Pointing Determination for a Coherent Wind Lidar Mission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Program Director: George Komar)
Advertisements

ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
Modulating Retro-reflectors for Space Tracking, Acquisition and Ranging using Multiple Quantum Well Technology G. Charmaine Gilbreath, N. Glenn Creamer,
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
1 Doppler Wind Lidar Technology Roadmap Ken Miller, Mitretek Systems Coauthors –see Reference 2 January 27, 2004.
Uncertainty in Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) Products and Measurements Presented by Patrick Selmer Goddard advisor: Dr. Matthew McGill Assisted.
Preliminary Results of Laser Ranging to Un-cooperative Targets at Shanghai SLR Station Yang FuMin, Zhang ZhongPing, Chen JuPing, Chen WanZhen, Wu ZhiBo,
Doppler Wind and Temperature Sounder: A breakthrough technique GATS Proprietary Larry Gordley, GATS Inc. Dave Fritts, GATS Inc. Tom Marshall, GATS Inc.
MR P.Durkee 5/20/2015 MR3522Winter 1999 MR Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Winter 1999 Active Microwave Radar.
Remote sensing in meteorology
Attitude Determination and Control
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Adaptive Signal Processing Class Project Adaptive Interacting Multiple Model Technique for Tracking Maneuvering Targets Viji Paul, Sahay Shishir Brijendra,
I. The Problem Telescopes on small, light, orbiting observatories are susceptible to pointing errors caused by reaction wheel rumble. The Jupiter Magnetosphere.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Super Star Tracker.
The Remote Sensing of Winds Student: Paul Behrens Placement and monitoring of wind turbines Supervisor: Stuart Bradley.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Current progress of developing Inter-satellite laser interferometry for Space Advanced Gravity Measurements Hsien-Chi Yeh School of Physics Huazhong University.
October 16-18, 2012Working Group on Space-based Lidar Winds 1 AEOLUS STATUS Part 1: Design Overview.
EECS 823 MACHARIA.  Four-frequency, linearly-polarized, passive microwave radiometric system which measures atmospheric, ocean and terrain microwave.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
B. Gentry/GSFCSLWG 06/29/05 Scaling Ground-Based Molecular Direct Detection Doppler Lidar Measurements to Space Using Wind Profile Measurements from GLOW.
An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen.
Pioneer Anomaly Test – Jonathan Fitt 1 Design Assessment of Lunar, Planetary and Satellite Ranging Applied to Fundamental Physics Jonathan Fitt Friday,
1 Global Tropospheric Winds Sounder (GTWS) Reference Designs Ken Miller, Mitretek Systems January 24, Jan-02.
10. Satellite Communication & Radar Sensors
Scaling Surface and Aircraft Lidar Results for Space-Based Systems (and vice versa) Mike Hardesty, Barry Rye, Sara Tucker NOAA/ETL and CIRES Boulder, CO.
B. Gentry/GSFCGTWS 2/26/01 Doppler Wind Lidar Measurement Principles Bruce Gentry NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center based on a presentation made to the.
Beam alignment and incorporation into optical design
TODWL and other Navy airborne wind lidar plans including nocturnal flight plan in November G. D. Emmitt SWA Working Group meeting Snowmass, CO 18 July,
Fig. 3 Wind measurements experimental setup Lidar (light detection and ranging) operates using the same concept of microwave RADAR, but it employs a lot.
Update on Hybrid Detection DWL Study* G. D. Emmitt WG on Space-based Lidar Winds Oxnard, CA 7-9 February, 2001 *funded by the IPO.
Spaceborne 3D Imaging Lidar John J. Degnan Geoscience Technology Office, Code Code 900 Instrument and Mission Initiative Review March 13, 2002.
Page 1 The Passive A-band Wind Sounder (PAWS) for Measurement of Tropospheric Winds Brian R. Johnson (CO- I), Shane Roark (PI), Pei Huang, Grzegorz Miecznik,
1 W. Rooney May 20, 2004 Imaging the Awake Animal MRI Efforts Overview.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Mobile Coherent Doppler LIDAR: Proposed Technologies for Scanning, Security and Wireless Communications GSFC at GISS Motivation:  The use of Coherent.
NASA ESTO ATIP Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations 12/12/01 NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 James B. Abshire,
HOLOGRAPHIC SCANNING LIDAR TELESCOPES Geary K. Schwemmer Laboratory For Atmospheres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
LIght Detection And Ranging LIDAR gathers data through laser light striking the surfaces of the earth and measuring the time of pulse return A LIDAR system.
GeoLidarObservatory A Geosynchronous LIDAR Observatory For Atmospheric Winds And Moisture Measurements G. D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates G. D. Spiers.
by M. J. Kavaya, F. Amzajerdian, J. Yu, G. J. Koch, U. N. Singh
Coherent Doppler Lidar Measurement of River Surface Velocity
Orbital Analysis for Inter-Calibration Dave Mac Donnell Brooke Anderson Bruce Wielicki Don Garber NASA Langley Research Center Solar Workshop January 30,
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation -
I.Prochazka, Tech.Univ.Munich, Germany.October 27, 2008 Gaining confidence – Breadboard demo, Prague n The entire Time transfer experiment may be carried.
GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ January 2004.
INTEGRATION OF IFE BEAMLET ALIGNMENT, TARGET TRACKING AND BEAM STEERING Graham Flint March 3, 2005.
Target Engagement Graham Flint - General Atomics Tom Lehecka - Penn State Electro-Optics Center Bertie Robson - NRL HAPL Project Review Oak Ridge National.
Kavaya-1 Coherent Doppler Lidar Roadmap to Both the NRC Decadal Survey “Science Demonstration” and “Operational” Missions Michael J. Kavaya Jirong Yu Upendra.
U NIVERSITY OF J OENSUU F ACULTY OF F ORESTRY Introduction to Lidar and Airborne Laser Scanning Petteri Packalén Kärkihankkeen ”Multi-scale Geospatial.
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
TEMPO Instrument Update
Lidar winds from GEO: The Photons to Winds Conversion Efficiency
Clouds, shear and the simulation of hybrid wind lidar
TEMPO Instrument Update
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
James Donahue EE 444 Fall LiDAR James Donahue EE 444 Fall
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
GAJENDRA KUMAR EC 3rd YR. ROLL NO
Validation of airborne 1
NPOESS P3I & Follow-on Threshold Operational Mission
Antenna Efficiency Optimization in Coherent Lidar Systems   Sammy Henderson, Pat Kratovil, and Charley Hale Beyond Photonics beyondphotonics.com.
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Pointing Determination for a Coherent Wind Lidar Mission J. Marcos Sirota, Christopher Field Sigma Space Corp. Michael Kavaya NASA LaRC January 2006

