SIMULATION OF GROUND VEGETATION DIVERSITY IN BOREAL FORESTS Larisa Khanina 1, Maxim Bobrovsky 2, Alexander Komarov 2, Alex Mikhajlov 2 1 Institute of Mathematical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report of St. Petersburg Team O.G. Chertov, M.A. Nadporozhskaya E.V. Abakumov Biological Research Institute St. Petersburg State University 2005 INTAS.
Advertisements

EU INTAS SILVICS Project Pushchino Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Mathematical Problems in Biology (Pushchino.
Overview of Research Activities of ARICFR, Team CR M. Palenova – team leader V. Korotkov S. Ripa E. Zubkova, All-Russian Research Institute.
Hans Verkerk, Vladimir Korotkov, Jeannette Meyer, Sergey Zudin, Sergey Lebedev, Marcus Lindner Impact of wood demand and forest management on forest development.
Report of Pushchino 1 Team A.Komarov, A.Mikhailov, S.Bykhovets Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science of Russian Academy.
Case study - Chuchloma FMU, Kostroma region, Russia Chumachenko S.I., Moscow State Forest University Korotkov V.N., All-Russian Research Institute for.
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
The methodology and applications of Agricultural Landscape monitoring in Estonia Kalev Sepp, Institute of Environmental Protection Estonian Agricultural.
Landscape Level Conservation Planning for prioritizing conservation action in Mozambique Bruno Nhancale, PhD Conservation Science workshop, 21 st April.
Reserves and Density of Organic Carbon in Russian Forests Anatoly Utkin, Dmitry Zamolodchikov, Georgy Korovin and Olga Chestnykh 4. C phytomass and forest-forming.
Chapter 3 Forest Resources and Carbon Sink First draft O. Chertov St. Petersburg State University, University of Applied Sciences Bingen e-LUP Simulating.
The West Cascades Park City The West Cascades NaFISNationwide Forest Imputation Study.
Diversity determinants. To be present in a community, a species has 1. To be able to reach the site (overcome the dispersal limitation) 2. To be able.
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Gembloux Agricultural University Ministry of Walloon Region.
Scale What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct scales to use? Scaling:  UP: bottom-up approach  Down: top-down.
benthos a region including the bottom of the sea and the littoral zonesbioculture is the scientific exploration of the relationships between human biology.
How many possums and where? The National Possum Model James Shepherd & Mandy Barron.
Scale & Scaling What is scale? What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct.
TREMA Tree Management and Mapping software Raintop Computing - Oxford.
Forest simulation models in Czechia: main developments and challenges WG1 COST ACTION FP0603: Forest models for research and decision support in sustainable.
Introduction to Vegetation Classification and the Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification System FRST 211: Forest Classification and Silvics.
Outline Community Ecology Ecosystem Ecology
Ecosystems are made up of both living and nonliving things
Introduction Subalpine meadows play a crucial role in species diversity, supporting many endangered species of plant and wildlife. Subalpine meadows play.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
HCVF and Biodiversity Conservation in Russian FSC Certification Standards Workshop, April , Syktyvkar Mikhail Karpachevskiy Biodiversity Conservation.
3.3 Studying Organisms in Ecosystems
Close to Nature Forestry and Harvesting Operations Hanns H. Höfle University of Göttingen Lower Saxony State Forest District of Bovenden.
Computer modelling ecosystem processes and change Lesson 8 Presentation 1.
Modelling forest ground vegetation on landscape scale Larisa Khanina 1, Maxim Bobrovsky 2, Alexander Komarov 2, Alex Mikhajlov 2 1 Institute of Mathematical.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
A Tool for Estimating Nutrient Fluxes in Harvest Biomass Products for 30 Canadian Tree Species CONTEXT: With a growing interest in using forest biomass.
EFIMOD – a system of models for Forest Management A.S. Komarov, A.V. Mikhailov, S.S. Bykhovets, M.V.Bobrovsky, E.V.Zubkova Institute of Physicochemical.
A Decision Support Demonstrator for Abiotic Damage to Trees, using a WWW Interface Ari Talkkari Roger Dunham.
International Seminar
Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea Thomas Bourdier, Thomas Cordonnier, Georges Kunstler & Benoit Courbaud 9th IUFRO.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
The study of the interactions among organisms and their environment. Ecologists are scientists who study these relationships. Two groups of environmental.
The Implementation of Land and Ecosystem Accounts in Europe Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting Roy Haines-Young, University of Nottingham.
Option G: Ecology and Conservation Chpt. 18: pages
Effects of Regeneration Abundance on Predicted Development of Interior Douglas-fir Stands By Cornel Lencar Graduate Student, Faculty of Forestry University.
Role of Spatial Database in Biodiversity Conservation Planning Sham Davande, GIS Expert Arid Communities Technologies, Bhuj 11 September, 2015.
FORESTRY TEST BASICS. How To Measure the Diameter of a Tree? Stand next to the trunk (if on an non-level slope – then stand on the uphill side of the.
Conservation Biology and Ecological Ecosystems Jess Drew Ali Powell Mark Zolla.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
International technical assistance project: «Baltic Landscape in change – innovative approaches towards sustainable forested landscapes» Work Package 6.
PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF FOREST ECOSYSTEM CARBON IN RUSSIA AND PROBLEMS OF ITS IMPROVING by Vladislav Alexeyev Maxim Markov Boris Rybinin Michael Tarasov Pavel.
Disturbance Effects on Carbon Dynamics in Amazon Forest: A Synthesis from Individual Trees to Landscapes Workshop 1 – Tulane University, New Orleans, Late.
Landscape ecology methods
Virtual Experiment © Oregon State University Models as a communication tool for HJA scientists Kellie Vache and Jeff McDonnell Dept of Forest Engineering.
Comparing Three Great Lakes Research Projects By Mary Bresee.
Introduction to Models Lecture 8 February 22, 2005.
Boreal forest resilience Some initial thoughts BNZ LTER meeting, March 2009 Terry Chapin & Jill Johnstone.
Special Lecture Stand Structural Diversity
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 20, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Spatiotemporal diversity and activity patterns of laccase genes in a forest soil H. Kellner, P. Luis, B. Zimdars and F. Buscot - Terrestrial Ecology, Institute.
Why use landscape models?  Models allow us to generate and test hypotheses on systems Collect data, construct model based on assumptions, observe behavior.
The Hills are Alive: Building an Interdisciplinary Earth Science Research Facility at Biosphere 2 INQUIRY B2 Institute To Tackle Scientific Grand Challenges.
FORESTS IN POLAND 2015 Made by: Igor Walczak, Magdalena Jankowska, Mateusz Dąbrowski.
Biodiversity in Functional Restoration Joan L. Walker Southern Research Station Clemson, SC.
Functional Traits and Niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian Forest Kraft et al
 The boreal forest or taiga exists as a nearly continuous belt of coniferous trees across North America and Eurasia.  Taiga is the Russian name for.
Forest ecological applications of ALS ALS provide 3D information where each point has height (and intensity) value Even with low pulse density data, say,
Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow and Riparia
Meadow Food Web.
Raisa Mäkipää Natural Resources Institute Finland
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
16.1 Teacher Notes Interactions of Living Things
a IIASA, ESM, Laxenburg, Austria,
Presentation transcript:

