SMART REGULATION A cleaner, fairer and more competitive EU Summary by Elpida Heracleous 29 March 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU BETTER REGULATION Maria Carim, 10 February 2009.
Advertisements

Examples of good practice. Examples of Good Practice Use of external UK and/or international external organisations as non-funded partners (target country.
The Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) in Canada
1 Introducing Multi-Level Government in the EUs Better Regulation Agenda Werner Stengg European Commission; DG Internal Market and Services; Impact Assessment,
Role of National Parliaments
Smart regulation communication HLG AB, 7 December 2010
1 SG C Smart Regulation: Regulatory Fitness High Level Group on Administrative Burden 17 October 2013 Elizabeth Golberg, Secretariat-General, European.
London Scrutiny Officers Network Meeting. Scrutiny Proposals in the Strengthening Local Democracy Consultation Helen Moores 16/09/2009.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Slide: 1 Impact Assessment in the Commission – an overview Stakeholder meeting Brussels, 28 June 2007.
1 SG C Commission Communication on EU Regulatory Fitness COM (2012) 746 Working Group on Better Regulation Meeting of 4 th March, 2013 Michael Gremminger.
 There is no such thing as a child-neutral policy  Every policy positively or negatively affects the lives of children  To comply with the CRC, the.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission E.U. conference of Administrative Burden Reduction Malta, 1 February 2008 Burden Reduction in Support of.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Role of Oversight Bodies for Regulatory Reform Claire Chaubert February 2007.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
BETTER REGULATION IN CYPRUS Andreas Charalambous Director of Economic Studies and EU Affairs Ministry of Finance 2 nd April 2012.
Internal auditing for credit unions Nuala Comerford, Chair IIA Irish Region Committee Pamela McDonald Council Member IIA Credit Union Summer School Thursday,
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Administrative Burden Reduction and Impact Assessment Presentation by Cavan O’Connor Close European Commission.
© EIPA – Craig Robertson - slide 1 Administrative Reform: The Lisbon Strategy: and Good Governance Craig Robertson Senior Lecturer, EIPA Conference organised.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
Workshop 1 – all groups Role of local government Reminder: all discussions will be recorded though non-attributable Local government plays an extremely.
Latest trends in Enforcement and Inspection Reforms: Prosperity and Protection.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Introduction to Regulatory Impact Assessment Claire Chaubert February 2007.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
1 Croatia: Project Partnership for social inclusion September 16, Progress P rogram m of Europ ean U ni on
Better Regulation A key priority for the European Commission "Public participation – together towards good legislation" Brdo pri Kranju, 13 th May 2015.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Student Voice in Academic Audit Dr Jan Cameron Director Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities May 2015.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
The EU’s Better Regulation Package Implementation of Impact Assessment Manuel Santiago European Commission DG Enterprise & Industry.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Evaluating the quality and use of Impact Assessments The role and approach of the NAO.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 The OECD experience of Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Improving Transparency, Consultation and Communication of RIAs March 2009.
Social Europe New start for social dialogue 13 October 2015.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Policy-making Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance,
Win Win Win: can we have regulation that protects people, supports business and costs less? Graham Russell Director Better Regulation Delivery Office.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
1 Quality Indicators of Regulatory Management Systems Stéphane Jacobzone, Chang Won Choi, Claire Miguet The views are the author’s responsibility OECD.
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF CONSUMERS OF FINANCIAL SERVICES Role of Supervisory Authorities Keynote Address to the FinCoNet Open Meeting 22 April 2016.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
European Commission 1 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020.
The EU & DG Enterprise & Industry / 1 Steve Rogers, Győr, 16 January 2007 The European Union and DG Enterprise & Industry Steve Rogers DG Enterprise &
UK approach to independent scrutiny to achieve better regulation 30/05/16.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

SMART REGULATION A cleaner, fairer and more competitive EU Summary by Elpida Heracleous 29 March 2010

2 Smart Regulation: What, Why and How 0 The report challenges the way European institutions make decisions and argues that smart EU regulation requires that businesses and citizens be at the heart of all European policy-making. 0 It shows how smart EU regulation should support growth and recovery in the current economic climate, maximise the European Union's social and environmental benefits, while reducing burdens and costs.

3 Key central elements to smart regulation The four key elements that are central to smart regulation: 1. The EU should develop and implement regulatory and non regulatory interventions in a smarter way, learning from the very best practice in MS and other countries around the world.

4 Key central elements to smart regulation 2. An approach is needed that embeds the elements of smart regulation in every intervention in every policy area, rather than operating in isolation. 3. Smart Regulation should further help EU institutions effectively work together in the development and design of policy. It can provide a framework for the Commission, Council, Parliament and MS to make transparent, evidence based decisions that encourage and deliver democratic oversight in sensitive areas.

5 Key central elements to smart regulation 4. In order to create smart regulation, should keep end-users – employees, consumers, businesses and other organisations in mind during policy making. It is the policy makers’ responsibility to involve the end-users, just as it is the end users’ and MS’ responsibility to contribute to the process.

6 Why end user focus is important As per Commission President Baroso: “Revitalising the link between the peoples of Europe and the EU will make it both more legitimate and more effective. Empowering citizens to be involved in decisions affecting their lives, including by ensuring transparency on how they are taken, will help to achieve these aims.” 1 1. José Manuel Baroso, Political Guidelines for the Next Commission, 2009, p.33

7 Elements for creating and implementing smart regulation for end-users Opportunities for end-users to get involved really exist. Robust governance mechanisms and incentives ensure end-users’ contributions are taken into account effectively. Quantitative and qualitative progress is tracked and communicated to end-users in a systematic way.

