How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electrical Installation
Advertisements

Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
LHC UPS Systems and Configurations: Changes during the LS1 V. Chareyre / EN-EL LHC Beam Operation Committee 11 February 2014 EDMS No /02/2014.
During a mains supply interruption the entire protected network is dependent on the integrity of the UPS battery as a secondary source of energy. A potential.
Electric Circuits  To calculate the size of a current from the charge flow and time taken Thursday, August 06, 2015.
Residential Wiring By: Ing. Hector M Lugo-Cordero, MS 03/25/2009.
CIRCUIT TYPES PHYSICS UNIT E. CIRCUITS Need a source of energy, a pathway for electrons, and something that uses energy. Ex) Sources: Battery, 120 V plug,
Electrical Installation 2
MICE Decay Solenoid Quench Detector Trevor Hartnett Daresbury Laboratory.
TE-MPE-EP, VF, 11-Oct-2012 Update on the DQLPU type A design and general progress. TE-MPE Technical Meeting.
Applied Circuit Analysis Chapter 3 - Power and Energy Copyright © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Domestic Wiring Two wires come from the power pole to the house. The ACTIVE wire is 240 V RMS. The NEUTRAL wire is 0 V and is connected to.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
Becoming familiar with QPS systems in the LHC (incl. EE) Presentation 02 Sept PART 1 of 3. Part 1: General layouts and principles Presentation of.
Protection of Microgrids Using Differential Relays
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 09-June Enhanced Diagnostics & Supervision for Quench Heater Circuits R. Denz TE-MPE-CP.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
FLEX! Flexible power from 100% till 150% Flexible input from 115 till 500Vac Flexible short circuit and overload protection  Extremely compact design.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
Recent cross-wiring issue and implication for circuits protection Bozhidar Panev TE-MPE-CP
LHC Enhanced Quench Protection System Review 24 – 26 February 2009.
M. POJER, ON BEHALF OF THE USUAL BUNCH OF SUSPECTS… S UPERCONDUCTING CIRCUITS RE - COMMISSIONING AFTER THE 2011 C HRISTMAS BREAK.
Essential lessons from commissioning of the 28 EE systems of LHC sector A corrector circuits.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
NQPS commissioning …a long way to go. Topics nQPS component overview Enhancements in Firmware Commissioning diagram Detailed task list Summary.
MP3 List of main Issues during March 2010 MP3 - Team.
Mondady Feb. 10, 2014PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #8 Monday February 10, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt CH 18 Electric Power.
1 J. Mourao (TE/MPE/CP) Enhanced DQHDS functionality  Status for 2011  Increase Magnet diagnostic capabilities  Our proposals.
TE-MPE -EI 23/6/2011,Antonopoulou Evangelia RQS circuit Simulation results of Quench Antonopoulou Evangelia June 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
QPS Signal Analysis Case studies from MPP and QPS Bob Flora.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
TE/MPE-MS MPE-TM meeting 14/06/2012, Richard Mompo Updated ELQA test procedure Co-authors: Nuria Catalan Lasheras Mateusz Bednarek Giorgio D’Angelo Richard.
E.Sbrissa EP/TA3 - IC ATLAS EDR_MAG Magnet Project Fault analysis, QA & Failure rate.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
TE/MPE/EE - LHC Knud 8/3/2012 Project for Upgrade of the Electrical Circuits, the Powering Scheme and the Quench Heater Supervision for Enhanced Monitoring.
Presentation Topic: Circuit Breakers Represented to: Dr. M. Riaz Khan Represented by: M. Mujahid.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
LMC 1 (Pre Chamonix) DN200 relief valve position DN200 relief valve position On top wherever possible. Open W bellows for MLI protection. On top wherever.
SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PREPARED BY: 1)BALDIWALA ALIABBAS ( ) 2)PARTH GUPTA ( ) 3)ANIL KHATIK ( )
CERN TE-MPE-EP, RD, 09-April Quench Protection Systems (QPS) for the LHC R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: K. Dahlerup-Petersen, A. Siemko, J.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 28-Sep Problems with QPS DAQ Systems During LHC Operation, 1 st Results from 2010 CNRAD Tests R. Denz TE-MPE-CP.
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
  The traditional molded-case circuit breaker uses electromechanical (thermal magnetic) trip units that may be fixed or interchangeable.  An MCCB provides.
Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.
Main MPE Activities during YETS/EYETS/LS2 and the Provision of Resources Andrzej Siemko Andrzej Siemko TE-MPE1.
DQLPUR Project Overview and Plans Review 30 November 2012
S. Feher MICE Magnet Readiness Review RAL, June 28th, 2016
Making Circuits Safe SNC1P1 Findlay.
D1 and D2 powering and protection
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
Shipboard Electrical Distribution
LV Safe Powering from UPS to Clients
Powering the LHC Magnets
Focus Coil Quench Detector
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Energy Consumption: HOME.
Chapter 7 System Protection
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
Engineering Project Cable Management.
Novel Protection Schemes for HVDC System
Domestic Electricity AIM: To understand the use of domestic electricity and safety features such as fuses, circuit breakers and the earth circuit
Energy Consumption: HOME.
Electrical components and systems
Nb3Sn QPS strategies How to protect.
R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: J. Steckert
Physics Circuit Types.
Presentation transcript:

How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS itself. -Interruption of a line for powering of Quench Detectors by opening of the upstream CB is not just a theoretical possibility; it actually occurred twice in 2008 during HWC– fortunately without consequences ! -Another incident lead to destruction of quench detector electronics by accidental presence of 400 V on the UPS phase line. -Reminder 1: Heater firing is exclusively triggered by the QDet, which needs UPS power for detection and firing. The QHDS’s require UPS power for firing and charging. -Reminder 2: In each sector each individual QDet is powered through separate, single (non-redundant) power lines, from 4 UPS units, 1 in each Alcove, 1 in UA and 1 in RR. A complete UPS failure may lead to a large number of magnets being unprotected during the energy extraction ( ≈4.5  ). A single CB opening will leave one magnet unprotected.

Options: -Local energy storage in QPS: Exists already but covers only typically 100ms. To cover 6 minutes of consumption (18 kJ) the capa banks would be too large. In this case the QPS system would substitute the role of the UPS, which makes no sense. -All other considered solutions require the introduction of a second, parallel supply line (Line-2) from the same UPS unit as Line-1, combined with an upgrade of the UPS in order to provide full redundancy as from the ac power input. -The extension of the supply lines from one alcove to the opposite end of the arc OR from the UA (or RR) to the middle of the arc would be too long (voltage drop). Consequently, redundancy between two different UPS systems is no option. -Power switching between two feeder lines from the same UPS at the input to the QDet, depending on availability, has been discarded as the necessary Industrial power switches are excessively expensive (totaling 3.7 MCHF) and lack the necessary radiation resistance (solid state drivers). -Our retained proposal consists in separate powering of the existing DQLPU and the new, additional layer of QPS electronics (the ‘Upgrade’).

Some details: -The proposed scheme is based on the fact that the new QDet for aperture- symmetric quench detection ALSO detects ‘normal’ asymmetric quenches (by 4- magnet comparison, threshold 200 mV). -The new, Distributed Busbar Detector is not affected as linked to FPA and not to heater firing. Topology: 1 ) At the place of the upgraded LPU (i.e. under each dipole ‘B’ and a few other places, total 436 crates): -Existing Quench Prot. Crate shall be powered from UPS Line-1 only, as before. -Two dipole DQHDS shall be powered from UPS Line-1, the two others from UPS Line-2. For the Main Quads one DQHDS shall be powered from each line. -The new DQLPU-typeS crates shall be powered from both Line-1 AND Line-2 (one line per power-pack, one additional power-pack to be foreseen). 2) At the place of all other existing LPU’s (1188 total): -Same separation of the powering lines for the DQHDS as above. The existing Quench Protection Crate shall be powered from the existing Line-1 only, as protection of the associated magnet in case of UPS Line-1 failure is assured by the ‘symmetric’ quench detector board in the new DQLPU-typeS.

Drawbacks: 1)A ‘normal’ asymmetric quench might be detected slightly later than ‘usual’ in case of a UPS Line-1 loss. 2)The PM data from the existing DQLPU will be lost in case of a UPS Line-1 trip. However, the PM data from the new DQLPU-typeS will be available due to parallel powering from UPS Line-2. 3)The redundancy of the Quench Heater Power Supplies is lost in case of rupture of one of the two UPS Lines. Consequences: The task involves installation of about 25 km of new power lines, > 1700 new circuit breakers, a large number of electrical distribution boxes, a redundancy upgrade of (at least) 32 UPS units. For QPS: 436 additional power packs, cables and patches. The estimated cost is exceeding 2 MCHF for EN/EL, ~ 220 kCHF for QPS. About UPS Redundancy Improvements for IPQ’s/IPD’s/IT: If the UPS supply lines are also doubled here the ~ 70 detectors can be relatively easily modified as they already contain redundant LV power supplies.