Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan. 2011 1 Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Advertisements

Some D0 Meeting November 2003 Muon Isolation Studies Ken Johns University of Arizona.
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Slide 1 SMP-V: Report for Luminosity Calibration Study Jiyeon Han, Ping Tan Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Hwidong Yoo Stoyan Stoynev Ilya Kravchenko, Jamila Butt.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Experience with muons in analysis: W’ search Carmen Diez Pardos CIEMAT Madrid Muon Barrel Workshop Physics sesion 25/02/
Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Status of Muon Trigger Efficiency Measurement for ICHEP Benedikt Hegner, Benjamin Klein, Yvonne Küssel, Patricia Lobelle, Markus Marienfeld, Rahmat Rahmat,
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
Update ON the Study of Subjet Multiplicity at CMS 7TeV Manuk Zubin Mehta, Manjit Kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh 11/27/
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Low p T Muon trigger studies for J/       Supreet Pal Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. J.B.Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
EM resolutions from low to high energy Jan Stark, LPSC Grenoble CAT Force meeting, May 13 th, 2003.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
L1 Global Muon Trigger Simulation Status URL of this presentation:
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Muon reco. efficiency status: from J/psi to Z T&P Giovanni Petrucciani (UCSD)
Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
Eff. determination WANG Zheng Mar Feb.2008WANG Zheng2 The method  Eff. Determined from MC sample.  Eff. Determined from data. Object id/efficiency:
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Slide 1 Status Report. Slide 2 QCD and W+jets Background Estimation Using Fake Rate Method Norbert Neumeister, Hwidong Yoo Purdue University EXO non-hadronic.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Top physics during ATLAS commissioning
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
analisys: Systematics checks
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
10 TeV BJ/K at CMS Zheng Wang Apr
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
Run and Luminosity dependence of p17 NN b-tag
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven method and Muon trigger efficiencies with Tag & Probe

Plan of talk India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan RPC trigger efficiencies with Data Driven method.  Analysis features  Brief description of method  Some efficiency plots  Summary Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe method  Analysis features  Brief description of Tag & Probe method  Selection cuts for Tag & Probe  Trigger Efficiencies plots  Summary

A Data Driven trigger performance evaluation method India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan GMT algorithm keeps trace of the muon sub-system which provided the candidates measurement(s) Such feature can be exploited for evaluating in a data- driven fashion the trigger performance of each muon sub- system By considering the trigger candidates provided by a given sub-detector using its complementary one as reference. Motivation Such method is relevant in cross section calculation scenarios, for trigger efficiency evaluation unbiased by MC guesses

Analysis Features India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan CMSSW version : 3_8_4_patch4 MC sample /WToMuNu_TuneZ2_7TeV-pythia6/Fall10-START38_V12-v1/GEN-SIM-RAW Data Sample /Mu/Run2010B-WZMu-v2/RAW-RECO Results of the Data driven efficiencies for RPC trigger system with MC sample and real data were compared.

India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Three types of efficiencies curves for the DT and RPC trigger system : For data driven efficiency with MC and real data – all the events with GMT candidates provided by the DT’s in barrel – amongst these, the number of events with candidates provided also by RPC is counted up. For Data Reco efficiency – all the L2 muons – amongst these the number of events with Candidates provided by RPC is counted up.

Some plots of RPC trigger system efficiency with eta cuts only India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan |eta|<0.2, 0.33<|eta|<0.56, 0.76<|eta|<0.97 for negative muonsfor positive muons

India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan for negative muonsfor positive muons Phi binning = 10 degree

India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan for negative muonsfor positive muons Pt binning = 10 GeV/c

Applied the different sets of phi cuts for positive and negative muons to rule out the geometric cracks along different sectors in phi India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan for negative muonsfor positive muons

India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan for negative muons for positive muons

India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan for negative muons for positive muons

Summary India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Efficiencies before applying phi cuts : Efficiency after applying phi cuts : Phi cuts improve the matching between the curves for MC and real data as well as the efficiencies. RPC Trigger efficiency curves after cuts show flat behaviour with respect to transverse momentum except low momentum. Data driven efficiency with MC Data driven eff with real data Eff with reco muons for real data For positive muons  0.06%83.95  0.63%84.32  0.61% For negative muons  0.08%83.01  0.74%83.57  0.72% Data driven efficiency with MC Data driven eff with real data Eff with reco muons for real data For positive muons  0.06%93.96  0.56%94.06  0.56% For negative muons  0.07%93.87  0.63%94.05  0.61%

Efficiencies of HLT_Mu9, HLT_Mu11 & HLT_Mu15 triggers with Tag & Probe India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan

Overview of Tag and Probe Method India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Tag and Probe method is a data- driven approach to estimate the efficiencies of the different processes which involves a particle reconstruction in a detector. Very tight selection criteria: Tag Paired with tag to fulfill resonance mass window: probe (loose selection criteria) ε = Npass/ Npass + Nfail

Analysis Features : India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan CMSSW version used : 3_8_4 MC sample used : /DYToMuMu_M-20_CT10_TuneZ2_7TeV-powheg-pythia/Fall10- START38_V12-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO Data sample used : 1) /Mu/Run2010A-WZMu-Sep17Skim_v1/RAW-RECO 2) /Mu/Run2010B-PromptReco-v2/RECO

Selection criteria on Tag & Probe India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Cuts on Tag : 1) Pt >20 GeV 2) |eta| < 2.1 3) Passing VBTF cuts (no isolation) Cuts on Probe : 1) Pt > 20 GeV 2) |eta| < 2.1 3) Passing VBTF cuts (no isolation) HLT_Mu9 – unprescaled upto run HLT_Mu11- unprescaled upto run HLT_Mu15_v1- unprescaled for all run range used in the present study

Efficiency of HLT_Mu9 wrt eta for all Pt range India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan

Efficiency of HLT_Mu9 wrt Pt for all Eta range India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan

Efficiency of HLT_Mu11 wrt eta for all Pt range India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan

Efficiency of HLT_Mu11 wrt Pt for all Eta range India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan

Efficiency of HLT_Mu15_v1 wrt eta for all Pt range India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan For real data

Efficiency of HLT_Mu15_v1 wrt Pt for all Eta range India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan For real data

Summary India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Efficiencies are summarized as : Significant matching between data and MC efficiency curves. There is a drop in efficiency for the eta region 1.05<|eta|<1.2 which is the overlap region. Drop in efficiency is more prominent for HLT_Mu9 (~70%) for both positive and negative eta regions where as for other two triggers a prominent drop is there for negative overlap region but not for positive overlap region. Trigger namesEfficiencies with MCEfficiencies with real data HLT_Mu ± 0.028%89.90 ± 0.50 % HLT_Mu ± 0.028%92.32 ± 0.31 % HLT_Mu15_v ± 0.20 %

Next Plans India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan RPC trigger efficiency work : Further optimize the eta and phi cuts for real data. Study of DT trigger system efficiency with data driven method. Muon trigger efficiency work : Study of efficiency drop in overlap region. Study of efficiency for |eta| region from 2.1 to 2.4. To calculate the trigger efficiency at L1 and HLT level separately with Tag & Probe.