Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Changes to the Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin Hogan, Julien Delanoe and Nicola Pounder University of Reading Towards unified retrievals of clouds, precipitation and aerosols.
Advertisements

Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook University of Reading Lin Tian NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phil Brown Met Office Why it is important that ice particles.
Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan OConnor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview Enhanced.
Ewan OConnor, Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan and the Cloudnet team Cloudnet.
The time-dependent two-stream method for lidar and radar multiple scattering Robin Hogan (University of Reading) Alessandro Battaglia (University of Bonn)
Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook University of Reading, UK Alessandro Battaglia University of Leicester, UK Fast forward modelling of radar and lidar depolarization.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
1 All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Liquid water path from microwave radiometers.
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
1 CloudNet data comparison These slides demonstrate the suggested comparison strategy for CloudNet data, although they are applicable for other model -
Convection Initiative discussion points What info do parametrizations & 1.5-km forecasts need? –Initiation mechanism, time-resolved cell size & updraft.
Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan, Julien Delanoë, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Anthony Illingworth University of Reading Evaluating and improving the representation of clouds.
Robin Hogan & Julien Delanoe
Radar & lidar observations of clouds UWERN Cloud systems and Orography meeting Robin Hogan University of Reading, UK 1.Current and future Chilbolton capabilities.
Robin Hogan, Malcolm Brooks, Anthony Illingworth
Joint ECMWF-University meeting on interpreting data from spaceborne radar and lidar: AGENDA 09:30 Introduction University of Reading activities 09:35 Robin.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoë Nicola Pounder Chris Westbrook
Blind tests of radar/lidar retrievals: Assessment of errors in terms of radiative flux profiles Malcolm Brooks Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth David.
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Ewan OConnor Nicolas Gaussiat Malcolm Brooks University of Reading Cloudnet products available from Chilbolton.
Robin Hogan Department of Meteorology University of Reading Cloud and Climate Studies using the Chilbolton Observatory.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Use of ground-based radar and lidar to evaluate model clouds
Robin Hogan & Anthony Illingworth Department of Meteorology University of Reading UK Parameterizing ice cloud inhomogeneity and the overlap of inhomogeneities.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Anthony Illingworth Department of Meteorology, University of Reading UK PDFs of humidity and cloud water content from Raman lidar.
Integrated lidar backscatter: Quantifying the occurrence of supercooled water and specular reflection Robin Hogan and Anthony Illingworth Enhanced algorithm.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Anthony Illingworth Nicolas Gaussiat Malcolm Brooks Cloudnet Evaluating the clouds in European forecast models.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Cloudnet level 3 products.
Cloud Radar in Space: CloudSat While TRMM has been a successful precipitation radar, its dBZ minimum detectable signal does not allow views of light.
Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
P.A.R. PRINCIPLES. Why do we need a PAR? To enable an aircraft to land in bad weather or poor visibility.
Review of model/obs/products. Models Fluxes –ECMWF fluxes will added v soon (Openshaw) UKMO Global model data –In testing –Damian to provide more data.
EarthCARE: The next step forward in global measurements of clouds, aerosols, precipitation & radiation Robin Hogan ECMWF & University of Reading With input.
Rainfall Monitioring Using Dual-polarization Radars Alexander Ryzhkov National Severe Storms Laboratory / University of Oklahoma, USA.
ESA Explorer mission EarthCARE: Earth Clouds, Aerosols and Radiation Explorer Joint ESA/JAXA mission Launch 2016 Budget 700 MEuro.
1. The problem of mixed-phase clouds All models except DWD underestimate mid-level cloud –Some have separate “radiatively inactive” snow (ECMWF, DWD) –Met.
Work Package 2 – Overview of instrumentation, data gathering and calibration issues Lidar Calibration Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth and Robin Hogan.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
Bredbeck Workshop, 7 – 10 July 2003 Jörg Schulz Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn Harald Czekala RPG Radiometer.
Ewan O’Connor Anthony Illingworth Comparison of observed cloud properties at the AMF COPS site with NWP models.
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and.
The aim of FASTER (FAst-physics System TEstbed and Research) is to evaluate and improve the parameterizations of fast physics (involving clouds, precipitation,
AOSC 200 Lesson 5. Observing the Atmosphere There are several instruments that are used to measure the basic atmospheric variables/ Temperature – Thermometer.
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
Satellite and Radar Imagery
CARPE-DIEM 13/6/02, slide 1German Aerospace Center Microwaves and Radar Institute CARPE-DIEM Besprechung Helsinki, June 2004 Ewan.
A Combined Radar/Radiometer Retrieval for Precipitation IGARSS – Session 1.1 Vancouver, Canada 26 July, 2011 Christian Kummerow 1, S. Joseph Munchak 1,2.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Dominique Bouniol, CETP, France CloudNET: retrieving turbulence parameters from cloud.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Nicolas Gaussiat Damian Wilson, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, UK Dominique Bouniol, Alain.
Lidar+Radar ice cloud remote sensing within CLOUDNET. D.Donovan, G-J Zadelhof (KNMI) and the CLOUDNET team With outside contributions from… Z. Wang (NASA/GSFC)
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
METEOROLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION NETWORK OF IMD. Meteorological instrument Observer Meteorological Observation (In situ & Remote sensing)
1 The RadOn method and associated error analysis Delanoë J., Protat A., Bouniol D., Testud J. C entre d’étude des E nvironnements T errestre et P lanétaires.
Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Marion Mittermaier Ice water content from radar reflectivity factor and temperature.
Nicolas Gaussiat, Anthony Illingworth and Robin Hogan Beeskow, 12 Oct 2005 Liquid Water Path from radiometers and lidar.
RadOn : Retrieval of microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds from Doppler cloud radar observations J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP.
ARM Validation Data for Climate Models
Radar-lidar synergy for the retrieval of water cloud parameters
Presentation transcript:

Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Changes to the Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product

Overview of changes Melting layer identification using Doppler velocity –Previously used only model wet-bulb temperature –Melting bit in category_bits variable is now used Sensitivity and error variables –Notably Z_sensitivity and lwp_error Will work without rain gauge data –Uses radar for rain detection Microwave brightness temperatures if available –Enables LWP to be recalculated using better algorithm if required Lidar molecular scattering bit for visible lidars –Enables molecular to be used to estimate optical depth in some studies –Lidar beam divergence and field of view now held as variables Works with ARM data –Tested on SGP and NSA data so far Documentation! –

Melting layer identification Previously rain was often diagnosed as ice because the melting layer height was taken purely from the model wet-bulb temperature

Melting layer identification Look within 5ºC of T w =0ºC isotherm in model –Melting layer is where greatest divergence in radar Doppler velocity Z v Classification Divergence Melting ice

Radar sensitivity Z_sensitivity variable is estimated as a function of height –Includes range-squared law, mean gas attenuation and ground clutter –Used for iwc_sensitivity and to modify model cloud fraction Currently susceptible to erroneous Z values below the real radar sensitivity Z_sensitivity A day of Z values

1 year of CloudNet data PDF of dissipation rate for different types of cloud Note that aircraft measurements have lower limit of detectability of ~10 – 6 due to aircraft vibrations Previous range for cirrus found from aircraft Bouniol, Hogan and Illingworth (2004)