CLOSING THE BOOKS WITH PARTIAL INFORMATION By Joseph Marker, FCAS, MAAA CLRS, Chicago, IL, September 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reserving for Incomplete Accident Years Nancy P. Watkins Milliman & Robertson, Inc. CLRS - September 28-29, 1998.
Advertisements

Introduction to Property & Casualty Actuarial Presenter: Matt Duke.
Unearned Premium Reserves Change is in the Wind
Assignment Nine Actuarial Operations.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Claims Reserving for Non Life Insurance Craig Thorburn, B.Ec., F.I.A.A. Phone
Reserve Risk Within ERM Presented by Roger M. Hayne, FCAS, MAAA CLRS, San Diego, CA September 10-11, 2007.
1 Math 479 / 568 Casualty Actuarial Mathematics Fall 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Professor Rick Gorvett Session 4: Loss Reserving I.
Agenda Introduction to Credibility Difference between Policy Year, Accident Year, and Calendar Year Relationship Between Accident Year and Calendar Year.
Non-life insurance mathematics
P&C Reserve Basic HUIYU ZHANG, Principal Actuary, Goouon Summer 2008, China.
1 Ken Fikes, FCAS, MAAA Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science November 2005.
1 Ken Fikes, FCAS, MAAA Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science Ken Fikes, FCAS, MAAA Director of Property & Casualty
October 5, 2006Purdue University Reserves James Miles, FSA, MAAA October 5, 2006.
1 Math 479 Casualty Actuarial Mathematics Fall 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Professor Rick Gorvett Session 5: Loss Reserving II September.
Loss Reserving in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico Eduardo Esteva New Orleans, Louisiana September 11, 2001.
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Washington, D.C. September 23, 2002 Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA Am-Re Consultants, Inc.
Loss Reserving Anatomy of a claim 12/15/99 Auto accident 12/20/99 Insured reports accident to agent 1/7/00 Claim recorded 2/3/00 $10,000 reserve set 1/8/01.
Session # P2 & P3 November 14, 2006, 10:00 am Estimating the Workers Compensation Tail Richard E. Sherman, FCAS, MAAA Gordon F. Diss, ACAS, MAAA.
French working group on Best Estimate: Main conclusions FinReq meeting 17 September 2007.
© 2007 Towers Perrin September 11, CLRS – San Diego, California Property Catastrophe Reserving – Approaches to large event reserving Christopher.
1999 CLRS Intermediate Case Study Discussion Material For GL Insurance Company.
The Reserving Actuary’s Role in Risk Assessment: Value Added by the Reserving Actuary in Identifying and Helping Mitigate Financial Risk Both on the Balance.
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 29, 2009 David Oakden.
2005 CLRS September 2005 Boston, Massachusetts
Basic Track I 2007 CLRS September 2007 San Diego, CA.
November 2,  Current Reporting Requirements Call for Statistics Form #4 – Accident Year 2002 – Present  Use and Financial Impact of Data  Detecting.
Tools for the Soft Market Midwest Actuarial Forum September 23, 2004 Tom Duffy.
1999 CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR Intermediate Track II - Techniques
Reconciliation and the Opining Actuary Wendy Germani, FCAS MAAA Holmes Gwynn, ACAS MAAA Presented CLRS – Fall 2004.
Estimating the Predictive Distribution for Loss Reserve Models Glenn Meyers Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 12, 2006.
CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR HOW A.M. BEST EVALUATES RESERVE ADEQUACY Matthew C. Mosher Managing Actuary September 28, Meeting.
A. Overview of Current Reporting Requirements B. Quality Reviews.
Milliman Package Policy Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Prepared by: Brian Z. Brown, FCAS, MAAA Consulting Actuary Milliman, Inc. Monday – September.
