MEIC Electron Cooler Design Concept. EC potential impact to colliders Reaching a high start luminosity Very short i-bunches achieved by longitudinal cooling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Cooling Accelerator Beams Eduard Pozdeyev Collider-Accelerator Department.
Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery? Rep. rateBeam 5GeV 100MHz 500MWAbsolutely 10MHz 50MW Maybe 1MHz 5MW 100kHz.
Cooling for Hadron Beams Yaroslav Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility The 4 th EIC Workshop Hampton, May 19-23, 2008.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
Advances in collider concepts Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Workshop 2010 Stony Brook, Long Island,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Kevin Jordan Beam Diagnostics Collaboration Meeting 3/18/15 MEIC Design Overview.
Page 1 Review 09/2010 Overview of MEIC Electron Collider Ring Yuhong Zhang.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Generation and Characterization of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC Photogun for MEIC Cooler Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport News, Virginia, USA ELIC: A HIGH LUMINOSITY AND EFFICIENT SPIN MANIPULATION ELECTRON-LIGHT ION COLLIDER.
Cooling with Magnetized Electron Beam Y. Derbenev MEIC Spring Collaboration meeting March 30, 2015 CASA/JLab.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Concepts for ELIC- a High Luminosity CEBAF based Electron-Light Ion Collider Ya. Derbenev, B. Yunn,
1 Studies of electron cooling at DESY K. Balewski, R. Brinkmann, Ya. Derbenev, Yu. Martirosyan, K. Flöttmann, P. Wesolowski DESY M. Gentner, D. Husmann,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Page 1 Review 09/2010 MEIC ERL Based Circulator Electron Cooler Yaroslav Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang.
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
ELIC Luminosity and Electron Cooling Ya. Derbenev and Y. Zhang EIC Collaboration Meeting Stony Brook University, January 10 to 12, 2010.
Overview of Collective Effects in MEIC Rui Li MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 6-8, 2015.
1 NICA Project Report of The Group I S.L.Bogomolov, A.V.Butenko, A.V.Efremov, E.D.Donets, I.N.Meshkov, V.A.Mikhailov, A.O.Sidorin, A.V.Smirnov, Round Table.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
Electron Cooling for High Luminosity Electron-Ion Collider at JLab Ya. Derbenev, P. Evtushenko, and Y. Zhang Cool’09 Workshop Lanzhou, China, August 31.
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Matched Electron Cooling Y. Derbenev Cool 2015 JLab,
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
JLEIC and Electron Cooling: An Introduction Yuhong Zhang JLEIC Discussion Forum, August 3, 2016.
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Experimental Overview
Space Charge Effect Simulation Using DA Based FMM and Electron Cooling Simulation for JLab’s MEIC Project.
Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC High Voltage Photogun
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker September 29, 2016
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
MEIC Electron Cooling: Do we have a Baseline Design and What is it?
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Ya. Derbenev JLEIC R&D meeting CASA Jefferson Laboratory
Cooler Ring Design Status - July 2017
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

MEIC Electron Cooler Design Concept

EC potential impact to colliders Reaching a high start luminosity Very short i-bunches achieved by longitudinal cooling in combination with SRF (cannot be attained with stochastic cooling!) make sense to design a super-strong focusing (low beta) at IP Short bunches allow one to employ the crab-crossing beams, thus avoiding the parasitic b-binteractions Low transverse emittance + high rep. rate allow one to minimize charge/bunch Extending the luminosity lifetime EC suppresses beam heating and luminosity loss caused by multiple and Touschek IBS

ion bunch electron bunch Cooling section solenoid HEEC basics Magnetized e-gun Injector SRF linac Cooling time grows with Therefore: staged cooling Cooling conditions: Co-moving “cold” electron beam serves as thermostat for a hot ion beam (i – e Coulomb collision exchange)

Parameter (p/e) UnitValue Beam energy GeV150/7 Energy of cooling beam MeV75 Bunch rep rate GHz1.5 Particles/bunch10 0.2/1 Beam current A0.5/2.5 Cooling current A2.5 Horizontal emittance* mm 1/100 Vertical emittance* mm 0.01/1 Number of interaction points 4 Total beam-beam tune shift 0.04/0.16 Laslett’s tune shift in p-beam 0.02 Luminosity overall IP (10 35) cm -2 s -1 2 Cooling/IBS time in p-beam core min5 Luminosity Touschek’s lifetime h20 High luminosity colliding beams Parameter (p/e) UnitValue EnergyGeV/MeV20/10 Cooling length/ circumf.%1 Particles/bunch10 0.2/1 Energy spread** /1 Bunch length**cm20/3 Proton emittance, norm** mm 4 Cooling timemin10 Equilibrium emittance, * mm 1 Equilibrium bunch length*cm2 Laslett’s tune shift0.1 Initial electron cooling ** max. amplitude * norm. rms Staged EC

Staged Cooling in Ion Collider Ring Initialafter boostColliding Mode EnergyGeV/MeV15 / / proton/electron beam currentA0.5 / 1.5 Particles/Bunch / 2 Bunch lengthmm(coasted)10 / 20~30 Momentum spread / 25 / 23 / 2 Hori. & vert. emittance, norm.µm4 / / 0.07 Laslett’s tune shift (proton) Initial cooling after ions injected into the collider ring for reduction of 3d emittance before acceleration After boost & re-bunching, cooling for reaching design values of beam parameters in colliding mode Continuous cooling during collision for suppressing IBS, maintaining luminosity lifetime

