1 Jim Thomas - LBL New Pad Plane Design Proposal & Specifications Jim Thomas, John Hammond, Bob Scheetz, Jon Wirth, etc., etc., and a cast of thousands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BELLWORK SINGLE POINT PERSPECTIVE
Advertisements

Access BDD Survey School
Muon EDR: Chamber design M2/3 R1/2 16/04/20031T.Schneider/LHCb Muon EDR 1.General description - AW read out -Cathode pad read out -HV supply 2.Details.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL A Brief Introduction to the STAR Time Projection Chamber Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory June 4 th, 2009.
Pattern Layout, Pinning & Cutting
TPC Proposal for the 35 Ton Liquid Argon Test Abstract We propose to equip the 35 ton cryostat with one APA and two CPA’s, and all the necessary equipment.
1 Potential Hardware Improvements, Related R&D Wieman RNC LBNL TPC Review Friday 6 October 2006.
Technological Systems Unit 1 ~ How They Work Lesson 1 ~ Exploring Technological Systems Technical Sketching.
D. Peterson, “Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program” TPC R&D Mini Workshop, Orsay 12-January Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program: first events with.
Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Installation. Indoor Unit Installation Typical Installation.
STATUS OF THE CRESCENT FLEX- TAPES FOR THE ATLAS PIXEL DISKS G. Sidiropoulos 1.
O Ring Groove (1) Bolt holes for fastening strongback to TPC wheel (26) SHV feedthroughs to feed HV wires to ABDB on side ports, all connectors are vacuum.
T. Horn, SHMS Optics Update SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009.
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
SOLIDWORKS: Lesson III – Patterns & Mirrors
HFT & PXL geometry F.Videbæk Brookhaven National Laboratory 13/9/12.
DIMENSIONING Why do we need to dimension drawings?
Part and Drawing Dimensioning
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
Using the Alphabet of lines. Drawing should be near bottom left corner. The front view shows how wide and how tall the object is.
Apex Target Marco Oriunno, April 23, Design and fabrication by: Marco Oriunno, Dieter Walz, Jim McDonald, Clive Field, Douglas Higginbotham, and.
1 E906 Pre-Amplifier Card 2009/10/07. 2 E906 Wire Chambers Station1 MWPC: –build a new E906 MWPC. –4500 channels in total. Station2 DC: –recycle old E866.
Malte HildebrandtDC Status Report, Dear MEG Committee,PSI, April 14 th 2009 this is the first report concerning the drift chamber status as.
JT: 1 The Berkeley Lab STAR TPC Distortions in the Transverse Plane: An Update Jim Thomas.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL The Mechanical Integration Challenge for New Tracking Detectors in STAR Jim Thomas 07/10/2006.
News on PANDA ToF from ITEP (new mechanic design for DRPC based system) ITEP Russia-Panda meeting — April 26-28, 2010, ITEP(Moscow) Alexander Akindinov.
ATLAS Calorimeter Argon Gap Convection Test Bed Brian Cuerden 24 Apr
David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.
HV connection for a Common GEM foil design Aiwu Zhang
Working with Objects. Objectives Create an object Transform an object Arrange and lock an object Step and repeat an object Use Live Distribute Use the.
One Point Perspective Design and Technology. One Point Perspective Task 3 Here are some high quality examples of what we are aiming to produce by the.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Calorimeter defines the inner-R edge of large- angle acceptance  The proposal assumed a 2.5 degree polar angle gap.
11 SSD Power and Cooling on the Cone STAR Integration Workshop Howard Matis May 16, 2008 STAR Integration Workshop Howard Matis May 16, 2008.
Chapter 4 Working with Frames. Align and distribute objects on a page Stack and layer objects Work with graphics frames Work with text frames Chapter.
ATLAS Calorimeter Argon Gap Convection Test Bed April 25,
Design Studies 20 ‘Show Off’ Project How to make a computer monitor In Google Sketchup By: Liam Jack.
LNF activities on WPC Panels Construction of prototypes and layout Status of tooling Proto 0, open items, plan,...
Technological Design Basic Dimensioning with AutoCAD How to annotate simple drawings for use in constructing an object.
TPC ExB distortion at LHC-ALICE experiment Yasuto Hori for the ALICE-TPC collaboration Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo 1.
Explanatory notes added to a drawing.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL A proposal to close the Grid Leak “it will never die” Yuri Fysiak, Jim Thomas & Gene VanBuren Eric Anderssen, Howard Wieman & Jon Wirth.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL Changes to the Inner Sector Strongback to accommodate a wall between the inner and outer sectors (and a 2 nd wall at the innermost edge.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL iTPC Soldering Notes Alexei Lebedev & Jon Wirth with additional notes by Qinghua Xu, Eric Anderssen and Jim Thomas 10/28/2015.
Large Curves Using Straight Track
1 Jim Thomas - LBL Sector Tools – a conversation with Jon Wirth and Eric Anderssen August 28 th, 2015.
G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Progress Tracker Mechanical Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Station Layout Light Guide Map Connectors Patch.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL Inner Sector Upgrade for the TPC Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory UCLA Upgrades Workshop December 14 rd, 2011.
R. Bradford 10 December, 2014 Sensor Details. Explanation Submitted some designs that will be included on the Novati/Tezzaron submission. Designs based.
Adobe InDesign CS5 – Illustrated Unit C: Working with Objects.
Sectional Elevations.  Used to show the insides of an object by drawing it as if it had been chopped.  Will appear in the General and Credit exams.
Perspective Drawings Linear perspective is a geometric method of representing the apparent diminishing of scale as the distance from object to viewer increases.
Redesign of LumiCal mechanical structure W.Daniluk, E.Kielar, J.Kotula, K.Oliwa, Wojciech Wierba, L.Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow,
Baby Mind C OIL DESIGN AND ASSEMBLY SCENARIOS Helder Silva Phillipe Benoit Alexey Dudarev Gabriela Rolando Herman ten Kate Etam Messomo Laurent Nicola.
Telecommunications JBCardenas © 1982 Com3 4Q1516 Antenna Design JBC © 198 v A2,2 Key design requirements 1.Undertake the theoretical computations of shapes.
Electrostatic FEA of the Ground Plane Features Bo Yu Sept. 14, 2015.
Rapid Change Technology The following is a presentation to aid Technicians in the replacement of the Rapid Change Technology Block.
Value Engineering proposal: Putting APA’s on outside or put short drift cell on outside April 21, 2014, Post meeting rev. April 25, 2014 Russ Rucinski.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
Mounting TPCs in SVX Dock During Phase II Tomorrow I will meet with a company engineer to update the BEAST TPC vessel design. I've attached some slides.
Two views Here are two views of the same shape made up of coloured cubes. How many cubes are there in the shape? What’s the minimum number? Maximum number?
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module
Chamber Design and Integration RE3/1 and RE4/1
MWPC prototyping and testing of STAR inner TPC upgrade
TPC Paul Colas Technical meeting, Lyon.
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
Print Reading.
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
RE3/1 & RE4/1 Parameter Space Services
Presentation transcript:

1 Jim Thomas - LBL New Pad Plane Design Proposal & Specifications Jim Thomas, John Hammond, Bob Scheetz, Jon Wirth, etc., etc., and a cast of thousands May 1 st, 2015

2 Jim Thomas - LBL Wire & Pad location 40 pad rows with 5 mm x 16 mm pads (center to center spacing) –A large number of simulations suggest that this is a good plan Where do we put the first (or last) pad row? –Anode wire location.vs. Pad row location is important pad response function, phase lock, etc. –Anode wire location.vs. Ground Shield location is important Limit sparking to pad plane by ensuring short path to Ground shield –Absolute location of pad rows on pad plane is not important The preferred location for the first (or last) pad row is largely determined by how we want to handle the Grid Leak problem

3 Jim Thomas - LBL Proposal: Build the new pad planes with a total of 3 “fat” wires on the top and 3 “fat” wires on the bottom of the anode grid Move the pad rows down 14 mm to accommodate the extra “fat” wires This will require changes to the padplane and strongback Simulations required to optimize the configuration A Proposal The current STAR anode wire planes have one “fat” wire on each end to provide low gain near the ends of the grids We can replace one (or more) of the “thin” anode wires with “fat” wires to extend the region with low gain and reduce the “grid leak” –This substitution can be done when the wire planes are on the granite tables at Shandong University … no advance-planning required Extra “fat” wires will force the centerline of the pad rows to move away from their original (old) locations by 14 mm –To keep an ideal pad response function, the pads must remain directly under a group of 4 anode wires and have 2 anode wires on either side of the pad

4 Jim Thomas - LBL Proposed Changes to Inner Sector Design Increase the size of the inner sector pads Add more pad rows, lower voltage on inner anodes Add more low gain wires on ends of anode grid (Old) Gated Grid = -115 V Ground Shield = 0 V Pad Plane = 0 V Anode Wires = V (outer) 1.6 cm Gap (2.0 cm at anodes) Anode Wires = V (inner) (New)

5 Jim Thomas - LBL 40 Pad Rows fit perfectly with the existing grid (Old) Identical pad response function on both ends of grid No need to change grid; wire locations remain the same! No need to add more ABDB or wire mount channels (good!) Anode wires spaced 4 mm apart (horizontally), Ground Shield and Gated grids spaced 1 mm apart

6 Jim Thomas - LBL Pad Location & Tracking Performance Extra “fat” (low gain) wires change the location of the pad rows Tracking over the inner/outer sector gap is not a problem –It will work better than ever … 40 Pad rows on inner sectors compared to 13 in original design Pad Row 40 (closest to the gap): centerline for the row has moved down 14 mm compared to original STAR design –Top edge of pad row 40 has moved away from an area of high distortion –Top edge has moved 12 mm away from gap when comparing old.vs. new centers move 14 mm but top edge moves 12 mm due to different length of pads Anode wires spaced 4 mm apart (horizontally), Ground Shield and Gated grid wires spaced 1 mm apart

