Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Improving Change-of-Address System For Colleges/Universities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Move Update & Compliance Fundamentals M & W Printers and United States Postal Service.
Advertisements

Reduce Your Return Mail by One Third! National Postal Forum Nashville TN March 20–23, 2005 Jan Caldwell, Address Management Sharon Harrison, SBC Liz Weber,
In November, the USPS will make all mail smarter & reduce waste Facts the U.S.P.S. Wants You to Know Each year, over 2 BILLION pieces of mail are discarded.
2013 National Postal Forum San Francisco, California GSA and Addressing (Rules and Recommendations) Adam Collinson Director of Research & Development GrayHair.
Achieve First-Class Address Quality with a Satori Software Solution By Mike Roy.
 Each year, 17% of Americans move or change their mailing address 1 out of every 6 families moves each year  Approximately 19% of all businesses move.
Mailers+4 The #1 Mailing Software in the Industry.
Introduction to MIRC 2014 Research: Energy & Resource Assessment Study for Mint Farming Research being conducted by etc3 Ltd.
Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) Task Team 2 General Session Presentation November 16, 2010.
United States Postal Service ® ANK Link ™ The New Address Quality Tool Intelligent Mail Address Quality WEBCAST Monday August 15, 2005 National Customer.
1 Understand The Differences in the Change-of-Address Programs National Postal Forum March 17 – 20, 2013 Michael Tate, SVP Enterprise Postal Strategy,
Total Address Quality. Total Address Quality 2 OSV At A Glance OSV produces over 500 Million envelopes every year! OSV processes over 4 Million addresses.
HOW CIRCULATION MANAGEMENT HAS MORPHED INTO AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT The ABC’s of Circulation Management.
Officer Training II Presented By: Title Chapter Name & No. 1.
Best Kept Secrets of the NCSC Keeping You in the Know! Speakers: Adam Avrick – Design Distributors Inc Cosmo Infantolino – USPS.
® TOTAL ADDRESS QUALITY & CASS ™ CYCLE “L” Ed WantaBaltimore PCC Address ManagementJune 1, 2007.
UMassOnline HEA Debriefing April 19, Introduction Background Why We are Doing This What We Hope to Achieve 2.
PostalOne! ® Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
Linda A. Kingsley Senior Vice President, Strategy and Transition United States Postal Service EMA Foundation November 2007 How the 21 st Century United.
NACUMS National Association of College and University Mail Services.
Value of the Mail: USPS and Industry Approaches to “Do Not Mail” Issues November 2008.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations August 2010.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. From the moment a child enters the school system, sensitive information is collected about the child (and even.
UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE J. J. Rowan Acting Chief Postal Inspector MTAC May 16, 2002.
Importance of Address Element Correction Jan Caldwell Manager, Address Management MTAC Meeting Washing DC, October 28,
Introduction to The Grant Center Grant Center, Fitchburg State College.
Introduction to The Grant Center Fitchburg State University.
MTE Forecasting and Tracking Workgroup #108 Goal: To have enough of the right type of MTE equipment in the right place at the right time to meet every.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
Mike Tate Enterprise Postal Strategy Bank of America 2013 National Postal Forum San Francisco, California What You Need to Know about Unique Address Types.
WELCOME TO WORKSHOP 1.1 The benefits of CCMA intervention in wage disputes Presented by Mr Afzul Soobedaar.
POSTAL AUTOMATED REDIRECTION SYSTEM (PARS)
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
National Change-of-Address Linkage System - NCOA Link USPS Confidential. Restricted Distribution.
Workgroup 127 Move Update PS 6014 Form Redesign. Issue Statement  PS 6014 form originated from MTAC WG #75 and was designed to clearly assign liability.
MTAC Workgroup 122 Full Service Implementation May 20, 2010.
MTAC Workgroup 106 Improve, integrate, and optimize data sources… Brian Euclide, Perry Judd’s Inc. Bob Galaher, USPS Marketing Nov 02, 2006 Washington.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
1 MTAC Work Group 136 Expanding and Enhancing ACS™ Data November 2010.
Complete, Correct, and Current Addresses  Complete the address  Leverage software and data to provide the missing information  ZIP + 4®, street name,
® Address Quality Strategy Update. Transformation Strategies Reduce Costs Increase Delivery Point Sequencing to 95% Improve Service Reduce UAA by 50%
MTAC Work Group 136 Kick-Off Expanding and Enhancing ACS™ Data June 7, 2010.
® Update: Safe Destruction of Mail Sam Pulcrano Vice President, Sustainability MTAC Washington, DC April 30, 2009.
® Secure Destruction Service Update Sam Pulcrano Vice President, Sustainability Jim Wilson Manager, Address Management MTAC Washington, DC November 18.
LIST MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW N.C. State Board of Elections
® MTAC Workgroup 116 Great Addressing to Increase the Value of Mail MTAC Meeting August 1, 2007.
1 Move Update February Move Update Nov. 23, 2008  Move Update required for mailpieces claiming Presorted or Automation prices for First-Class®
1 USPS/MTAC Work Group #75 MOVE Update Initiative February 5, 2003 Joel Thomas and Angelo Wider MOVE Update Initiative.
1 MTAC Periodicals Focus Group Product Development August 15, 2012.
National Postal Policy Council. Celebrating our 25 th Year.
CRYSTAL ZUFELT JORDAN WILSON KEVIN DANISAVAGE IDS 1999 November 30th, 2012.
Sponsors Industry: Jim Schemmel & Joe Lubenow USPS:Charlie Bravo & Nick Barranca Work Group Leaders Industry:Thom Roylance, BYU USPS: Jim Wilson & Frank.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations May 20, 2010.
Advancing Government through Collaboration, Education and Action Institute for Innovation Discussion with Shared Interest Group Vice Chairs October 14,
® MTAC Workgroup #121 Improving the ACS TM / OneCode ACS ® System MTAC Update – February 19, 2009 Postal Workgroup Leader:Industry Workgroup Leader: Lisa.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
Data, Infrastructure and Markets Workgroup. Workgroup Meetings Held two meetings – March 31 and April 19 Primary Discussion Topics Data and analysis needs.
MMA presentation for MTAC August 2, MTAC Association Presentation Wednesday, August 2, 2006.
Negotiated Service Agreements Presented at the Interagency Mail Policy Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Margaret Cigno Director of the Office of Accountability.
What Are Bad Addresses – Xactly? 1 What are “Bad” Addresses & What Do You Do With Them – Xactly? National Postal Forum Anaheim, CA May 18 th – 21 th, 2007.
1 First Class MTAC Workgroup 102 November 1, 2006.
® Move Update MLNA and Closed PO Box Process Flow MTAC May 20, 2010.
®. ® Charles Bravo Senior Vice President Intelligent Mail & Address Quality Charles Bravo Senior Vice President Intelligent Mail & Address Quality intelligent.
Colleges & Universities Delivery Partners Program
Postal Changes That Will Affect Nonprofit Mailers
Industrial Assessment Center Database
Reduce Your Return Mail By One Third
Presentation transcript:

