Low energy e + e –  hadrons in Novosibirsk I.Logashenko On behalf of the CMD-2 and SND Collaborations Budker Institure of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Advertisements

July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Glasgow, October 25, 2007 Results on e+e- annihilation from CMD2 and SND G.V.Fedotovich and S.I.Eidelman Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
G.V.Fedotovich Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk MC generators with radiative corrections used in direct e + e - scan experiments.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Debora Leone Institut für Experimetelle Kernphysik Universität Karlsruhe on behalf of KLOE collaboration Measurement of the hadronic cross section at KLOE.
Measurement of B (  (nS)   +   ) at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration 1 st Meeting of the APS.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
The Hadronic Cross Section Measurement at KLOE Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa on behalf of the KLOE collaboration EPS (July 17th-23rd 2003) in Aachen, Germany.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Measurements of R Value and Hadronic Form Factors at BES Haiming Hu Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing Novosibirsk, Russian Feb. 27 – Mar.
R Value at BESIII Haiming Hu Workshop on Future PRC-US Cooperation in High Energy Physics Beijing, China June 11, 2006.
The Number of Light Neutrino Families ● Physics motivation for measurement ● Direct / indirect searches for ● Analysis methodology for ● Single photon.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Measurement of the Hadronic Cross Section at DA F NE with KLOE Achim G. Denig for the KLOE Collaboration La Thuile, Vallée d’Aoste XXXIX th.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Initial State Radiation and Inclusive Hadron Production at B A B AR Fabio Anulli University of Perugia, INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
16 June, 2015 В.И. Тельнов 1 Two-photon experiments with detector MD1 at VEPP-4 Valery Telnov Budker INP and Novosibirsk St. Univ. PHOTON 2015, June 16,
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
1 Recent results on  (3770) production & decays from BES/BEPC Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R.
The measurement of R at low energies: status and perspectives Federico Nguyen - Università degli Studi di Roma TRE.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Febr.28-March 2, 2006N Nbar project at VEPP The project to measure the nucleon form factors at VEPP-2000 Workshop - e+e- collisions from phi to psi,
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Detectors for VEPP-2000 B.Khazin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 2 March 2006.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Studies of Electroweak Interactions and Searches for New Physics Using Photonic Events with Missing Energy at the Large Electron-Positron Collider Marat.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
JINR, Dubna 5-9 December, 2011 Current status of luminosity measurements with the CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 G.V.Fedotovich BINP, Novosibirsk.
Fedotovich G.V. On behalf of CMD-3 collaboration Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk State University phipsi15, USTC, Hefei, China 23 – 26.
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
Measurement of the total hadronic cross-section at e+e- machines I. Logashenko Boston University (Boston, USA) Budker Institure of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk,
MC generators with radiative corrections
MC generator for the process e+e-  with RC pro mille accuracy
Measurement of J/ψ→ηCγ at KEDR
Cross section of the process
First results of SND experiment at VEPP-2000
  at Super tau-charm
Precise measurements of hadron productions in e+e- annihilation
Progress on Pion Form Factor at KLOE (large photon polar angle)
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
Status and results of Novosibirsk accelerator complex
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Low energy e + e –  hadrons in Novosibirsk I.Logashenko On behalf of the CMD-2 and SND Collaborations Budker Institure of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) Boston University (Boston, USA) 10 th International Workshop On Tau Lepton Physics Novosibirsk, Russia, Sep 22 – 25, 2008

Cross-section e + e -  hadrons Measurement of the cross-section e+e-  hadrons in VEPP-2M energy range is interesting for: measurement of R(s) measurement of parameters of light vector mesons ρ, ω, φ, ρ’, ρ’’, ω’, ω’’ comparison with spectral functions of the hadronic tau decays At low s R(s) has to be measured. The value and the error of the hadronic contribution to muon’s (g-2) are dominated by low energy R(s).

