 Interventions take time and patience.  PLC work is never done.  Hang your hats on making progress.  You and your PLC are the key to the change that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Differentiated Instruction Introduction
Data to Instruction Eric Lech Session Objectives Understand differences in assessments and their impact on instruction Understand the.
Meeting the needs of all learners.  Is differentiated instruction new? ◦ Think of the one room school house. ◦ Can you remember how your elementary teachers.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. What is an IEP?  An IEP is a documented plan developed for a student with special needs that:  describes.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
ACT Close and Critical Reading Using ACT Content Passages Macomb Intermediate School District September 15 th, 2010.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
MAY 7, 2010 MEADOWDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL BY CHRISTINE AVERY Raising the Bar and Closing the Gap by DuFour.
Analyzing Common Formative Assessments. ON TARGET 2 Today’s Learning Targets ✓ I can explain common formative assessments. ✓ I can identify quality common.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Instructional Strategies Instructional strategies – refer to the arrangement of the teacher, learner, and environment Many different types – we will explore.
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
What is Flexible Grouping?
Determining Essential Learnings or Essential Outcomes September 14, 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Student centered learning The shift from teachers teaching to students learning: more than semantics.
Differentiated Instruction: from DRAB to Garden City Public Schools.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
 The Inclusive Classroom: Assessment & Differentiation Design and Assessment for ALL students STMU: Sept 14, 2012 Guest Instructor: Cheryl Babin.
Response to Intervention How Do We Define a Tier I (Classroom-Based) Intervention? Jim Wright
Teaching Strategies Accommodations and Modifications.
Building Assessment Literacy in Michigan through Quality Common Assessment Development.
Professional Learning Communities A school-wide approach to ensure that all students learn.
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
RTI 2 : TIER 1_A DEEPER DIVE AND CONNECTION TO FIP TOOLS Clinch-Powell Cooperative Presenters:
10 Principles of a Successful Classroom. Students are presented with meaningful, higher-order, activities that create the context for learning and build.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
ASSESSING THE WHOLE CHILD Creating Powerful Portfolios and Student Led Conferences.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
RTI, SDUSD and the EXCEED Student Management System “Diversity is the norm, not the exception.” CAST, 2009.
Data Teams. Data Teams in Action Medical/Education connections Double Entry Journal MVP – Most Valuable Point Explain one MVP with a partner and then.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
How Will We Respond When Some Students Don’t Learn? Systematic Interventions.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
February 28.  Unit plans feedback (that I have completed)  Expectations for reflections  Pre-Internship Expectations  Questions you always wanted.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
COST/SST Referral Process The Pyramid of Interventions.
Differentiation Prepared by: Shuhudha Rizwan (2007)
Growing Teachers to Grow Students: Part I October 9, 2015.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Teacher Checklist for Differentiating Instruction, page 1 of 2 Franny McAleer, Think about your curriculum and instruction,
DATA WAREHOUSE The District School Board of Collier County
Differentiated Instruction
Heacox Chapter 7 What Do Students Need?
Presentation transcript:

 Interventions take time and patience.  PLC work is never done.  Hang your hats on making progress.  You and your PLC are the key to the change that is needed to meet the needs of all learners.  There is strength in numbers.  Start somewhere and build on small successes.

 Interventions should ensure all students receive support in a timely fashion—at the first indication they are experiencing difficulty.  PLC’s, schools, and teachers must require a system to monitor student progress continually and frequently and to respond immediately when students struggle.

 The process should direct rather than invite students to devote the extra time to support until they are experiencing success.  Students should get help when they need it regardless of who their teachers might be.  A good system of intervention is designed to allow students who need more time and help to access it, but does not let students off the hook when they do not learn.

 Interventions must be monitored to ensure that they are working. If they are not, adjustments must be made and alternative interventions must be available.  The intervention system must be fluid to allow students to come in and out as needed.  Interventions should help students master agreed upon standards. › Prerequisite steps are critical.

 Analyze common formative assessments together  Look at student grades together  Look at attendance and skipping and who it is affecting  Look at summative test results and which students are not meeting benchmarks (Some of this is PLC work; some is school-wide work.)

 What do we believe as a group is acceptable performance in each area we need to monitor?  What do we as a group intend to do when students fall below acceptable performance levels?

