AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Advertisements

2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
Breed composition of the United States dairy cattle herd R. L. Powell,* H. D. Norman, and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2003 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-1) Performance of dairy cattle clones and evaluation of their milk composition H. Duane Norman*,1 and Marie K.
2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansInner.
2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
ADSA/ASAS/CSAS meeting (1) 2005 A Salute to Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service US Department of Agriculture.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Reproduction.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA Board – 2009 (1)
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
2003 P.M. VanRaden* and M.E. Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Definition.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Presentation transcript:

AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD

AFGC Convention 2004 (2) 2004 Topics l Does the proposed national animal ID system help genetic programs for dairy cattle? l What genetic programs work well for graziers? 2004

Benefit of proposed national animal ID system to genetic programs for dairy cattle AFGC Convention 2004 (3) 2004

AFGC Convention 2004 (4) 2004 Background l BSE in Washington state l Better ID for dairy cattle (traceability) – Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding – National FAIR – Wisconsin ID Consortium l Timetable shortened l Funding sources expanded

AFGC Convention 2004 (5) 2004 National dairy breeding program l Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory – Dairy cattle ID database – Genetic evaluations l Requirements for success – Parent ID – Birth date – Production recording – Progeny test

AFGC Convention 2004 (6) 2004 National ID program l USAIP (U.S. Animal Identification Plan) l Monitor and document animal movement l Trace back for health concerns l Enhance genetic programs? – Must include birth date and sire ID – Dam ID can further improve evaluation accuracy

Genetic improvement issues for graziers AFGC Convention 2004 (7) 2004

AFGC Convention 2004 (8) 2004 Grazier breeding l Objective – Cattle with better fertility or other desired characteristics l Approaches – Bulls from countries that practice grazing – Bull breed different from cow breed – Effectiveness?

AFGC Convention 2004 (9) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Daughter performance compared within herd – New Zealand AI Holstein bulls – Other AI Holstein bulls (predominantly U.S.) l Cows included – Records in AIPL national database – Calved before March 2004 – Time to express the performance traits

AFGC Convention 2004 (10) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Data continued l 145 herds l 452 New Zealand daughters l 4,954 U.S. daughters l 110 herds l 283 New Zealand daughters l 4,141 U.S. daughters l 72 herds l 145 New Zealand daughters l 2,372 U.S. daughters – First lactation – Second lactation – Third lactation

AFGC Convention 2004 (11) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Yield continued l U.S. daughters superior ™ First lactation 1046 lb*** ™ Second lactation 1108 lb*** ™ Third lactation 1049 lb*** l New Zealand daughters superior ™ First lactation 4 lb ™ Second lactation 2 lb l U.S. daughters superior ™ Third lactation 1 lb l U.S. daughters superior ™ First lactation 10 lb** ™ Second lactation 12 lb** ™ Third lactation 13 lb – Milk – Fat – Protein

AFGC Convention 2004 (12) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Value of U.S. daughter yield superiority at current milk prices – First lactation – Second lactation – Third lactation continued l $30.35 l $38.30 l $43.79

AFGC Convention 2004 (13) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Somatic cell score continued l U.S. daughters superior ™.2*** l U.S. daughters superior ™.1 l New Zealand daughters superior ™.1 – First lactation – Second lactation – Third lactation

AFGC Convention 2004 (14) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Days open continued l New Zealand daughters superior ™ 7 days* l New Zealand daughters superior ™ 8 days l New Zealand daughters superior ™ 4 days – First lactation – Second lactation – Third lactation – Pheno- typic trend Lactation

AFGC Convention 2004 (15) 2004 U.S. daughters of New Zealand bulls l Productive life – Comparison needed – Advantage for New Zealand daughters? continued

AFGC Convention 2004 (16) 2004 Crossbreeding l Heterosis – Milk 3.4 – Fat 4.4 – Protein 4.1 – SCS-0.7 – Days Open 1.8 continued

AFGC Convention 2004 (17) 2004 Recommendations l Don’t select bulls solely on reproductive performance or any other single trait because several traits also have economic value l If you practice seasonal calving, use an index with more weight on daughter pregnancy rate than is recommended for the general U.S. dairy cattle industry

If a national animal ID system is to enhance genetic programs for dairy cattle, the critical development issue is to obtain sire information! AFGC Convention 2004 (18) 2004