NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presidents FY13 Federal Budget Crop Protection Funding Line Susan T. Ratcliffe Ph.D. Crop Protection Visioning Teleconference March 7,
Advertisements

WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Gulf of Mexico Coastal Storms Program Tracie Sempier Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Image: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Motivation for the Forum Coordination Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Corps Watershed Plan Corps.
Slide1 Managing Flood Risk U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Steven L. Stockton, P.E. Director of Civil Works U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14 July 2009 Presentation.
Lower Hunter & Central Coast Regional Environmental Management Strategy.
The Alabama RSM Workgroup And The Gulf of Mexico Alliance Habitat Conservation & Restoration Team Gulf-wide Regional Sediment Master Plan USACE RSM Policy.
Corps Regional Sediment Management and Habitat Restoration: Cape May, NJ J. Bailey Smith National Planning Center of Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage.
Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies David W. Yoskowitz Carlota Santos Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University.
Cooperative Efforts with Gulf of Mexico Alliance New Web Site – me.html First Annual Monitoring Forum Priority.
Alachua County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 27, 2010.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Wetland and Coastal Habitat Conservation and Restoration Long-term Alliance Partnership Goal Increase coordination among the Gulf States and local, federal,
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Q AVG US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Q AVG US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Regional Sediment Management Program Linda.
“Its All About the Sediment”
Moving Forward: NOAA & Earth Observation Systems Mr. Timothy R.E. Keeney Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Oceanographic.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emily Vuxton and Lauren Leuck U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources (IWR) Alexandria,
Deepwater Horizon NRDA Update December 15, 2010 restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast.
1 Technological Innovations and Future Vision of Technical Support Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration and Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance Nutrients Priority Issue Team National Water Quality Monitoring Council Pensacola, FL February 1, 2011 Kim Caviness MS Dept of.
The West Coast Governors’ Agreement on Ocean Health Jessica Hamilton Keys Natural Resources Policy Advisor Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski Hydrographic.
Tim Osborn NOAA Office of Coast Survey Gulf of Mexico Marine Debris Mapping Project Presented to Center for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence: Central.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
Regional Sediment Management: NY & NJ Harbor Estuary D.A. Pabst, E.A. Stern, J.F. Tavolaro*, Monte P. Greges* USEPA Region 2 USACE NY District* NDT/RDT.
A NOAA Cooperative Institute David R. Shaw, Director Northern Gulf Institute.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Coastal Management Issues and Strategies: State and Municipal
Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,
SOUTHWEST COASTAL AND SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECTS – Update and Path Forward CPRA Meeting January 22, 2013 committed to our coast.
Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies. NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Update On Mississippi River Delta Management Plan Presented at August 20, 2009, Meeting of Governor’s Advisory Commission on Coastal Protection, Restoration.
1 A Sample of NCDDC's GCOOS-Related Data Management Activities Julie Bosch NOAA/ National Coastal Data Development Center GCOOS DMAC Committee Meeting.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE-IOOS Missions, Priorities, Recommendations Linda Lillycrop IOOC Member USACE Liaison, U.S. IOOS US Army.
Tony MacDonald Director Urban Coast Institute Monmouth University November 30, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® NATIONAL SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDY: COASTAL SYSTEMS PORTFOLIO INITIATIVE (CSPI) Initiatives on a Systems.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Managing Through Partnerships Ralph Cantral NOAA’s Ocean Service September 5, 2003.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Los Angeles District CERB June 4, 2009 Regional Sediment Management Plan Development throughout California Heather Schlosser Los Angeles District.
Draft Recommendations from the NH Coastal Risks and Hazards Commission Sherry Godlewski Department of Environmental Services Coastal Adaptation Workgroup.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Regional Sediment Management Policy and Implementation Workshop April, 2009.
Border Master Plan Laredo, Texas July 28, 2010  Laredo District  Coahuila  Nuevo León  Tamaulipas.
GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.
Beneficial Use of Dredge Materials: Introduction to Dredging and Policy J. Bailey Smith US Army Corps of Engineers April 4, 2011.
Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Implemented Jointly by Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Lake Erie Dredge Material: Finding a Solution for Ohio Ohio Brownfield Conference 2016 April 6-7, 2016.
COSA Committee Meeting
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Mike Spranger Nancy Rabalais Sharon Walker Ann Jochens
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Presentation transcript:

NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new emergencies

NOAA Restoration Center Regional Ocean Governance Context GRSMMP advanced over the last 3-4 years as a product of the Gulf of Mexico Alliance GOMA is a State-led effort to develop regional ocean governance structure promoted by the US Ocean Action Plan, initiated in 2004 GRSMMP is a technical work product of the “Habitat Conservation & Restoration Team” of the Alliance

NOAA Restoration Center Ecological Context – the “ongoing emergency” Recent data indicates Gulf of Mexico coastal wetland loss averaging ~60K acres (~94 sq. miles) annually, compared to net gains reported nationally Geomorphic characteristics of the western Gulf account for a large part of this instability RSM concepts such as beneficial use are critical to addressing ongoing loss of ecosystem services

NOAA Restoration Center Figure 2-3. The eight geomorphic regions classified for the Gulf of Mexico.