Outline Background Information Proposed system for coherent wind lidar Wind Lidar Mission Concept Pointing Determination in GLAS/ICESat ICESat attitude data Proposed system for coherent wind lidar Analysis of pointing control and determination requirements and solutions. Summary

Orbiting Doppler Wind Lidar at 400 km Second shot: t+100 ms, 768 m, 103 mrad Return light: t+3.1 ms, 24 m, 3.5 mrad First Aft Shot t + 46 s Nadir tilt rate ~ 1mrad/ms 7.7 km/s 90° fore/aft angle in horiz. plane 30° FORE AFT 400 km 467 km 6.1 m (86%) 180 ns (27 m) FWHM (76%) 2 lines LOS wind profiles 1 line “horiz” wind profiles 45° 7.2 km/s 32.1° 233 km 120 shots = 12 s = 86 km 165 km 1/10 s = 722 m 165 km

Pointing Geometry - Side View Earth-Orbiting Doppler Wind Lidar Pointing Geometry - Side View qT = arcsin[(RE + ZL) sinqL/(RE + ZT)] VL RT ZL = 400 km qL = 30 deg. ZT = 4 km (example) qT = 32.1 deg. VL = 7676 m/s RT = 462 km R E = 6371 ±10.7 km qL qT ZL qS ZT qT - qL SPACE R E ATM ATM EARTH Lidar Beam Direction

2 “Horizontal” Wind Lines, 400 km, 30 deg nadir Azimuths = ±45, ± 135 deg Target Sample Volume Horiz. Resol. 350 km S/C Ground Track 78 km 330 km

Two “Horizontal” Wind Profile “Lines”

