Non-parametric data-based approach for the quantification and communication of uncertainties in river flood forecasts Niels Van Steenbergen Patrick Willems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop
Advertisements

Review bootstrap and permutation
1 Module 10 Environmental Systems Modelling. Author. A. van Griensven 2 Learning objectives Understand and explain the chemical and biological processes.
Model error estimation employing ensemble data assimilation Dusanka Zupanski and Milija Zupanski CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, U.S.A.
Genetic Statistics Lectures (5) Multiple testing correction and population structure correction.
Information theory Multi-user information theory A.J. Han Vinck Essen, 2004.
Evaluation of River Flood Regulation using Model Predictive Control K. U. LEUVEN Patrick Willems Toni Barjas Blanco P.K. Chiang Bart De Moor Jean Berlamont.
Introduction hydrologic and hydraulic modelling using MIKE11 (NAM and HD) Gennadiy Donchyts UCEWP, Kiev.
EGU General Assembly 2014 May 2nd, 2014, Vienna
PROVIDING DISTRIBUTED FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION USING A STATISTICAL NOWCAST SCHEME Neil I. Fox and Chris K. Wikle University of Missouri- Columbia.
Steve Taylor Flood Forecasting Team Leader Anglian Region
Climate-Change Impacting Hydrologic Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service Eastern Region, Chief Hydrologic Services Division.
Application of Forecast Verification Science to Operational River Forecasting in the National Weather Service Julie Demargne, James Brown, Yuqiong Liu.
Kostas Andreadis1, Dennis Lettenmaier1, and Doug Alsdorf2
Overview of STAT 270 Ch 1-9 of Devore + Various Applications.
A Process-Oriented Observational Study of Snowfall Potential in the Central United States Chad M Gravelle Saint Louis University Charles E Graves Saint.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
RATING CURVE VALIDATION (1) WHEN VALIDATION: –ON FITTED RELATION –WHEN NEW GAUGINGS BECOME AVAILABLE TO TEST CHANGE IN RATING *AT LEAST 6 GAUGINGS AT STABLE.
Data Envelopment Analysis. Weights Optimization Primal – Dual Relations.
Reclamation Mid-Term Operational Modeling Seasonal to Year-Two Colorado River Streamflow Prediction Workshop CBRFC March 21-22, 2011 Katrina Grantz, PhD.
Hydrologic Statistics
1 Flood Risk Management Session 3 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Risk Management.
Local flood forecasting for local flood risk areas Keith Beven, David Leedal, Peter Young and Paul Smith Lancaster Environment Centre.
Data-assimilation in flood forecasting for the river Rhine between Andernach and Düsseldorf COR-JAN VERMEULEN.
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
Photo: Environment Agency Review of Hydraulic Flood Modeling Software Used in Belgium, The Netherlands, and The United Kingdom Daniel Gilles and Matthew.
Introduction SPATSIM is a system that makes use of shapefiles
1 Flood Hazard Analysis Session 1 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Hazard Assessment.
Prospects for river discharge and depth estimation through assimilation of swath–altimetry into a raster-based hydraulics model Kostas Andreadis 1, Elizabeth.
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
Application of a rule-based system for flash flood forecasting taking into account climate change scenarios in the Llobregat basin EGU 2012, Vienna Session.
Mississippi River Tri-Agency Meeting National Weather Service 1 COE/NWS/USGS Tri-Agency Meeting Mississippi River Basin AHPS UPDATE COE/NWS/USGS Tri-Agency.
TECHNICAL GUIDE No.1 Estimation of Future Design Rainstorm under the Climate Change Scenario in Peninsular Malaysia Research Centre for Water Resources.
Stochastic population forecasts for the United Kingdom Emma Wright & Mita Saha Office for National Statistics.
Developing stochastic population forecasts for the United Kingdom: Progress report and plans for future work Emma Wright Office for National Statistics.
Gabriele Coccia (1)(2) and Ezio Todini (1)(2) (1) University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (2) Idrologia e Ambiente s.r.l, Napoli, Italy Probabilistic flood.
1 Upper Mississippi River System Flow Frequency Study Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alexandria, Virginia.
Limits to Statistical Theory Bootstrap analysis ESM April 2006.
Error & Uncertainty: II CE / ENVE 424/524. Handling Error Methods for measuring and visualizing error and uncertainty vary for nominal/ordinal and interval/ratio.
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling-- Jodi Eshelman Analysis of the Number of Rain Gages Required to Calibrate Radar Rainfall for the Illinois River Basin.
Logistical Verification Forecast Services in IHFS Mary Mullusky RFC Verification Workshop, August
Probabilistic Modelling Golder Associates (UK) ltd Ruth Davison Attenborough House Browns Lane Stanton on the Wolds Nottingham NG12 5BL
Hydrological forecasting: application, uncertainty, estimation, data assimilation and decision making EGU – Wien, 7th april 2011 The Po flood management.
Forecast Interpretation CBRFC Stakeholder Forum October 20, 2015.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National River Forecast Verification System NOAA Science Advisory Board Meeting July 16, 2003 Gary Carter Director, Office.
LHF 1 LHF DIVISION Laboratoire d’Hydraulique de France.
Surface Water Virtual Mission Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Kostas Andreadis, and Doug Alsdorf Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
The DEWETRA platform An advanced Early Warning System.
From Fread, D.L., Flood routing models and the Manning n.
Data analysis GLUE analysis Model analysis Rating Curve analysis based on hydraulic model Formulation of different Rating Curve models Pappenberger et.
Potential for estimation of river discharge through assimilation of wide swath satellite altimetry into a river hydrodynamics model Kostas Andreadis 1,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Greg Smith Senior Hydrologist National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center January 25, 2011 Navajo.
Quantifying Uncertainty
1 Ensemble forecasting and the Global Flood Awareness System Peter Salamon, Joint Research Center, European Commission & many colleagues at the JRC and.
RFC Verification Workshop What to Expect Julie Demargne and Mary Mullusky RFC Verification Workshop, August
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
MATH Section 7.2.
Combining Deterministic and Stochastic Population Projections Salvatore BERTINO University “La Sapienza” of Rome Eugenio SONNINO University “La Sapienza”
Assessment of hydropower system safety using a systems approach and dynamic resilience June 27, 2017 Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Red River of the North 1997 $2 Billion damages 60,000 people evacuated
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
5th Follow up Committee Meeting HIVA-KUL, 6th October 2009
Please note: As of session Lifeskills Mathematics will be known as Applications of Mathematics.
Modeling tools Training Module
Flood Forecasting as a tool for Flood Management
Information content of weather predictions for flood-control in a Dutch lowland water system Steven Weijs December 9, 2018 Section Water Resources Management.
Preliminaries: Distributions
What forecast users might expect: an issue of forecast performance
(with ) by clicking on it and then
Presentation transcript:

Non-parametric data-based approach for the quantification and communication of uncertainties in river flood forecasts Niels Van Steenbergen Patrick Willems KULeuven – Hydraulics Division EGU General Assembly, Vienna, April 2012 Session NH1.6/HS4.7

Outline Introduction Methodology Communication Conclusion

Introduction Flood forecasting models of Flanders Hydraulics Research Navigable waterways in Flanders, Belgium 48h time horizon Deterministic results (water levels & discharges) Hydrological (NAM), hydrodynamic (Mike11) & rainfall forecasts => subject to uncertainties => Methodology to quantify and visualise uncertainty

Methodology Statistical analysis of model error Non-parametric approach Data-based (historical simulation results) Case study: Nete Scheldt Upper Scheldt Lys Bruges Polders Ghent Channels CatchmentRiver / Channel Location Demer Aarschot DemerZichem Yser Lo-Fintele Channel Nieuwpoort - Duinkerke Veurne Dender Overboelare Bruges Polders Channel Ghent-Ostend Steenbrugge Channel Ghent-Ostend Varsenare Channel Ghent-Ostend Plassendale Ghent Channels Lys ChannelDeinze RingvaartEvergem Lys Menen NeteGrote NeteHulshout Scheldt Antwerp

Methodology Statistical analysis of model error Non-parametric approach (no predef. prob. distr.) Data-based (historical simulation results)

Methodology Water Level Time Observation

Methodology Water Level Time Observation Simulation TOF1 TOF2 TOF3 TOF4

Methodology Water Level Time Observation Simulation TOF1 TOF2 TOF3 TOF4 Residuals

Methodology Time Observation Simulation Residuals Time Horizon Class Value Class

Methodology Time Observation Simulation Residuals Time Horizon Class Value Class

Methodology Residuals [m] Percentile [%] Bias correction 95% confidence interval

Methodology Residuals [m] Percentile [%] Bias correction 95% confidence interval Value Class Time Horizon Class 3D error matrix Percentile

Methodology 3D error matrix

Methodology Value Class Time Horizon Class 3D error matrix Percentile Time Water Level

Methodology Time Water Level ALARM Level ALERT Level Time Exceedance Probability

Communication Linguistic Simple Easy to understand Larger public Time independent No decision making Technical Precise Larger Public (without reference) Time independent No decision making Time (in)dependent Precise Decision making Water managers Difficult Interpretation Numerical Graphical

Communication Linguistic

Communication Numerical

Communication Graphical

Communication Probabilistic flood maps 13/11/ :00 13/11/ :00 14/11/ :00

Conclusion Simple, but efficient method Total uncertainty (not only input) More information compared with deterministic results Different communication strategies

Questions?? Contact: For more information: Van Steenbergen N., Ronsyn J., Willems P. (2012). A non-parametric data-based approach for probabilistic flood forecasting in support of uncertainty communication. Environmental Modelling & Software 33,