CARBOB Regulatory Revisions CARB Phase 3 Gasoline Workshop July 25, 2000 Western States Petroleum Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Transport and Station Observations and Recommendations January 26, 2005 TOMA – Diesel Fuel Marketers Seminar Nashville, TN TRANSPORTATION OF ULSD MAP.
Advertisements

The standard for new emissions standards. Diesel Engine School Bus Retrofit Technology Workshop Maryland Department of the Environment April 29, 2004.
1 Proposed California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline Regulations December 9, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
ALKYLATES Key Components in Clean-Burning Gasoline
Developing Coal Tar/ Petroleum Pitches
Chapter 2: Refinery Products Over 2000 individual products distributed in 17 classes as shown in table below:
Fuel Source Storage and Distribution In the Bay Area 03/21/2013 Public Fleet Supervisor’s Association.
Potential Impacts of a Partial Waiver of the Ethanol Blending Rules Wallace E. Tyner Farzad Taheripour Chris Hurt Purdue University October 11, 2012.
Compliance Overview Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel Rule.
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT Chapter Twenty McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Ethanol, Gasoline, and ULSD Supply Issues in 2006 State Heating Oil and Propane Conference August 2006 John Hackworth Joanne Shore Energy Information Administration.
1. © 2013 Petroch Services Pty Ltd BP Version J11002– Occupational Hygiene in the Oil & Gas Industry Occupational Hygiene in the Oil & Gas Industry Day.
Transportation Energy Information Resources Implications for the US gasoline market Elimination of RFG oxygen standard Complete Phase Out.
Why Events Overseas Matter to Gasoline Retailers and Consumers.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION California Energy Commission Spring 2006 Price Spike Report Media Briefing August 15, 2006 Joseph Desmond Undersecretary of.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1. 2 First authorized to be established by the Clean Air Act of 1970.
Distribution Strategies
1 The Impact of Using LNG-Derived Natural Gas in the South Coast Air Basin January 2006.
Big West of California, LLC Bakersfield Refinery REFINING 101
California Transportation Fuel Trends in Historical Demand Joint Lead Commissioner Workshop on Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts June 24, 2015 Gordon.
Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,
ULSD Downgrading A general overview of the Clean Diesel Fuel Rules on downgrading as defined by the US EPA It is the responsibility of each person to understand.
Ethanol - Experiences and Issues Dr. R.K.Malhotra General Manager IOC, R&D Centre - Faridabad April, 2006.
1 Ethanol Transportation & Distribution Governors Ethanol Coalition Mike Mears Senior Vice President
California Energy Commission Ethanol in California Pat Perez Manager, Transportation Fuels Office California Energy Commission Platts Ethanol Finance &
Section 24.2 Inventory Control
Short-Term Energy and Summer Fuels Outlook Guy Caruso Administrator, Energy Information Administration 2006 Summer Transportation Fuels Outlook Conference.
Reformulated Gasoline in Metro-Atlanta An analysis of E10 Reformulation CEE/EAS 6792 Burcak Kaynak & Grant T. Michalski.
California Issues - Expanded Use of Ethanol and Alkylates LLNL Workshop Oakland, Ca April 10-11, 2001 Gordon Schremp California Energy Commission.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Alaska Crude Oil Disruption Staff Update California Energy Commission Fuels and Transportation Division Gordon Schremp August.
Workshop to Discuss Proposed Amendments to Motor Vehicle CNG Fuel Specifications February 2002 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
Slides 6 Distribution Strategies
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
Public Workshop to Discuss the Need for Amendments to the Alternative Fuels Regulations Regarding Motor Vehicle LPG & CNG June 21, 2000 California Environmental.
Flat Glass Logistics Council May 1, 2003Chicago Council Meeting 1 Flat Glass Logistics Council Issues Chicago, May 1, 2003.
Motiva Board of Directors Meeting November 7, 2001 Convent Refinery and Norco Refinery Low Sulfur Gasoline Projects.
ULSD Workshop November 20-21, 2002 Houston, TX Transition to 15 ppm ULSD.
MARATHON ASHLAND PIPE LINE ULSD TESTING Wesley Neff November 20,
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) Informational Update Permitting and Compliance Committee Meeting February 17, 2009.
Petroleum Products in Western Canada. Western Canada Refining Esso, Shell, PetroCanada in Edmonton – 400 Mbd ChevronTexaco in Vancouver – 50 Mbd Husky.
1 Fuels Workshop California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board May 2, 2005.
09/30/03Presentation by Pat Perez, Manager, Transportation Fuels Office 1 The Causes for Gasoline Price Changes in California During 2003 Presentation.
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Public Transit Bus Fleet Rule and Emission Standards for New Urban Buses California Air.
1 AIR QUALITY AND ETHANOL Gary Z. Whitten. 2 INTRODUCTION Ethanol impacts both positive and negative Ethanol similar to but not MTBE Trade-off’s can be.
Recent Fuel Price Trends & Market Developments Petroleum Market Advisory Committee Meeting California Energy Commission Sacramento, California December.
ARB Phase III Reformulated Gasoline Auto Industry Comments Ann M. Schlenker DaimlerChrysler Representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers September.
8/4/03Proprietary & Confidential Engine/OBD Maintenance/Operations Fuel / #2 Diesel, Urea Availability: –Overall supply. –Supply of ULSD. Impact.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Diesel Fuel Implementation Workshop Transportation Panel Pat Barnecut Southern Counties Oil Company Orange,
1 Module 1: Ethanol and Ethanol-Blended Fuels. 2 Objective Upon the completion of this module, participants will be able to describe the use & continued.
1 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board November 16, 2010 LEV III Workshop E10 Certification Fuel.
A2OA2O A 2nd Opinion on CaRFG3 T50 & Supply Presented To: Air Resource Board Meeting to Discuss Issues Relating to the California Phase 3 RFG Regulations.
Fuel Implementation Issues at the Regional Air Quality Workshop by Bob Leidich BP Products North America Inc. November 17, 2004 Rosemont, Illinois.
NPRA Annual Meeting 2003 Effects of Feed Quality and Product Specification Changes on Refined Product Supply Joanne Shore John Hackworth Energy Information.
Petroleum Outlook: Increased Inter-PADD Movements Expected Joanne Shore Energy Information Administration API Annual Pipeline Conference Dallas, Texas.
Global Market Opportunities for Ethanol – A Clean, Green, Renewable Fuel Comments By: James W. Miller Vice President / Chief Economist Growth Energy December.
1 Meeting on Issues Relating to the California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline Regulations California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Proposed Amendments to Fuel Test Methods Monitoring and Laboratory Division January 25, 2013.
Availability of Gasoline Imports in the Short to Mid Term: U.S. Perspective Joanne Shore John Hackworth Charles Shirkey Energy Information Administration.
Distribution Strategies
Nonroad Diesel Engine and Fuel Standards
Dr. Eng. Tarek M. Aboul –Fotouh1,2 Eng. Omar A. Mazen2
Taiwan Experience regarding MTBE Use
Chapter Ten: Blending process
Chapter Ten: Blending process
Chapter Ten: Blending process
Chapter Ten: Blending process
Chapter Ten: Blending process
2019 Corn-Ethanol Situation & Outlook
Presentation transcript:

CARBOB Regulatory Revisions CARB Phase 3 Gasoline Workshop July 25, 2000 Western States Petroleum Association

CARBOB Revision Goals Adequate gasoline supply Product selection in marketplace Manufacturing flexibility Gasoline meets CARB standards Maintain current enforcement scheme –Caps downstream –Flats and averages at production/import point

CARBOB/Ethanol Issues Terminal QA/QC requirements - deleted 12/99 Oxygen cap - increased to 3.7 wt.% 12/99 CARBOB/Ethanol blending model Ethanol quality specifications Tank transitions Pipeline interface handling Recordkeeping / Reporting / PTDs

Tank Transitions with MTBE MTBE added at refinery as a variable blend component Blends may contain: vol% MTBE (in RFG) 0-15% vol MTBE (in non-RFG) MTBE addition can be changed every blend depending on economics and needs Gasolines with different MTBE contents are fungible at all locations (refineries, terminals and retail)

Tank Transitions with CARBOB/Ethanol Refineries produce CARBOB & specify ethanol % (range) to be added at terminals to meet CaRFG regulations Blends may contain: vol% ethanol (RFG areas) 0-10 vol% ethanol (nonRFG areas) Two CARBOBs are only fungible if they require the same ethanol % (range) addition (i.e vol% ethanol) CARBOB and non-oxygenated CaRFG are not fungible

CARB Regs. Prohibiting Commingling (f)(1): No person may combine any CARBOB that has been supplied from the facility at which it was produced or imported with any other CARBOB, gasoline, blendstock or oxygenate, except: (A) Oxygenate of the type and amount specified……. (B) Other CARBOB for which the same oxygenate type and amount was specified………… (f)(2): The executive officer may enter into a written protocol with any person to identify conditions under which the person may lawfully combine CARBOB with California gasoline or other CARBOB during a changeover in service of a storage tank for a legitimate operational business reason…...

