Kristen Ryding WA Department of Fish and Wildlife May 10, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 13, 2013 Comparison of methods for Chinook abundances using CWT Run Reconstruction, PSC Chinook Model, and FRAM Larrie La Voy--Northwest Region,
Advertisements

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife: Coded Wire Tag Recovery from Ocean Salmon Fisheries.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
The Coded-Wire Tag Program: Regional Overview
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Management Implications of ISAB Tagging Report # Council Meeting June 9, 2009 Whitefish, Montana.
Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.
WRIA 8 Plan Updates 3-Year Work Plan and 10-Year Start List WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council March 18, 2010.
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook Harvest.
U.S. Marine Fisheries Management Dr. Louis B. Daniel III Director N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries.
11 Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Project #: Aja DeCoteau, CRITFC Watershed Department Manager.
P4 Tagging Software and MRR Data Model Preview John Tenney, Nicole Tancreto and Craig White Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for.
Genetic Stock Identification/Parental Based Tagging for Pacific Salmon Molecular Genetics Laboratory (MGL) Pacific Biological Station.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
Modeling fisheries and stocks spatially for Pacific Northwest Chinook salmon Rishi Sharma, CRITFC Henry Yuen, USFWS Mark Maunder, IATTC.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 1 Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review Paul Lumley, Yakama, CRITFC Executive Director Northwest Hydroelectric.
MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
CWTs and the Chinook Fishery Regulation Assessment Model (FRAM) Pete McHugh Washington Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 10 May 2012.
Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
1 Columbia River Salmon Opportunities for Success Presentation to the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
Salmon Stock Variability And The Political Economy Of The Pacific Salmon Treaty Contemporary Economic Policy July 1996 Paper Author: Kathleen A. Miller.
Using CWT’s to assess survival, ocean distribution and maturation for Chinook stocks across the Pacific Northwest: Are there any predictive capabilities.
History  Need to mark fish to get survival & exploitation rates for Treaty negotiations, to determine differential survival of various release strategies.
Chinook Management Overview Rishi Sharma Columbia River Intertribal Fish Commission University of Washington, Quantitative Ecology & Resource Management.
Okanagan River Salmon Management. History zChinook, coho, chum, sockeye present in Canadian sections of Okanagan River historically zConstruction of dams.
Ballast Water and the Columbia River: Patterns and Reporting Compliance Christina Simkanin and Mark Sytsma Aquatic Bioinvasion Research and Policy Institute.
Recreational Fisheries Engagement Initiative Update MAFAC Recreational Fisheries Working Group April 13, 2011.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
West Coast and Other Fisheries. West Coast Fishery Salmon is most important (400 times larger than Atlantic catch) Salmon is most important (400 times.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
September 15, 2015 NMFS Observer Programs Presentation to the Council Coordination Committee.
Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.
Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Program for Mark-selective Chinook Salmon Fisheries in Puget Sound, Washington Washington Department of.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
IN PUGET SOUND & COASTAL WASHINGTON Hatchery Reform February 2003.
Mass Marking and Electronic Recovery of CWTs In the Pacific Northwest Ron Olson Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Olympia Washington.
Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
STATE OF CHINOOK SALMON IN LAKE HURON in 1999 BY: Jim Johnson, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Lloyd Mohr, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia.
Washington State Steelhead Stock Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING AMILEE WILSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 2004.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.
Scale Analysis Lisa Borgerson Kanani Bowden Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Hwy 34 Corvallis, OR (541) x232.
West Coast Salmon Genetic Stock Identification Collaboration Renee Bellinger, Coordinator.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
2015 Ocean Salmon Regulatory Process Update Fish and Game Commission February 11, 2015 Barry Miller 1 Credit: James Phillips.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries A Priority in motion at NOAA Recreational Fisheries.
Potential Effects of Mark-Selective Fisheries on Central Valley Salmon Brian Pyper and Steve Cramer Cramer Fish Sciences.
S K E E N A S O C K E Y E C O N S E R V A T I O N
66 items – 70% of circulated products
The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 1 November 2018
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 2 November 2018
West Coast/ Pacific Fisheries
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Kristen Ryding WA Department of Fish and Wildlife May 10, 2012

2008 Pacific Salmon Treaty, Annex IV, Chapter 3, paragraph 3 (b) “Parties agree…to provide 7.5 million in their respective currencies…to implement over a five year period beginning no later than 2010 within their respective jurisdictions critical improvements to the coastwide coded wire tag program operated by their respective management agencies.”

