Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

Advertisements

A Roadmap for Professional Development Planning

Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.

Service to Leadership Freshmen Orientation Assessment Service to Leadership Professional Development Training August 14, 2012 Agriculture Research Complex.

1 Strategic Planning Workshops February 23, 2007.

Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.

Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.

+ Project IDEAL in Minnesota: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.

Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.

Issues & Priorities of Online Students What Do They Want? Deborah W. Proctor, Ph.D. eCurriculum Director for Academic Innovations/Minnesota Online Minnesota.

Academic Assessment Workshop: A Review of the Student Satisfaction Inventory Implementation & Implication Liz Baldizan, Ed.D., Assistant Dean, Academic.

Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.

1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)

M I L L I K I N U N I V E R S I T Y Critical Writing, Reading & Research I & II MPSL First-Year Writing Requirement Report for Academic Year

2007 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Bruce Schultz, Dean of Students and Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Development Michael Votava, Associate.

1. 2 ALFI: Focus on Adult Learner Assessment The National Institute on the Assessment of Adult learning 2010 Judy Wertheim, Ed.D. Vice President for Higher.

Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.

Lynette Olson, Assessment & Effectiveness Director & Gary Langer, Associate Vice Chancellor, Office of the Chancellor, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.

National Council for Workforce Education Casting Relationships, Forging Partnerships 2014 Conference Retooling Atlanta Metropolitan State College Adult.

© 2011 by Anthony A. Piña, Ed.D. Using Sloan-C Quality Scorecard & Accreditation Standards as Administration Tools Dr. Anthony Piña, Dr. Larry Bohn & Nina.

Tips on Preparing a Successful Educational Research Proposal Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, professor, BIT Nancy J. Stone, professor and chair, Psychological Science.

Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.

What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.

Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,

SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.

+ Distance Learning PD History and Development Model: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.

Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.

All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, LLC. Permission is required to reproduce information. Adult.

1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.

IAF Certification/ Registration Bodies’ Member Satisfaction Program September 19, 2003 Final Report Summary.

High-Impact Educational Practices: What are they? Evelyn Waiwaiole Program Manager, High-Impact Practices Jeff Crumpley Associate Director CCCSE Center.

Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.

LeBaron Woodyard Dean, Academic Affairs October 30, 2013 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS FALL 2013 CONFERENCE.

IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.

Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.

Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.

Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!

ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.

Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.

* Number before each statement is the item number in the survey. Number with “S” prefix in parentheses indicates the scale the statement is under. Institutional.

North Carolina Central University Distance Education “Because Your Education Shouldn’t Have Boundaries” Kimberly Phifer-McGhee March 25, 2011 Home | Training/Development.

Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.

August 2004League for Innovation: Learning Summit1 Learning Outcomes Assessment in Student Services A Statewide Initiative in Maryland.

Support Services for Online & Distance Ed Programs Pace University -- A.S. in Telecommunications Degree FIPSE Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnership (LAAP)

Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun

Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.

Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.

MERLOT 101 Online: A Faculty Development Course Cathy Simpson, Director Technology Applications Center Laura Franklin,

Effects of a Postsecondary Faculty Professional Development Program Designed to Better Address the Needs of Students with Disabilities Accessing Higher.

1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,

An Institutional Look at Students’ Satisfaction with NWTC Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.

Assessing Distance Learners at Texas Tech University West Texas Assessment Conference Jennifer Hughes, M.S. Director, Office of Planning and Assessment.

UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.

RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.

Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.

The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.

MORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE Debby Blatzer Kimberly Golk Sumeet Singh There is an “US” in Syllabus: Creating and Incorporating a Syllabus for Academic.

The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.

Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012

Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey

7th Annual QM National Conference

VCSU’s Assessment of Student Learning

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services

Student Priorities Survey Results

Closing the Loop on Student Feedback

Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007

McPherson College, Fall 2017

The Impact of QM: Before and After

Presentation transcript:

Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum Director Academic Innovations/ Minnesota Online Teresa Theisen —Online Consortium System Director Distance Minnesota

Project Description Sponsor a Pilot PSOL The Priorities Survey for Online Learners was administered during the spring of 2006 by 17 participating Minnesota Online colleges. –13 two-year institutions –4 four-year institutions Pilot Results 2818 total students completed the survey Response rates to the survey ranged from 11% to 36% with an average of 21%

Procedure March 2006: PSOL Data provided to all stakeholders and Web Conference Review June 2006: Minnesota Online Summer Conference Affinity Process August 2006: Noel Levitz PSOL Focus Group Session September 2006: Opportunities Analysis & Improvement Plan Activities October 2006: Final Participant Survey to Direct Next Steps

Perspectives & PSOL Experience

Key Assumption Extensive review of data is important to Minnesota Online and individual institution response

Minnesota Online Priorities During FY07 Minnesota Online will work with and support the 17 institutions as they respond to their Noel Levitz PSOL Survey Data. The collective information from the procedures in 2006 have been collapsed into the following list of four priorities areas: 1. Minnesota Online Value 2. Quality Improvement 3. Best practices 4. Seamlessness

Formsite Survey Results

Taking action as a result of the data is key to your success. Respond to your students’ priorities and focus resources in the areas that matter most to them. (Bryant, 2006)

Next Steps Offer a Minnesota Online sponsored PSOL to institutions who did not participate in Address challenges identified in the PSOL during Promote a system Minnesota Online sponsored PSOL survey in spring 2008

Questions & Discussion

Matrix for prioritizing action Very Important Very Satisfied Very Unimportant Very Dissatisfied Copyright 2004 Noel-Levitz

Strengths definition Importance score is above the mid-point (top 50% of your items) AND Satisfaction score is in the top quartile (top 25% of your items)

Strengths nationally for online learners 2005 Student assignments are clearly defined in the syllabus. Registration for online courses is convenient. Program requirements are clear and reasonable. Instructional materials are appropriate for program content. Billing and payment procedures are convenient for me. Assessment and evaluation procedures are clear and reasonable. The bookstore provides timely service to students.

Strengths for Minnesota Online Learners 2006 The online course delivery platform (Desire2Learn or D2L) is reliable. (Campus item 2) Student assignments are clearly defined in the syllabus. Registration for online courses is convenient. Instructional materials are appropriate for program content. Billing and payment procedures are convenient for me. My program advisor is accessible by telephone and .

Challenges definition Importance score is above the mid-point (top 50% of your items) AND Satisfaction score is in the bottom quartile (bottom 25% of your items) OR performance gap score is in the top quartile (top 25% of your largest gaps)

Challenges nationally for online learners 2005 The quality of online instruction is excellent. Faculty are responsive to student needs. Tuition paid is a worthwhile investment. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress. There are sufficient offerings within my program of study.

Challenges for Minnesota Online Learners 2006 Faculty are responsive to student needs. The quality of online instruction is excellent. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress. Tuition paid is a worthwhile investment. There are sufficient offerings within my program of study.