4 Horiz Wind Lines 90 deg. 4 2 45 deg 6 1 8 5 7 3 115 deg. 155 deg. LaRC/Kavaya-

Four “Horizontal” Wind Profile “Lines”

Space-Based Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar System Schematic Transmitter Laser PZT Injection Locking Driver Loop Detector Mirror Power Amplifier Pulsed Laser Oscillator BS Master Osc. Laser MM Optics Isolator Transmitter Beam Telescope, Scanner, and Pointing Determination System 10mm Frequency BS LO Laser Locking Det. Nadir Angle Compensator FB Control Nadir Angle Compensator Signal Beam 2mm Local Oscillator Laser Control Signal l/4 BS Polarizing BS Lens 10mm Alignment Mirror Detector & Pre-Amplifier 90/10 BS Control Signal Scan Controller Laser Controller Scan Controller Command & Data Data IF Receiver A/D Management System Recorder Data Transmitter INS/GPS

LOS Wind Measurement Sequence Orbiting Doppler Wind Lidar at 400 km LOS Wind Measurement Sequence Aim scanner to next desired direction [pre-shot pointing control, ±2 deg.] Tune LO laser to remove predicted gross motion and earth rotation [pre-shot pointing knowledge, ±0.2 deg.] Measure LO laser frequency error and tune electronic mixer to compensate Fire laser pulse Keep receiver axis well aligned for 3 ms [Stability A: 6.6 mrad/3 ms] Optically mix, electronically mix, and digitize backscattered signal Divide data into time/range/altitude bins [NALT = 22] Combine shots aimed in same direction, if desired [NACC = 60] [Stability B: ±0.2 deg./12 sec.] Estimate frequency Remove residual spacecraft and earth rotation caused frequencies [Final pointing knowledge, ±60 mrad] Assign time, location, altitude, and direction to each LOS velocity Repeat above sequence for other desired cross-track distances [NCT = 4] Repeat above sequence for aft perspectives collocated with fore perspectives [NPER = 2] On Orbit On Orbit Or Ground Processing

Pointing Knowledge, Control, and Stability Requirements Pre-shot control to ensure that Doppler shift is within LO laser tuning range a) ±2 deg. from -ZLV, scanner fore or aft, if ±4000 MHz LO tuning range b) ±6.7 deg. from -ZLV , scanner fore or aft, if ±4500 MHz LO tuning range Pre-shot knowledge to allow LO to be tuned for sufficiently small heterodyne beat frequency ±0.2 to ±0.5 deg. affects receiver bandwidth and data quality Stability, t = 0 to 3 ms, for each shot 7.1 mrad, 1 s, for budgeted 3 dB 1 s SNR loss Stability, while staring for shot accumulation (for 0.3 m/s LOS error) nadir ±0.2 deg., azimuth ±0.3 deg. (beam azimuth at 45 deg. to wind) up to 30 sec. Final post-mission knowledge (for 0.3 m/s LOS error) ±60 mrad = ±0.0034 deg. = ±12 arcsec (scanner azimuth angle at 45 deg. to fore or aft) Will require use of lidar surface return data for this Shuttle Hitchhiker mission

Background Information: ICESat The Geoscience Laser Altimeter System on ICESat carried the first laser pointing determination system in a Lidar space mission. It determines the laser pointing direction w.r.t. the stars with an accuracy of 7.5 microradians per axis for every laser shot (40 Hz). The system includes star and laser imagers, a high precision gyroscope, and cross-reference optical sources.

Geoscience Laser Altimeter System Measurements Surface Altimetry: Range to ice, land, water, clouds Uses time of flight of 1064 nm laser pulse Digitizes transmitted & received 1064-nm pulse waveforms Laser-beam pointing from star-trackers, laser camera & gyro 3 cm single shot range resolution 7 urad angular resolution Atmospheric Lidar: Laser back-scatter profiles from clouds & aerosols Uses 1064 nm & 532 nm pulses 75 m vertical resolution Analog; photon counting detection Simultaneous, co-located measurements with altimeter

SRS Functional Block Diagram

ICESat Bus The ICESat bus was selected based on its pointing accuracy and stability. The Ball Global Imaging System 2000 is an imaging-based platform where the attitude control and determination system were designed for accurate pointing control and stability during image acquisition of high resolution Earth scenes from orbit.

