Comparisons between GERB and the Met Office NWP model Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading Sean Milton, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, Exeter Thanks to the GERB International Science Team
Sinergee project: GERB Model Harries et al. (2005) BAMS; Allan et al. (2005) JGR
Objectives Improve experience with satellite datasets including GERB Timely Model Evaluation –using geostationary data independent of the assimilation system Understanding of physical processes
ShortwaveLongwave Mean model bias: 2006 All-sky Clear-sky Allan et al. (2007) QJRMS
All-sky Clear-sky ShortwaveLongwave Marine stratocumulus Convective cloud Radiative biases in the Met Office global model Convective outflow Surface albedo
All-sky Clear-sky ShortwaveLongwave Mineral dust aerosol
Dust impact on longwave radiation Large perturbation to Met Office model OLR during summer over west Sahara –Consistent with high mineral dust aerosol optical depth (see also Haywood et al. 2005, JGR) –Used in planning of GERBILS Model minus GERB OLR: July 2006, UTC All-skyClear-skydust aerosol
CLEAR Model-GERB OLR difference time series 15 o W-5 o E, o N
Dust impact on longwave radiation Model minus GERB OLR: UTC All-skyClear-skydust aerosol June July 2006
19 June
21 June
Conclusions Model evaluation –Satellite data independent of assimilation system –Good feedback for modellers and satellite team –Identified biases relating to cloud and surface Mineral dust aerosol over Sahara –Monthly longwave radiative effect up to 50 Wm -2 –Large effect of single events (Slingo et al. 2006, GRL) –June : smaller dust events than previous years but detectable OLR bias
Marine Stratocumulus
Curious banding structure –Transition across model levels (see Lock et al. 2001, MWR) Cloud reflectivity bias –Model low-altitude stratiform clouds are too reflective
Cloud liquid water path Bias: model minus GERB; SSM/I; SEVIRI Albedo Liquid Water Path Cloud Reduction in model bias from June to July relates to cloud liquid water …but see also Horvath and Davies (2007) JGR
Convective cloud 5 th June 2006
Convective Decay Time-scale Unrealistically low levels of convective cloud On-off; common problem in models Simple fix…
Improved shortwave reflectivity
Increased convective cloud cover But is the physics any better? Future work: Comparisons with CloudSat