doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Sept 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide Sept 2011 Closing Plenary Reports Date: Authors:
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Sept 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 2 Abstract This document is a digest of the closing reports of all sub-groups for presentation at the Sept 2011 closing plenary meeting.
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportSlide WG Editor’s Meeting (Sept ‘11) Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1/5 of r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportSlide 4 Volunteer Editor Contacts TGmb – Adrian Stephens – TGaa – Alex Ashley – TGac – Robert Stacey – TGad – Carlos Cordeiro – TGae – Henry Ptasinski – TGaf – Peter Ecclesine – TGah – Minyoung Park – TGai – Tom Siep – Editors Emeritus: –TGk – Joe Kwak– –TGp – Wayne Fisher – –TGr – Bill Marshall – –TGs – Kazuyuki Sakoda – –TGu – Necati Canpolat – –TGv – Emily Qi – –TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – –TGz – Menzo Wentink – Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation September 2011 from slide 2/5 of r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Style Guide See wg11-style-guide.doc Editor’s responsibility includes checking the 2009 IEEE Standards Style Manual when creating or updating drafts. Submissions with draft text should conform to both the WG11 Style Guide and IEEE Standards Style Manual Note that the Stle Guide evolves with our practice Slide 5Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/5 of r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportSlide 6 Editor Amendment Ordering Amendment NumberTask GroupREVCOM Date Amendment 8TGvFeb Amendment 9TGuFeb Amendment 10TGsSept Revision802.11mbMar 2012*est Amendment 1TGaeJun Amendment 2TGaaJun Amendment 3TGadDec Amendment 4TGafMar Amendment 5TGacDec Amendment 6TGahJuly Amendment 7TGaiSept 2013 Data as of Sept 2011 See Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers! Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/5 of r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Most current doc shaded green. TGPublished or Draft Baseline Documents SourceMEC Style GuideEditor Snapshot Date Publi shed smbaeaaadafacahai sYFrame 8.0Yes2009Kazuyuki Sakoda19-Jul mbY10.1Frame 9.0Yes2009Adrian Stephens21-Sep aeY OpenOffic e 3.2 Yes2009Henry Ptasinski19-Jul aaY WordYes2009Alex Ashley19-Jul adY WordYes2009Carlos Cordero21-Sep afY Frame 9.0No2009Peter Ecclesine22-Sep acY Frame 9.0No2009Robert Stacey19-Jul ahNo2009Minyoung Park19-Jul aiFrame 10.0 No2009Tom Siep22-Sep Changes from last report shown in red. Slide 7 Sept 2011 Draft Development Snapshot Slide 7Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation September 2011 from slide 5/5 of r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 8 Closing Report Date: Authors: from slide 1/3 of r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 9 Abstract Closing report for WNG SC for September 2011, Okinawa, Japan from slide 2/3 of r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 10 Presentations at September 2011 meeting –Proposed Use Case & Improve ad-hoc mode for ah/a/b/g/n ( ah-packet-radio-mode-for ah-a-b-g-n.ppt) – Romana Challans –IP over Congested WLAN ( ai-ip-over-congested-wlan.ppt) – Masataka Ohta Minutes – wng-sept-2011-meeting-minutes.doc Plans for November 2011 –1 2 hour session from slide 3/3 of r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 11 ARC Closing Report Date: Authors: from slide 1/5 of r0 by Mark Hamilton, Polycom, Inc. Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Abstract This document is the closing report for ARC SC, September 2011, Okinawa meeting Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 12 from slide 2/5 of r0 by Mark Hamilton, Polycom, Inc. Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 13 Work Completed 802 Overview and Architecture Draft 1.2 letter ballot –Proposed text for RM Annex, agreed Updated architectural RM figure, based on Figure 4-15 in REVmb D10.0, to show MAC-SAP access when 802.1X is not in use –Discussed a comment for the “front material” of the 802 O&A to clarify that the O&A is a continually evolving document to reflect newly developed technologies and architectural concepts Minutes are in 11-11/1251 from slide 3/5 of r0 by Mark Hamilton, Polycom, Inc. Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 14 Teleconferences No specific plan, will schedule with 10 days notice Topic(s): –“Front material” comment for 802 O&A from slide 4/5 of r0 by Mark Hamilton, Polycom, Inc. Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 15 November 2011 Goals Will be a working meeting with 802 to complete ballot comment resolution One meeting slot planned for any “homework” items or discussion we need to support the comment resolution from slide 5/5 of r0 by Mark Hamilton, Polycom, Inc. Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 16 JTC1 SC September Closing Report 22 Sept 2011 Authors: Meeting document: from slide 1/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report JTC1 SC agenda items –Status of WAPI in SC6 –Status of 802.1X/AE and security replacements –Status of N-UHT (802.11ac replacement) –Plan for 8802 standards –Plan for next SC6 meeting Feb 2012 in Guangzhou Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 17 from slide 2/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 met in San Diego in June 2011 and will meet in Guangzhou, China in Feb 2012 –SC6 has a F2F meeting every 9 months or so –The last meeting was held on June 2011 in San Diego All WGs met in San Diego –WG1: Physical and data link layers –WG7: Network and transport layers (also known as Future Network) –WG8: Directory –WG9: ASN.1 and registration –The next meeting is in Guangzhou, China in February 2012 Now confirmed for week of 20 Feb 2012 Only two WGs are planning to meet –WG1: Physical and data link layers –WG7: Network and transport layers The IEEE 802 will need to send a delegation again! –Please start planning to attend! Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 18 from slide 3/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report The WG has liaised various Sponsor Ballot drafts to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 –Bruce Kraemer will send the red highlighted documents after Okinawa –The WG told SC6 it will liaise ac as soon as it passes a LB – will be submitted to SC6 when approved by the SASB – early 2012 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 19 Task Group After SD After Hawaii After Dallas After LA After Sing. After Palm Sp After SanFran After Okinawa July 10Sept 10Nov 10Jan 11Mar 11May 11July 11Sept 11 TGae D5.0 TGaa D6.0 TGac TGmb--D6.0-D8.0--D10.0 TGs--D8.0-D10.0-Ratified- TGuD11.0-D13.0--Ratified-- TGvD13.0D Ratified-- TGzD12.0D Ratified-- from slide 4/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report There have been attempts to make progress on WAPI NP at a series of CRM teleconferences –In San Diego, the US NB proposed that progress could be made on resolving the WAPI NP comments by teleconference –IEEE objective is to expunge false commentary on security –SC6 subsequently agreed to hold comment resolution meetings (The CRMs were held 10 Aug, 31 Aug, 15 Sept held so far, 21 Nov scheduled (probably last!) US, UK, Switzerland, China, Korea and IEEE 802 have been represented Convenor: Mr Seung Ok Lim (Korea) – also new WG1 Chair –After the first two teleconference made little progress, it was decided to use as well Hundreds of s resulted Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 20 from slide 5/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report The Chair would like to thanks various individuals for representing IEEE 802 at the CRMs Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 21 Bruce Kraemer Dan Harkins Dorothy Stanley Jodi Haaz Brian Weis 10 August Bruce Kraemer Dan Harkins Dorothy Stanley Jodi Haaz Brian Weis 31 August Bruce Kraemer Dan Harkins Dorothy Stanley Jodi Haaz 15 September from slide 6/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report There will be one final CRM on 21 November... –The CRM convenor stated that there will only be one more CRM It will be held on 21 November discussion is encouraged in the meantime –The various parties are far apart... Latest s are not very encouraging China NB & Swiss NB technical experts do not seem to understand the implementation of functional entities defined by i Swiss NB rep is continuing to asserting that all of i is insecure because it includes WEP and TKIP US NB, UK NB and IEEE 802 reps appear to be aligned SC6 Chair has stated, “Unless the allegations around 'serious security loopholes' in the NP are deleted and the NP form is revised, it's chair's position not to accept the DoC” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 22 from slide 7/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Other topics in SC6 –China NB has proposed An 802.1X/AE replacement An security replacement An ac replacement –Withdrawal of a number of standards including the 8802 series – responsibility delegated to IEEE 802 to report back with definitive list in February 2012 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 23 from slide 8/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report The discussion in San Francisco decided to send 802 standards to ISO/IEC under certain conditions Summary from San Francisco 802 plenary meeting –There was consensus that it was important for 802 to send standards to ISO/IEC for “registration” –Need to guarantee that these will not be edited without the explicit agreement of the 802 owner –An implementation plan will be further explored during the November plenary Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 24 from slide 9/9 of