1 MCHP-1 clamp and MC port opening metrology review ProE model: stb-mchp-1_vvsa1_pppl_best_fit.asm stb-fpa_mech_left_side.asm, Rep: mchp-1_clamp_metrol_pts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture Set 3 Gauss’s Law
Advertisements

Is the shape below a function? Explain. Find the domain and range.
DO NOW: Find where the function f(x) = 3x4 – 4x3 – 12x2 + 5
The electric flux may not be uniform throughout a particular region of space. We can determine the total electric flux by examining a portion of the electric.
Lecture 2 – Clearance Fits
C2 to C5 fit up review-R41 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4.
B2 Casting Measurement Comparison The Verisurf data from MTM and the Romer Arm data from PPL were both filtered thru a common sorting program (sortdata2.f)
Click on this image to open the full PDF document.
Electrical Energy and Electric Potential AP Physics C.
DBQ 5.63 Adding other steel components to the model Ben Shepherd January 2011.
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM)
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
Torque and Center of Mass
Ch.9 Tolerancing Objective: Learn how to present tolerance, types of tolerance presentation, fit types and terminology Why tolerance is so important in.
Status of the Power Core Configuration Based on Modular Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES.
Slide 1 Assignment 3. Slide 2 PROBLEM 1 Calculate the maximum deflection in a beam clamped at the both ends as shown in Figure below where the thickness.
TMP112 Calibration. Slope 1 (Max) Slope 2 (Max) Slope 3 (Max) Slope 1 (Min) Slope 2 (Min) Slope 3 (Min) The slope regions below were created from characterization.
Calypso Freeform Overview
Copyright © 2015 Chris J Jewell 1 Mechanics M1 (Slide Set 4) Linear Motion (Constant Acceleration) Mechanics M1.
TECH 104 – Technical Graphics Communication
MC Type-B fit up review1 Review of MC Type B assembly clearances reviewing A-to-B and B-to-C interfaces 3/1/07 Summary: Wing interfaces look okay between.
General Tolerance and Hole Fit
SVD Mechanics 21th B2GM Florian Buchsteiner (HEPHY Vienna)
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
Chapter 21 Gauss’s Law. Electric Field Lines Electric field lines (convenient for visualizing electric field patterns) – lines pointing in the direction.
R 2R2R a a Today… More on Electric Field: –Continuous Charge Distributions Electric Flux: –Definition –How to think about flux.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
Dimensioning and Tolerancing
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
L0 and L1 Structure Deflections During Installation of Silicon Sensors C H Daly 8/24/2003.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Thermal Insulation Final Design Review July 31, 2006 WBS12 NCSX.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
PHY132 Introduction to Physics II Class 12 – Outline:
Chapter 25 Capacitance.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
NCSX B. Nelson for the NCSX Engineering Team NCSX modular coil cooling workshop June 10-11, 2004 PPPL NCSX Modular Coil Cooling Requirements and Initial.
Chapter 2: Frequency Distributions. Frequency Distributions After collecting data, the first task for a researcher is to organize and simplify the data.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Field Period Assembly Mike Viola NCSX Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Project Review April 8-10, 2008.
Straightness measurement
Diffraction AP Physics B. Superposition..AKA….Interference One of the characteristics of a WAVE is the ability to undergo INTERFERENCE. There are TWO.
1 Stellarator Core Metrology issues NCSX WBS-1 Meeting April 2, 2003 What are we measuring? When? How do we take the measurements? How do we correlate.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
RFQ Cold model manufacture, June 2006 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 OFC RFQ Cold Model Manufacture The first step is to convert.
Electric Potential 2 q A C B r A B r path independence a a Rr VQ 4   r Q 4   R.
1 Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF) Information Meeting February 23, 2005.
Functions of Several Variables Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Functions of Several Variables 13 Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
ASSEMBLING THE PCB Your PCB has two sides, a COMPONENT side and a TRACK side. The view below shows the component side.
SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY.
1 FPA Stage 2 MC Flange Assembly Issues and Design Proposals June 20, 2006 T. Brown.
1 MC B3 Inspection MTM data: dated 12/22/06 1/6/07 Pro/E model: b3_mtm_data_check.asm T. Brown / D. Williamson.
1 MC B1 Inspection MTM data: FIDUCIALS.IGS DATA.IGS 9/26/06 Pro/E model: b1_mtm_data_check.asm.
MAP Assembly Investigation A project summary for discussion during 4/11/2014 meeting.
1 NCSX radial build NCSX Project Meeting December 18, Modular coil build assumptions 2.Vessel build assumptions 3.FW/internal build assumptions.
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field Ampère’s Law Example 28-6: Field inside and outside a wire. A long straight cylindrical wire conductor of radius.
ELECTRONIC ASSEMBLIES AND SOLDERING TECHNIQUE –PART II
SBN Far Detector Installation & Integration
support structure ACDTopCoreThickness + 2 * ACDFaceThickness
Gauss’s Law Gauss’s law uses symmetry to simplify electric field calculations. Gauss’s law also gives us insight into how electric charge distributes itself.
11.6 Volume and Surface Area of Spheres
Chapter 21 Gauss’s Law.
Information Derived from EC/ED Crystal River Nuclear Plant
13 Functions of Several Variables
Functions of Several Variables
Presentation transcript:

1 MCHP-1 clamp and MC port opening metrology review ProE model: stb-mchp-1_vvsa1_pppl_best_fit.asm stb-fpa_mech_left_side.asm, Rep: mchp-1_clamp_metrol_pts Source data: MCHP-1 VVSA1 clamp summary.xls 6/5/08 T. Brown / M. Smith

2 This review covers the installation clearance of MCHP-1 passing over VVSA1 Reviewed clamp envelop-to-VV clearance assuming a 7/8” vessel services offset (slide 3 - 5) Evaluated the clearance of metrology measured MCHP-1 clamp data moving over VV looking at the closest set of clamp points (slides 6 – 11) Made a visual inspection of the region where the clamp distance is minimum (slide 12) Reviewed VVSA1 as-built data (slides ) Reviewed the assembly clearance of the second set of metrology measured clamp points and found them to be less restrictive. A preliminary investigation of the VVSA1 / MCHP-1 port clearances has been made (slides 14 – 18) Summary: A.51 to 0.56” minimum assembly clearance occurs at Step 4 in the assembly path (based on disassembly steps). The minimum clearances occur at two locations along the Type-B MC. One area is near the midsection and one near the crest of the vessel (see slides 5 and 14).

3 VVSA1 metrology measured surface points added to VV 1.38” The Type-B MC winding form comes within 1.38” to the CAD defined VV surface. Minimum clearance encountered during assembly

4 There are no out-of tolerance points in the tightest region. Local measurement were made to confirm that all added surface components did not extend more than 1” off the surface. The maximum VV surface component offset found is 7/8”

5 VV / MCHP clearances 0.509” minimum clearance to a 7/8” offset of surface components Step 0 defines the final assembled position on this graph 7/8” limit of surface components above vessel surface. In general there is 2” assembly space above the VV CAD surface. With ≤ 1” surface components, leaves a min. 1” assembly gap. Final clearance is 0.74” (1.62-7/8” VV services)

6 Clearance of A/B/C envelope plus clamp data to a 7/8” VV offset surface.241” Calculated clearances between all of the MC clamp envelops and clamp metrology data to a 7/8” offset of the VV surface with a minimum distance found at metrology clamp data at the type-B MC ”

7 MCHP-1 (left side) MC clamp metrology data shown over the VVSA1 VV. The above figures shows Verisurf metrology points of the MC clamps that were measured along with spheres placed at the closest distances to the VV surface.

8 Closest distance VV-to-probe surfaces is 0.785”; 15 mm Ø probe (0.59”) Minimum distance of VV services to clamp = /8 = 0.50” in its final position.

9 Clamp distance is measured from a 7/8" offset of the CAD VV surface. The vessel as-built information also needs to be factored into the clearance calculations. See next two slides Step 1 Step 4 (.241”) Evaluation of metrology measured clamp data tracking the closest group of points (see nest slide).

10 At Step Clearance values shown includes an assumed 7/8” vessel service stand-off Closest set of points at Step 1

11 Step N-8 N-9 M-9 N-6 O-6 Clearance values shown includes an assumed 7/8” vessel service stand-off. A visual inspection of VVSA1 shows the a 0.6” hose and 0.8” max. clamp offset in this area. Locating loop numbers Closest set of points at Step 4

12 MTM data PPPL data All measured points in this area are negative, located inside the vessel surface Although the MTM and PPPL points are slightly different the size the offset is about the same (see next few slides) AS-BUILT Measurements

13 PPPL - yellow spheres MTM - blue spheres

14 Points in red are as-built metrology points which are all negative (below the CAD surface) -.25 to -.375” -.25 to -.38” -.23 to -.24” The minimum expected clearance in this area then should be  0.56” [ (7/8 -.8) =.56 ]

15 Clamp distance is measured from a 7/8" offset of the CAD VV surface. The vessel as-built information also needs to be factored into the clearance calculations. The graph below tracks the next set of closes MC clamp points.

16 MCHP shell port opening clearance review

” to 0.44” distance to center of probe 15 mm probe Ø (0.59”) ” to ” reduced radial clearance 2.0” nominal CAD space clearance PORT 8 See next slide

” distance to center of probe which implies a clamp to port surface distance of 0.725” ( /2) 15 mm probe Ø (0.59”) Spool piece port Clamp envelope Clamp metrology probe points 2.0” nominal CAD space clearance

” to 0.38” distance to center of probe ” to ” radial clearance change PORT ” nominal CAD space clearance

” to 0.16” distance to center of probe ” to ” clearance space increase 0.32” distance to center of probe ” clearance reduction PORT 4

” distance to center of probe ” clearance reduction PORT ” distance to center of probe; 1.525” port to clamp surface clearance 2.0” nominal CAD space clearance 1.79” distance to center of probe 2.08” port to clamp clearance We need to look at this clamp!