8 How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? o Recently, EU and MS developed better ways of informing end-users and inviting their views but there is more room for improvement. There is evidence that government openness is positively linked to lower regulatory burden and effective regulatory governance o common commencement dates for business related proposals, o strengthen the legislative and work programme by defining and publishing what contributes a ‘significant’ measure for inclusion and the likely scale of individual measures’ benefits, costs and AB).

How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? o Commission should make two-way communication more effective and extend the minimum 8 week consultation period and applying the new minimum consistently o consultation guidelines in 2002 o Webpage Your Voice in Europe o European Business Test Panel est A tool used by Commission in testing early ideas and seek initial data from a large sample of businesses

How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? o Impact Assessments should be communicated and updated by EU Institutions through out the policy making cycle. o A two page statement to be included in all EU IAs with key estimated costs and benefits. The Council and Parliament to use it extensively. o IAs to be carried out on all significant measures and to be updated throughout the policy making cycle.

How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? Examples across the EU: Kafka (Belgium) introduced an online contact point where citizens comment on existing regulations and submit proposals for improvement. These proposals formed the basis of a reform programme for the Federal Gov.

How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? Examples across the EU: Burden Hunters Project (Denmark) applies user-centric innovation techniques to allow users to identify the red tape that causes them more irritation. Civil servants visiting businesses to see challenges they face. Businesses set the agenda for regulatory action and help develop solutions to cut AB.

How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? Examples across the EU: Simplifying Together (France): Developed a framework that focuses on “life-events” to understand better the burdens faced by businesses. Includes key point in life of a business (starting up, moving, hiring etc) Using this framework and through consultation with the users of regulation they developed a programme to reduce the number of processes, the cost and the time to navigate these events.

How can end-users see what is going on and get involved? Examples across the EU: Consulting on IAs (UK): Views IAs as a continuous process, from the early stages of identifying a policy challenge through to development of policy options, public consultation and final decision making and implementation. A Small Firms Impact Test is included if proposal affects business. End-user comments not only on proposal but also on analysis and evidence underlying it.

15 How can end-users be confident that their contributions are used and produce tangible results? o Ensuring the best policy outcome by improving the use of regulatory alternatives throughout the policy making cycle. oCommission to continue work with small businesses across policy areas to develop and promote effective measures on the basis of costs and benefits-Think small First) oGermany relaxed rules regarding recording of driving times for vehicles btwn tons oFinland website for small firms for fulfilling their obligations as employers oIreland reduced freequency with which small firms need to file and pay taxes. oEU Inst to reviews Inter-Institutional agreement (how to better assess and manage alternatives to regulation through out the policy-making cycle).

How can end-users be confident that their contributions are used and produce tangible results? Improving regulatory outcomes by strengthening the commission IA Board and embedding smart regulation principles in the work of council and parliament. IA board should make further use of external experts to ensure rigorous quantification of the costs and benefits of proposals Commission Council and Parliament to ensure IA Board’s opinion is taken into account and encourage tougher consequences if not.

17 How can end-users be confident that their contributions are used and produce tangible results? o Introducing robust monitoring that ensures that the reduction of regulatory burden is tangible for businesses. o The remit of the Stoiber group to be strengthen to examine the role of all 3 EU institutions in imposing new unnecessary burdens and incorporate costs and irritants, while taking real benefits into account. o Programmes aimed at reducing regulatory burdens on business should deliver tangible results on an ongoing basis.

How can end-users be confident that their contributions are used and produce tangible results? o Introducing robust monitoring that ensures that the reduction of regulatory burden is tangible for businesses. o AB programme to be widened to include proposals within and beyond the current 13 priority areas o To ensure tangible results the 25% target should consider AB that arise from new EU legislation. o The EU to ensure that new legislation does not create barriers for eGovernment solutions when implemented.

How can end-users be confident that their contributions are used and produce tangible results? Improving the quality of regulation by checking its relevance throughout the policy making-cycle EU Institutions to develop mechanisms to check periodically that proposals are still relevant

20 How can end-users see that genuine quantitative and qualitative progress has been made? For smart regulation to be a success there needs to be transparent mechanism across the whole programme.

How can end-users see that genuine quantitative and qualitative progress has been made? Commission and MS should improve accountability by better monitoring and communicating the quantitative outcomes of smart regulation, and how end users are experiencing improvements. Annual progress report by Commission on legislation that came into force the last year Annual progress report by Commission on legislation that came into force the last year To help create better ownership and accountability of the agenda across all the institutions, Commissioners should have clear responsibilities for delivering smart regulation in their specific policy areas.

22 How can end-users see that genuine quantitative and qualitative progress has been made? The Council and Parliament should strengthen their oversight of smart regulation to increase democratic scrutiny Every Council formation and parliamentary committee should consider how to deliver smart regulation as part of their policy making process. Parliament to further promote Smart Regulation and explore whether to establish a Parliamentary Better Regulation Committee to focus on reviewing all of the BR programmes

How can end-users see that genuine quantitative and qualitative progress has been made? The European Court of Auditors should evaluate the Smart Regulation programmes to enable further reform and improvement The ECA should assess on a systematic basis whether BR programmes are delivering on their promises as it does with the IA system