Potential Reasons to Change Ethanol % Short-term economic factors –Ethanol vs. gasoline blending economics –Ethanol supply shortages –Gasoline supply Seasonal factors –Summer vs. winter RVP standards –Winter oxygen mandate (South Coast) Location factors (RFG vs. non-RFG) Gasoline grade factors (premium vs. regular)

CARBOB Commingling Challenges CARBOB is typically: Sub-RVP in summer (<6.4 psi EPA minimum) Sub-octane Requires addition/dilution of ethanol to be complying CaRFG: –Octane –Product specs: (sulfur, olefin, benzene, aromatics, oxy, T50, T90) and/or –Predictive model standards (hydrocarbons, NOx and toxics)

Kinder Morgan S. Cal. Distribution System CalNev Pipeline KM Niland KM Imperial Phoenix KM Watson KM Colton C Refinery A Trucks B KM Orange & Mission Valley

Kinder Morgan N. Cal. Distribution System KM Stockton/ Fresno/ Bakersfield Reno KM Concord C Refinery A Trucks B KM Richmond/Brisbane/San Jose KM Chico KM Sacramento Trucks KM Rocklin

Tank Transitions - A Few Conclusions Commingled system Many tanks to convert –Refinery tankage –Up to four sets of KM tanks (Watson to Imperial) –Retail tanks To convert from Gasoline “A” to “B” –Process to arrive at consensus among shippers takes time –Proprietary pipeline systems are simpler –Takes volume & typically 2 batches No location or conversion is identical

A Few Conclusions (cont.) Terminal tank transitions will be infrequent but could occur: –in spring –in fall –due to market conditions Terminal conversions could – involve entire distribution chain –occur in proprietary pipeline systems Need to have clear guidelines for tank transitions that are fully understood by entire industry to execute transitions quickly and effectively: –Build in to regulation? –Industry-wide protocol?

FROM TO CaRFG w/ MTBE CARBOB (to move to CaRFG3) CARBOB “A” CARBOB “B” (i.e. requiring 5.7% ethanol) (i.e. requiring 7.7% ethanol) CARBOB CaRFG (non-oxygenated) CaRFG (non-oxygenated) CARBOB Potential Tank Transitions

CARBOB to oxy-free CaRFG Transitions Key points Summer transitions are difficult due to RVP limits (7.2 max/ 6.4 min) Winter transitions are less difficult due to higher RVP maxima Transitions between CARBOBs requiring different amounts of ethanol should not cause RVP problems since variable amounts of ethanol have very little impact on the resulting gasoline’s RVP. Maintenance of octane levels adds a level of difficulty downstream when changing ethanol levels or from CARBOB to oxy-free Must maintain current enforcement structure –Predictive model with flats and averages at refinery –Caps downstream

Winter Season Transitions “Simple Mixing” At the start of the transition terminals would reduce their inventory to a practical minimum (similar to how they do today for RVP transitions). CARBOB to oxy-free CaRFG (typically would occur in the Spring) –Refiners would start to produce/ship complying oxy-free CaRFG. –The terminals would continue to add ethanol until the terminal tanks had been transitioned to oxy-free CaRFG (typically two turns if the initial tank inventory gets down to ~25%). –The resulting product would have an RVP>7.0 psi but less than the maximum RVP allowed for the specific time period/region. All of the other PM specs would be below the applicable enforcement caps. Oxy-free CaRFG to CARBOB (typically would occur in the Fall) –Refiners would start to produce/ship complying CARBOB. –Terminals would start adding ethanol as soon as the CARBOB started to arrive into the terminal tanks. –Ditto above on RVP and PM specs.

Idealized Summer Terminal Transition Solution CARBOB “A” to CARBOB “B” Pull terminal tanks to low inventory Add ethanol at greater of “A range” or “B range” following first two terminal tank-fill batches of CARBOB “B” After receiving third batch of CARBOB B, add ethanol at “B” range Resulting gasoline will be <7.2 psi RVP

Idealized Summer Terminal Transition Solution CARBOB to non-oxygenated CaRFG Pull terminal tanks to low inventory Deliver two tank-fill batches of full-octane CARBOB to convert terminal tanks to full octane (difficult to blend) Continue adding ethanol to two tank batches Third batch received can be non-oxygenated CaRFG; stop ethanol addition Ideally, resulting gasoline will be <7.2 psi RVP (summer) and meet octane standards

Idealized Summer Terminal Transition Solution Non-oxygenated CaRFG to CARBOB Pull terminal tanks to low inventory Deliver two tank-fill batches of sub-RVP CARBOB (difficult to blend) Begin adding ethanol upon receipt of first CARBOB Deliver normal-RVP CARBOB in third batch Ideally, resulting gasoline would be 6.4 psi RVP and meet octane standards