Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Practical Considerations for Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Low-Dose Dual-Energy CT for PET Attenuation Correction with Statistical Sinogram Restoration Joonki Noh, Jeffrey A. Fessler EECS Department, The University.
Advertisements

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Nuclear Stockpile Stewardship and.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Physics-Based Constraints in the Forward.
Learning from spectropolarimetric observations A. Asensio Ramos Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias aasensio.github.io/blog.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition Objectives: Course Introduction Typical Applications Resources: Syllabus Internet Books and Notes D.H.S: Chapter 1 Glossary.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Yiannis Demiris and Anthony Dearden By James Gilbert.
Rob Fergus Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University A Variational Approach to Blind Image Deconvolution.
The loss function, the normal equation,
Active Calibration of Cameras: Theory and Implementation Anup Basu Sung Huh CPSC 643 Individual Presentation II March 4 th,
Copyright 2004 David J. Lilja1 Errors in Experimental Measurements Sources of errors Accuracy, precision, resolution A mathematical model of errors Confidence.
1 Distributed localization of networked cameras Stanislav Funiak Carlos Guestrin Carnegie Mellon University Mark Paskin Stanford University Rahul Sukthankar.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Basic Business Statistics 10 th Edition.
Multi-Cluster, Mixed-Mode Computational Modeling of Human Head Conductivity Adnan Salman 1, Sergei Turovets 1, Allen Malony 1, and Vasily Volkov 1 NeuroInformatics.
8-1 Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Statistics for Managers using Microsoft.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Statistics for Managers using Microsoft Excel 6 th Global Edition.
The Calibration Process
Binary Variables (1) Coin flipping: heads=1, tails=0 Bernoulli Distribution.
Chapter 1: The Study of Life
Virtual COMSATS Inferential Statistics Lecture-6
Basic Business Statistics, 11e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Basic Business Statistics 11 th Edition.
Confidence Interval Estimation
Chap 8-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Business Statistics: A First Course.
Estimation of Statistical Parameters
PARAMETRIC STATISTICAL INFERENCE
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Nick Salazar Operations Support.
MML Inference of RBFs Enes Makalic Lloyd Allison Andrew Paplinski.
Self-Calibration and Metric Reconstruction from Single Images Ruisheng Wang Frank P. Ferrie Centre for Intelligent Machines, McGill University.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 07: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND BAYESIAN ESTIMATION Objectives: Class-Conditional Density The Multivariate Case General.
M. Gelfusa 1 (16) Frascati March 2012 Validation of Polarimetric measurements on JET using advanced statistical analysis of the residuals M. Gelfusa,
Statistics and the Verification Validation & Testing of Adaptive Systems Roman D. Fresnedo M&CT, Phantom Works The Boeing Company.
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Assessment of predictive capability Derek Bingham 1.
Feature based deformable registration of neuroimages using interest point and feature selection Leonid Teverovskiy Center for Automated Learning and Discovery.
ELEC 303 – Random Signals Lecture 18 – Classical Statistical Inference, Dr. Farinaz Koushanfar ECE Dept., Rice University Nov 4, 2010.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
BPS - 3rd Ed. Chapter 161 Inference about a Population Mean.
9.0 New Features Min. Life for a Titanium Turbine Blade Workshop 9 Robust Design – DesignXplorer.
Real-Time Simultaneous Localization and Mapping with a Single Camera (Mono SLAM) Young Ki Baik Computer Vision Lab. Seoul National University.
Jet With No Cross Flow RANS Simulations of Unstart Due to Mass Injection J. Fike, K. Duraisamy, J. Alonso Acknowledgments This work was supported by the.
Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 7 th Edition, Global Edition Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education.
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
Chapter1: Introduction Chapter2: Overview of Supervised Learning
DFT Applications Technology to calculate observables Global properties Spectroscopy DFT Solvers Functional form Functional optimization Estimation of theoretical.
Forward Modeling Image Analysis The forward modeling analysis approach (sometimes called “analysis by synthesis”) involves optimizing the parameters of.
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
Chapter 13 Sampling distributions
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
Univariate Gaussian Case (Cont.)
Smart Sleeping Policies for Wireless Sensor Networks Venu Veeravalli ECE Department & Coordinated Science Lab University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Chance Constrained Robust Energy Efficiency in Cognitive Radio Networks with Channel Uncertainty Yongjun Xu and Xiaohui Zhao College of Communication Engineering,
Chapter 9: Introduction to the t statistic. The t Statistic The t statistic allows researchers to use sample data to test hypotheses about an unknown.
Basic Business Statistics, 11e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Business Statistics: A First Course 5 th Edition.
Accuracy, Reliability, and Validity of Freesurfer Measurements David H. Salat
Introduction to emulators Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
Ch 1. Introduction Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, Updated by J.-H. Eom (2 nd round revision) Summarized by K.-I.
Modelling & Simulation of Semiconductor Devices Lecture 1 & 2 Introduction to Modelling & Simulation.
The Calibration Process
Chapter 6 Calibration and Application Process
Approximate Models for Fast and Accurate Epipolar Geometry Estimation
Dynamical Statistical Shape Priors for Level Set Based Tracking
Unfolding Problem: A Machine Learning Approach
Adnan Salman1 , Sergei Turovets1, Allen Malony1, and Vasily Volkov
Confidence Interval Estimation
Design of A New Wide-dynamic-range Neutron Spectrometer for BNCT with Liquid Moderator and Absorber S. Tamaki1, I. Murata1 1. Division of Electrical,
LECTURE 09: BAYESIAN LEARNING
Model selection and fitting
Dr. Arslan Ornek MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Presentation transcript:

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Practical Considerations for Analysis By Synthesis, a Real World Example using DARHT Radiography. By James L. Carroll 2013 LA-UR

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Abstract The mathematical theory of inverse problems has been intensely explored for many years. One common solution to inverse problems involves analysis by synthesis, where a forward model produces a synthetic data set, given model inputs, and optimization is used to find model inputs that minimize the difference between the real data and the synthetic data. Some beautiful mathematical results demonstrate that under ideal situations, this procedure returns the MAP estimate for the parameters of the model. However, many practical considerations exist which makes this procedure much harder to actually use and implement. In this presentation, we will evaluate some of these practical considerations, including: Hypothesis testing over confidence, overfitting systematic errors instead of overfitting noise, optimization uncertainties, and complex measurement system calibration errors. The thrust of this work will be to attempt to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the errors in density reconstructions for the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrotest Facility (DARHT) and LANL. Slide 2

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D What is Hydrodynamic Testing? High Explosives (HE) driven experiments to study nuclear weapon primary implosions. Radiographs of chosen instants during dynamic conditions. Metals and other materials flow like liquids under high temperatures and pressures produced by HE. Slide 3 Static Cylinder Set-upStatic Cylinder shotStatic Cylinder Radiograph

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 4 DARHT:

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D THE FTO Slide 5

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Challenges: Dose/Dynamic Range Slide 6

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Static Test Objects (e.g. FTO) l Allow us to calibrate against objects with known geometry. l Comparison of machines (microtron, PHERMEX, DARHT) l Benchmark radiographic codes (e.g. SYN_IMG, the BIE) l Benchmark scatter codes (MCNP). l Develop understanding and train experimentalists.

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Collimation l Rough collimation controls angular extent and direction of radiation fan. l Shields from source scatter. l A Graded collimator is an approximate pathlength inverse of object and flattens field for reduced dynamic range and reduced scatter. l An exact graded collimator would produce an image with no features!

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Challenges Dose/Dynamic Range Slide 9 Graded collimator

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D (FTO+Collimator+Fiducial+plates) Slide 10

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Inverse approach (approximate physics) Transmission (experimental)

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Inverse approach (approximate physics) Transmission (experimental) How do we extract density from this transmission?

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Model density (allowed to vary) Inverse approach (approximate physics) Compare statistically Simulated radiographic physics Transmission (experimental) Transmission (simulated) How do we extract density from this transmission?

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data We develop a parameterized model of the density (parameters here might be edge locations, density values) True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Model density (allowed to vary) Inverse approach (approximate physics) How do we extract density from this transmission? Compare statistically Simulated radiographic physics Transmission (experimental) Transmission (simulated)

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data We develop a parameterized model of the density (parameters here might be edge locations, density values) True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Model density (allowed to vary) Inverse approach (approximate physics) How do we extract density from this transmission? Compare statistically Simulated radiographic physics Transmission (experimental) Transmission (simulated) Model parameters are varied so that the simulated radiograph matches the experiment

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data We develop a parameterized model of the density (parameters here might be edge locations, density values) True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Model density (allowed to vary) Inverse approach (approximate physics) How do we extract density from this transmission? Compare statistically Simulated radiographic physics Transmission (experimental) Transmission (simulated) Model parameters are varied so that the simulated radiograph matches the experiment p(m|r) h(m)

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Bayesian Analysis Slide 17

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Assumptions Where n is some independent, additive noise. If n is Gaussian then: Slide 18

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Plug that in: If I assume a uniform prior then: Slide 19

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D A forward modeling approach is currently used in analysis of (single-time) radiographic data We develop a parameterized model of the density (parameters here might be edge locations, density values) True radiographic physics ? True density (unknown) Model density (allowed to vary) Inverse approach (approximate physics) How do we extract density from this transmission? Compare statistically Simulated radiographic physics Transmission (experimental) Transmission (simulated) Model parameters are varied so that the simulated radiograph matches the experiment p(m|r) h(m)

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D The Solution Building h(m) Optimizing parameters m Slide 21

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Using the Prior Computer vision is notoriously under constrained. Penalty terms on the function to be optimized can often overcome this problem. These terms can be seen as ill-posed priors GGMRF Slide 22

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Dealing with Scatter Slide 23

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 24

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Example, approximating scatter Slide 25

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Beautiful, Yes! Slide 26

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Practical Considerations Slide 27

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Axis 2, Time 1 Flat Field Slide 28

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Flatfield Components Slide 29

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Necessary Assumptions Axis 2 Time 1 FTO Slide 30

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Necessary Assumptions Slide 31

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Necessary Assumptions Slide 32

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Necessary Assumptions Slide 33

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Necessary Assumptions Slide 34

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 35

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Learning Fields Treat entire known chain (FTO+collimator+fiducial plate) as a fiducial Examine fields Produced Slide 36

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D 4df s 4df g FTO Residuals 5% residuals Slide 37

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Nov 2012 FTO Data Scatter and Gain Analysis (5 plates) 4DF S 4DF G 48% 8% Slide 38

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Axis 2, Time 1 Flat Field Slide 39

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Center Camera Only FTO Residuals Slide 40

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Inferred Scatter, FTO Slide 41

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D So What? Simulation is broken, Just learn whatever the field is… Slide 42

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Width of the Known Ring for FTO Slide 43

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Additional synthetic fiducials in FTO graded collimator, with FTO Slide 44

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Width of the Known Ring for FTO Fiducials Slide 45

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Density in the FTO Ta Slide 46 With Fiducials:Without Fiducials:

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Conclusion Scatter is more curved than previously thought Curved fields can’t be learned accurately in existing thin fiducial ring Fiducials inside unknown objects don’t perfectly solve the problem But they can help Slide 47

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Questions Slide 48