UNECE-UNODC Meeting on Crime Statistics, 25- 27 January 2006 Session 4: Dissemination of crime victim data Results from the UNECE-UNODC questionnaire on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 2010 World Population and Housing Census Programme ( )
Advertisements

Paul Richards, University College London (UCL) Crime surveys user meeting Tuesday 7 December 2010 Shedding more Light on the Dark Figure.
Lucero Sosa Edgar Flores Period 1. California Standards  8.0 Student organized and describe distribution of data by using of different methods, including.
A Tale of Two Sources Bringing Together Scotland’s Crime Statistics Trish Campbell, Justice Analytical SGJusticeAnalys.
Inference for a Population Proportion
Use of crime and criminal justice statistics at the national and international level Steven Malby Research Officer Statistics and Surveys Section.
Statistical Decision-Making Process: Decision Problem Statistical Plan Data Description and Summary Analysis and Conclusions Testing Validity of Results.
1 Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Section 7.2 Estimating a Population Proportion Objective Find the confidence.
United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Revising the Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses New York, 29 October – 1 November.
Scot Exec Course Nov/Dec 04 Ambitious title? Confidence intervals, design effects and significance tests for surveys. How to calculate sample numbers when.
How tired are students in the morning ? Jose Almanza Period
ICVS IN SLOVENIA Tatjana Škrbec. Content of presentation  Short history  Crime victim survey 2001 within SORS  Methodology and content of questionnaire.
Issues Related to Data Dissemination in Official Statistics Presented at the European Conference On Quality in Official Statistics Helsinki, Finland May.
10.3 Estimating a Population Proportion
Working Group on Crime Statistics 9 June 2011 Point 3. Commission Activities ( Doc. CR/WG2011/1)
GENDER BASED VIOLENCE: Violence against women quantitative survey Ms.J.Tsogzolmaa, Analyst NSO of Mongolia International Seminar on Gender Statistics 12-14,
Recent Developments of the OECD Business Tendency and Consumer Opinion Surveys Portal coi/coordination
Development of metadata in the National Statistical Institute of Spain Work Session on Statistical Metadata Genève, 6-8 May-2013 Ana Isabel Sánchez-Luengo.
With funding from the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FOR JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS
Population census micro data for research: the case of Slovenia Danilo Dolenc Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia Ljubljana, First Regional.
CONFIDENCE INTERVALS Feb. 18 th, A STATS PROFESSOR ASKED HER STUDENTS WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE REGISTERED TO VOTE. IN A SAMPLE OF 50 OF HER STUDENTS.
Statistical Inference: Making conclusions about the population from sample data.
Challenges in Collecting Police-Reported Crime Data Colin Babyak Household Survey Methods Division ICES III - Montreal – June 20, 2007.
Conducting and Analysing Labour Force Surveys for Monitoring of the Labour Market, ِِ Amman November 2012 Challenges and Opportunities Labour Force.
Sami Nevala 11 September 2006 Report of the UNECE Task Force on Measuring Violence against Women ECE/CES/GE.30/2006/6.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. International Statistics Part 2 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration.
1 1 Metadata for the Norwegian outward FATS Which of the following approaches best describes the methodology adopted to produce outward FATS population?
What is you’re GPA? Cristian Espinoza Juan Gonzalez Period
C ONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR PROPORTIONS Sec 9.3. T HE P LAN ; F OR BUILDING A 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL.
Aspects of victim survey methodology: results from the inventory of victimisation surveys Jonathan Allen UK Home Office.
VISUALIZATION AND OTHER TOOLS FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING & DISSEMINATION UNECE Work Session on Statistical Dissemination and Communication May 2008,
With funding from the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FOR JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Putting Statistics to Work.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division The UNECE Gender Database and Website UNECE Statistical Division.
Chapter 19 Confidence intervals for proportions
Regional Seminar on Promotion and Utilization of Census Results and on the Revision on the United Nations Principles and Recommendations for Population.
Section 8.3 ~ Estimating Population Proportions Introduction to Probability and Statistics Ms. Young.
Core variables in Estonian social surveys Merle Paats Statistics Estonia.
Can We Trust Data Users to Consider Data Quality? Presented at the 2008 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics.
Measuring Violence Against Women in Australia Horst Posselt Director Family & Community Statistics Australian Bureau of Statistics UNECE Work Session on.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division The UNECE Gender Statistics Database and Website UNECE Statistical Division.
RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF SORS METADATA REPOSITORIES FOR FASTER AND MORE TRANSPARENT PRODUCTION PROCESS Work Session on Statistical Metadata 9-11 February.
Mariana Lopez Carlos Aguilar Alex Rodriguez Period Commute time for senior student’s high school experience.
Patrick Kent Watson Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies The University of the West Indies St. Augustine.
User Satisfaction Surveys in Eurostat and in the European Statistical System 2008 Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Rome, 8-11 July 2008 Pierre.
Gender Statistics in Armenia National Statistical Service Republic of Armenia Prepared by Gagik Gevorgyan, Member on State Council of Statistics, Astghik.
On average how many phones have you had since your first phone? Jesus Guerrero Period
The survey was mailed to 6,401 households in the state of Maryland, randomly selected from within each of four regions.
UNECE-UNODC Meeting on Crime Statistics, January 2006 OPENING SESSION General results of the UNECE-UNODC Questionnaire on Victim Surveys Presentation.
The Practice of Statistics Third Edition Chapter 10.3 (12.1): Estimating a Population Proportion Copyright © 2008 by W. H. Freeman & Company Daniel S.
- UNECE Statistical Division Slide 1 Analysis of the pre meeting questionnaire Budapest Initiative on Measuring Health Status Geneva, January 2010.
Survey Training Pack Session 19 – Interpretation of Findings.
Overview What is the 2010 World Population and Housing Census Programme? Implementation of Population and Housing Censuses in the 2010 Round UNSD's activities.
Population and Housing Census 2011 Czech Republic
11-14 January, 2016 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Working Group Meeting: Statistics on Crime and Criminal Justice 15 March 2017, Luxembourg Ongoing work on developing the ICCS manual and translations.
Overview What is the 2010 World Population and Housing Census Programme? Implementation of Population and Housing Censuses in the 2010 Round UNSD's activities.
Vital statistics and their sources
Background to the development of a European Victimisation Survey
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
EHIS W2: Quality reports & analysis of microdata
UNECE-UNODC Programme on Victimization Surveys
Overview What is the 2010 World Population and Housing Census Programme? Implementation of Population and Housing Censuses in the 2010 Round UNSD's activities.
Workshop on Health Statistics Context, Objectives & Organisation
Comparisons between Eurostat and UNODC results
Project on translating and testing a victimisation survey module
Inference for Proportions
Paolo Valente UNECE Statistical Division
Paolo Valente UNECE Statistical Division
Presentation transcript:

UNECE-UNODC Meeting on Crime Statistics, January 2006 Session 4: Dissemination of crime victim data Results from the UNECE-UNODC questionnaire on victim surveys Philippe Lamon UNODC

Overview Comparability of results Comparability of results Margin of error Margin of error Availability of data and dissemination Availability of data and dissemination

Were the results of the survey compared with data on crimes reported to the police? SurveysCountries Yes2228%1753% No5064%2681% No answer 68%516% Total78100%32

Rates per population of selected crimes 436 data are given on 1660 possible data (26%)

Rates per population of selected crimes Problems: Problems: - Period reference ? - Period reference ? - Comparability ? - Comparability ? - per household or per owner ? - per household or per owner ? = 0.09% or 9% ? = 0.09% or 9% ? - etc. - etc.

If the survey results have been made public, what margin of error was adopted in presenting the results? 33 relevant information in 78 surveys (42%)

Types of margin of error Relevant information % of all surveys ‘Over 25% are considered unreliable’ 618%8% Different according to the data (groups, territory level, etc.) 26%3% 95% confidence interval 1442%18% Not enough specific (published with S.E., etc.) 39%4% Other (0.03, 0.15, 1-2%, 0.035) 824%10% N/A57% Total33100%78100%

Margin error adopted by the ICVS

Is there a public use microdata file? SurveysCountries Yes3140%1650% No4355%2372% No answer 45%39% Total78100%32

Are survey results available on internet? SurveysCountries Yes5165%2578% Not available yet 34%39% No2228%1856% No answer 23%26% Total78100%32

Were printed reports published with the results of the surveys? SurveysCountries Yes4766%2991% Yes, as part of the ICVS analysis 57%413% No2228%1444% No answer 45%39% Total78100%32

Conclusion (1) Comparability of the data 1. with police data 28% of surveys but 53% of countries (63% of surveys in 88% of countries in dark figure/unreported crime, but only 28% of surveys compare with police data) 2. with other surveys: lack of comparison Comparability of the data 1. with police data 28% of surveys but 53% of countries (63% of surveys in 88% of countries in dark figure/unreported crime, but only 28% of surveys compare with police data) 2. with other surveys: lack of comparison

Conclusion (2) Comparison of data collected between different surveys? Possible if at least: - same methodology - same reference population, rates per owner/pop, etc. Possible in two ways for international comparison: - ICVS - comparison of two surveys (complicated) Comparison of data collected between different surveys? Possible if at least: - same methodology - same reference population, rates per owner/pop, etc. Possible in two ways for international comparison: - ICVS - comparison of two surveys (complicated)

Conclusion (3) Margin of error Should we propose a model? Margin of error Should we propose a model?

Conclusion (4) Dissemination of results 1. on internet (65% of surveys, 78% of countries) = good 2. printed version (67% of surveys, 94% of countries) = ok for countries, lack of finalization for surveys Dissemination of results 1. on internet (65% of surveys, 78% of countries) = good 2. printed version (67% of surveys, 94% of countries) = ok for countries, lack of finalization for surveys

Thank you