1 Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor Wednesday September 24, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innovate Now: Overview and Next Steps February 2007.
Advertisements

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
June Strategic Questions Where can we lead the world? Can we define the Engineering College of the 21 st Century? Positioning the College to leverage.
Powering Maryland Forward USM's 2020 Plan for More Degrees, a Stronger Innovation Economy, and a Higher Quality of Life USM Strategic Plan Presentation.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
THECB 7/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Progress Report Presentation for: Texas Community College Teachers Association David W. Gardner July 30, 2007.
NCI Designation: Expanding Science and Promoting Health in the Region Name Title, Company Date.
SCHOOL OF HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS STRATEGIC PLAN 2003 DRAFT.
Research Foundation Strategic Plan Cathy Kaszluga and Ellen Kelly 3/24/2015.
BY THE NUMBERS Pennsylvania in FY 2012 $261 Million: NSF funds awarded 7 th : National ranking in NSF funds 82: NSF-funded institutions 1,137: NSF grants.
High Impact Implementation for an Innovation-Driven Economy The Texas Industry Cluster Initiative.
1 William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Investment Board June 8, 2005.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Chesapeake College Sustainability Roundtable Monday, March 23, 2009 Presentation by William E. Kirwan Chancellor, University System of Maryland.
University of Idaho Biotechnology & Biomedical Research Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force September 7, 2005 By Charles R. Hatch Vice.
Background for Public Hearings October 18, 2004 John Austin, Cherry Commission Policy Director John Burkhardt, Senior Policy Advisor U-M Center for the.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Strategic Planning Definitions Tennessee Board of Regents.
Texas Workforce Commission The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) is a collaborating partner in the economic development processes for the State of Texas.
Workforce Development for the Biotech Industry. Workforce Development National Level State Level Corporate Level Current Programs Future Requirements.
The U.S. Public Workforce System An Overview. Overview: The Workforce System and its evolution Defining today’s innovation economy WIRED Initiative and.
My college: SDSU. Campus Tuition How much does it cost to go to SDSU? The answer to that question depends on your choice in scheduling. At SDSU you pay.
1 INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES Presentation by The University of Arizona, May 5, 2008.
Ministry of Research and Innovation Research Programs International Society for Computational Biology July 23, 2008.
Florida Center of Excellence for Biomolecular Identification and Targeted Therapeutics.
Stanford Technology Ventures Program Slide 1 State Policy Academy on Entrepreneurship New Orleans, July 16, 2001 “Human Capital.
Innovation Systems Research Network MCRI Theme III: Social Inclusion and Civic Engagement David A. Wolfe, Ph.D. Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation.
Nathan Tinker Executive Director New York Biotechnology Association New York BizBio 2009 Fighting for a Healthy Biotech Industry.
The Dream & & The Challenge UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Strategic Plan UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Strategic Plan.
Director, DG RTD, Directorate International Cooperation
Investing in STEM to Secure Maryland’s Future Report of the Governor’s STEM Task Force Presentation to the Greater Baltimore Committee November 13, 2009.
University of Louisville Faculty Discussion on Research Ho! Ho! Ho! Happy Holidays! 1 December 10,2009.
1 Presentation to the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee University System of Maryland January 15, 2004.
Technology Based Economic Development in West Virginia Gaps, Strengths and Recommendations 2008 Create WV Conference.
Board of Trustees Orientation September 23, 2014 Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor of Educational Services and Institutional Effectiveness 1.
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND FY 2009 BUDGET William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor February 1, 2008.
Colorado State University System: Investing in Economic Prosperity for Colorado Presentation to the Joint Budget Committee Patrick Grant, Chair, Board.
Detroit Regional Manufacturing Skills Alliance. History In late 2006 the Detroit Regional Chamber was selected as the convener for the advance manufacturing.
April, The Governor's Information Technology Initiative Presentation for the Appropriations Committee, Louisiana House of Representatives.
Providing capital, knowledge & networks since Federal Laboratory Consortium Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern.
University System of Ohio. Strategic Plan for Higher Education The State of Ohio increase its educational attainment to compete in a global economy that.
Investing in the State of Innovation International Seminar on Knowledge and Innovation 1 October, 2013 Creating a High-Performance Innovation Ecosystem:
The Value of Investment in University Research and Innovation Arizona’s Research Universities Drive State Economic Growth 1.Workforce development - provide.
University of North Florida Work Plan Presentation to Board of Trustees June 10, 2014.
1 College of Pharmacy. The mission of the University of Michigan, College of Pharmacy is to prepare students to become pharmacists and pharmaceutical.
New Venture Development: How to be a Hometown Hero Randy Goldsmith, PhD.
Success Strategies for the Knowledge Economy Preparing for a bright future. Ohio...
1. The Research Process Research New Research New Ideas Solve Problems Commercialization Enhanced Scientific Literacy Updated Learning Materials Increased.
University/Industry Partnerships for Excellence in Education and Research.
Your University. Missouri’s Future. Speaker’s Name Here Date.
1 HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS AT NASA K. E. BLANDING, PH.D. Acting Director, Higher Education Division NASA Office of Education.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
Office of Science Office of Science Advisory Committee Chairs Perspectives on the Department of Energy Office of Science - Issues and Opportunities in.
Prepared by Collaborative Economics. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  San Diego is participating in a new global innovation economy  San Diego’s global reach has.
Developing, Funding, and Managing University Centers Presentation by Doug Day Deputy Director for Policy Studies Illinois Board of Higher Education SHEEO.
Committee of 100 for Economic Development IFFCBANO Conference
Workforce Education & Economic Development 204 Sutton Hall Indiana, PA Fostering partnerships to create and sustain growth.
Welcome to Atlanta and Georgia Tech Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology Association of University Research Parks October 26,
Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) 
Universities and Innovation
Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) 
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Research Development Office
Donald D. Snyder President UNLV
Topics Introduction to Research Development
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
Economy Workforce Trends
Commonwealth Cyber Initiative (CCI)
Presentation transcript:

