©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Jessica Kasten and Rebecca Woodward August 14 th - 15 th 2014 Minnesota LTSS Service Access Study:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Conducting the Community Analysis. What is a Community Analysis?  Includes market research and broader analysis of community assets and challenges 
Preparing for Managed Care The Kansas Experience, From providers, customers and advocates Audrey Schremmer, Executive Director Three Rivers Inc., Center.
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
2003 Alabama Health Care Insurance and Access Survey Montgomery, AL May 2, 2003 Ashley Alvord, MPH Alabama Department of Public Health Children’s Health.
“Medicare’s Health Care Home Demonstration in Minnesota” Age and Disability Odyssey Conference 6/21/11 Ross Owen DHS Health Care Administration.
Laura L. McDermott, PhD, FNP, RN Gale A. Spencer, PhD, RN Binghamton University Decker School of Nursing THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS.
Impact of a Voucher Program on Consumer Choices of Personal Assistance Providers: Urban-Rural Differences Hongdao Meng, Ph.D., Stony Brook University Brenda.
Travel Time Analysis of Medicaid Managed Care Plans in the District of Columbia October 9, 2007 Brian Blankespoor, MS Chanza Baytop, MPH, DrPH.
Rest of Course Proposals & Research Design Measurement Sampling Survey methods Basic Statistics for Survey Analysis Experiments Other Approaches- Observation,
Washington State Prevention Summit Analyzing and Preparing Data for Outcome-Based Evaluation Using the Assigned Measures and the PBPS Outcomes Report.
 Department of Family and Children Services, Santa Clara County  San Jose State University School of Social Work  Santa Clara County Children’s Issue.
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
USING THE METHODOLOGY FOR EXTERNAL LEGAL EDUCATION QUALITY ASSESSMENT Training on behalf of USAID FAIR Justice project – 27 th and 28 th May 2015.
ORC TA: Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program HRSA U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
ASSESSMENTS IN SOCIAL WORK: THE BIO-PSYCHO-SOCIAL MODEL
RESEARCH DESIGN.
MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles One Care: MassHealth plus Medicare Implementation Council Meeting January 9, :00 PM.
Managed Long Term Care Plans Mandatory Enrollment Linda Gowdy Home Care Association May 31,
Efforts to Sustain Asthma Home Visiting Interventions in Massachusetts Jean Zotter, JD Director, Office of Integrated Policy, Planning and Management and.
Data and Data Collection Questionnaire
Montana Community Choice Partnership Money Follows the Person (MFP) Demonstration Grant Stakeholder Advisory Council Meeting March 10, 2015.
Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
The Challenges of the Medicaid Modernization Mandate – Part 1 Joel L. Olah, Ph.D., LNHA Executive Director Aging Resources of Central Iowa Iowa Assisted.
A Study of Critical Access to HCBS in Minnesota Presentation to the HCBS Partners Panel August 15, 2014.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
Lecture 4 Transport Network and Flows. Mobility, Space and Place Transport is the vector by which movement and mobility is facilitated. It represents.
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports in Maryland: Money Follows the Person Metrics October 4, 2015 Presented to the Maryland Department of Health and.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
1 Factors Associated with Regional Variation in Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan Participation and Beneficiary Leslie M. Greenwald, Ph.D. Principal.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 22, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Exploratory Analysis of Observation Stay Pamela Owens, Ph.D. Ryan Mutter, Ph.D. September, 2009 AHRQ Annual Meeting.
1 Minnesota Medical Home Project: Evaluation Feasibility Study Saturday, June 7, 2008 SHRIG Meeting, Academy Health.
Introduction to research methods 10/26/2004 Xiangming Mu.
QAI Data Mart Overview. What is a Data Mart? Purpose of the QAI Data Mart Examples of Available Data Future plans.
Comparing Medicaid & Non- Medicaid Environments Suzanne Crisp National Program Office February 13, 2008.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Examining Long-Term Care Episodes and Care History for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Longitudinal Analysis of Elderly Individuals with.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Brianna Gass, MPH November 17, 2014 Local Needs, Local Data.
Evaluating the Impact of Medicaid Managed Care on Preventive Health Care Use by Children and Adolescents June 24, 2006 Todd Eberly, Ph.D. Child Health.
HRSA Frontier Community Health Integration Project (FCHIP) Technical Assistance, Tracking and Analysis Program Guidance Overview Sarah Bryce July.
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
1 Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Competition and Other Factors Linked to Wide Variation in Health Care Prices Christine Brudevold Assistant.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Barriers to Independence Among TANF Recipients: Comparing Caseworker Records & Client Surveys Correne Saunders Pamela C. Ovwigho Catherine E. Born Paper.
MnCHOICES Olmstead Planning Committee June 21, 2012 Alex Bartolic Kristi Grunewald 2.
Finding a Predictive Model for Post-Hospitalization Adverse Events Henry Carretta 1, PhD, MPH; Katrina McAfee 1,2, MS; Dennis Tsilimingras 1,3, MD, MPH.
Ready for Reform! Medicaid Expansion: Evidence of Success from Washington State Paid Claims Database October 26, 2015, Oregon Tribal Health Directors Meeting.
Mark Leeds Director of Long Term Care and Community Support Services April 26, 2012 Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee: Balancing Incentive Program.
The Effect of Foster Care Policy on EPSDT Visits Angela B. Snyder, Ph.D., M.P.H. Glenn M. Landers M.B.A., M.H.A. Mei Zhou, M.S.
Impact of a Voucher Program on Consumer Choices of Personal Assistance Providers: Unintended Consequences Hongdao Meng, Ph.D., Stony Brook University Brenda.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
Readings n Text: Riddick & Russell –Ch1 stakeholders – p10 –Ch 2 an evaluation system –Proposal p25-36 – Ch 4 – Lit Review n Coursepack –GAO report Ch.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Impacts of Managed Care on SSI Medicaid Beneficiaries: Preliminary Results From A National Study Terri Coughlin Sharon K. Long The.
Rest of Course Proposals & Research Design Measurement Sampling
©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 MLTSS Subcommittee – March 2, 2016 Paul Saucier, Truven Health Analytics Coordination of Medicaid.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Supporting Minnesotans Where They Live: A Home Care Update Jeanine Wilson Diane Benjamin Disabilities Services Division.
Pediatric Asthma Hospitalizations: Impact of Managed Care in the Patterns of Outpatient Healthcare Utilization Capriles, JA., Rodríguez, MH., Rios, R.,
Managed Care Nursing Facility Quality Initiatives February 2, 2015.
MLTSS FAQs Frequently Asked Questions for Stakeholders on Managed Long- Term Services and Supports (MLTSS) What is Managed Long Term Services and Supports.
CIS 170 MART Teaching Effectively/cis170mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT HCA 497 MART Inspiring Minds/hca497mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES.
Brian C. Martin, Ph.D., MBA East Tennessee State University
Statewide Medicaid Managed Care Prenatal Report
Carina Omoeva, FHI 360 Wael Moussa, FHI 360
CLINICAL PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT
Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview
Fiscal Mapping Community of Practice
Presentation transcript:

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Jessica Kasten and Rebecca Woodward August 14 th - 15 th 2014 Minnesota LTSS Service Access Study: Findings from Years 1 and 2

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Minnesota is National Leader in Publicly-funded LTSS Ranked 1st in AARP Scorecard in overall performance across multiple dimensions, both in the 2011 and 2014 editions Increased shares of people receiving LTSS in the community Ranked 3 rd on Medicaid per-person spending specific to HCBS (2012) 1

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3 Purpose of Study  Authorized by 2011 Legislature  If there were impacts of rate changes, how much?  What other factors were relevant to access?  How do findings support development of access measures for a DHS Dashboard? The main purpose was to ascertain the extent to which provider rate changes affected recipients’ ability to access LTSS.

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4 Study Period Timeline for Provider Rate Change Effects

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Three Phases of Study Close collaboration with DHS Background and Selection of Access Measures Exploratory analysis of trends and encounter data Multivariate analysis

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 6 Phase 1 Background on Service Access and Selection of Measures

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Background on Service Access and Selection of Measures, 2012  Literature Review related to measurement of access in health care and LTSS  Review of how access to LTSS is assured in managed care o Interviewed MN MCO key informants  Proposed several measure domains to explore in the quantitative analysis: 1.Comparison of services used to services authorized, with a significant discrepancy indicating an access constraint 2.Service utilization 3.Provider availability  Measures described in discussion of multivariate analysis Truven Health gathered and synthesized background materials to inform the selection of LTSS service access metrics.

