Morphometry BIRN Lobar analysis and atlas registration to subjects Parallel computing and statistical analysis Anatomical Segmentation Retrospective Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPM5 Segmentation. A Growing Trend Larger and more complex models are being produced to explain brain imaging data. Bigger and better computers allow.
Advertisements

VBM Voxel-based morphometry
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Diffusion Weighted MRI.
2005 All Hands Meeting Multi-Site Alzheimer’s Disease Project a.k.a. “MAD” Project Leaders: C. Fennema-Notestine, R. Gollub, B. Dickerson.
The BRAINs Orientation
Automatic Identification of Bacterial Types using Statistical Image Modeling Sigal Trattner, Dr. Hayit Greenspan, Prof. Shimon Abboud Department of Biomedical.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Biomedical Informatics Research Network.
Michael Marron, Ph.D., Director Division of Biomedical Technology National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health Department of Health.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Voxel Based Morphometry
MNTP Trainee: Georgina Vinyes Junque, Chi Hun Kim Prof. James T. Becker Cyrus Raji, Leonid Teverovskiy, and Robert Tamburo.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN - Overview - Scientific Achievements.
Collaborations and Architectures mBIRN Progress at BWH.
Automatic Brain Segmentation in Rhesus Monkeys February 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging 2006 Funding provided by UNC Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Robust Cerebrum and Cerebellum Segmentation for Neuroimage Analysis Jerry L. Prince,
A New Method for Mapping the Linkage between Abnormal Gray Matter Loss and the Clinical and Cognitive Deficits in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia 1 Christine.
Evaluation of Multi-Center Diffusion Tensor Imaging VA Magnotta 1, GS Bonett 1, J Turner 6, B Mueller 2, A Juhl 1, K Lim 2, S Reading 3, E Aylward 5, M.
2004 NIH Building on the BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Randy Gollub, MD PhD Steve Pieper, PhD Morphometry BIRN.
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
Design, Construction and Early Use of the Biomedical Informatics Research Network July 2004 Dr. Philip Papadopoulos Program Director, Grid and Cluster.
DTU Medical Visionday May 27, 2009 Generative models for automated brain MRI segmentation Koen Van Leemput Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical.
Morphometry BIRN Bruce Rosen, M.D. Ph.D.. Scientific Goal Methods –Multi-site MRI calibration, acquisition –Integrate advanced image analysis and visualization.
Sparse Shape Representation using the Laplace-Beltrami Eigenfunctions and Its Application to Modeling Subcortical Structures Xuejiao Chen.
OPTIMIZATION OF FUNCTIONAL BRAIN ROIS VIA MAXIMIZATION OF CONSISTENCY OF STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY PROFILES Dajiang Zhu Computer Science Department The University.
Surgical Planning Laboratory -1- Brigham and Women’s Hospital Slicer Training 10 EMAtlasBrainClassifier Sonia Pujol, Ph.D. Randy.
Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, Massachusetts USA a teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School Overview Ron Kikinis,
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN: Milestones for 2005 Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing ABC: Atlas-Based Classification Marcel Prastawa and Guido Gerig Scientific Computing.
BIRN Advantages in Morphometry  Standards for Data Management / Curation File Formats, Database Interfaces, User Interfaces  Uniform Acquisition and.
References: [1]S.M. Smith et al. (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation in FSL. Neuroimage 23: [2]S.M.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN - Overview - Scientific Achievements.
All Hands Meeting 2004, Boston Informatics Workshop.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing National Alliance for Medical Image Computing: NAMIC Ron Kikinis, M.D.
Morphometry BIRN: Imaging Calibration Analysis Tools Data Sharing.
All Hands Meeting 2005 AVI Update Morphometry BIRN Analysis, Visualization, and Interpretation.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Segmentation Foundations Easy Segmentation –Tissue/Air (except bone in MR) –Bone in CT.
EMSegmentation in Slicer 3 B. Davis, S. Barre, Y. Yuan, W. Schroeder, P. Golland, K. Pohl.
MINC meeting 2003 Pipelines: analyzing structural MR data Jason Lerch.