NOAA Restoration Center Purpose of the Plan Understand sediment dynamics (inputs, outputs, movement) to manage sediment resources to accomplish environmental restoration, conservation, and preservation, while reducing coastal erosion and coastal storm damages and associated costs of sediment management. Link sources of sediment with sediment needs, provide a basis for assessing competing needs for sediment, and provide regional strategies for sediment management that: –make more effective use of sediment from inlets, navigation channels and other sources in support of environmental and economic objectives; –coordinate the collection and dissemination of data about the movement of sediment to better integrate the understanding of regional sediment process into planning, management and other decisions; and –facilitate cooperation among states, federal agencies, and other stakeholders in sediment management.

NOAA Restoration Center Goals of the Plan Understand sediment dynamics, better manage sediment resources in the region (sources, movement, sinks, watershed and coastal processes, structures and actions affecting movement, use, and loss). Inventory sediment resources and needs. Use BMPs in managing sediment resources and minimize secondary adverse impacts. Inform projects and activities involving sediment, assist in prioritizing uses of sediment resources. Develop regulatory and policy processes that weigh environmental considerations equally with other costs and benefits; Improve regulatory processes for consideration of beneficial uses for existing projects Leverage resources for related programs and projects Facilitate effective sediment management in systems that cross political boundaries. Increase stakeholder participation in development and implementation of sediment management strategies. Promote information exchange about regional sediment resources and management needs. Engage Port Authorities in RSM planning & implementation. Support resiliency goals and objectives.

NOAA Restoration Center Focus Areas of the Plan Ecological Considerations –Relocating sediments for restoration –Restoration sediment needs –Direct and indirect effects, conflicts, and synergies Sediment Resources –Sediment Inventories –Sediment Budgets –Dredging Activities Data & Information Management Policies, Authorities, & Funding

NOAA Restoration Center Current Status Content and recommendations still in development Dredging information provided by the four Gulf Coast districts is compiled at the following website: dex.asp Next team workshop May 13-14, New Orleans, LA

NOAA Restoration Center Dredging Database Project name and location Volume of sediment typically dredged Nature of sediment (sand, silt, clay, etc.) Associated disposal areas Typical dredging schedule Beneficial uses

NOAA Restoration Center What’s Missing More information about beneficial uses, beach nourishment projects Sources and volumes of material Dredging windows Contaminant information Shoreline restoration activities Links to survey data Private dredging activities.

NOAA Restoration Center Policy Recommendations for Short- Term Implementation  Better Coordination & Communication (ICTs, BUGs, etc) Flexibility in the Federal Standard- policy adjustment to rethink least cost alternative. –Recommended change to the rules under which the Corps operates. –Incorporated ecosystem benefits & services into cost/benefit analyses. –Language that means something to project managers and is consistently applied across the Gulf. –Addresses inconsistencies between and within districts on how the standard is implemented. –Needs to come from the states, COE cannot lobby. –Need Port Authorities in the mix. –States need to push for flexibility in the standard as well as for additional funding to the COE to support ongoing RSM/BU implementation, especially during O&M.

NOAA Restoration Center Longer-term Policy Recommendations Submerged lands ownership issues Funding of COE continuing authorities –New projects should be made multi-purpose (navigation & restoration) and build beneficial use/restoration into the projects. –Adjust cost sharing Additional team members (MS & FL, DOI, Ports) Information Management Support Identify and gather state authorities & policies, NOAA legislative atlas-includes state and federal Compare and contrast state & federal policies and authorities Identify specific changes to permitting processes and better facilitate beneficial use for habitat restoration/conservation

NOAA Restoration Center Significance for NDT Ultimate goal of applying RSM concepts and recommendations to all dredging operations in the region will require support of O&M divisions, Port Authorities in each district Overcoming inertia of least-cost alternatives using CDFs or ODMDSs, for the purpose of responding ongoing to habitat loss emergency condition, requires fundamental policy & funding shifts Current responses to new emergencies tend to reinforce that inertia (dredging after storms, using existing, pre- approved placement sites); emergency responses that beneficially use all dredged material in the region require plans, funding, and authorities to be in place in advance