R(s) measurements at low s VEPP-2M Babar/Belle (ISR) KLOE (ISR) VEPP-2000 At VEPP-2M the cross-sections of each final state are measured exclusively

VEPP-2M collider VEPP-2M collider: GeV in c.m., L  /cm 2 s at 1 GeV Detectors CMD-2 and SND: 70 pb -1 collected in

CMD-2 detector

SND detector 1 - beam pipe, 2 - drift chambers, 3 - coincidence counter, 4 - fibre light guide, 5 - PMTs, 6 - NaI(Tl) crystals, 7 – phototriodes, 8 - iron absorber, 9 - muon tubes, cm iron plate, 11 - muon counters, 12 - magnetic lenses, 13 - bending magnets

Example of CMD-2 and SND events e + e -  π + π - in CMD-2e + e -  K + K - in SND

Overview of the results

How cross-section is measured Luminosity L is measured using Bhabha scattering at large angles Efficiency  is calculated via Monte Carlo + corrections for imperfect detector Radiative correction  accounts for ISR effects only All modes except 2  Ratio N(2  )/N(ee) is measured directly  detector inefficiencies are cancelled out Virtually no background Analysis does not rely on simulation (sort of) Radiative corrections account for ISR and FSR effects Formfactor is measured to better precision than L (1-2%) 22

e+e-π+π-e+e-π+π-

Experimental data 96 95, ,98 98,2000 CMD-2 SND Events signature: two back-to-back tracks, originated near the interaction point Data sample includes: e+e-, μ+μ-, π+π-, cosmic muons There is almost no background at √s <1 GeV Data were taken in 6 separate runs between 1994 and 2000

Event separation (CMD-2) e/  /  separation using particles momentum can measure N(  )/N(ee) and compare to QED <0.6 GeV Momentum Energy >0.6 GeV e/  /  separation using energy deposition N(  )/N(ee) is fixed according to QED Momentum Energy Likelihood minimization:

Event separation (SND) Event separation is based on neural network: 7 input parameters: energy deposition in each layer for both clusters and polar angle 2 hidden layers 20 neurons each 1 output parameter – R e/π Trained on simulated events Checked on experimental 3π and e+e- events E 1 (1,2,3), E 2 (1,2,3),Θ R e/π Distribution by separation parameter Misidentification ~ %

Radiative corrections ISR+FSR ISR+FSR+VP Radiation terms Vacuum polarization CMD-2 uses custom Monte- Carlo generator to calculate RC ee, ,  final states: 1  at large angle, multiple  ’s along initial or final particles (≤0.2%) CMD-2 calculation is consistent with independent calculations (BHWIDE, KKMC) SND uses BHWIDE for ee final state and CMD-2 generator for ,  final states

Comparison with other calculations of the radiative corrections Comparison with BHWIDEComparison with KKMC

Reconstruction efficiency correction (CMD-2) All selected final states produce very similar signal in the drift chamber. In the first order, the reconstruction efficiency is cancelled out from the formfactor calculation Due to drift chamber malfunction, the correction for reconstruction efficiency reach up to 4% percent for 1998 data set. Measured ratio ε ππ /ε ee

Pion formfactor - results SND 3.2% 1.3% CMD2 0.7% 0.6% (95)/ 0.8% (98) % SND only CMD2 only

Internal Cross-checks Δ(95-98)≈0.7%±0.5% CMD2, 2 independent scans of rho-region CMD2 vs SND √s<0.52 GeV Δ(SND-CMD2)≈1.2%±3.6% CMD2 vs SND 0.6<√s<1.0 GeV Δ(SND-CMD2)≈-0.53%±0.34% CMD2 √s<0.52 GeV

Other modes

“Narrow” resonances Mass and width are measured to ≈0.1 MeV, Γ ee to ≈2-3%

Cross-section e+e-  4π Systematic error: Systematic error ≈5-7% Efficiency determination gives main contribution to the systematic error SND = 8% CMD2= 15% (discrepancy 15-25%) problem with efficiency determination! CMD2-reanalysis preliminary = 8%

Cross-section e+e-  3π Systematic error: ≈6% (>1GeV) 1-2% on omega 2.5% on phi Fit:

Cross-section e+e-  2K CMD2 SND Systematic error ≈5-8% Systematic error ≈3-9% Systematic error is ≈2-3% at φ resonance CMD2(prel.) SND

Overview of the results 1.0%~ % 0.6% % 1.5% ~ % 1--2% % 2.0% Systematic error: Total error: Error of R(s)

