Manhattan Catholic Schools Summary of Data for the Standards Assessment Report for Accreditation Cycle 2003-2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Math PDSA Pierce Elementary School Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
Advertisements

EOC & NCFE Data
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Reading and Writing Testing Results USD 244 Board of Education March 12, 2001.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Post-Test Data Analysis Workshop. Agenda I. Analyze 2014 TerraNova Results II. Comparative Data Analysis: TerraNova & Explore Test Results III. Using.
STAR Basics.
Data Analysis Software 2.01 Data Analysis Navigating the software Overview & Help Technical Explanations Entering and Viewing Data Analyzing Data Tools.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Shannon Kewin EFD The Basics a. Terra Nova (TN) Test Score Results b. Wilson School Annual Report Card 2. Breakdown of scores (Reading) 3. Breakdown.
AN EVALUATION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE ALGEBRA PROGRAM IN GRAND BLANC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 8 th Grade Algebra 1A.
Overview of the MAP Assessment Implementation Appoquinimink School District Board Meeting 10/13/09.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
PLC-Data Disaggregation Week of September Before the meeting Make sure each person has signed in. Review the group norms Todays goals are to disaggregate.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
PVPHS Mathematics - Transitions. PVPHS Mathematics Department Encourage students to take 4 years of mathematics Offer multiple levels of classes to meet.
End-of-Year Goals Report. The District’s goals for are: 1.100% of Ripon teachers will use a data dashboard to monitor the Response to.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2007: Summary of Results.
U-32 Spring 2013 NECAP Presentation March 27,
Nativity Catholic School IOWA Testing. 70 years of educational research and test development Form E Big Picture student’s classroom work homework projects.
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2012 MCAS Presentation October 30, 2012.
375 students took the number sense common formative assessments this school year. These are their stories. (Please view as a slide show)
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Guide for Parents Created By: Ginger Psalmonds/CST New Prospect Elementary.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 1.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Science and Social Studies Testing Results USD 244 Board of Education April 9, 2001.
School Report Card Data Summary for Flint Hill Elementary Vienna, VA Part of Fairfax County Public Schools Lauren Hill – EDRD 632 Dr. Vance 2/29/2012.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Creating Your School Improvement Plan in ASSIST. Click on the “Goals & Plans” Tab.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Parent Guide. Overview ITBS testing is done in October at BMS. The testing is a “norm-referenced” test that compares a student’s.
Kindergarten – Grade 2. Testing in the Primary Grades Provides information for instructional planning Serves as a baseline for monitoring student progress.
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
Qatar Comprehensive Educational Assessment (QCEA) 2008: Discussion Session For QCEA Support.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
American Mathematics Competition. ACM Scores of 1998: Cumulative Distribution by Gender (n= 107,894 USA 8th Graders)
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
MARIETTA HIGH SCHOOL. PURPOSE The purpose of this presentation is to look at aggregated and disaggregated data and gather teacher input in regards to.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
“The retained student” Ethnic minorities: black/Hispanic Gender: male Low SES Late birthday Parents normally a dropout; little or no involvement Behavior.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
SPRING 2011 IOWA TEST OF BASIC SKILLS. ITBS READING TOTAL PERCENTILE RANK OF AVERAGE STANDARD SCORE – NATIONAL NORMS 3rd4th5th6th7th Voc
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Data Snapshot Matt Bednorz Englewood High School Spring 2013.
Lakeview Community Schools ITBS Results
LIVINGSTON COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL
Instructional Planning
Instructional Highlight
Understanding ITBS Scores
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Proactive Assessments
Understanding ITBS Scores
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
CAT 4 Reading Results 2011.
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
Campbell County Middle School
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Manhattan Catholic Schools Summary of Data for the Standards Assessment Report for Accreditation Cycle

