under 500  Percent of Economically Disadvantaged.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Teaching In The 21st Century at J.S. Adame Elementary
STaR Chart Analysis Roberto Martinez EDTC The University of Texas at Brownsville.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Stephanie Warmoth MEDT 6466 Fall Compton Elementary Mission The mission of Compton Elementary School is to provide students with a diverse education.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Reviewed by Kim Davis EDLD 5362 Final Project May 15, 2011.
Digital High School Program. Lincoln HS Vision Statement It is our vision to produce –problem solving, critical thinkers who are –responsible citizens.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Local to National.  “To ensure that technology is effectively integrated into the schools, educators and community members must collaborate to create.
By Raquel Cantu Lamar University, EDLD 5362, ET8021.
Technology Implementation Plan Our Community Christian School.
Salt Creek School District 48 Annual ISBE School Report Card Board of Education Report October 30, 2012.
February 9, 2012  Partner with the community  Provide an effective educational experience  Prepare every student to find success in our complex society.
CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.
+ Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP) School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Cambrian School District April.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
Network Comparison Edutopia Facebook Page and Epsilen Project Share EDLD 5362 By Janet Kelly Cohort 13/ ET 8027 Dr. Sheryl Abshire.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
Spearman High School Technology Plan Melissa Eudy EDLD 5362.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Vision Library Media Center serves as an integral part of the school ’ s educational program and is the information hub of the school. All students will.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Governor Thomas Johnson High School Analysis of 2008 AYP Scores.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
THE ROLES OF THE MEDIA SPECIALIST Lisa White A Media Specialist at a Glance… All images from Microsoft Office Clip Art.
Technology Plan for E-Rate Year 2013 Liberty Hill ISD Presented by Bonnie Reichert EDLD 5362 Informational Systems Management Plan for Success.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
HOW STRONG LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAMS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN SCHOOLS TODAY.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
McVee, M.B., Bailey, N.M. & Shanahan, L.E. (2008). Technology lite: Advice and reflections for the technology unsavvy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,
Texas STaR Chart Milby High School What is the Texas STar Chart The Teacher STaR Chart is designed to help teachers, campuses, and districts.
Fort Bend Independent School District: Long Range Technology Plan As it relates to the national standards.
{ North East ISD Technology Plan North East ISD Technology Plan By Dilene Witt-Nelson EDLD 5362 ET 8040.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Strategic Plan 2017 How will you contribute to our success?
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
The audience will be appealed forcing them to participate in the activities that each station has and asking parents to provide succinct expressions.
Carver STaR Chart Moving Toward Target Tech for Our 21 st Century Learners.
Hardware, Software, Training
The Alvin Independent School District (AISD) Technology Plan
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Success for All Foundation
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
The CCPS Strategic Plan
Allegheny-Clarion Valley School District Comprehensive Planning Meeting January 13, 2013.
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Presentation transcript:

SPEARMAN HIGH SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN Melissa Eudy EDLD 5362

VISION STATEMENT The mission of Spearman ISD is to effectively infuse technology into the process of education to produce students who use technology as a tool to accomplish meaningful work. In creating a well-educated workforce with technological literacy, schools will be providing an essential prerequisite for successful competition in this rapidly changing world (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011).

THE PLAN Goal #1 - All students and staff being served by the district will have access to technology Goal #2 - Administrative services will ensure transparent use of technology support in curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Goal #3 – All professional staff will meet new teacher SBEC standards and district technology proficiency standards through high quality professional development. Goal #4 – All Spearman ISD teachers and administrators will incorporate technology to improve student academic achievement in all areas of teaching and learning. (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011).

NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Overview of Categories 1. Assessment 2. Infrastructure 3. Learning 4. Productivity 5. Teaching (Nagel, 2010)

STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN Overview of Categories 1. Teaching and learning 2. Education preparation and development 3. Leadership, administration and instructional support 4. Infrastructure for technology (TEA, 2010)

Similar goals for educators and students Assessment Technology can be used to asses data and enable teachers to improve education (Kimball, 2005) National – use technology to make data driven decisions and for ongoing formative assessments (Nagel, 2010) State - integrate student performance data from district/state assessment instruments to inform and differentiate instruction for every child (TEA, 2010) Local – use DMAC for information about TAKS testing and project-based activities for formative assessments (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011)

Infrastructure Technology enables learners to access education anywhere at anytime (Beldarrain, 2006, p. 139). National - broadband for everyone (Nagel, 2010) State - anytime/anywhere access to technology-based learning for all students (TEA, 2010) Local - access to Internet through school equipment before, during, and after school (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011)

Learning Student engagement and empowerment should be the emphasis of learning activities (Nagel, 2010). National – create learner-centered environment (Nagel, 2010) State -support the use of technology to promote student- centered learning (TEA, 2010) Local – increase use of engaging student-centered, project- based lessons (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011)

Productivity Technology must be part of a coherent education approach in order for student learning to improve (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). National – rethinking how and why technology is used to aid student success, including learning, teaching, infrastructure, operational, and financial issues (Nagel, 2010) State - support the use of emerging technologies aligned with state standards (TEA, 2010) Local – assessing financial expenditures for technology, aligning use of technology with testing results (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011)

Teaching “Teachers are the agents of change in the integration of the effective use of technology in the classroom” (Pitler, 2005, p. A-1). National –institute collaborative professional learning through connected teaching (Nagel, 2010) State - support teachers in developing classroom websites and online resources to collaborate with other teachers, parents, and students (TEA, 2010) Local – increased opportunities for district-level professional development (Spearman Technology Committee, 2011)

WHERE DOES THE LOCAL PLAN FALL SHORT? Web 2.0 tool use Teacher collaboration Inclusive SIS program

Web 2.0 tools can fulfill many of the requirements for learner-centered education set forth in both the national and state plans. Web 2.0 tools encourage engagement, problem solving skills, and project-based learning to help create a learner-centered environment (Solomon & Schrum, 2007).

Collaboration is necessary and addressed by both national and state plans. “Technology integration requires developing opportunities for teachers to discuss and work collaboratively with their colleagues or partners to develop, modify, and improve their own instructional use of technology” (Pitler, 2005, p. A-6).

Although new additions are being made to the technology plan, the SIS includes only attendance tools, the grade book, and scheduling. A way to meet NCLB requirements for parent involvement is to include test scores, disciplinary action, and even homework assignments and the school calendar (Darby & Hughes, 2005).

Overall, the Spearman ISD technology plan addresses all areas of the state and national educational technology plans. The majority of the local plan addresses financial considerations and allocation of equipment. Changes need to be addressed that involve the learner and teacher categories to enable students to become successful 21 st Century learners. Conclusion

REFERENCES Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27.2, Bransford. J. D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded edition). Ch. 9, pp. 194,218. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Retrieved on February 17, 2011, from Darby, R., & Hughes, T. (2005, October 1). The evolution of student information systems. THE Journal. Retrieved on April 21, 2011, from Information-Systems.aspx?Page=3fhttp://thejournal.com/Articles/2005/10/01/The-Evolution-of-Student- Information-Systems.aspx?Page=3f Kimball, B. (2005, July1). Using data systems to meet AYP: Vermont. THE Journal. Retrieved on April 21, 2011, from Nagel, D. (2010, November 9). National ed tech plan puts technology at the heart of education reform. THE Journal. Retrieved on May 6, 2011, from journal.com/Articles/2010/11/09/National-Ed-Tech-Plan-Puts-Technology-at-the-heart-of- education-reform.aspx Pitler, H. (2005). McRel technology initiative: The development of a technology intervention program final report (Contact Number ED-01-Co-0006). Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED486684) Retrieved March 14, 2011 from Search_SearchValue_0=ED486685&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED Search_SearchValue_0=ED486685&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Spearman Technology Committee (2011). Spearman ISD technology plan for e-rate year TEA (2010) Progress report on the long-range plan for technology, Retrieved on May 6, 2011, from