Future measurements at VEPP-2000

VEPP-2000 storage ring Up to 2 GeV c.m. energy Factor >10 in luminosity L=10 31 cm -2 c -1, √s=1.0 GeV L=10 32 cm -2 c -1, √s=2.0 GeV ≈100 1/pb per detector per year Status: construction is finished had first beams and collisions 2009 – start of experiments

CMD-3 Detector 1 – vacuum tube, 2 – drift chamber, 3 – calorimeter BGO (680 crystals), 4 – Z–chamber, 5 – CMD-3 superconducting solenoid, 6 – calorimeter LXe (400 liters), 7 – calorimeter CsI (1152 crystals), 8 – magnet yoke, 9 – solenoids of VEPP-2000 Advantages compared to CMD-2: new drift chamber with x2 better resolution better tracking thicker barrel calorimeter better separation LXe calorimeter - much better spatial resolution for γ’s - shower profile

SND – beam pipe 2 – tracking system 3 – aerogel 4 – NaI(Tl) crystals 5 – phototriodes 6 – muon absorber 7–9 – muon detector 10 – focusing solenoid Advantages compared to “old” SND: new system - cherenkov counter (n=1.05, 1.13) e/π separation E<450 MeV π/K separation E<1 GeV new drift chamber better tracking better determination of solid angle

How can we improve measurement of R? We expect to: measure 2  mode to %, 4  mode to 2% overall improvement in R precision by factor 2-3 We expect to get the following improvements: high statistics! (x10-x100) – current measurement is still statistics-limited radiative corrections to 0.1% - add photon jet + large angle γ measure radiative tails and compare them to calculations (ISR?) luminosity to 0.5%, use γγ in addition to Bhabha for cross-check much better separation – smaller systematic error, try to measure e+e-  μ+μ- precise trigger efficiency monitoring better drift chambers – higher resolution, efficiencies

Examples of improvements (CMD-3) CMD-3 CMD-2 Separation by energy deposition Separation by momentum Because of better resolution of the drift chamber, the separation by momentum should work up to √s ≈ 0.65 GeV CMD-2 2*0.26 GeV CMD-3 2*0.32 MeV 4σ4σ √s/2, GeV

Conclusion CMD-2 and SND data analyses are nearly complete. Cross sections of all major modes of e+e-  hadrons are measured at energy range √s < 1.4 GeV. These are the best direct (energy- scan) measurements at the moment. There is good agreement between Novosibirsk results, in particular: pion formfactor CMD-2 (94,95) vs CMD-2 (98), CMD-2 vs SND. Over the last few years new indirect high precision measurements of R were performed: new tau-decay data and ISR. The question of agreement between different methods is still open. New more precise measurement of R is scheduled at VEPP-2000.

Backup slides

Pion formfactor calculation Master formula: σ B – Born cross-section (F π =1) δ – radiative correction ε – reconstruction efficiency Δ N – correction for nuclear interactions Δ D – correction for decay in flight Δ bg – correction for e+e-  3π,4π,2K background Δ corr – correction for E +  E - correlation Nππ/Nee is measured, other values are calculated:

What is really measured? Definition of  (e + e -  hadrons) depends on the application Hadron spectroscopy: vacuum polarization (VP) is the part of the cross-section (“dressed”), final state radiation (FSR) is not “Bare” cross-section used in R: vice versa – FSR is the part of the cross-section, VP is not Measured number of events include VP and part of FSR allowed by the event selection CMD-2 published 2 cross-sections e + e -  2  : radiative correction take into account part of FSR, allowed by the event selection (thus remove FSR completely from the measured cross-section); VP is left untouched. Used to get rho-meson mass, width, … VP is removed, all FSR is added. Used for R calculation VP FSR

Systematic errors Source of errorCMD-2 √s<1 GeV SNDCMD-2 √s>1.0 GeV Event separation %0.5% % Fiducial volume0.2%0.8% % Energy calibration %0.3% % Efficiency correction0.2%-0.5%0.6% % Pion losses (decay, NI)0.2% Other0.2%0.5% % Radiative corrections %0.2% % Total %1.3% %