r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 25 IEEE Regulatory SC Okinawa Closing Report Date: Authors: from slide 1/5 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 26 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the September 20, 2011 IEEE Regulatory Standing Committee meeting in Okinawa. from slide 2/5 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Regulatory Summary – North America US –FCC 5 GHz rules changes update – industry input for NPRM –OMB approved spending for Part 15 Subpart H Establishment of database(s) only remaining hurdle –Forty-five day geo-location database trial begun September 19 th –US House of Representatives looking to auction ALL spectrum Canada –TVWS Consultation: prepared a response (18-11/75r3) SMSE Consultation on a Policy and Technical Framework for the Use of Non-Broadcasting Applications in the Television Broadcasting Bands Below 698 MHz –Radio Advisory Board of Canada (RABC) meetings to discuss TVWS Slide 27Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3/5 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Regulatory Summary – European Union Ofcom –Geo-location database planning –Results of consultation on “Implementing Geolocation” –Next steps Consult on and publish Statutory Instrument (SI) to license- exempt TVBDs Cooperate with industry partners to enable information on licensed services Continue engagement with industry and EU regulatory and standards groups to developed harmonized approach –Trials running in three locations in the UK Slide 28Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4/5 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Regulatory Summary - Asia UHT/EUHT Standards in China –UHT = Ultra-High Throughput (802.11n equivalent) –EUHT = Enhanced Ultra-High Throughput (802.11ac equivalent) –CCSA approval then application for ISO recognition –Claim to coexist with Wi-Fi –EUHT is LTE-like (TDD) Slide 29Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5/5 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 30 Smart Grid SC–Closing Report- September 2011 Date: 22 September 2011 Discussion topics during September Okinawa Session NameCompanyAddressPhone Bruce KraemerMarvell5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, Abstract: 1 – NIST PAP2 2 – November Tutorial Meeting Document r1 from slide 1/5 of r1 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report 802 Goals in the PAP02 Context 802 Goals Recognition of IEEE 802 wireless standards in NIST Catalog of Standards Acceptance of wireless standards as viable in Smart Grid deployments Meeting Goals Information about NIST SGIP PAP02 status and plans Determine best method for developing or reviewing key deliverables Engagement Participate in the PAP02 activity to develop Wireless Guideline 2.0 Prepare and Submit application paperwork for 802 standards to NIST for inclusion in the Catalog of Standards Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 31 from slide 2/5 of r1 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 32 SDO Update – Modeling Tool One area that has exhibited a considerable amount of progress is the propagation model. from slide 3/5 of r1 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report 802 Work Plan Discussion Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 33 Determine best method for developing or reviewing key deliverables Can we adequately address Licensed vs unlicensed spectrum Interference Is setting the noise floor adequate representation Continue to define practical/achievable goals/results Is the multistory residence feasible in Guideline 2 schedule? from slide 4/5 of r1 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 34 Proposed Smart Grid Tutorial November 2011 Possible Topics and Speakers What is the Smart Grid? – Views of the elephant IEEE Activities including P2030– Bill Ash European Perspective (EC, ITU, ETSI) – Tom Siep, Larry Taylor WiFi Status Report – Dave Halasz SEP Bob Heile NIST SGIP PAP02 – Bruce Kraemer EPRI Status Report – Tim Godfrey 15.4g Status Report – Phil Beecher PAP15 & P ? from slide 5/5 of r1 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 35 September 2011 Closing Report -TGmb Date: Authors: from slide 1/6 of r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 36 Abstract This document contains the TGmb closing report for September from slide 2/6 of r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 37 Accomplishments Completed fourth Recirculation SB Comment Resolution (D10.0) –257 comments –Fifth Recirculation SB (15 day) to start in early October Scheduled teleconference calls –To be announced –10am Eastern (7am Pacific), 2 hours from slide 3/6 of r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 38 Current TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot Nov 2009 – Recirc start July 2010 – Conditional Sponsor Ballot Approval from EC August 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days) – Closes