1 Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor Wednesday September 24, 2008

2 Workforce –First in the percentage of the population 25 and older with a graduate or professional degree –First in the total number of doctoral scientists and engineers as a percentage of total employment Strength in Research and Development (R&D) –Second nationally in federal obligations for research and development On a per capita basis, Maryland ranks first in federal R&D obligations –First in the nation in NIH research and development contract awards –UMCP, UMB, UMBC, JHU & Mont. College: Research Parks Maryland First-of-its kind cooperative association representing our entire state –USM extramural research funding exceeded $1 billion last year More than $500 million in the life sciences Federal Research Facilities –NIH, NIST, FDA, NASA, etc. Maryland’s “New Economy” Strengths

3 Dramatic rise in key “life science” degrees issued by USM over past five years –Biological Sciences –Chemistry –Health Professions Up about 30 percent across the board –Bachelor’s degrees up 28% –Master’s degrees up 32% –Doctoral / First Professional up 26% USM Life Science Progress Degrees Issued

4 USM Life Science Progress Capital Projects In the proposed 10-year CIP, significant support for instructional space in the sciences, including the life sciences. –Chemistry Building Renovation at UMCP ($71 million) –Smith Hall Addition/Renovation at TU ($124 million) –Natural Science Lab/Crawford Science Building Expansion at Bowie State University ($96 million) –Health Sciences Facility III at UMB ($400 million) –Pharmacy Hall Addition / Renovation at UMB ($78 million) This follows on the heels of recently completed capital projects in support of life sciences research –UMBI's Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology (CARB II) at the Shady Grove Life Sciences Center ($60 million) –UMCP's New Biosciences Research Building ($63 million)

5 Importance of nano-bio –A trillion-dollar industry in a decade, employing 2 million people –Maryland can be a global leader strength in medical science and engineering USM Office & USM institutions worked closely with DBED for a number of years to create a nano-bio fund –To recruit top talent and provide seed funding for promising new research efforts Faculty supported by the Nano-Bio fund have submitted 81 proposals to 20 different outside funding entities –More than $7 million in funding to date with $26 million pending USM Life Science Actions Nano-Bio Fund

6 Consortium of Maryland higher education resources acting to facilitate and encourage drug discovery and development –Targeting the entire discovery and development cycle basic research, clinical and regulatory support, manufacturing, and workforce training Four UM campuses—UMCP, UMB, UMBC, and UMBI—along with JHU, Montgomery College, and CCBC –Strong marketing tool to assist bioscience companies in Maryland wishing to access university resources and to attract companies See this as a model of higher education collaboration & cooperation USM Life Science Actions Drug Discovery and Development Network

7 The same four USM institutions—UMCP, UMB, UMBC, and UMBI—also serve on the Innovation and Commercialization Group ICG is a Regents Work Group focused on the wide range of issues pertaining to the Innovation and Commercialization of USM assets: –Best practices, Collaborations, Metrics, etc. The System Office organizes the ICG –And participation is open to any interested USM institution USM Life Science Actions Innovation and Commercialization Group

8 Chaired by Dan Mote and charged with studying: –Areas of research important to economic growth where USM and Maryland have a strategic advantage due to a critical mass of top talent –Strategies to build the areas identified into centers of excellence on an international scale –Strategies to increase USM’s and Maryland’s capacity to do translational research and build the knowledge based economy –State policies that would support the knowledge based economy in Maryland as well as benchmarks to measure Maryland’s progress toward that goal There is also a “parallel” group—The Presidential Task Force on the STEM Workforce—chaired by Bob Caret USM Life Science Actions Presidential Task Force on Research and Economic Competitiveness

9 USM and the FDA will identify priorities and topics of mutual interest such as: –Exchanges between university faculty and staff and FDA scientists and staff –Educational opportunities for students, staff, and faculty –Joint meetings for education and research –Research collaborations –Cooperative international activities and outreach –Sharing of facilities and equipment for increased cost efficiencies for scientific endeavors By sharing resources and talents, MOU will open up new areas of discovery, funding, and cooperation USM Life Science Actions MOU with FDA

10 Currently being re-written Will have a significant research component –Recognizing research as an important element of Maryland’s overall economic and educational future USM and USM Institutions involved –Need to make sure YOUR voice is heard as they make progress toward their new plan Next Steps MHEC’s 5-year plan