In re Phoseon Technology Inc., 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1822 (TTAB 2012) 1 Failure To Function As Mark SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prosecution Lunch October Trademark Bullies? USPTO is requesting feedback from U.S. trademark owners, practitioners, and others regarding their.
Advertisements

Trademark Group Luncheon March, TM Announcements New version of TBMP due online by end of March Eliminating step of furnishing printed copy of published.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates November, 2011.
October 2007KSR Training1 TC 3700 KSR Sample Rejection.
Section 5 of the FTC Act “Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are.
1 Rule 132 Declarations and Unexpected Results Richard E. Schafer Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
Trademark Update January 16, Applicant Must Pay PTO Fees District court review of an ex parte appeal decision by the TTAB Section 1071 (b)(3) –In.
1/03/09 De 89 à 98. 1/03/09 De 89 à 98 1/03/09 De 89 à 98.
Obviousness and Predictability Chief Judge Gerard Rogers, TTAB.
Copyright © 2010 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Lessons from the Beverage Alcohol Trademark Wars Andrew Reibman.
Prosecution Group Luncheon July 2012 Trademarks. Failure To Function, the next rejection? MONTICELLO YELLOW In re Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc., Serial.
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition Trade Dress June 30, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
N. A word, phrase, logo, or other graphic symbol used by a manufacturer or seller to distinguish its product or products from those of others. Referent.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks April, 2011.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 14, 2004 Trade Dress - Part 2.
Trademarks: Administrative Issues Intro to IP – Prof Merges
ARE THE U.S. PATENT PRIORITY RULES REALLY NECESSARY? Mark A. Lemley Colleen V. Chien Hastings Law Journal July, Hastings L.J
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 7, 2004 Bars to Registration.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Registrability of Performer Names Neil Henderson Partner Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Trademark Priority + TM Office Procedures/Incontestability Intro to IP – Prof Merges [Originally scheduled for 3.13 and ]
© 2013 Kilpatrick Townsend Presented to Selected Topics in Trademark Law William Bryner Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Judge Lorelei D. Ritchie, USPTO David W. Grace, Loeb & Loeb LLP Candice E. Kim, Greenberg Traurig LLP Betsy Rosenblatt, Whittier Law School.
Non-Traditional Marks
1 ANTICIPATION BY INHERENCY IN PRIOR ART James O. Wilson Supervisory Patent Examiner Technology Center 1600 USPTO (571)
Copyright © 2013 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Ethical Considerations In Trademark Practice Frank L. Politano Partner, Newark September 10, 2013.
Trademark and Copyright Updates July USPTO TMEP Update July 2015 TBMP Update July 2015 Final rule relating to Changes in Requirements for Collective.
Patent Prosecution Luncheon March White House Patent Reform: Executive Actions Draft rule to ensure patent owners accurately record and regularly.
Examination Procedures for §2(a)/§2(e)(3) Deceptiveness Refusals for Geographic Marks Examination Guide 02-09: Examples and Illustrations Presented by:
Routine Optimization Jean Witz, tQAS, TC
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to.
Prosecution Group Luncheon November, Prioritized Examination—37 CFR “No fault” special status under 1.102(e) Request made with filing of nonprovisional.
19/19/07132 Declarations 37 CFR § Practice GENERAL INTRODUCTION.
Prosecution Group Luncheon January Nice Agreement 10 th ed. Version 2013 developed to classify, most entries are not sufficiently definite to use.
Trademarks I Introduction to Trademarks Class Notes: March 26, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
1 Edom Labs., Inc. v. Lichter, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1434 (TTAB 2012)
Prosecution Lunch September Trademark Public Advisory Mtg. Concerns about unauthorized practice of law by document mgmt services and others eFiling-
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon August 21, USPTO – Enhanced Assignment Filing New Conveyance Types –Entity conversion –Merger and change of name.
Trademark Year in Review (2004): Overview of Litigation and Legislative Developments Boston Bar Association January 20, 2005 Julia Huston, Esq. (617)
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon March Are You A Canadian John Doe? February 2014, Federal Court of Canada ordered an ISP to release the names and.
Prosecution Luncheon November 2014 (No December luncheon)
Prosecution Group Luncheon May, General Announcements Version 3 of TBMP now available online; copies in the print rooms USPTO submits “Trademark.
1 Examination Guidelines Update: Developments in the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR v.Teleflex.
Vector Claims in Gene Therapy Applications: In vivo vs. In vitro Utilities Deborah Reynolds SPE GAU
Trademark May Pay the USPTO’s ATTORNEY FEES??? Ex parte appeal to D. Ct. for De Novo Review –must name the Director of the PTO as a defendant; and.
Prosecution Luncheon February 13, USPTO – TM Withdrawal Form may use form to request withdrawal. Removes info from the attorney and correspondence.
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition U.S. Prosecution, Part II June 25, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Inequitable Conduct: Update Mark Guetlich AIPLA Mid-Winter JP Practice Committee Orlando.
Trademarks II Establishment of Trademark Rights Class 20 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Trademark Law1  Oct. 9, 2006  Week 6 Finish Chapter 4 – Registration Start Chapter 5 - Loss of Trademark Rights  Read Pgs , , ;
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
(c) 2004, David Schnapf, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP 1 Examiner Use of Background Statements David Schnapf Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton.
Fall Trademark Law1  Sept. 11, 2006  Week 3  Chapter 3 - Acquisition of Trademark Rights Reading:  Pgs
Trademark Update June 13, No Likelihood of Confusion? TAMAYA is not confusingly similar to MAYA TTAB found dissimilarity based on: –3 syllables.
。 33 投资环境 3 开阔视野 提升竞争力 。 3 嘉峪关市概况 。 3 。 3 嘉峪关是一座新兴的工业旅游城市,因关得名,因企设市,是长城文化与丝路文化交 汇点,是全国唯一一座以长城关隘命名的城市。嘉峪关关城位于祁连山、黑山之间。 1965 年建市,下辖雄关区、镜铁区、长城区, 全市总面积 2935.
Reviewing Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. and other select 2012 trademark cases of interest Garrett Parks Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Presented to the Alaska.
A Survey of Nontraditional Trademarks in the United States Linda K. McLeod.
ΜΕΤΑΣΥΛΛΕΚΤΙΚΗ ΦΥΣΙΟΛΟΓΙΑ ΕΡΓΑΣΤΗΡΙΟ 3. Μετασυλλεκτική Εργ3-Λιοσάτου Γ.2 ΒΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΠΑΡΑΓΟΝΤΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΕΠΗΡΕΑΖΟΥΝ ΤΗ ΦΘΟΡΑ ΤΩΝ ΟΠΩΡΟΚΗΠΕΥΤΙΚΩΝ Αναπνοή Η λειτουργία.
Microbiology Market Contributes 5% to Overall In-Vitro Diagnostics Market
Prosecution Luncheon July 2016.
Processes Which Employ Non-Obvious Products
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
Noteworthy Developments at the TTAB
דיני חברות ד"ר ויקטור ח. בוגנים
Basics Semiconductors
Cooper & Dunham LLP Established 1887
اثرات گرمايش جهاني تغييرات آب و هوا، تأثيرات عميق و شديدي بر بسياري از عوامل اساسي موثر بر سلامت از جمله : آب، غذا، هوا و محيط زيست دارد كه اين مورد خود.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 4 – The Institution Decision
Secondary Liability for Trademark Infringement
Design Panel Speakers: Dan Altman (Knobbe Martens), Stefano Ferro (Bugnion), Anbar Khal (Oakley) Moderated by: Hans Mayer (Knobbe Martens) Washington.
Using Image Recognition Software for Searching Designs
Presentation transcript:

In re Phoseon Technology Inc., 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1822 (TTAB 2012) 1 Failure To Function As Mark SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX

 In re Compania de Licores Internacionales S.A., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1841 (TTAB 2012)  In re Premiere Distillery LLC, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1483 (TTAB 2012)  Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. Guantanamera Cigars Co., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1085 (TTAB 2012) 2 Section 2(e)(3) -- Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive

 Primary significance of mark is a generally known geographic place,  Goods do not come from that place,  Public would believe that goods come from that place, and  The misrepresentation would be a material factor in the consumer’s decision to purchase the goods. 3 In re Compania de Licores, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1841 (TTAB 2012) The Test Under Section 2(e)(3)

“PRODUCT OF USA” 4 Goods Do Not Originate in Cuba

5 Public Would Believe That Goods Come From That Place

Materiality Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. Guantanamera Cigars Co., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1085 (TTAB 2012)

Functionality In re Becton, Dickinson & Co., 675 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

TTAB post-Becton, Dickinson In re Hershey Chocolate and Confectionary Corporation, Serial No (June 28, 2012) [not precedential]

9 Refreshing, But Is It A Mark?

Ser Ser. No In re The Procter & Gamble Co., 105 U.S.P.Q.2d 1119 (TTAB Nov. 16, 2012) In re The Procter & Gamble Co., 105 U.S.P.Q.2d 1119 (TTAB Nov. 16, 2012)

 Seabrook Foods Inc. v. Bar-Well Foods, Ltd., 568 F.2d 1342, 196 U.S.P.Q. 289 (CCPA 1977)  Common shape?  Common in the field?  Mere refinement of existing design? 11 The Seabrook Test

12 Available Alternative Designs

13