Kirsten Fiest, PhD June 23, 2015 1 CONDUCTING META-ANALYSES IN HEALTH RESEARCH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katrina Abuabara, MD, MA1 Esther E Freeman MD, PhD2;
Advertisements

Meta-analysis: summarising data for two arm trials and other simple outcome studies Steff Lewis statistician.
EVAL 6970: Meta-Analysis Vote Counting, The Sign Test, Power, Publication Bias, and Outliers Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Spring 2011.
Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA
Statistical Models in Meta- Analysis T i ~ N(  i  i 2 )  i ~ N(  2 )
ODAC May 3, Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials Stephen L George, PhD Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University Medical Center.
Estimation and Reporting of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare.
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2005.
Department of Health Sciences M.Sc. in Evidence Based Practice, M.Sc. in Health Services Research Meta-analysis: heterogeneity and publication bias Martin.
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Making all research results publically available: the cry of systematic reviewers.
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org C2 Training: May 9 – 10, 2011 Data Analysis and Interpretation: Computing effect sizes.
  Meta-Analysis of Correlated Data. Common Forms of Dependence Multiple effects per study –Or per research group! Multiple effect sizes using same.
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Statistics
Daniel Acuña Outline What is it? Statistical significance, sample size, hypothesis support and publication Evidence for publication bias: Due.
Department of O UTCOMES R ESEARCH. Daniel I. Sessler, M.D. Michael Cudahy Professor and Chair Department of O UTCOMES R ESEARCH The Cleveland Clinic Clinical.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Program Evaluation. Program evaluation Methodological techniques of the social sciences social policy public welfare administration.
Data Analysis in Systematic Reviews-Meta Analysis.
Data Analysis in Systematic Reviews
Experimental Design making causal inferences Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
Simon Thornley Meta-analysis: pooling study results.
How to Evaluate the Effects of Potential Bias in Meta-analysis in R.
Systematic Reviews By Jonathan Tsun & Ilona Blee.
IMPRINT Developer’s Workshop December 6-7, 2005 Meta-analytic Reviews of the Effects of Temperature and Vibration on Performance J.L. Szalma & G. Conway.
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Meta-analysis and “statistical aggregation” Dave Thompson Dept. of Biostatistics and Epidemiology College of Public Health, OUHSC Learning to Practice.
Meta-analysis 統合分析 蔡崇弘. EBM ( evidence based medicine) Ask Acquire Appraising Apply Audit.
Author(s): Joel J. Gagnier M.Sc., Ph.D., 2011 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons.
Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org C2 Training: May 9 – 10, 2011 Introduction to meta-analysis.
AHMED AWAD ALDHAHRI SUPERVISOR DR DARFIANA NUR Meta-Analysis of a Systematic Review on Adult Obesity in Kuwait.
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger. Academic viva 2 papers 1 hour to read both Viva on both papers Summary-what is the paper about.
PH 401: Meta-analysis Eunice Pyon, PharmD (718) , HS 506.
Impact of Air Pollution on Public Health: Transportability of Risk Estimates Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS NERAM V October 16, 2006 Vancouver, B.C. Department.
Development and the Role of Meta- analysis on the Topic of Inflammation Donald S. Likosky, Ph.D.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Systematic Synthesis of the Literature: Introduction to Meta-analysis Linda N. Meurer, MD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine.
Fixed- v. Random-Effects. Fixed and Random Effects 1 All conditions of interest – Fixed. Sample of interest – Random. Both fixed and random-effects meta-analyses.
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction And Death from Cardiovascular Causes Alternative Interpretations of the Evidence George A.
Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Designs
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.
Evaluation of statistical methods for meta-analysis Julian Higgins School of Social and Community Medicine University of Bristol, UK 1 Cochrane Methods.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 27 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Metasynthesis,
Is a meta-analysis right for me? Jaime Peters June 2014.
Wim Van den Noortgate Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Belgian Campbell Group Workshop systematic reviews.
Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing Mark Dancox Public Health Intelligence Course – Day 3.
Chapter 22 Inferential Data Analysis: Part 2 PowerPoint presentation developed by: Jennifer L. Bellamy & Sarah E. Bledsoe.
Meta-analysis of observational studies Nicole Vogelzangs Department of Psychiatry & EMGO + institute.
Table 1. Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MORE) – observational studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic diseases Tatyana Shamliyan.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 From: Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic.
Meta-analysis Overview
Brady Et Al., "sequential compression device compliance in postoperative obstetrics and gynecology patients", obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 125, no.
Visual funnel plot inference for meta-analysis
Benefits and Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger.
Testing for moderators
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Lecture 4: Meta-analysis
Natalie Robinson Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Dr. Maryam Tajvar Department of Health Management and Economics
EAST GRADE course 2019 Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias in Systematic Reviews
MetaForest Using random forests to explore heterogeneity in meta-analysis Caspar J. van Lissa, Utrecht University NL
Presentation transcript:

Kirsten Fiest, PhD June 23, CONDUCTING META-ANALYSES IN HEALTH RESEARCH

 A statistical method of combining data from multiple independent sources  Powerful tool to compare the effects of interventions, determine the magnitude of association, or prevalence/incidence of disease  Often informed by the results of a systematic review  Can assess differences between subgroups that may not be possible in individual studies 2 META-ANALYSIS

 SAS, STATA, SPSS, R, spreadsheets, RevMan  Graphics quality will differ  Easiest to start with data in a spreadsheet  Will need, at minimum, study identifier, effect size, and measure of error 3 STATISTICAL PROGRAMS

 Fixed effect  Assumes there is one true effect size to be estimated  Pooled estimate is the common effect size  Weighting is based entirely on the size of the study  Only source of error is within studies  Random effects  Allows the true effect to vary from study to study  Trying to estimate the mean of a distribution of true effects  Weights assigned are more balanced  Can be error within and between studies 4 ANALYTICAL METHODS

5 INTERPRETING META-ANALYTIC OUTPUT Random-Effects Model (k = 11; tau^2 estimator: REML) I^2 (total heterogeneity / total variability): 99.69% Test for Heterogeneity: Q(df = 10) = , p-val <.0001 Model Results: estimate se zval pval ci.lb ci.ub

6 INTERPRETING A FOREST PLOT

 Clinical and statistical heterogeneity should be assessed  Clinical heterogeneity  Factors known to influence the relationship under consideration  Eg. disease duration, age, sex  Statistical heterogeneity  Measured most commonly by the I 2 and Q statistics  Assesses whether any observed differences may be due to chance alone  Interpret with caution (power) 7 HETEROGENEITY

8 STRATIFICATION

 Potential bias for journals to publish large studies with significant results  Statistical tests to determine its presence  Funnel plots  Examine visually and statistically  Begg’s test is a rank correlation method  Egger’s test is a regression-based method  Trim and fill 9 PUBLICATION BIAS

 Used to identify trends across an extraneous variable  Allows for the inclusion of continuous or categorical variables  Is the incidence of dementia changing over time?  Does the prevalence of epilepsy differ by geographic region? 10 META-REGRESSION

 Method of comparing treatment effects  Pool data from multiple studies with one common arm  Can assess direct and indirect effects 11 NETWORK META-ANALYSES ACT, behavioural activation; CBT, cognitive-behavioural therapy; DYN, psychodynamic therapy; IPT, interpersonal therapy; PLA, placebo; PST, problem solving therapy; SST, social skills training; SUP, supportive counselling; UC, usual care; WL, waitlist. Barth et al., PLOS Med, 2013, 10(5)

 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)  MOOSE (Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology)  Consider reporting guidelines for initial studies as well (STARD, STROBE, CONSORT) 12 REPORTING GUIDELINES

13

14 Patten et al.; CJP, 2014, 59(11):60-614

15

 Limited by the reporting of individual papers  Definitions, estimates provided, basic study details  Quality of individuals studies may vary  Heterogeneity between estimates may weaken some conclusions 16 LIMITATIONS

 Reporting guidelines  Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analyses in Context, 2 nd Edition. Egger, Smith & Altman  Journals in your field of interest RESOURCES 17

18