Our scores on the ITBS Math Computation test showed a significant increase, from 32%, in 2003, to 50%, in 2007, of our students in grades 1-8 scoring at 75 to 100 in national percentile ranking. The number of students performing at the 0-25% range decreased from 9% to 3%. When we disaggregated these scores by ethnicity, it also showed an increase from 26 to 42% scoring in the top quartile and a decrease from 4% to 0% of these students scoring in the bottom quartile. We felt that the interventions we implemented for increasing the math computation levels in our school were highly effective and produced remarkable results. Our Kansas Math Assessment scores for grades 3-8 also showed an increase from 32%, in 2006, to 39%, in 2007, of our students performing at exemplary and a decrease from 3% (representing 6 students) to 2% (representing 4 students) of students performing at academic warning. The male students showed a significant increase from 26% in 2006 to 38% in 2007 performing at the exemplary level and the females showed an increase from 35% to 41% performing at exemplary. We hope this trend continues and all students will continue improving. We are pleased with this data and were proud that grades 3-7 made the State Standard of Excellence. The STAR Math scores showed 60% of our students in grades 2-8 scoring at th in percentile rank in both 2006 and There was a slight increase in both males and females performing at the 0-25th percentile rank over the same time period. Our local, curriculum embedded test, using the End of Year Harcourt Math test in grades 1-6, has been given for 2 years. The scores for students scoring at 90 – 100 percent correct, has decreased from 24%, in 2006 to 18% in It is noted that the greatest decrease at this level has occurred among the females. One of the reasons for this decrease is that this test is given at the end of the school year and students may be tired of testing. These results may also indicate that we need to be more mindful of how males and females store and retrieve information, as this test is a review of the entire year.

Our reading comprehension scores for grades 1-8 on the ITBS showed a significant increase from 51%, in 2003 to 59%, in 2007 of students in the 75 to 100 national percentile ranking. The percentage of students performing at the 0-25% ranking remained constant at 2%. When disaggregating by ethnicity, our 31 students showed an increase from 35%, in 2003, to 42%, in 2007, performing at the 75 to 100 percentile ranking, but also showed that we increased from 0 to 10% the number of students at 0-25 percentile rank. This is something we as a school will need to evaluate and monitor more closely. The Kansas Reading Assessments for grades 3-8 showed a significant increase from 40%, in 2006, to 49%, in 2007, of students performing at the exemplary level. We went from having 2 students performing at the academic warning level in 2006 to 1 student at this level in Our gender equity also showed that the males performing at exemplary increased from 34% to 42%, and the females increased from 46% to 56% performing at exemplary. We are very pleased with these results and were excited to have made the Standard of Excellence in grades 3-8 for the 2007 school year. In 2004, 57% of our students in grades 2-8 were at the 75 – 100 percentile rank on the STAR Reading Test, and in the spring of 2007, 61 percent of the students in grades 2-8 were at this same level, for an increase of 4%. There was a slight decrease from 6% to 5% of students performing at the 0-25 percentile ranking for this same time period. In 2005, we began to give a curriculum embedded reading comprehension end of the year test provided by Scott Foresman. In 2005, 53% of the students in grades 1-6 performed at 90 – 100 percent correct on this test, and in 2007, 48% of the students in grades 1-6 performed at that same level. This was a decrease although a total of 84% of the students performed at 80% and above in 2005 and 82% performed at this level in There was also a slight decrease, from 7% 9n 2005 to 6% in 2007 performing at the 0-69% correct level. The male students showed a greater drop in performance than the females. As a whole, we believe our interventions for reading were effective and our attention to evaluating the assessments throughout the year, reteaching struggling students, and using the correct vocabulary has greatly impacted our students reading comprehension.

Our 5 th and 8 th graders take the NCEA ACRE test each year to test their knowledge of religion. We graphed domain three which focused on liturgy. In 2003, 32% of the 5 th and 8 th graders scored in the advanced category. In 2007, 54% of the 5 th and 8 th graders scored in the advanced category, showing a significant increase. In 2003, 36% of these students were in the needs improvement category and in 2007, only 16% were in the needs improvement category. Grades 1-8 take a curriculum embedded (Silver Burdette) liturgy test at the end of each year. In 2005, 49% of our students were at the 90 – 100 percent correct category. In 2007, that number decreased slightly to 45%. There are 2 reasons for this decline. In 2007, the 8 th grade teacher did not give the religion test. The test was then administered to the Jr. High students when they came for various sports camps in the summer. Obviously they were not in the mood to test as all their results were poor. There were 11 Jr. High students who did not take the test. Because of these 2 things, we feel our data is not accurate and does not reflect the growth we expected to see after implementing our interventions.