CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
Assessing the Quality of Online Courses Rayane Fayed Instructional Designer American University of Beirut June 2013.
Diane Ruiz Cairns, MBA, Ed.S.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
Course Selected Institutions decide to examine an online or hybrid course as part of a peer review. Since institutions make a significant investment in.
Where do I Begin? Basic Course Development for Online Learning.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design
► Why regular and effective student contact matters. ► Definition of regular and effective student contact. ► How to achieve regular and effective student.
Chapter 11 Online Evaluation. Chapter Outline Curtain Up: Getting the Online Course Set Up and Ready to Go Getting Students Started on the Right Foot:
E-Learning Center Deanship of Academic Development.
Quality Bucks Inter-Collegiate Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Peer Reviewer Training The SLN Quality Matters Initiative Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Professional Development Training. The Big Picture The Hermes Model – Slide 3 Your Role as an On-Site Facilitator – Slide 4 What is Asynchronous Learning?
Introduction To Online Learning Prince George’s Community College.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Managing an Online Course Personal Philosophy of Josh Eastwood.
Establishing a Distance Learning Framework for the Institution (Part II) Sali Kaceli Director, Educational Technology and Distance Learning Cairn University.
Blackboard 201 Communication Workshop Barbara Cooper. OCC Faculty Online Coordinator.
Blackboard Course Design and Quality Matters
Blackboard Strategies: Using Blackboard Pedagogically.
The New Teaching Institute Program Evaluation Report Lin Chengyan Eric Whitmer Anastasia Kalmykova.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
The Mechanics of Putting Your Courses Online Summer Institute 2003 Lesley Blicker, Office of Instructional Technology
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
Strategies for Transforming Face-to- Face Courses to Hybrid or Fully Online Courses David Robinson, Ed. D. David Wizer, Ph. D. Lilly Conference- Spring.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
Distance Learning - Trends and Issues CAAHEP Summer Workshop July 19, 2013 Boston, Massachusetts Darcy W Hardy, PhD.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
Dakota State University.
Preparing Students for an Online Learning Community Designing an Effective Online Orientation November 9, 2001.
Overview of a Recommended Course Development Process.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Fair and Appropriate Grading
Pedagogical Standards and Sustainable Distance Education Programming Karen Gersten Associate Provost for Academic Programs and Faculty Development Laura.
G UIDELINES FOR D ESIGNING O NLINE C OURSES Abigail S. Inapat Ariko.
COLLABORATIVE WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN EDUCATION USING WIKIS & BLOGS IN THE CLASSROOM.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Tips on Discussing the Standards & Giving Peer Feedback February 2010.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Information Literacy Instruction Sessions in Online Classes Dr. Marilyn Harhai, Department of Library Science Mary Buchanan, University Libraries Clarion.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Implementing QM towards Program Certification
Online / Hybrid Workshop: Course Design, Development, and Delivery
The Academic Technology Center
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Melissa Kaufman, MS – Instructional Designer
It’s Not Just Course Design… It’s EPIC
Professor Lindsay Henning Program Director,
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Quality Matters Overview
Evaluation Tools for Online Courses
Presentation transcript:

CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015

Workshop Objectives Upon completing this workshop, you will be able to do the following: 1.Explain how the assessment of online courses differs from that of “in-person” courses. 2.List the benefits of assessing online courses. 3.Access an online course on Blackboard. 4.Assess the design of an online course, using the Quality Matters rubric. 5.Assess course delivery in an online course.

Definitions In-person (face-to-face in classroom) Hybrid* (30-79% online with reduced classroom time) DL(80-100% online) Online (Hybrid* and DL) How many of you have taught an online course? How many of you have taught with Blackboard? *aka “Blended”

Why Assess Online Courses? Reaccreditation Better Student Learning Better Teaching

How Does Assessment Differ for “In-Person” vs. Online Courses? “In-Person” Students – Student evaluations – Student performance Peers – Review of course materials – Classroom observation Administrators + Implementation of policies Online Students – Student evaluations (online with additional questions)additional questions – Student performance Peers – Review of course materials – Course site visit Administrators + Implementation of policies, including HU Distance Ed PolicyHU Distance Ed Policy

Why Should Peer Reviewers Visit the Coursesite? The syllabus alone cannot reveal enough about the course design and delivery. Poor course design or delivery can lead to high student attrition rates and low student achievement. Careful peer reviews of coursesites help faculty improve their online courses.