Trilogy of committees Expert Panel PSC CWT Technical Workgroup “An action plan in response to CWT Expert Panel reccomendations” - March 2008 CWT Implementation Team Members: US & Canada - AK, NOAA Fisheries, US Fish & Wildlife, CRITFC, NWIFC, Canadian DFO.

PST 2008, Annex IV, Chapter 3, paragraph 3 (b) “…Commission shall select a bilateral body to recommend funding of specific action items identified in PSC TR No. 25 that are priority uses for these funds to improve precision and accuracy of statistics such as abundance, exploitation rates, survival, etc. for Chinook salmon used by the CTC in support of this Chapter…” Projects are Chinook centric, but we look favorably on ones that benefit Coho too.

CWTIT US – 7 members 1.5 million/year; 5 years WA, OR, AK, CRITFC, NWIFC, QIN, NOAA Fisheries Develop RFP - October/November Review and recommend projects for US funding Canada – 1.5 Million CN/yr, 5 years Dept. Fisheries and Oceans Work independently but share information and review each other’s recommendations Joint project review in December

PSC Tech. Report 25 - Themes Tagging issues Representation of CWT production regions Determination of tagging levels Sampling Representative Mixed stock fisheries Terminal fisheries Escapement Voluntary reporting in sport fisheries Mark selective fisheries

PSC Tech. Report 25 (continued) Data reporting Timeliness Data exchange Inter/Intra agency coordination Standards – unclear authority to establish and enforce standards Validation; Updating Identified regional priorities

What is CWTIT looking to fund? High priority – Sampling – tag recoveries Mixed stock fisheries – rate & representativeness. SE Alaska commercial, OR and WA ocean troll Escapement and terminal areas – rate, representativeness. Voluntary recovery programs – BC sport Mark selective fisheries Data coordination and reporting Efficiency & integration of agency systems to facilitate data sharing Redefining sampling strata, e.g. SEAK troll Tag expansion in Willamette spring Chinook

What is CWTIT looking to fund? High priority (continued) Equipment – new, replace worn-out. (timeliness, accuracy) Moderate priority – Tagging – increase release numbers; gaps in coverage (e.g., Col. R. summers; Hanford Reach wild; Lewis R. wild) Methods manual for analysis and experimental design Low – projects that improve system, but not related to above. Self sustaining – can continue after PSC funding ends

What has been funded? Examples Ocean sampling – WA, OR sport and troll Loss of Anadramous Fish Act funds – supported by PSC Mixed stock fishery sampling Decision theoretic tool – program for determining tagging and sampling rates for precision goals SEAK – redefining spring troll strata (25 strata vs currently) Lab equipment – microscopes with LCD screen CWT Detection Wands – SEAK, WA, OR (85). Also training

What has been funded? Examples OR Columbia R. management area sampling – tag recoveries Database system upgrades – SEAK, OR and WA Mid-OR Coast – tagging and CWT recovery of Elk River Fall Chinook Indicator not currently represented BC sport fishery – voluntary tag recovery Increased number dead-pitch sites Canadian funds US fish caught there too.

Benefits thus far? Improved tag recovery in SEAK fisheries Improved rate of recoveries in BC sport fisheries Improving inter and intra agency data sharing with new data bases Improved timeliness in lab processing (WA) Electronic detection in SEAK - Reduced lab and processing costs, improved timeliness Increased coverage of production regions (Elk River OR; Stikine R. AK; BC areas) Puget Sound MSF fisheries – tag recovery, comparison of sampled catch to Catch Record Card catch

What is next and contact 2010 and 2011 projects still ongoing Continue to make gains 2012 funding – projects starting in July 2 more years of funding – US section Bilateral workshop – project review. November/December, Seattle. Open to public. More info? WA rep – Kristen Ryding, US Chair – Scott McPherson,