SIMULATION OF GROUND VEGETATION DIVERSITY IN BOREAL FORESTS Larisa Khanina 1, Maxim Bobrovsky 2, Alexander Komarov 2, Alex Mikhajlov 2 1 Institute of Mathematical Problems in Biology of RAS, Pushchino 2 Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science of RAS, Pushchino IBFRA conf. ‘New challenges in Management of Boreal Forests’ August 28– Umeå Sweden

Dynamics of ecosystem and plant species diversity abiotic parameters (climatic, soil, water, etc.) temporal parameters of plant populations in different forest zones spatial parameters of the area and plant populations availability of seed sources Forest Ecosystem Modelling

EFIMOD forest-soil model (Chertov et al., 1999, Komarov, et al., 2003) Different levels of forest modelling Forest ecosystem modelling FORRUS Individual-based models forest model (Chumachenko et al., 2003)

Ecosystem production Soil features Trees renewal Ground Vegetation EFIMOD

The first step to calculate dynamics of ground vegetation diversity at a level of forest stand on a base of · State Forest Inventory Data · Forest simulated results

Our approach plant species functional groups in ground vegetation modelling ecological-coenotic species groups introduced in Nitsenko (1969) derived from multivariate analysis species traits matrix community matrix matrix of environmental factors

Ecological-coenotic groups Nemoral Nm species of broad-leaved and oak forests Boreal Br species of boreal spruce and spruce-fir forests Piny Pn species of pure pine forests Nitrophilous Nt species of flooded black alder forests Meadow Md species of meadows, steppes and forest edges Water-marsh Wt species of coastal and intrawater habitats, lowland bogs Oligotrophic Olg plants of oligotrophic bogs

To use the groups for modelling dynamics of ground vegetation · to define the dominant group at the initial step of simulation · to define rules of the group switching according to dynamics of the simulated parameters tree species composition, light supply, deadwood, litter, soil C and N pools etc.