“The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA Ratemaking Seminar March 10, 2005.
Tail Factors Working Party: Part 2. The Work Product Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Boston, MA September 12-13, 2005.
Slide 1 Basic Track III 2001 CLRS September 2001 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Asbestos Valuation CLRS – Chicago; September 8, 2003 Kevin M. Madigan, PhD, ACAS, MAAA Vice President, Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. Claus S. Metzner,
1 Casualty Actuarial Society Loss Reserve Seminar Thomas G. Moylan, FCAS, MAAA September 8th, 2003 Closing the Books.
Estimating ULAE Liabilities Alejandra Nolibos April 12, 2005 Rediscovering and Expanding Kittel’s Approach By: Robert F. Conger and Alejandra Nolibos.
Estimation and Application of Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar.
CLRS Establishing the Expected Loss Ratio George M. Levine, FCAS, MAAA Senior Manager, KPMG LLP September 9, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
November 3, 2005 November 16, 2005 Tail Factors Working Party Casualty Actuarial Society 2005 Annual Meeting Renaissance Harborplace Hotel Baltimore, Maryland.
 Washington State Transit Insurance Pool Actuarial Report Based on data evaluated as of June 30, 2008 Presented by: Kevin Wick, FCAS, MAAA September.
©Towers Perrin September 13, 2004 Reserving Implications of Reform Workers Compensation David Mohrman John Booth.
1 Casualty Actuarial Society Loss Reserve Seminar ALLAN R. NEIS, FCAS, MAAA September 11, 2001 Closing the Books.
September 11, 2001 Kathy Barnes, FCAS, MAAA Loss Development in Massachusetts Private Passenger Automobile Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar - New Orleans.
©Towers Perrin Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Atlanta, Georgia September 11, 2006 Christopher K. Bozman, FCAS, MAAA.
CLRS Intermediate Track II September 2006 Atlanta, Georgia Investigating and Detecting Change.
Basic Track II 2004 CLRS September 2004 Las Vegas, Nevada.
From “Reasonable Reserve Range” to “Carried Reserve” – What do you Book? 2007 CAS Annual Meeting Chicago, Illinois November 11-14, 2007 Mark R. Shapland,
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, Illinois September 9, 2003 Christopher K. Bozman, FCAS, MAAA.
Chapter 6 WORKSHEET FOR A BUSINESS. What we are going to learn:  Introduce the 8 Column Work Sheet  In order to complete a work sheet  Adjustments.
1 Casualty Actuarial Society Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago Marriott Chicago, Illinois ALLAN R. NEIS, FCAS, MAAA September 8-9, 2003 Closing the Books.
A. Overview of Current Reporting Requirements B. Quality Reviews.
September 11, 2001 Thomas L. Ghezzi, FCAS, MAAA Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Call Paper Program Loss Reserving without Loss Development Patterns - Beyond.
0 July , 1998 Boston, Massachusetts Presented by: Susan E. Witcraft Milliman & Robertson, Inc. Addressing Three Questions Regarding an Insurance.
Basic Track I 2008 CLRS September 2008 Washington, DC.
CLRS Intermediate Track III GL Case Study September 2004 Las Vegas, Nevada.
1998 CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR Intermediate Track II - Techniques
Risk Analysis ASAP by Actuarial Services and Programs Evaluating Experience of Individual Accounts or Program Groups.
Loss Reserving in Mexico
Reinsurance Reserving Methods
2003 CLRS September 2003 Chicago, Illinois
2001 CLRS September 2001 New Orleans, Louisiana
ASU Short Duration Contracts – New GAAP Disclosures
RESERVING TECHNIQUES By Lorie Darrow Select Actuarial.
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation
Presentation transcript:

CLOSING THE BOOKS WITH PARTIAL INFORMATION By Joseph Marker, FCAS, MAAA CLRS, Chicago, IL, September 2003

2 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Outline This presentation discusses the setting of Loss and LAE reserves when a “fresh” reserve analysis is not available. Shows one method in detail. Discusses this method in relation to others. Shows how method addresses Management’s reserving issues.

3 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Importance of Loss and LAE Reserve This reserve is: The largest liability on the balance sheet. The balance sheet item with the greatest uncertainty. Subject to scrutiny at least quarterly.

4 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Information Available at Closing Often the books are closed with no “fresh” reserve study done in time for the closing, such as  At quarter end, when reviews are not done every quarter,  At quarter end, if a “fresh” reserve review cannot be done in time.  At monthly intervals, if reviews are done every quarter. From here on, assume that we are dealing with quarterly closings.

5 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Information Available at Closing At closing time, various levels of information may be available: 1. A full reserve review on data as of the current quarter, or 2. No reserve review, but actual loss development through the current quarter, e.g.: Paid and outstanding loss and loss expense by accident year. Paid and outstanding claim counts. Earned premiums and earned exposures. 3. Loss payment and written premium information only. This discussion assumes that information described in (2) is available.

6 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Example: Company XYZ Company XYZ is closing its books as of 3/31/2003. A full loss reserve review is available as of 12/31/2002. Exhibit 1 shows an example of a “Roll Forward” calculation. Method compares expected and actual development during the quarter. Uses this information to modify the Selected Ultimate Loss

7 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Expected Loss Development: Exhibit 1 Exhibit 1 determines the expected 1 st quarter development and payments. Shows the “chain ladder” methods (paid and incurred) through 12/2002. Separates expected development into current quarter vs. future. Requires the Selected Ultimate Loss by accident year as of 12/2002. LDF for 1 st quarter may need to be interpolated from annual factors.

8 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Expected Loss Development: Exhibit 1 Calculation of 1 st Quarter Expected development Future development on each accident year equals selected ultimate minus developed loss to date (12/31/2002) The expected proportion developing in 1 st quarter is given by: [ LDF (to quarter end) – 1.0 ] divided by [ LDF (to ultimate) – 1.0 ] We need to know the proportion of the annual development expected in the 1 st quarter.

9 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Expected Loss Development: Exhibit 1 Calculation of 1 st Quarter Loss Development Factor If quarterly LDFs are available, use those. If only annual LDFs are available, use interpolation. Most difficult to assess for the immediate past accident year. Reference: Richard E. Sherman, “Extrapolating, Smoothing, and Interpolating Development Factors,” PCAS LXXI (1984), pages

10 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Expected Loss Development: Exhibit 1 Limitations of Exhibit 1: l Uses only the standard age-to-age LDF methods. l Does not estimate the loss amount for the current partial accident year. Exhibit 1 can also project claim counts.

11 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Exhibit 2: Actual Development Exhibit 2 brings in the actual paid and developed loss for the quarter. Differences between actual and expected development lead to recalculation of the ultimate loss.

12 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Revising the Selected Ultimate Loss: XYZ Company Exhibit 2 “Roll Forward” Loss Adjustment Mechanism: For Incurred Method, Ultimate Loss = Previous Ultimate Loss plus the difference between Actual and Expected 1 st Quarter development. For Paid Method, use Actual minus Expected payments to adjust the loss. Key observations about this adjustment mechanism: For Incurred Method, the Ending IBNR at 3/2003 depends only on expected development. For Paid Method, the Ending Total Reserve depends only on the expected payments.

13 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Comments on Exhibit 1 Ultimate Loss If the “tail” is lengthening, this procedure understates reserves compared to fresh analysis. More stable, less responsive than fresh analysis. May be used to “screen” lines of business for deeper analysis when actual and expected development vary significantly.

14 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Comments on Exhibit 1 Ultimate Loss Management relates well to the concept of comparing Actual and Expected development. Since IBNR is determined independently of actual development, reserve discussions can begin before the quarter end.

15 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Current Accident Year We have not discussed setting reserves for the current accident year To do this, use exhibits where projections are based on: l Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods rather than straight LDF methods l Pricing projections will likely be the key information used. Common methods for estimating the current accident year are l Fix the loss ratio based on pricing studies l Using the loss ratio and the projected development pattern, adjust the loss ratio by the difference between actual and expected emergence. l Use frequency-severity methods and track claim count reporting.

16 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Current Accident Year Calculation is tricky for 2 nd and 3 rd quarter reserves. LDFs account for future losses for the entire accident year. IBNR reserve includes only future development on losses with accident dates in the partially completed year.

17 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003 Summary When closing the books without a current reserve evaluation, use the actual development to date to modify previous reserve estimates. Deal with quantities that make sense to management, such as Actual versus expected development. Keep the explanatory exhibits simple and few. Use the exhibits to involve other disciplines in explaining variances.

18 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003

19 Closing the Books with Partial information - CLRS 2003