High Energy e-Cooler for Collider Ring Design Requirements: up to 10.8 MeV for cooling at injection energy (20 GeV/c) up to 54 MeV for cooling top proton energy (100 GeV/c) Cooling e-beam current : up to 1.5 A CW beam at 750 MHz repetition rate About 2 nC bunch charge (possible space charge issue at low energy) Solution: ERL Based Circulator Cooler (ERL-CCR) Must be an SRF Linac for accelerating electron beam Must be Energy Recovery (ERL) to solve RF power problem Must be Circulator -cooler ring (CCR) for reducing current from source/ERL ERL-CCR is considered to provide the required high cooling current while consuming fairly low RF power and reasonable current from injector

Conceptual Design of Circulator e-Cooler ion bunch electron bunch Electron circulator ring Cooling section solenoid Fast beam kicker SRF Linac dump electron injector energy recovery path (Layout A)

ERL Circulator Electron Cooler ion bunch electron bunch Cooling section solenoid (Fast) kicker SRF Linac dump injector (Layout B)

Optimized Location of Cooling Channel 10 m Solenoid (7.5 m) SRF injector dumper Eliminating a long circulating beam-line could cut cooling time by half, or reduce the cooling electron current by half, or Center of Figure-8 (Layout C)

Cooler Design Parameters Max/min energy of e-beamMeV54/11 Electrons/bunch bunch revolutions in CCR~100 Current in CCR/ERLA1.5/0.015 Bunch repetition in CCR/ERLMHz750/7.5 CCR circumferencem~80 Cooling section lengthm15x2 Circulation duration ss 27 RMS Bunch lengthcm1-3 Energy spread Solenoid field in cooling sectionT2 Beam radius in solenoidmm~1 Beta-functionm0.5 Thermal cyclotron radius mm 2 Beam radius at cathodemm3 Solenoid field at cathodeKG2 Laslett’s tune MeV0.07 Longitudinal inter/intra beam heating ss 200 Number of turns in circulator cooler ring is determined by degradation of electron beam quality caused by inter/intra beam heating up and space charge effect. Space charge effect could be a leading issue when electron beam energy is low. It is estimated that beam quality (as well as cooling efficiency) is still good enough after 100 to 300 turns in circulator ring. This leads directly to a 100 to 300 times saving of electron currents from the source/injector and ERL.

Issues Space charge limitations in CCR: Coulomb interaction (non-linear Laslett detune) CSR Intra- and Inter-Beam Scattering in CCR Source/Injector/ERL/CCR beam matching gymnastics Magnetized cathode Matching with cooling solenoids, straights and arcs Beam size at cathode and related canonical emittance Other agendas? ( space charge dominated beam in axial optics …) Fast kicker (beam-beam or other) And more…

Backup slides

Parameter UnitValue Max/min energy of e-beamMeV75/10 Electrons/bunch10 1 Number of bunch revolutions in CR1001 Current in CR/current in ERLA2.5/0.025 Bunch rep. rate in CRGHz1.5 CR circumferencem60 Cooling section lengthm15 Circulation duration ss 20 Bunch lengthcm1 Energy spread Solenoid field in cooling sectionT2 Beam radius in solenoidmm1 Cyclotron beta-functionm0.6 Thermal cyclotron radius mm 2 Beam radius at cathodemm3 Solenoid field at cathodeKG2 Laslett’s tune shift in CR at 10 MeV0.03 Time of longitudinal inter/intrabeam heating ss 200 ERL-based EC with circulator ring

Technology: Ultra-Fast Kicker h v0v0 v≈c surface charge density F L σcσc D kicking beam A short (1~ 3 cm) target electron bunch passes through a long (15 ~ 50 cm) low-energy flat bunch at a very close distance, receiving a transverse kick The kicking force is integrating it over whole kicking bunching gives the total transverse momentum kick Proof-of-principle test of this fast kicker idea can be planned. Simulation studies will be initiated. Circulating beam energyMeV33 Kicking beam energyMeV~0.3 Repetition frequencyMHz5 -15 Kicking anglemrad0.2 Kinking bunch lengthcm15~50 Kinking bunch widthcm0.5 Bunch chargenC2 An ultra-fast RF kicker is also under development. V. Shiltsev, NIM 1996 Beam-beam kicker

Electron source e-gun V 500 KeV Pulse duration 0.33 ns Bunch charge 2 nC Peak current 0.65 A Emittance, norm 1 mm.mrad Rep.rate 15 MHz Average current 30 mA 1 st compressor Prebuncher frequency 500 MHz Voltage 0.2 MV Energy gradient after prebuncher 2x 10% 1 st drift 2 m Bunch length after 1 st compression 1 cm Beam radius (assumed value) 2 mm Coulomb defocusing length 30 cm 1 st accellerator cavity Voltage 2 MV Frequency 500 MHz Beam energy 2.5 MeV 2 nd compressor Buncher frequency 1.5 GHz Energy gradient 2 x 10% 2 nd drift 1.8 m Bunch length, final 0.5mm Beam radius 2 mm Coulomb defocusing length 35 cm Estimates for Injector to ERL