Catia Grimani University of Urbino – INFN Florence Italy In collaboration with: M. Fabi, N. Finetti, M. Laurenza, M. Storini ECRS 2012 Moskow July 5th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Development of a Statistical Dynamic Radiation Belt Model Center for Space Radiations (CSR) UCL, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium S.
Advertisements

Radiation Environment in a Human Phantom aboard the International Space Station during the Minimum of 23-rd Solar Cycle Semkova J. 1, Koleva R. 1, Maltchev.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
An analysis of the 23 rd Solar Cycle’s High Speed Solar Wind Streams activity: sources of radiation hazards in Geospace Space Weather Effects on Humans:
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Temporal Variability of Gamma- Ray Lines from the X-Class Solar Flare of 2002 July 23 Albert Y. Shih 1,2, D. M. Smith 1, R. P. Lin 1,2, S. Krucker 1, R.
GCR Methods in Radiation Transport F.A. Cucinotta And M.Y. Kim NASA Johnson Space Center.
GEANT-4, Spenvis Users Meeting, 6-9 Nov, 2006 Interplanetary Proton Cumulative Fluence Model Update A.Glover 1,2, A. Hilgers 1,3, L. Rosenqvist 1,4, H.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
PHOEBUS* on LISA: A Proposal for Solar Physics on LISA INFN-SPAZIO/2 Riunione sulle prospettive della Fisica Astroparticellare nello spazio LNF, 16 Febbraio.
Adriana V. R. Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie COROT /11/2005.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
1 Introduction The TOP-modelPotential applicationsConclusion The Transient Observations-based Particle Model and its potential application in radiation.
Flare Thermal Energy Brian Dennis NASA GSFC Solar Physics Laboratory 12/6/20081Solar Cycle 24, Napa, 8-12 December 2008.
21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium Kosice September 11th 2008 Catia Grimani and Michele Fabi Urbino University and INFN Florence The potentialities of.
Characterization of the space environment at Mercury’ orbit P. Diego, M. Laurenza, M.Storini, and S. Massetti IAPS/INAF - Italy.
Decay Phase of Proton and Electron SEP Events E.I. Daibog 1, K. Kecskeméty 2, Yu.I. Logachev 1 1 Skobeltsyn Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State Univ.,
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Space Environment (Natural and Artificial) Probabilistic model of fluences and.
Spectral Properties of Heavy Ions Associated with Interplanetary Shocks at 1 AU SHINE 2004 Big Sky, Montana M. I. Desai University of Maryland, College.
M. Kim and F. Cucinotta Example Solar Proton Event Data NASA JSC August 30, 2006.
Long-term prediction of solar extreme events basing on the general regularities of energetic particle generation by the Sun by Rikho Nymmik Skobeltsyn.
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
ESP & Psychic Solar Flare Models
1 SEP “Campaign Events” for SHINE 2003 Question: Can we identify solar/interplanetary factors that drive SEP spectral and compositional variability at.
1 An Impulsive Heating Model for the Evolution of Coronal Loops Li Feng & Weiqun Gan Purple Mountain Observatory.
Composition and spectral properties of the 1 AU quiet- time suprathermal ion population during solar cycle23 M Al-Dayeh, M I Desai, J R Dwyer, H K Rassoul,
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Solar and Cosmic Ray Energetic Particle Models : Space Weather Aspects
Long Term Measurements of Solar Wind Fe Charge States Mark Popecki, A. Galvin, L. M. Kistler,H. Kucharek, E. Moebius, K. Simunac, P. Bochsler, L. M. Blush,
Production Readiness Review of L0/L1 sensors for DØ Run IIb R. Demina, August, 2003 Irradiation studies of L1 sensors for DØ 2b Regina Demina University.
Understanding SEP properties through Neutron Monitor data modeling Neutron Monitor Network: a tool for revealing the relativistic SEP properties Ground.
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
Composition and spectral properties of the quiet-time suprathermal ion population ACE Team meeting October 13-14, 2008 M Al-Dayeh 1, M I Desai 1, J R Dwyer.
TEMPORAL VISUALIZATION OF DATA FROM THE FRENCH SENTINEL NETWORK.
Approaches to forecasting radiation risk from Solar Energetic Particles Silvia Dalla (1), Mike Marsh (2) & Timo Laitinen (1) (1) University of Central.
TRAD, Tests & Radiations ESWW11-session 5, November 18, 2014 Processing of the ACE/SIS heavy ion data in the frame of the ESA ESHIEM project Athina Varotsou.
CRaTER TIM April 2005 Proj. Sci. Justin Kasper (MIT) Galactic Cosmic Rays and Solar Flares Justin Kasper (MIT) CRaTER Project Scientist LRO/CRaTER TIM.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
ESSEM Earth System Science and Environmental Management 17/11/ ESWW6-2 M. Messerotti, A. Marassi M. MESSEROTTI 1,2,3, A. MARASSI 1 1 INAF-Astronomical.
Drift Effects if the 22-year Solar Cycle of Cosmic Ray Modulation
Mid-term Periodicities of the LYRA data spectrum
Southwest Research Institute
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
Multispacecraft observation of solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment at different orbits Vasily S.
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, C. M. S. Cohen, R. A. Mewaldt,
Extreme solar particle events: what Is the worst case scenario?
A Physicist’s View of SOC Models
Modeling the SEP/ESP Event of December 13, 2006
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Relative abundances of quiet-time suprathermal ions at 1 AU
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
CRaTER-specific LRO Mission Duration Issues
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Alexander Mishev & Ilya Usoskin
  V1 and V2 Measurements of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Outer Heliosphere and the Heliosheath during Solar Cycle #23   W.R. Webber (The.
Phillip Hess Jie Zhang, Dusan Odstrcil
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Teacher name August phone: Enter text here.
Solar Energetic Particle Spectral Breaks
February 2007 Note: Source:.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Production Month Sun Hours K Monthly Kwh Tou Peak Value After Kwh
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Catia Grimani University of Urbino – INFN Florence Italy In collaboration with: M. Fabi, N. Finetti, M. Laurenza, M. Storini ECRS 2012 Moskow July 5th MeV/n