2004 FBIRN Meeting FIRST BIRN: Challenges of Collaborative Multi- site, Multi-discipline Research Steven Potkin, MD Gary Glover, PhD Gregory McCarthy,
Morphometry BIRN Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA) JHU (CIS): M. F. Beg, C. Ceritoglu, A. Kolasny, M. I. Miller, R. Yashinski MGH (NMR): B. Fischl;
Jorge Jovicich, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School Biomedical Informatics Research Network Overview Testbeds Morphometry BIRN.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Evaluating Brain Tissue Classifiers S. Bouix, M. Martin-Fernandez, L. Ungar, M.
Automatic pipeline for quantitative brain tissue segmentation and parcellation: Experience with a large longitudinal schizophrenia MRI study 1,2 G Gerig,
All Hands Meeting 2005 Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA)
References [1] Coupé et al., An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE TMI, 27(4):425–441, 2008.
White Matter Structural Integrity in Healthy Aging Adults and Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Bartzokis, et al. UCLA.
Federating Standardized Clinical Brain Images Across Hospitals.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Imaging Science 2006 Summary.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Hierarchical Atlas Based EM Segmentation.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD / BIRN Coordinating Center NAMIC Group Site PI: Mark H. Ellisman Site Project.
Department of Psychiatry, Department of Computer Science, 3 Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities 1 Department of Psychiatry, 2 Department.
Accuracy, Reliability, and Validity of Freesurfer Measurements David H. Salat
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Volumetric Studies.
All Hands Meeting 2004 Clinician’s Requirements for HID Query and Statistics Interface Christine Fennema-Notestine, Ph.D. David Kennedy, Ph.D.
Kim HS Introduction considering that the amount of MRI data to analyze in present-day clinical trials is often on the order of hundreds or.
Submitted by :- Sridev Shyam K.V. Problem Definition.
Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of Short- term conversion to AD: Results from ADNI Xuejiao.
Introduction  Recent neuroimaging studies of memory retrieval have reported the activation of a medial and left – lateralised memory network that includes.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NAMIC Core 3.1 Overview: Harvard/BWH and Dartmouth Structural and Functional Connectivity.
Group Averaging of fMRI Data
AVI Update Morphometry BIRN
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
NWSI Neuroimaging Web Services Interface
Computational Neuroanatomy for Dummies
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
Detecting Gray Matter Maturation via Tensor-based Surface Morphometry
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
Anatomical Measures John Ashburner
Presentation transcript:

Morphometry BIRN Lobar analysis and atlas registration to subjects Parallel computing and statistical analysis Anatomical Segmentation Retrospective Data Upload The LONI Pipeline Processing Environment (UCLA) applies a sequence of processes to identify the lobar regions of the brain for each subject and align the BWH Probabilistic Atlas to each subject space. Briefly, subject PD volumes are stripped of non-brain tissue using the logic of the Brain Surface Extractor (Shattuck et al., 2001) and the Brain Extration Tool (Smith, 2002), ensuring no extraneous tissue is left in the brain volumes. Separate 252 parameter 5th order polynomial warping fields are used to align each subject brain to the BWH Probabilistic Atlas and a common atlas space. The BWH Probabilistic Atlas is resampled to each individual subject for anatomical segmentations to be performed by the BWH EM algorithm. The common atlas contains a lobar labeling from a subgroup of subjects. These labels are resampled to each individual subject brain to identify the corresponding cortical lobes (e.g. frontal, parietal, and temporal). The common atlas space was generated previously from a similar, but separate, set of data from the Duke Archives. It was derived using a tensor averaging (Woods, 2003) of the individual subject's linear alignment transformations to each other. This common space is a linear least distant space from the contributing subjects in which a non- linear 252 parameter warp is used to carefully align gross anatomy within the space (Rex et al., 2003). This space is ideal for identifying gross anatomic structures, such as the lobes of the brain. UCLA AIR Registration and Lobar Analysis Multi-site Imaging Research in the Analysis of Depression (MIRIAD) Duke University (NIRL): M. Payne, J. MacFall, B. Boyd, R. Krishnan, D. McQuoid, E. Flint Brigham and Women's Hospital (SPL): S. Pieper, K. Pohl, N. Weisenfeld, J. Sacks, S. Warfield, M. Shenton, R. Kikinis UCLA (LONI): D. Rex, A. Toga; UCSD (BIRN-CC): P. Papadopoulos, J. Grethe; The Brain Morphometry BIRN: Introduction: Conclusion The Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) project is a nationwide effort by NIH supported research sites