7 Jim Thomas - LBL Wires aligned with pads Note that Ground Shield and Gated Grid wires lie directly above the Anode wires –This helps to guide sparks & breakdown to the Ground Shield wires and not to the pad plane Anode wires phase locked in groups of 4 with pad rows to ensure every pad row has the same pad response function

8 Jim Thomas - LBL Wire locations near the gap will not change The location of the wires near the inner/outer gap cannot change –Position and total number of wires on each plane remains the same Because … it is not possible to add more wires –The full extent of the side mounted wire mounts are already used

9 Jim Thomas - LBL New Pad Plane design and layout A corner of the new inner pad plane layout by John Hammond & Bob Scheetz Row 40 Row 39

10 Jim Thomas - LBL Location of Wires and Pads Radius (Y) Description 0.00Center of STAR Detector (vtx) Bottom of Full size PC Board Tertiary Fiducial L & R Strongback Bottom Edge Gated Grid Wire Gated Grid Wire Anode Wire 1 & GG W Anode Wire 2 & GG W Anode Wire 3 & GG W Secondary Fiducial Anode Wire 4 & GG W Anode Wire 5 & GG W Pad Row 1 - Center Pad Row 2 - Center Pad Row 39 - Center Primary Fiducial Pad Row 40 - Center Anode Wire 166 & GG W Anode Wire 167 & GG W Anode Wire 168 & GG W Anode Wire 169 & GG W Alternate Primary Fiducial Anode Wire 170 & GG W Gated Grid Wire Gated Grid Wire Strongback Top Edge Tertiary Fiducial L & R Top of Full size PC Board Repeat pad rows every 16 mm Wire Locations are the same as before except for the replacement of 6 thin anode wires with larger diameter anode wires (0.020 mm  mm) References: LBL Drawings 24A055, 24A373, 24A374

11 Jim Thomas - LBL Grounding the last anode wire Gene VanBuren has proposed that we ground one or more of the fat wires at the end of the anode grid to close off the “grid leak” This is an excellent proposal which needs simulations to confirm its intuitive cleverness Technically, this should be easy to do BUT it does involve putting a HV wire (+1120 Volts) next to a ground wire. The problems lies at the epoxy joint on either side of the grid and potentially on the ABDB board. Special epoxy handling procedures may be required.

12 Jim Thomas - LBL More than one way to close the “Grid Leak” Add extra “fat” wires –Lower the gain near the edge of the grid (gain  1/wire radius) –No changes to strongback required Add a “wall” near the gap between the inner and outer sectors –The wall should be grounded in order to terminate field lines from the anode wires … (wall requires a change to the strongback) –The wall could be taller than shown and could have multiple potentials on several conductor stripes –Simulations needed to determine the best strategy

13 Jim Thomas - LBL Summary – Make as few changes as possible PadPlane –40 pad rows, 5 mm x 16 mm pads (center to center spacing), full coverage –Move pad row centerline away from the inner/outer gap by 14 mm –Add “wall” on either end of padplane to help terminate the grid leak –Add additional fiducial marks, alignment holes and improve air paths Wires –Exactly the same as before: same wire count, same composition, same diameters, same tension, same locations, same ABDB board design, etc. –Substitute 3 “fat” wires for 3 “thin” wires on each end of the Anode grids Strongback is 99% the same as before –Do not thin the front face. Do not reduce the height of the ribs. –Do not move the spider mounts or optical target mounts –Re-use the existing cooling manifolds –Re-use the existing hole pattern in the front face (perhaps tiny adjustments) Changes to the strongback –Mill out a step on either end of the strongback for mounting Grid Leak walls –Counter-bore put in several places on ribs for new optical survey markers

14 Jim Thomas - LBL Backup Slides

15 Jim Thomas - LBL Possible changes at low radius to avoid grid leak We might wish to consider adding more wires to the grid at low radius –There is a grid leak at low radius as well as near the gap between the inner and outer sectors. We could add up to 7 GG wires and/or 2 anode wires. –We plan to put more “fat” wires on the low radius end of the pad plane, anyway … but do we need the wires to run all the way to the end of the frame? –This would mean many changes: e.g. extra channels for ABDB boards, side wire mounts, etc. It may not be worth it. Very little space for extra boards/channels. –We could also consider putting a grounded “wall” at low radius in a style that is similar to be done at the gap between the inner and outer sectors Simulations required … no change proposed until simulations prove need

16 Jim Thomas - LBL The Alice Solution to Grid Leak Multiple thick anode wires near the boundaries of the sectors A wall – to terminate the field lines from the Anode wires with ground potential and “cover” potential (match field gradient)

17 Jim Thomas - LBL TPC Outer Sector Detail Gating Grid Ground Plane of Wires Anodes –No field shaping wires Simple and reliable –Individually terminated anode wires limit cross-talk –Low gain Inner Sector gain: 3000 at 1150 volts Outer Sector gain: 1100 at 1380 volts Pad Plane Grids stop here, last anode is larger diameter wire Outer sector Inner sector Gating grid = -127 V Ground plane = 0 V 1.2 cm gap

18 Jim Thomas - LBL Detail: The Original Inner and Outer Sectors

19 Jim Thomas - LBL The Original Pad Plane design & layout