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8 MCOs’ Perspectives on Access  Semi-structured telephone interviews (December February 2013) using protocol approved by DHS  MCOs use numerous methods to assure access to LTSS  MCOs use several sources to assess their enrollees’ access to LTSS  MCOs generally did not think the rate changes affected access  Some did not think providers could sustain further cuts  Some thought the increase in PCA requirements adversely affected provider availability

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 9 Phase 2 Exploratory Analysis of Trends and Encounter Data

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 Service Use Trends  Selected services based on multiple criteria (e.g. policy interest, adequate data, offered by multiple programs, etc.) o Personal Care Assistance (PCA) o Private Duty Nursing (PDN) o Skilled Nurse Visit (SNV) o Homemaker o Consumer Directed Community Supports (CDCS)  Examined number of recipients using the service and amount of service used over the study period  Examined by delivery system (FFS and managed care)  Average number of people using the service increased both in FFS and managed care for PCA, homemaker, and CDCS  Trends not consistent between FFS and managed care for PDN or SNV

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Encounter Data Review  Reviewed encounter claims for the 5 services included in the trends analysis  Reviewed most relevant claims fields with particular focus on units of service  Most important finding for multivariate analysis was the significant number of outliers in units of service for some services in some years o Addressed by trimming the outliers to reasonable amounts based on DHS billing guidelines

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12 ©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12 Phase 3 Multivariate Analysis

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 13 Multivariate Analysis Overview  Statistical study of 2 or more variables of interest at the same time  Include factors such as geographic area, age of recipient, level of likely LTSS need, etc.  Main focus was rate effects (FYs )  Explored same set of services from Phase 2, except for CDCS o CDCS presented methodological challenges  Included large number of State data sources  Added Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) classification of geographic areas What has been the impact of rate changes, relative to other potential correlates, on access to LTSS in Minnesota?

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 14 Multivariate Outcome Variables Multivariate Model Access Measure as Dependent Variable Access Measure Description Service Authorized Amount vs. Used Measure 1 (FFS Only)% difference between authorized and used amounts of LTSS Service X, with access constraint defined as a discrepancy of >15% UtilizationMeasure 2Out of those eligible, use or non-use of LTSS Service X within a given yearly quarter Measure 3Out of service users, amount (units) of LTSS Service X used within a given yearly quarter Provider Availability Measures 4a and 4bNumber of enrolled LTSS providers per county (4a) and participating LTSS providers per county (4b) Measures 5Ratio of unique recipients to unique participating LTSS providers

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 15 Explanatory Variables Zip code characteristics (e.g. RUCA) Provider rate changes Recipient characteristics that vary over time (e.g. age) Recipient characteristics that do not vary over time (e.g. gender, race)

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16 Measure 1 Results: Discrepancy Between Authorized and Used Amounts of Service

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17 Measure 2 Results: Use vs. Non-Use of Service

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 18 Measure 3 Results: Amount of Service Used

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 19 Measure 4a Results: Enrolled Provider Counts

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 20 Measure 4b Results: Participating Provider Counts

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 21 Measure 5 Results: Ratio of Unique Recipients to Unique Participating Providers

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 22 Multivariate Summary  Designed and analyzed access measures tailored to available data and DHS’ interests  Novel approach with few, if any, precedents  Most of the measures showed some rate change effects with Measure 3 (amounts of service used) showing the largest effects  Provider availability measures showed the least rate change effects  PCA appears to be the service, of the four examined, most greatly affected by the rate changes  Other factors such as age, level of LTSS need, and geographic area had much larger influence than the rate changes on access in Measures 1 and 2, but comparable or smaller-sized effects in Measure 3  Enrollment in managed care often has a larger effect on access measures as compared to the effects of other factors

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 23 Study Limitations  Main focus and charge were to determine whether there were rate change effects  Not able to explore whether other statistical approaches might explain the access measures better (i.e. better “fit” to data)  With no available control group, an observational study like this shows associations, not causation  Difficult to control for policy or programmatic changes (e.g. PCA reform)  Likely other factors we have neither identified nor controlled for  Presence of an informal caregiver  Level of LTSS need for people without assessments

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 24 Next Steps  Development of technical appendix  Consider which measures best lend themselves to Dashboard metrics and what the most useful “drill-down” variables should be  Age group  Geographic location (RUCA, county, other)  Program (waiver, home care)  Develop Dashboard and test measures

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 25 COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS

©Truven Health Analytics Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26 More than Data. Answers. Jessica Kasten Rebecca Woodward