 Work with another partner to determine how you would work with each other to prevent failure on the skills assessed in these two classes. (Handout 3 and 4)

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% 3 Types of Interventions: Intensive Interventions Targeted group interventions Universal interventions

THE CLASSROOM

 You can start small and build a big bag of tricks as you go along.  Part the beauty of a PLC is shared responsibility for developing that bag of tricks.  Ask for help. Your administrators stand ready to help you prepare for every student to succeed.

Preparation is key!  Tiered assessments will tell you what each student needs  Tiered assignments can be developed in advance and used again and again › Anchor (enrichment) assignments can be ready for students when they have mastered a standard before other students have.

 Meets standard:“Design a balanced menu for 3 meals in a day using the nutritional guide for minerals, vitamins, etc.  More Complex: “Research and compare the dietary/nutritional needs of an average middle school student and a world class athlete. Create a well-balanced menu based on a typical day for each person. Include caloric intake and breakdown of fats, carbohydrates and proteins for the day.

 Evaluation  Synthesis  Analysis  Application  Comprehension  Knowledge Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering (Based on Pohl, 2000, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 8 )

 Curriculum compacting: Be prepared to isolate and eliminate teaching content that students already know.  Be ready to teach lessons more than one way to accommodate students who learn in different ways. › Find a different way to present the material the next time. (Definition of Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over expecting to get a different result.)

 What would seem relevant and engaging to struggling learners?  To students who already know it?

 Number off 1-5.  Work with those who have your number to generate examples of your strategy for meeting all student needs. 1. Compacting 2. Anchor (enrichment) assignments 3. Tiered assignments and tiered assessments 4. Assignments to appeal to student interests 5. Two great ways to teach the same lesson

All students must know what is expected of them.  Classroom rules, procedures, and learning expectations.  Getting help  Transition time  Use of material and equipment  Voice levels

 Will students be expected to help each other? What are the rules/expectations around cooperative learning?  Do students know what will happen if a student needs extra time or help?  Do students know what will be expected if they “get it” quickly?

Table groups: List two student expectations that ensure learning for all that have been successful for you. Be ready to share.

 Is the classroom set up to handle groups of different sizes and also individuals working alone?  Are there work centers?  Reading areas?  Research areas?  Independent work spaces?  Where are the anchor (enrichment) activities and how are students held accountable for completing them?  Where are the resources students will need?

Think-Pair-Share: What is one thing you are going to do in arranging classroom space for the success of all learners that you have not done before?

 Large group/whole class  Small homogeneous groups  Heterogeneous groups  Cooperative groups where students help each other.  Pairs of students.  Individuals working alone.

In table groups: Give one example of when each type of group can be effectively used to ensure the success of all learners.  Large group/whole class  Small homogeneous groups  Heterogeneous groups  Cooperative groups where students help each other.  Pairs of students.  Individuals working alone.

 Research shows that tracking does not enhance student achievement. Activity:  In table groups: What is the difference in a homogeneous group and tracking? What does flexible grouping mean? Give some examples.

 Students must know… › The expected learning target. › How they will be assessed. › What proficiency looks like. › How progress will be monitored. (Teacher feedback is key to achievement and ownership!) › That they have some choices. › That they have responsibilities for the success of the classroom. › That their achievement will be celebrated.

 Contracts  Portfolios  Self-assessments  Progress monitoring tools (Graphs, charts, etc.)  Built in time and mechanisms for individual feedback from the teacher

Table groups:  List 3 strategies you’ve used or heard about for increasing student ownership and responsibility to enhance learning for all students.  Share out by table until we run out of strategies.

 Flexible grouping/shared students (Requires advanced planning so that the schedule can accommodate. It’s a systemic change, but you can make it happen! Talk to your administrators!)  Consistency (Reduces teacher shopping and parent complaints because everyone is on the same page about how student success will be ensured.)

 Shared work load (All contribute to planning for a big bag of tricks to meet the needs of all learners.)  Shared problem solving (All teachers in the PLC help each other with strategies for meeting the needs of all learners.)  Lends credence to requests for systemic solutions. (All members of the PLC have attempted classroom interventions and can document the need for a systemic response.)

Research shows that system interventions are most effective when they support teams rather than individual teachers. Table Groups: List 2-3 reasons this statement might be true.

30 seconds each person. Go around the room.  What ideas for ensuring the success of all learners do you have leaving today that you didn’t have when you came?