The HPSS Research Ethics Service Northern Ireland Dr Siobhan McGrath Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland Mar2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Foundation Trust Status for UHL Foundation Trust Project Director.
The Research Ethics Process RPT Conference 28 th April 2006.
Research Policy & Management RACD INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH GOVERNANCE.
Ethics – where to start! October 2013 Lois Neal FMS Research & Innovation Office.
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
Bridging the gap between good practice principles and research study realities. Using case studies to build descriptors of the public involvement role.
Research involving adults lacking the capacity to consent Legal, ethical and practical issues Dr Mikey Dunn Senior Research Associate in Health and Social.
Navigating the PhD – The Research Degrees Office.
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
Research Ethics Committees’ role in constructing the PIS to secure informed consent: tensions in the role of the PIS as a contract and a prospectus Carolyn.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
Highly Specialised Technologies Evaluations
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Responsible Sponsorship A case study Dr Birgit Whitman, Head of Research Governance.
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
The Research Project: ethical approval process
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Research Ethics John Porter London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Applying to a Research Ethics Committee
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
15 September Development of Nursing Research.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
Introducing Research Ethics: Policy and Procedure
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) New system for Research Ethics Committees Sure Start – April 2004 Joan Kirkbride OREC Manager for.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
Making an Application to an NHS REC Friday 27 th September 2013.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
AfRE Framework of Policies and Procedures for University Research Ethics Committees Overview Prof Margaret Rees AfRE Chair 29 July 2015 Association for.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Conflicts of Interest in Research Ethics Committee Review Dr. Vichai Chokevivat M.D,MPH Chairman, Forum for Ethical Review Committees in the Asia Pacific.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Introduction to Research Governance, Ethics and Integrity Mrs April Lockyer Senior Research Policy Officer (Governance and Integrity)
Improving Process and Outcomes of Ethics Review at Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University Anusra Thaprom, MBA Chawapornpan Chanprasit, PhD Suthisa Lamchang,
Research ethics.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Tusla’s Research Ethics
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Ethical Principles of Research
Research Ethics and Integrity Officer
And don’t forget… ethics and R&D
Application for research Ethical Approval in Practice
Ray French Research Governance Manager, ACCORD.
Presentation transcript:

The HPSS Research Ethics Service Northern Ireland Dr Siobhan McGrath Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland Mar2007

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Outline of presentation §UK policy §Structure of RECs in UK §HPSS RECs §The process for ethical review

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Scope §All HPSS Research (Health and Social Care) §DOH/DHSSPS has applied standards to all research under its remit §One set of Standard Operating Procedures §One GAfREC §RGF

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Scope UK context §Implementation of DH Research Governance Framework requires that independent ethics review is undertaken of all health and social care research §Currently there is no national system for review of social care research comparable to that of NHS RECs

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) ORECNI- History §Established as part of CSA by DHSSPS (2003) §Set up 3 HPSS RECs (Feb 2004)

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) ORECNI Mission To maintain a Research Ethics Service to protect the rights, dignity and welfare of research participants within the HPSS/NHS, and to protect the rights of researchers to perform ethical research and legitimate investigation.

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) ORECNI Objectives §To support the HPSS RECs and link with the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) §Ensure the HPSS RECS comply with governance arrangements as set out in the Northern Ireland Research Governance Framework, GAfREC and the UK Clinical Trials Regulation (2004) §Provide training and administrative support to the HPSS RECs §Ensure all stakeholders understand arrangements §Develop and maintain effective working arrangements

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) HPSS RECS §REC 1 Chair Mr Mark Nelson §REC 2 Chair Dr Theresa Donaldson §REC 3 Chair Dr John Trinder

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) HPSS RECs -Remit All health and social care research §HPSS staff § premises § patients § services users § carers §Access to service user or patient records §Access or collection of tissue §Qualitative or quantitative research

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) When should I apply? §Is your research in the field of health and/or social care? §Does it involve HPSS service users/patients? §Does it involve HPSS staff or premises? §Do you need access to user/patient/staff data? §Do you need to take human tissue samples? §Does your research involve qualitative or quantitative methodologies?

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) When to submit? §Sponsor agreed §External peer review §Arrangements have been made with the care organisation §Evidence of funding/ project resources

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Research Category? §CTIMPs §Clinical Investigations of Medical Devices §Research Administering questionnaires for quantitative analysis §Research involving qualitative methods §Research working with new tissue samples §Non-interventional research §Other

The process for ethical review New application form Standard letters Database

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Terminology §Favourable opinion §Unfavourable opinion §Provisional opinion §Site specific assessment §Amendment

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) HPSS REC Meetings 3 HPSS RECs §3 opportunities to submit new applications per month §Other business e.g amendments, annual reports, queries handled by sub- committee See:

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Committee Composition §Maximum 18 §Chair, Vice-Chair and Alternate Vice- Chair §At least 1/3 lay membership §Quorate- 7 members §Experts Social Care and Clinical

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Types of decision §No opinion §Favourable opinion §Unfavourable opinion §Provisional opinion

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Timelines §Total Review 60 calendar days §Amendments 35 calendar days §SSA 25 days §Book slot by telephone-4 days to keep slots

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Principles of Ethical Conduct Autonomy -right to choose for oneself Non-maleficence- not harmful Beneficence- doing good, active kindness Justice- justness, fairness

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Protection for Research Participants Potential Risk §Vulnerable populations §Psychological /emotional harm §Negative impact on services §Risks to researcher Potential Benefit §Clearly state background and rationale §Describe likely impact of research findings §Describe benefits to research participants §Provide details of peer review comments

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Elements of the Review Process 1. Methodology and conduct of the study 2. Recruitment of research participants 3. Care and protection of research participants 4. Protection of participants confidentiality 5. Informed consent process 6. Community considerations Helsinki Declaration 2000 CIOMS Guidelines 2002

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) performance data (1) Type of study by number reviewed (all RECs) §CTIMP 60 §Student 107 §Other 119

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Pitching the Information §Overall quality §Correct spelling and grammar §Attention to details- not rushed or incomplete §Offer reasonable explanations if question is inappropriate to your particular methodology §Attend meeting- many issues better explained face to face

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) What HPSS RECs want §Clear description on LAY terms §Researcher has considered and understood the ethical issues §Adequacy of your proposals to address these issues §Peer review §Consistency: application/ other documents §Sufficient measures in place to protect research participants §Well presented information sheets and consent forms

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Performance Data §Favourable- 30% (15%) §Unfavourable - 6.8% (6.9%) §Provisional- 46.7% (60%) §Withdrawn- 14.7% (14.9%)

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) ORECNI- Useful Details §Web: § §Tel: §Fax:

Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) Useful Contacts- ORECNI Dr Siobhan McGrath ORECNI Manager HPSS REC Administrators: §Kathryn Taylor- HPSS REC 1 §Katrina Walls -HPSS REC 2 §Jan Daley- HPSS REC 3 ORECNI Office Assistant- Tony Hanna