Predicted Bus Stability

Spacecraft motion with Solar Panel Articulation (Case 1) Star Trajectory in LRS 20 urad ~ 1 sec

Spacecraft motion with Solar Panel Articulation (Case 2) Star Trajectory in LRS ~ 200 urad ~ 1 sec

Normal Flight, No Solar Array Articulation s = 1.2 urad

Stellar Reference System in ICESat ICESat II Concept What did you accomplish during the year? What is the significance of these results? SRS Old system of equal function

Space-Based Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar System Schematic Transmitter Laser PZT Injection Locking Driver Loop Detector Mirror Power Amplifier Pulsed Laser Oscillator BS Master Osc. Laser MM Optics Isolator Transmitter Beam Telescope, Scanner, and Pointing Determination System 10mm Frequency BS LO Laser Locking Det. Nadir Angle Compensator FB Control Nadir Angle Compensator Signal Beam 2mm Local Oscillator Laser Control Signal l/4 BS Polarizing BS Lens 10mm Alignment Mirror Detector & Pre-Amplifier 90/10 BS Control Signal Scan Controller Laser Controller Scan Controller Command & Data Data IF Receiver A/D Management System Recorder Data Transmitter INS/GPS

Pointing determination system concept for Wind Lidar Mission Lateral Transfer Retroreflector Laser Camera /Star Tracker Transceiver Telescope Counter-rotating Ring Frame Motor with Absolute Encoder Silicon Wedge

Star Tracker Errors Per Axis Single frame errors for HD-1003 (example) - 2 arcsec (1s) pitch and yaw (ST coordinates) - 40 arcsec (1s) roll If at 45 degree to Nadir it translates to: ~ 30 arcsec per axis per frame Filtered solution (Star tracker plus Inertial Reference Unit) shall yield about 3 arcsec per axis (1s).

Pointing knowledge analysis

Stability analysis Requirement Stability of ICESat-class spacecraft is adequate for round-trip per shot requirement Orbital motion compensation with aft-optics mirror is necessary for multi-shot integration

Requirement Compliance Analysis 1. How will we have pre-shot pointing control? To ensure that the gross Doppler (spacecraft and earth motions) is within the tuning range of the tunable LO laser. (+/- 2-7 degrees) a. Spacecraft slew rates for ICESat-class bus have demonstrated this level of pointing control. b. Fine pointing can be achieved with the aft-optics beam steering mechanism.

Requirement Compliance Analysis 2. How will we have pre-shot pointing knowledge? To allow the setting of the tunable LO frequency so that the return signal is within the bandwidth of the detector and electronics. (+/- 0.2 degrees, or ~ 3.5 mrad) Pointing knowledge will be obtained from the Laser Sensor, Attitude Determination System, and Scanner Encoder to within 20 urad per axis.

Requirement Compliance Analysis 3. How will we hold the line of sight of the receiver stable while waiting for the laser light to return from the earth? To avoid more SNR lossthan is budgeted. (8 microradians 1 sigma over 7 ms). The stability of the spacecraft is sufficient to comply with this requirement. If we wish to compensate for the 3.1 urad from orbital motion then a fixed-angle wedge or tilt mirror can be introduced on the path between fire and return.

Requirement Compliance Analysis 4. How will we hold the line of sight stable while we are accumulating several shots to make one wind measurement? To avoid smearing the angle at which we probe the atmosphere which will add error to the wind estimate. (+/- 0.2 degrees over 12 seconds). The Nadir Compensation Mechanism will provide compensation form shot to shot, holding the line of sight stable until the end of integration.

Requirement Compliance Analysis 5. How will we achieve the final pointing knowledge for each shot? To allow minimum error in reporting the measured wind's direction to the user. (+/- 60 microradians assuming earth surface is not available to use for reference). The Laser Reference Sensor plus the Scanner Encoder shall provide knowledge for every shot fired w.r.t the stars to better than 20 urad per axis.

Summary Pointing requirements for a space based coherent wind lidar mission can be met with space proven technology, and some current miniaturization efforts. Same design could be used to adapt the system to various platforms, i.e dedicated craft or multi-instrument (NPOESS).