Sept 14 November 2010 – Initial Sponsor Ballot completion Jan 2011 – Sponsor Recirc. Start Nov 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval March 2012 – RevCom/SASB Approval from slide 4/6 of r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 39 Goals for Sept - Nov 2011 Recirculation Sponsor Ballot on D11.0 Comment resolution on any comments received on D11.0 Recirculation SB on D12.0 (if needed) or D11.0 (unchanged) November (Atlanta) meeting –Comment Resolution on any comments received on D12.0 (if required) –EC Approval to forward the draft to Revcom –Standards Board Continuous Process from slide 5/6 of r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 40 References from slide 6/6 of r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Okinawa Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 41 from slide 1/4 of r0 by David Hunter, WireFi Networks Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportSlide 42 Meeting Topics aa Draft D6.0 –Is in the second week of its first Sponsor Ballot –Sponsor Ballot 1 votes are due October 12, 2011 There were no discussions in the current meeting. Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 42 from slide 2/4 of r0 by David Hunter, WireFi Networks Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportSlide 43 Teleconferences (reminder from July 2011 meeting) October 24, 27 and ; November Hrs ET Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 43 from slide 3/4 of r0 by David Hunter, WireFi Networks Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportSlide 44 Plans In the teleconferences and at the November 2011 meeting: –Work on resolutions of comments from SB 1 –Complete resolutions and begin another SB Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 44 from slide 4/4 of r0 by David Hunter, WireFi Networks Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 45 TGac September 2011 Closing Report Date: Authors: from slide 1/5 of r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 46 Abstract This document is the closing report for the TGac for the September 2011 session. from slide 2/5 of r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Work Completed Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 47 Continue to resolve LB 178 comments –590 technical comments are resolved –350 technical comments are remaining to be resolved Resolved comments related to GCMP. Plan an Ad Hoc meeting in San Jose, California on November 2-4, to speedup the resolution of comments. Agenda is available at: 00ac-september-2011-tgac-meeting-agenda.ppt 00ac-september-2011-tgac-meeting-agenda.ppt from slide 3/5 of r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 48 November 2011 Goals Complete resolutions of LB 178 comments on D1.0. Prepare draft D2.0 and start WG Letter Ballot from slide 4/5 of r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 49 Conference Call Times Previously Approved –September 29, October 13 20:00 – 22:00 ET –October 6 10:00 – 12:00 Oct 27, Nov 17, Dec 8 –20:00 – 22:00 ET Oct 20, Nov 3, Dec 1, Dec 15 –10:00-12:00 ET from slide 5/5 of r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report TGad September 2011 Closing Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 50 Date: Authors: from slide 1/5 of r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Abstract This document is the closing report for TGad for the September 2011 session. Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 51 from slide 2/5 of r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Work Completed Resolved all comments on LB 183 this week TG and WG approved motion for recirculation letter ballot on D5.0 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 52 from slide 3/5 of r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Goals for November 2011 Comment resolution on D5.0 Conditional approval for Sponsor Ballot Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 53 from slide 4/5 of r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Conference call times Previously approved conference calls –Aug 25, Sept 8, Sept 29, Oct 13 10:00 – 12:00 ET –Aug 18, Sept 1, Sept 15, Oct 6, 20:00-22:00 ET New conference calls –Not overlap with TGac –Oct 27, Nov 17, Dec 8 10:00 – 12:00 ET –Oct 20, Nov 3, Dec 1, Dec 15 20:00-22:00 ET Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 54 from slide 5/5 of r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 55 TGae Closing Report – September 2011 Date: Authors: from slide 1/5 of r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 56 Abstract This document is the closing report for the TGae Task Group for the September 2011 session. from slide 2/5 of r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 57 Work Completed Comment Resolution for Initial Sponsor Ballot – resolutions.xlshttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/11/ ae-lb-180-comment- resolutions.xls –Approved