Jun Li DHCP Option for Access Network Information draft-lijun-dhc-clf-nass-option-01.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Allocation of Shared IPv4 Addresses draft-csf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-00 Q. Sun, Y. Cui, I. Farrer, Y. Lee, Q. Sun, M. Boucadair IETF 89,
Advertisements

22-23 June 2004TISPAN-3GPP Workshop - Sophia-Antipolis 1 TISPAN NGN Architecture Overview Richard Brennan pulver.com, WG2 Chair
SIP and IMS Enabled Residential Gateway Sergio Romero Telefónica I+D Jan Önnegren Ericsson AB Alex De Smedt Thomson Telecom.
MOBILITY SUPPORT IN IPv6
SIP, Session Initiation Protocol Internet Draft, IETF, RFC 2543.
SIP-IMS CONFORMANCE TESTING STANDARDIZATION WORK PLAN VICE-CHAIRMAN OF ITU-T SG11 MARTIN BRAND.
IPv4 over IP CS draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00 Soohong Daniel Park Syam Madanapalli 68 – Prague, Czech Republic March 18-23,
IPv6 Transition Technologies Selection using DHCP/DHCPv6 draft-yang-v6ops-IPv6tran-select-00 Tianle Yang, Lianyuan Li, Qiongfang Ma China Mobile
November 2006IETF67 - ECRIT1 A Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) based Location-to-Service Translation Protocol (LoST) Discovery Procedure draft-polk-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery-01.
DHCP: Dual-Stack Issues draft-ietf-dhc-dual-stack-01 Tim Chown dhc WG, IETF 60, San Diego, August 2, 2004.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 70 – Vancouver draft-ietf-ancp-framework-04.txt.
1 NGN Issues - Numbering and Addressing Peter Darling ACIF NGN FOG No. 3.
30-31 March 2005 Workshop "IMS over Fixed Access" - Washington 1 TISPAN_NGN Project plan Martin Niekus Alain Sultan
RFC 3361: DHCP Option for SIP Servers Speaker: Chung yu Wu Teacher: Quincy Wu.
Dean Cheng Jouni Korhonen Mehamed Boucadair
IPv6, the Protocol of the Future, Today Mathew Harris.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 71 – Philadelphia draft-ietf-ancp-framework-05.txt.
© 1998 R. Gemmell IETF WG Presentation1 Robert Gemmell ROAMOPS Working Group.
1 Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia Ted Lemon July 2011 DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation as IPv6 Migration Tool in Mobile Networks IETF 81
CP-a Emergency call stage 2 requirements - A presentation of the requirements from 3GPP TS Keith Drage.
Dean Cheng Jouni Korhonen Mehamed Boucadair
80-VXXX-X A July 2008 Page 1 QUALCOMM Confidential and Proprietary PMIP Comparison QUALCOMM Inc. Jun Wang, George Cherian, Masa Shirota
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Chapter 5 speaker : Wenping Zhang data :
Peering: A Minimalist Approach Rohan Mahy IETF 66 — Speermint WG.
Sua-04.ppt / 10 December 2000 / John A. Loughney SCCP User Adaptation Layer 49 th IETF Meeting: San Diego, CA draft-ietf-sigtran-sua-04.txt John A. Loughney.
Draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 1 FEC framework Configuration Signaling draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt IETF 76 Rajiv Asati.
1 Access Authentication to IMS Systems in Next Generation Networks Authors: Silke Holtmanns, Son Phan-Anh ICN’07 IEEE Speaker: Wen-Jen Lin.
SIP-H.323 Interworking Group RRR-1 IETF-48 SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-reqs-00.txt Hemant.
Binding Revocation for IPv6 Mobility draft-muhanna-mip6-binding-revocation-01.txt MIP6 WG, IETF 69 Ahmad Muhanna Mohamed Khalil
Dean Cheng 81 st IETF Quebec City RADIUS Extensions for CGN Configurations draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext
Dynamic Stateless GRE Tunnel Li Xue Dayong Guo 1.
Design Guidelines Thursday July 26, 2007 Bernard Aboba IETF 69 Chicago, IL.
DHCP Vrushali sonar. Outline DHCP DHCPv6 Comparison Security issues Summary.
DHCP options for PAA Status report of draft-ietf-dhc-paa-option-01.txt Lionel Morand IETF-65, Dallas.
NETLMM Applicability Draft (Summary) 28 Sep
Diameter SIP Application
Minneapolis, March 2005 IETF 62 nd – mip6 WG Goals for AAA-HA interface (draft-giaretta-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-00) Gerardo Giaretta Ivano Guardini Elena Demaria.
V6OPS WG IETF-72 IPv6 in Broadband Networks draft-kaippallimalil-v6ops-ipv6-bbnet Presented by: David Miles Kaippallimalil John Frank Xia July 2008.
DHCPv4 option for PANA Authentication Agents draft-suraj-dhcpv4-paa-option-00.txt DHC/PANA WG IETF-63 France, Paris.
IPv4 over IP CS Soohong Daniel Park Syam Madanapalli.
IPv6-based Multihoming Standardization Activities April, 2008
Discussion on DHCPv6 Routing Configuration
Unified Mobility Management Network Research Division
Gateway-Initiated 4over6 Deployment
ETSI–3GPP NGN ACTIVITIES
ETSI–3GPP NGN ACTIVITIES
PANA Discussion and Open Issues (draft-ietf-pana-pana-01.txt)
PANA Issues and Resolutions
RELO: Retrieving End System Location Information draft-schulzrinne-geopriv-relo-03 Henning Schulzrinne March 2007 IETF68 - GEOPRIV.
IETF#67 – 5-10 November 2006 FECFRAME requirements (draft-ietf-fecframe-req-01) Mark Watson.
Lionel Morand DHCP options for PAA Lionel Morand
Teemu Savolainen (Nokia) MIF WG IETF#75 28-July-2009
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-partial-handoff-02
Introduction Web Environments
NETLMM Applicability Draft (Summary)
DHCP Anonymity Profile Update
Open Forum th November 2016.
PANA Implementation in Open Diameter
Debashish Purkayastha, Dirk Trossen, Akbar Rahman
draft-ipdvb-sec-01.txt ULE Security Requirements
Lecture 6: TCP/IP Networking 1nd semester By: Adal ALashban.
RELO: Retrieving End System Location Information draft-schulzrinne-geopriv-relo-03 Henning Schulzrinne March 2007 IETF68 - GEOPRIV.
call completion services
Planning the Addressing Structure
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
ETSI–3GPP NGN ACTIVITIES
Transport Protocols Relates to Lab 5. An overview of the transport protocols of the TCP/IP protocol suite. Also, a short discussion of UDP.
Extended BFD draft-mirmin-bfd-extended
Dayong GUO Sheng JIANG (Speaker) Remi Despres
Presentation transcript:

Jun Li DHCP Option for Access Network Information draft-lijun-dhc-clf-nass-option-01

RFC3455 defines some Private Header (P-Header) Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). P-Access-Network-Info Header is one of these headers. The SIP terminal can use it to carry the access network information. So, we need a DHCP option to provide the access network information. Through this Option, the SIP terminal will know the access network information, and will send the information to Service Control Subsystem via P-Access-Network-Info Header. The Bigger Picture

CLF NACF(DHCP Server) NASS Access network1 CLF NACF(DHCP Server) NASS Access network2 Service Control Subsystem CPE CPE provides P-Access-Network-Info to Service control subsystem CPE registered with access network service control subsystem CPE gets access network identifier via DHCP How this all fits together

From ETSI TISPAN WG2 The service network will cooperate with multi access network in the TISPSN NGN architect. And the service network entity needs to query some information (for example, the access location information) of the user from the access network entity. But as there are multi access network exist, the service network can ’ t identify which access network attached of this user because the service entity just get the IP address of the user. And the IP address is not enough to locate the access network, especially there are private IP address, mobile IP or nomadize network scenario exists. Now in the TISPAN network, there is some method for user to bring the access network info to service network entity. But the user can ’ t get any information about the attached access network. So the TISPAN WG2 needs the IETF to give a solution to resolve this issue above.

Added terminology section on TISPAN Verified TISPAN R1 does not need IPv6 Reworked option to be more generic “ Access Network Information ” Made encoding a sub-option field (easier for implementers) Changes since IETF 63

DHCP Option for Access Network Information The format of the access network information option is: Code Len Access network Information Field | TBD | N | i1 | i2 | i3 | i4 | | iN | N = number of octets of Access Network Information

The Access Network Information field consists of a sequence of SubOpt/ Length/ Value tuples for each sub-option, encoded in the following manner: Access Network ID (ANID): SubOpt Len Sub-option Value | 1 | N | i1 | i2 | i3 | i4 | | iN | Connectivity Session Location and Repository Function (CLF): SubOpt Len Sub-option Value | 2 | N | i1 | i2 | i3 | i4 | | iN | DHCP Option for Access Network Information

Next Steps Who has read the draft? Is there still work to do on the draft? Interest in working on the draft? Do we still need to break out address encoding discussion to a separate document?

THANK YOU !

TISPAN NGN Architecture Background

Network Attachment Subsystem (NASS) The Network Attachment Subsystem provides the following functionalities: Dynamic provision of IP address and other user equipment configuration parameters (e.g. using DHCP). User authentication, prior or during the IP address allocation procedure. Authorisation of network access, based on user profile. Access network configuration, based on user profile. Location management ETSI TISPAN WI20021 Background

TISPAN calls for a new DHCP option: The NACF should be able to provide to the CPE a access network identifier. This information uniquely identifies the access network to which the CPE is attached. With this information applications should be able to locate the CLF. Note: The transport of the access identifier depends on extension in existing protocols (e.g. new DHCP option ) ETSI TISPAN WI02021