At the initial step of simulation Regional vegetation databases Ecological-coenotic forest type Dominant groups in ground vegetation Ecological-coenotic groups of plants Average species richness for the forest unit Indices of vegetation diversity for regional forest types Forest Inventory Data Dominant tree in overstorey Dominant species in understorey Phytosociological releves

Database on vegetation sample plots in mapped points of European Russian forests Regional vegetation databases Phytosociological releves

Average species richness for the forest unit Dynamics of ground vegetation diversity Step 1 Step n Dominant tree species Dominant ecological- coenotic group Forest inventory data EFIMOD runs Tree species composition Deadwood, litter, soil C and N pools Ecological- coenotic forest type Dominant ecological- coenotic group Dominant tree species Ecological- coenotic forest type Regional vegetation databases

BioCalc - a software for dynamic analysis of forest ground vegetation diversity

BioCalc input data · tables of probabilistic distribution of the groups in ground vegetation according to the tree dominant and the forest site class · a correspondence tables between the forest types and ranks of plant species richness · a time series table of forest stand ecosystem parameters (results of the EFIMOD runs)

Creation of rules for the switching the ecological-coenotic groups BioCalc user selects in an interactive mode from the time series tables the thresholds for a number of ecosystem parameters. These thresholds cause a change of the dominant ecological-coenotic group. The user can observe all values of any ecosystem parameter displayed graphically

Creation of rules for the switching the ecological-coenotic groups If the values are digital, the graphic is built with the values in ascending order, which allows for an`easy detection of the thresholds

BioCalck outputs Dynamics of · ground vegetation functional groups, · forest types, and · ranks of species diversity Transfer of the output results to the Common-GIS (Andrienko, Andrienko, 1999) for visual exploration of ground vegetation dynamics at the landscape level

A case study experimental forestry “Russkii Les” (Moscow region) 273 ha 104 units Strategies of silvicultural regimes for 200 years time span ·natural development ·legal clear cutting ·selective cutting ·illegal clear cutting

(i) meadow group switched to boreal group when spruce began to dominate in overstorey (ii) any group switched to nemoral when oak and lime began to dominate in overstorey (iii) piny group switched to boreal group when deadwood overpassed the 1st threshold value (iv) any group switched to nitrophilous group when deadwood overpassed the second threshold value, and (v) nitrophilous group switched to nemoral group when deadwood fell below the 2nd threshold value Case study rules of functional group switching

In the scenarios with clear cuttings: after the clear cutting, a dominant group was taken from a specially designed probabilistic table of the group distribution in ground vegetation designed for the after- clear-cutting conditions Case study rules of functional group switching

Tree dominant dynamics Selective cuttingsNatural development Illegal clear cuttingsLegal clear cuttings

Tree dominant dynamics The beginning Legal clear cutting Natural development Legal selective cutting Illegal clear cutting 200-year dynamics

Deadwood dynamics

Functional group dynamics The beginning Legal clear cutting Natural development Legal selective cutting Illegal clear cutting 200-year dynamics

Functional group dynamics Natural development Legal clear cuttingIllegal clear cutting Legal selective cuttings

Species diversity dynamics

The beginning Legal clear cutting Natural development Legal selective cutting Illegal clear cutting 200-year dynamics

I initial state, II legal clear-cutting, III natural development 50-year dynamics Regional level: Manturovsky forestry (Kostroma region), ha, 3430 units

Conclusion The functional group approach was elaborated and tested for modelling the dynamics of forest ground vegetation diversity. The modelling results showed that cuttings support a higher ecosystem diversity of the area in comparison to the free forest development. However, the protective strategy leads to the higher species diversity in ground vegetation, if a free forest development has taken place for rather long time, e.g. more than 100 years in our study area.

used tree composition deadwood in progress C and N soil pools in planlight soil moisture EFIMOD parameters for ground vegetation dynamics

Thank you for your attention!