When Did Making Adults Mad Become A Crime? Keeping Kids in School and Out of Courts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcome mapping in child rights-based programming
Advertisements

Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. DMCRC.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
SCHOOL REFERRAL REDUCTION PROGRAM: Reducing Racial Disparities and the Criminalization of Low Risk Youth Center for Children’s Law & Policy Third Annual.
Marion County History and Future Presiding Judge, Marilyn A. Moores Chief Magistrate Gary Chavers Deputy Chief Probation Officer Christina Ball Juvenile.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Partnering to Reduce School Crime Collaborative Efforts to Reduce School Crime Referrals in Hennepin County.
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Introductions Agenda 10:00- 10:20am Introductions and Today’s Agenda 10:20- 10:40am Project Overview (large group) 10:40- 11:30am Definitions 11:30-
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Public Policy Conflict. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLICPUBLIC INTERESTINTEREST Attorney General Independent/Accountable Judges, Prosecutors, Police Constitutional.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Targeting Offenders Prospects, Practices and Concerns June
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Juvenile Justice History Review New York House of Refuge – First juvenile detention center – Became a place to put delinquent youth Included kids without.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
Connecting People and Place: Improving Communities through Integrated Data Systems Public School Absenteeism in Pittsburgh, PA Cross-site Project of the.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Policy Academy-Action Network Initiative: Overview of State Proposal and Goals April 17, 2015 Tom Andriola: Chief of Policy and Implementation, DCJS.
AVERY FOWLER CREATIVE CREATION. LET’S TAKE A MOMENT TO REVIEW THE G.P.S FOR OUR UNIT SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Ojjdp.gov Raise The Age Presented by Toni Walker.
1 The New Jersey Experience: The Stationhouse Adjustment Program Part II Presented by: Raymond Massi, Jr., Law Enforcement Coordinator, US Attorney’s Office.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
Governor Pat Quinn B UDGETING FOR R ESULTS Budgeting for Results Funding Priorities, Improving Outcomes March
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
Crime Prevention LEGAL STUDIES 3C. Police & Community Youth Club list=UUS5sqhTIHvmBoZ8R5w3FISQ.
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Section I Management, Supervision and Leadership: An Overview Chapter 2 The Organization and Structure of American Policing.
School/Court Cooperative Programs Working Together to Reduce Crime and Improve Education.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2009 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2009.
Why Raise the Age? Keeping kids in the juvenile system prevents crime Lower recidivism vs. peers in adult system Juvenile system often holds kids more.
EXPEDITING JDAI Conference New Orleans November, 2006 John Rhoads.
Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.
Essex Police Challenge Local Policing 27 th February 2014.
Criminal Justice Reform Brussels, 18 June 2013 Katarina MOTOSKOVA DEVCO B1 –Governace Democracy Human Rights and Gender EuropeAid Development and Co-operation.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Mount Vernon Chronic Truancy Reduction Initiative How an Inner-City School District Cut Absenteeism by 19.8% in Two Years - With No Additional Grant Funding.
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Sustainable Cities through Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Kenneth Markowitz 19 October 2015.
Understanding Positive Behavior Support Closing the Gap Conference November 12, 2009 Pamela A. Clark, MSW.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Crime Reduction Project Update: “Bridging the Gaps” CCJA Congress October 29, 2009.
BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening.
Community BASED Policing/ ADELIN+JANNU. Structure Of Presentation Introduction for Community Based Policing Four basic principles of Community Based Policing.
dfamerica.org. 2 Desired Outcomes Community and system capacity that enhances quality of life and positive outcomes for people living.
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Aim To provide an overview of the Act Participants will: Know about the history of the Act Be aware of the Parts and features of the Act Appreciate differences.
Social Studies 9.  Unit 1 focuses on the structure of the Canadian federal government. This includes: ◦ The separation and division of powers within.
7X Wednesday MN Juvenile Justice System Describe the goals, offenses, penalties, long-term consequences, and privacy concerns of Minnesota’s.
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Safety and Justice Challenge: An Effort to Reduce the Jail Population
Crime Prevention Legal Studies 3C.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Sexual Assault Employee Training.
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
School Justice Partnership Project
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
8 Building Blocks of National Cyber Strategies
SCHOOL-JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Steven C Teske, Chief Judge Juvenile Court, Clayton County, GA
Presentation transcript:

When Did Making Adults Mad Become A Crime? Keeping Kids in School and Out of Courts

IMPACT OF SRO WITH & WITHOUT MOU SRO Program Begins Negotiations Begin on MOU

The process of enabling the participation of students to improve school safety and climate using positive behavioral techniques, practices, and interventions that yields a willingness, capacity, and opportunity to safely participate in the prevention and solving of discipline and safety concerns THE POSITIVE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT MODEL FOR SCHOOL POLICING: A DEFINITION ST

Best Practices Improves Safety Reform Begins

Don’t Let Appearances Fool You! 2013 data as compared to the same measures in % decrease in average daily detention population (ADP) 75% reduction in ADP of minority youth 47% reduction in average length of stay Felony re-arrest (prior to adjudication) is 0% 72% fewer commitments to state custody 66% fewer commitments of minority youth, BUT a 72% reduction in formal petitions 62% reduction in complaints

Keeping Kids in School, Out of Court, Improves Community Safety Protocol Begins JDAI Begins

School-Justice Stakeholder Group Decision Chart Rule One: School-Justice Partners responsible for school, law enforcement, and court decision- making are mandatory voting members; Rule Two: Only those providing financial or in-kind support have voting authority; Rule Three: All others are advisory members; and Rule Four: School-Justice Partners may veto decisions affecting school, law enforcement, and court regulatory or legal authority.

Backbone Agency Development Process 1.Schools do not have capacity to assess & treat the causes of chronic disruptive behavior 2.Community should bridge the schools and community resources through backbone agency 3.Backbone agency focuses on underlying needs where schools are prohibited or lack resources 4.Backbone agency should include the private and public sectors of the community.

ST

COMPONENTPURPOSEGOALS/CONDITIONS Quality Control Who & How on implementation & oversight Data Collection Who collects it? How is it collected? How is it used? How is it reported? Periodic quality control meetings Who attends? How often? What are the Performance measures? What are the outcome measures? What is the process for modifications? INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT/MOU

Children respond to what they see and hear

s s Facebook Linkedin Phone (770) Geniene Lewis, Judicial Assistant