resolutions to 103 comments – 109 remaining. Teleconferences: –Weekly teleconferences beginning on Wednesday Oct 5 at 11am ET for 1 hour, except Oct 19. from slide 3/5 of r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 58 TGae Timeline – September 2011 Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: September ‘10 Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: January ‘11 Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: May ’11 Mandatory Editorial Check: May ’11 Initial Sponsor Ballot: Aug ’11 Sponsor Ballot Recirculation: Oct ‘11 Final WG/EC Approval: Mar ‘12 RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June ‘12 from slide 4/5 of r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 59 November 2011 Goals Resolve comments from latest Sponsor ballot Prepare for recirculation Sponsor ballot from slide 5/5 of r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 60 TGaf San Francisco Closing Report Date: Authors: from slide 1/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 61 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the eleventh face-to-face meeting of IEEE TGaf taking place the week of September 19, 2011 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Okinawa. from slide 2/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Agenda Approve meeting, ad hoc and teleconference minutes Approve the LB171 comment spreadsheet in /277r17 Approve draft P802.11af D1.03 as the working draft Approve agreed to comment resolution submissions Review of the progress since July Comment resolution PHY planning Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 62 from slide 3/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report TGaf Accomplishments Approved document >>11-11/1111r11<< Resolved 242 comments –902 of 1302 comments have Approved resolutions Met with TGac PHY experts to discuss how TGaf can proceed prior to approval of the TGac draft – decided to create separate clause for TGaf PHY Revised the P802.11af timeline Planned for November meeting, and weekly teleconferences –Tuesdays at 21:00 ET Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 63 from slide 4/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Plans for September Complete comment resolution Prepare draft 2.0 and ask the WG to begin our second Letter Ballot Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 64 from slide 5/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 65 TGaf Timeline – Updated September 2011 New Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: January 2011 Second Working Group Letter Ballot: November 2011 Recirculation Letter Ballot: March 2012 Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: June 2012 Initial Sponsor Ballot: September 2012 Recirculate Sponsor Ballot: November 2012 Final WG/EC Approval: March 2013 RevCom/Standards Board Approval: March 2013 from slide 6/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Teleconferences Weekly on Tuesdays: Time: 21:00 ET for 120 minutes Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 66 from slide 7/7 of r1 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 67 IEEE ah Closing Report for July 2011 Date: Authors: from slide 1/5 of r0 by David Halasz, OakTree Wireless Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Activity in TGah Initial specification framework document adopted! – ah-specification-framework-for-tgah.docx ah-specification-framework-for-tgah.docx –Contains some text on Bandwidth, channelization and spatial multiplexing Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 68 from slide 2/5 of r0 by David Halasz, OakTree Wireless Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Going forward Update Specification Framework document, providing details on functional blocks Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 69 from slide 3/5 of r0 by David Halasz, OakTree Wireless Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Teleconferences October 10 th at noon ET 1.5 hours October 31 st at 10 AM ET 1.5 hours Desire to have rolling time of noon, 10 AM and 7 PM Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 70 from slide 4/5 of r0 by David Halasz, OakTree Wireless Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Timeline No update, see 11/285 for details –Internal Task Group Ballot : July 2012 –Initial Letter Ballot : November 2012 –Initial Sponsor Ballot : November 2013 –EC Approval : September 2014 –Revcom Approval : November 2014 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 71 from slide 5/5 of r0 by David Halasz, OakTree Wireless Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 72 IEEE TGai Closing Report Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone Hiroshi MANOROOT Inc.8F TOC2 Bldg Nishi- Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo JAPAN Marc EmmelmannFraunhofer FOKUS Kaiserin-Augusta-Alle Berlin Germany from slide 1/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 ReportAdrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 73 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the Okinawa meeting of the IEEE TGai. from slide 2/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Plan for this week Okinawa, Sep 2011 Official time slot –Monday PM2, EVE (Tutorial) –Tuesday AM2, PM2 –Wednesday AM1 –Thursday AM1,PM2 Goals for the Meeting: –Review and Approve the San Francisco and Teleconference meeting minutes –Presentation of submissions Submission of Initial technical contributions General submissions –TIME line of task group –Plan for November conference Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 74 from slide 3/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Accomplishments TGai 1/3 Reviewed and Approved the Singapore and Teleconference meeting minutes Approved TGai evaluation methodology document –July 2011 San Francisco session minutes, 11/ ai-july-2011-san-francisco-session-minutes.doc –Aug to Sep Teleconference minutes 11/ ai-aug-sep-teleconference-minutes.doc Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 75 from slide 4/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Accomplishments TGai 2/3 Technical contribution – r2 TGai Upper Layer Setup Proposal / Hitoshi Morioka (Root,.INc) – r0 Upper Layer Data IE / Hiroki Nakano (TNT) –11/ r1 Providing IP address config param to the STA during auth /Gabor Bajko (Nokia) –11-11/1047r3 Using Upper Layer Message IE in Tgai /Ping Fang, Zhiming, Ding, Phillip Barber (Huawei) – r0 FILS association / JH Lee (LG) General submissions – /r1 Active-Scanning-Improvement.pptx / Marc Emmelmann (Fokus) – /r1 Passive-Scanning-Improvements.pptx / Marc Emmelmann (Fokus) – r2 Optimized Network Selection / Gabor Bajok (Nokia) – /r0 IP over Congested WLAN / Masatak Ohta (Tokyo Institute of Technology) 11-11/1160/r2 Fast Re-authentication / George Cherian (Qualcomm Inc.) –Security Topics / Robert Moskoviz (Verizon business) –11/ ai-ip-config-during-assoc-norm.docx / Gabor Bajko (Nokia) – ai-security-discussions / Robert Moskowitz (Verizon business) – a-Early Key Generation by ECDH and PKC /Hiroki Nakano (TNT) Sep 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 76 from slide 5/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Accomplishments TGai 3/3 Editors Report –11-11/1278r0 Editors_Report /Tom Siep (CSR) Approved Weekly Teleconference schedule Approved Joint session with REG-SC in Atlanta Approved Time Line Approved Plan for November Sep 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 77 from slide 6/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Monday Tutorial Standardization activities in Japan (15.4 & 11ai) Session ai (FILS) topics 19:30-21:30 –2a. 11ai over view (PAR, Scope and current status) Hiroshi Mano (Root,Inc.) –2b. Prospected Use case reference 11-11/1154r Tom Siep (CSR) –2c. Basic technical ideas Marc Emmelmann (Fokus) –2d. Security requirements to IEEE802.11ai Paul Lambert (Marvel) Sep 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 78 from slide 7/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Time line of TGai PAR Approved, Modified, or Extended –Close of initial submissions for creating draft 0.1Jan 12 –WG Letter Ballots Initial / RecircMay 12 / Sep 12 –Form Sponsor Ballot Pool / Reform Mar 13 –MEC DoneMar 3 –IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballots Initial / Recirc May13/ Sep 13 –Final WG Approval Mar 14 –final or Conditional 802 EC Approval Mar 14 –RevCom & Standards Board Final or Continuous Process Approval May 14 –ANSI ApprovedN/A Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 79 from slide 8/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Teleconference Schedule Motion: –Approve the following schedule of weekly teleconferences. – Tuesdays 10:00 EST (NY Time) continue from 4 th Oct. –Duration 1Hour –Using WEB-EX that will be provided by Task Group Chair Moved: Tom Siep (CSR), Seconded:Lee Armstrong (US DoT) Result: Sep 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 80 from slide 9/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Plan for November –Goal Approve minutes of Okinawa and teleconference. Submission of technical contribution General submission Time Line Plan for January Sep 2011 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 81 from slide 10/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Motion for joint session with REG SC in Atlanta Motion –Move the TGai Chair to request a joint session with IEEE REG SC in November to discuss regulatory issues involved in enabling active scanning in DFS bands in 5GHz. Moved:Marc Emmelmann Seconded:Lee Armstrong Yes:12No:0Abstain: 10 Sep 2011 Slide 82 from slide 11/12 of r0 Sept 2011
doc.: IEEE /1342r0 Report Thanks to all who participated! Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 83 from slide 12/12 of r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) Sept 2011