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Improving Change-of-Address System For Colleges/Universities

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) MTAC #90 Purpose and Goals Workgroup Purpose Study the feasibility and benefits of including college and university student change of addresses in the National Change of Address database. Workgroup Goal Improve efficiency for schools, mailers, and USPS in the handling and forwarding of UAA student mail.

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Introduction to Workgroup #90 Feasibility Study Only  Must be beneficial to BOTH parties  Applicable to on-campus student housing facilities only  Off-campus housing is handled by local post office  May also be usable with military/govt. addresses This is NOT about forwarding of student mail

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) History Issues  Student housing mail treated as “temporary” addresses  Not included in National Change of Address database  Campus forwards student mail  Bypasses CFS  UAA/fowardable mail is perpetuated

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Costs of “old” student mail Forwarding of Student Mail is Inefficient for the School, the USPS, AND the Mailer  Mail sorted/new address applied by school and then given to USPS for processing  “Old addressed” mail keeps on coming  Non-forwardable mail is discarded

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Potential Benefits Including Student COA in NCOA Database can:  Save The Mailer … by providing updated student addresses prior to mailing  Save the USPS … by improved processing, decreasing the amount of forwardable mail, and collecting postage due where necessary

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Potential Benefits Including Student COA in NCOA Database can:  Save the School … by reducing processing costs through decreased forwardable mail  Save the Student … by getting their mail to them in a more timely fashion

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Current Efforts Work Group Status  First meeting conducted at Postal Forum (Sep 21, 2004)  Advised college and university attendees of workgroup purpose and goals  Requested collection of data

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Current Efforts Industry Impact  NACUMS schools responded  million pieces of UAA student mail annually  10% at 37¢ saves $5.5 million annually  Investigating USPS cost savings

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Grading College & University In-coming Mail Grades by Sector Grading Scale D C B A All Sectors Publishing Financial Industrial Technology Media Apparel Other

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Type of School Grading Scale All Large MediumSmall D C B A Grading College & University In-coming Mail

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Future Efforts Change of address information MUST BE a standardized, ZIP+4 codeable address  Encourages administrations to standardize their campus addresses  Improves overall quality of college & university addresses (WG #88)  Trains students to use quality addressing with ripple effects outside COA (e.g., military, govt., etc.)

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Future Efforts Pursuing implementation of web-enabled capture of address changes by school officials  Keep costs down for both USPS and institutions  Builds mailer confidence in information submitted

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Future Efforts Next Steps  Identify privacy issues  Evaluate impacts within schools with unique ZIP Codes  Continue survey of schools to establish issues and potential value

Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) For Additional Information Thom Roylance Industry Workgroup Leader Nat’l Assn of College/University Business Offices Jim Wilson USPS Workgroup Co-leader Change-of-Address Data Services/IMAQ Frank Spencer USPS Workgroup Co-leader Marketing Specialist/Product Development