to merge data grid and computational cyberinfrastructure into the workflows of biomedical research. The Morphometry BIRN is building on the BIRN infrastructure by integrating data and analysis methodology drawn from the participating sites. The Multi-site Imaging Research in the Analysis of Depression (MIRIAD) project, diagrammed below, applies sophisticated image processing of a dataset of MRI scans of a longitudinal study of elderly subjects. The subjects include patients with clinical depression and age-matched controls. Some of these depression patients go on to develop dementia. The BIRN MIRIAD Project demonstrates the benefits of pooling algorithms and analysis techniques from multiple leading research centers. This collaboration allows researchers to extract clinically-relevant morphometric data from longitudinal imaging studies and explore the structural basis for debilitating neuropsychiatric diseases. This multi-site collaboration enabled a more detailed analysis than had previously been possible on this retrospective data set. The BIRN infrastructure provides a medium through which a geographically distributed group of researchers are able to work jointly on projects to analyze, visualize, and interpret large imaging data sets in the context of a rich clinical history. Fifty depressed subjects and 50 normal controls were recruited and scanned with both Proton Density and T2 weighted MRI protocols. Various clinical assessments were administered to establish subjects' scores on depression and other ratings and scales. Diagnoses were assigned based on the DSM-IV diagnostic manual. The scanning protocol was repeated every two years and the clinical assessments every year. In order to satisfy HIPAA requirements for the protection of subject privacy, all requisite identifiers were removed from the image header, such as medical record number, name, date of birth etc. The MRN or equivalent identifier was replaced by the BIRN ID, which is a uniquely defined 8 digit random number used to track the subject's data while preserving anonymity. Subject data was shared following an anonymization protocol approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board. Duke Archives Goals: To integrate brain morphometry tools from multiple sites (BWH and UCLA), analyze MRI structural data from one site (Duke), and measure volume changes in cortical and subcortical gray matter that correlate with various clinical measures in depression and age-matched controls. MIRIAD Data Flow 1 Retrospective data upload from Duke 2 Lobar analysis and Registration of Atlas to Subjects 3 Anatomical Segmentation 4 Comparison to Clinical History Duke Clinical Analysis High Performance Computing Statistical Analysis. Morphometric results across the subject population are statistically analyzed with respect to the neuropsychiatric scales collected for the individuals. As an example, early results for the lobar analysis show that: (1) Depressed subjects have smaller parietal lobe fractional volume both at baseline and Year2 compared to controls (p < 0.02); (2) Subjects who responded to therapy showed a trend to larger fractional temporal lobe volume (p <.08) compared to non-responders while there was no such trend in the frontal lobe (p < 0.6). The comprehensive lobar analysis made possible by the BIRN infrastructure indicates that there are major lobar architectural changes associated with unipolar major depression in elderly subjects. Analyses for the other variables are underway. Parallel Computing. The BWH segmentation tools were adapted to run on a high performance compute cluster located at UCSD (SunFire V60x 128 Node Grid Computing Cluster). Application of this compute resource to the MIRIAD data allowed rapid iteration of new algorithmic approaches applied to the entire data set. BWH Probabilistic Atlas (one time transfer) Morphometry BIRN Anatomical Segmentation. To enhance the outcome of the Expectation Maximization Segmentation process (developed at BWH in collaboration with MIT), an Intensity Normalization process is applied to the image data. This alters, in a highly constrained way, the intensity profile of a given image to meet that of a model. The EM Segmentation algorithm distinguishes different tissue classes by using several different pulse sequences, in this case T2-weighted and Proton Density scans. By an iterative process which alternately takes into account intensity profiles of tissue classes and field inhomogeneities, a segmentation of grey matter, white matter and CSF is obtained. The probabilistic atlas provides subdivision of these structures into anatomically meaningful substructures. BWH Intensity Normalization and EM Segmentation Tissue Classes: 3D Slicer's EM Segmentation algorithm uniquely identifies each MRI voxel with one of the following anatomical labels: CSF, White Matter, Gray Matter, and Left and Right: Amygdala, Hippocampus, Parahippocampus, Thalamus, Posterior Insula Cortex, Anterior Insula Cortex,Inferior Temporal Gyrus, Superior Temporal Gyrus, Temporal Lobe. UCLA Brigham and Women’s Hospital Johns Hopkins University Brain Imaging and Analysis Center