19001020304050607080902000 Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code - 1947 Declaration of Helsinki - 1964 WWII – 1939-45 Time Line for Human Subject Research and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Nursing Research. Perspectives for Assessing Ethical Acceptability Utilitarian Perspective - the good of a project is defined.
Advertisements

The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Darran Boyer, Moderator Alicia (Ali) Craig-Rodriguez President, Comprehensive Neuroscience, Inc. Kim Lerner Chief Executive.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Ethical Issues in Human Experimentation The Role of the IRB The IRB is an administrative body established to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Special IND/IDE Considerations: Emergency Use of Investigational Product Compassionate Use & Emergency Research July 21,
PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis Lecture 1d – The Belmont Report.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Chapter 3 Ethics in research.
Ethical Issues in Research
DO THE CODES APPLY TO MY RESEARCH?
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Ethics In Research: Duties, Decisions and Dilemmas Colleen M. Gallagher, PhD, FACHE Chief & Executive Director Section of Integrated Ethics Associate Professor,
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
HUMAN RESEARCH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Objectives Identify the history events that lead to the development of principles, regulations, and guidance.
Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI.
1 HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS Daniel R. Vasgird, PhD, CIP Office of Research Compliance West Virginia University (304)
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Clinical Research.
Frederick G More, DDS, MS Professor New York University New York, NY, USA July 2009University of Haiti.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Research Ethics.
Sociological Research Methods Chapter 3 Ethics in Research.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Is public "Health” & “Pride” influence by? Health & Pride Nationalism Public Opinion PropagandaJustice Presentation by Maria C Alvarez May 6 th, 2015.
+ UW-Stout IRB News from the IRB New protocol form New online training New certification New staff.
Protection of Human Research Subjects Theresia Yiallourou Nora Leonardi Ulrike Kettenberger November 19 th 2010.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Beyond Regulations: Ethical Considerations in Research
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Promoting a Rights Based Approach in Research Ethics Pathmeswaran A & Perera WN Ethics Review Committee Faculty of Medicine University of Kelaniya, Sri.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Ethical Dilemma Research that is most likely to reveal something important about human nature is also the most likely to violate human rights. A number.
Mary Travis Director of Research Compliance
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Investigator Responsibilities: What should we expect from researchers?
Ethics in Research.
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials
Ethical issue in medical research.
Ethics of human research
Presentation transcript:

Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki WWII – Time Line for Human Subject Research and Protection

Declaration of Helsinki – 1964 Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects “… a statement of ethical principles to provide guidance to physicians and other participants in medical research involving human subjects.” “It is the duty of the physician to promote and safeguard the health of the people. The physician’s knowledge and conscience are dedicated to the fulfillment of this duty.” World Medical Association Updated 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, and 2000 “In medical research on human subjects, considerations related to the well being of the human subject should take precedence over the interests of science and society.” Ben Shahn – Credo

Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki Tuskegee Study – WWII – Time Line for Human Subject Research and Protection

Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki Tuskegee Study – WWII – Belmont Report Time Line for Human Subject Research and Protection

1. National Research Act - Public Law – July 12, Establishes the National Commission 2. Charge to Commission:  Identify the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving humans subjects  Develop guidelines which should be followed to assure that such research is conducted in accordance with those principles 3. Smithsonian Institution’s Belmont Conference Center – February 1976

Belmont Report – Basic Ethical Principles Respect for Persons “Respect for persons incorporates at least two ethical convictions; first that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection.” “To respect autonomy is to give weight to the autonomous persons’ considered opinions and choices ….” Department of Energy Radiation Counting in Child – 1950s

Belmont Report – Basic Ethical Principles Beneficence “Persons are treated in an ethical manner … by making efforts to secure their well being … In this document, beneficence is understood … as an obligation.” “Two general rules have been formulated as complementary expressions of beneficent actions in this sense: (1) do not harm and (2) maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms.” Department of Energy Radiation Counting in Child – 1950s

Belmont Report – Basic Ethical Principles Justice “Who ought to receive the benefits of research and bear its burdens? This is a question of justice in the sense of ‘fairness in distribution’…” “… the selection of research subjects needs to be scrutinized … to determine whether some classes (e.g., …persons confined to institutions) are being … selected simply because of their easy availability, their compromised position, or their manipulability, rather than for reasons directly related to the problem being studied.” Department of Energy Radiation Counting in Child – 1950s

Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki Tuskegee Study – WWII – Belmont Report I.R.B.s Time Line for Human Subject Research and Protection

Institutional Review Boards (IRB) Responsibilities –Review informed consent document –Assess risks and benefits of proposed research –Review subject selection Constitution –At least five members –Varied backgrounds –Scientists –Non-scientists –Community members Ben Shahn

Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki Tuskegee Study – WWII – Belmont Report I.R.B.s Common Rule Time Line for Human Subject Research and Protection

“Common Rule” 1.Subpart A45 CFR 46 2.Agreed to by 16 Federal Agencies 3.Effective August 19, Sets forth as a common rule requirements for the protection of human subjects involved in research conducted by Federal Departments and Agencies

Jesse Gelsinger (Age 18)  Facts  University of Pennsylvania  Institute for Human Gene Therapy  Ornithine Transcarbamylase (OTC) Deficiency  Adenovirus Vector  Dies September 17, 1999  Issues  Problems not reported to IRB  Eligibility questions  Conflicts of Interest

Ellen Roche (Age 24)  Facts  Johns Hopkins Medical Institution  Healthy Volunteer  Study of Airway Reactions  Inhales Hexamethonium  Dies June 2, 2001  Issues  Institutional Responsiveness  Inadequate IRB Review  Studies from 1950s describing Hexamethonium toxicities not identified

Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki Tuskegee Study – WWII – Belmont Report I.R.B.s Common Rule R.S.A. Time Line for Human Subject Research and Protection

Research Subject Advocates (RSA) New positions within the GCRCs (2001) Educate investigators and facilitate the informed consent process Assist in developing data safety monitoring plans for research protocols Audit research records to assure compliance with federal regulations Ben Shahn – In Quiet Rooms

Over the past century, the process of conducting research with human subjects has improved with substantial gains in human health. Yet each day brings new challenges, and we must remain vigilant. Ben Shahn – Birds Fly