Who Should Visit the Course? QM A team of three reviewers All experienced QM- certified online instructors One Master Reviewer One subject-matter expert (SME) One external reviewer HU A team of three reviewers CETLA DL-certified online instructors One CETLA-certified Reviewer (if available) At least one subject-matter expert (for departmental reviews) Note: Visitors should request background information from the instructor (see the QM Instructor’s Worksheet) prior to the visit.QM Instructor’s Worksheet

How Can You Visit a Course? Ask the instructor to add you as a student. Ask the instructor to make all assignments and tests available—password- protected if necessary. Log into edu edu If you can’t log in, contact Howard’s Help Desk or

What Affects the Quality of Online Courses? Technology Administrative infrastructure Faculty training Student readiness Course content Course design Course delivery

Why Is Assessing Course Design So Important in an Online Course? “When learners can’t find what they need or are confused about where to go and what to do, it is harder for them to learn. Being an online learner is challenging enough without these additional barriers. Plus, frustrated learners tend to either drop out or drive the instructor crazy….” Patti Shank

How Can You Assess Course Design? Use the Quality Matters (QM) rubric! Based on research, best practices, and instructional design principles Aligned with national standards (e.g., Sloan Consortium Pillars) Aligned with accreditation standards for distance- learning (e.g., Middle States) Consistent with HU Provost’s syllabus guidelines

What Is the QM Rubric? Rubric Standards Annotated Rubric

How Do You Review a Course? Read the annotation. Look for evidence in the course—the site as well as the syllabus. Decide whether the standard has been met according to the “85% Rule.” Write a recommendation that is sensitive, balanced, constructive, specific, and measurable.

How Do You Rate a Course? Award all points for a standard if a course meets at least 85% of the requirements for the standard; do not give partial credit. If at least two reviewers agree that a course meets a standard, award all points. If at least two reviewers agree that a course does not meet a standard, do not award any points. A course must meet all 3-point standards. An effective course will earn 84 of the 99 points (85%).

Now you try it! Log into the CA12 Practice Review Site.

Standard 1.1 “Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components.” 1.Not met 2.Met

Standard 5.2 “Learning activities provide opportunities for interaction that support active learning.” 1. Not met 2. Met

Standard 8.1 “Course navigation facilitates ease of use.” 1. Not met 2. Met

Why Is Assessing Course Delivery So Important in an Online Course? Watch this video:

How Can You Assess Course Delivery? Ask the instructor to generate two Blackboard course reports (click here for instructions): here – “Overall Summary of User Activity” for all students – “Overall Summary of User Activity” for the instructor Visit the coursesite.

What Should You Look for in the Report? What to Assess 1.Instructor Presence & Availability 2.Instructor Feedback 3.Instructor Participation What to Check Calendar statistics Tool statistics Which? © The Learning House, 2013

What Should You Look for in the Report? What to Assess 1.Student Retention 2. Student Participation What to Check Calendar statistics Tool statistics Which? © The Learning House, 2013

What Should You Look for in the Site? What to Assess 1.Instructor Presence & Availability 2.Instructor Feedback 3.Student Retention What to Check 1.Announcements What else? 2.Discussion Board What else? 3.Discussion Board What else? Note: In your “student” role, you cannot access the instructor’s grade book, Performance Dashboard, or Early Warning System. © The Learning House, 2013

What Should You Look for in the Site? What to Assess* 4. Instructor Participation 5. Communication of University and/or Course Policies 6. Pacing What to Check 4. Discussion Board What else? 5. Syllabus What else? 6. Assignments What else? © The Learning House, 2013