Outline LISA-PF GCR projections and SEP occurrence in 2015 SEP differential flux trend above 100 MeV/n Conclusions

LISA-PF inertial sensor and test mass V AC T1 V AC T2 VMVM C sen s1 C sen s2 V AC 100 kHz L L CpCp CpCp

2 silicon wafers of 1.4 x 1.05 cm 2 area placed 2 cm apart. Courtesy by A. Lobo

Predicted Sunspots in 2015: 59 5 and 95 percentile levels: 33 and 84 Solar modulation parameter expected variation: 350 MV/c MV/c Usoskin et al.,2005, 2011 LISA-PF data taking CG et al., CQG, 2012

GC et al., CQG, 2012 and references therein  MV/c – 800 MV/c

We consider here SEP events associated with a peak flux equal or larger than the minimum GCR background expected in Nymmik’s model (Nymmik, 1999 a,b) allows us to predict SEP occurrence (N SEPS ) in terms of both event fluence and peak fluxes on the basis of expected yearly SS (N SS ): N SEPS = N SS SEP fluence distribution is assumed to follow a power-law trend with an exponential decrease for large fluences.

The number of expected SEP events at the time of LISA-PF is: 1.1 min – 2.0 avg – 2.9 max with fluences above 10 6 protons/cm 2 > 30 MeV

 February 23rd 1956: N24W74  May 7th 1978: N23W72  September 29th 1989: S27W90  July 14th 2000: N22W07  April 15th 2001: S20W85  January 20th 2005: N14W61  December 13th and 14th 2006: S06W23 and S06W46

SEP Event February 23rd 1956 SEP Event December 13th and December 14th 2006 Adriani et al., 2011 Vashenyuk et al., 2007

(1) F(E)= A e -E/b Particles/[m 2 sr s GeV(/n)] (2) F(E)= A E -  Particles/[m 2 sr s GeV(/n)] (3) F(E)= A e -E/b E -  Particles/[m 2 sr s GeV(/n)] Ellison and Ramaty, 1985

SEP energy differential flux interpolation during the whole evolution of various intensity events above 100 MeV/n indicates (on average) that: the initial phase of SEP events is sometimes better represented by an exponential trend, however, in general, a power-law modulated by an exponential or power-laws and/or broken power-laws basically represent all phases of the events.