Testing and characterizing the CCDs of the OmegaCam wide-angle camera F. Christen 2, C. Cavadore 1, B. Gaillard, O. Iwert 1, K. Kuijken 2, D. Baade 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results of Acceptance Tests of Hyper Suprime-Cam CCDs Yukiko Kamata, Hidehiko Nakaya, Satoshi Miyazaki National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
Advertisements

X-ray Imaging Spectrometers (XIS) of Astro-E2 Hironori Matsumoto (Kyoto University) and the XIS team 1. Overview Astro-E2 is the fifth Japanese X-ray Astronomy.
Kamera CCD Astronomi (2) AS3100 Lab. Astronomi Dasar I Prodi Astronomi 2007/2008 B. Dermawan.
Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
CCDs in Astronomy History of CCDs How do CCDs work ?
Astronomical Detectors
06/02/2008CCDs1 Charge Coupled Device M.Umar Javed M.Umar Javed.
1 Fast conversion factor measurement of a CCD using Images with vertical gradient Charge Transfer Efficiency based on The variance of the signal in flat.
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. Correction of Raw Image with Bias, Dark, Flat Images Flat Field Image Bias Image Output Image Dark Frame Raw.
1D or 2D array of photosensors can record optical images projected onto it by lens system. Individual photosensor in an imaging array is called pixel.
Charge-Coupled Device (CCD)
Digital Technology 14.2 Data capture; Digital imaging using charge-coupled devices (CCDs)
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
A Primer on Image Acquisition and Data Reduction Using TheSky6, CCDSoft V5 and Microsoft Excel Thomas C. Smith Dark Ridge Observatory (DRO)
UVP BioImaging Systems Solutions for the Science of Life Digital CCD Cameras 101.
Overview of Scientific Imaging using CCD Arrays Jaal Ghandhi Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Your Observing Challenge: White Dwarfs in Open Star Clusters.
Copyright : Marconi Applied Technologies Limited. All Rights Reserved. CCDs for Adaptive Optics CfAO Workshop: Nov 1999 By P.
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
AST3 detector properties
Bulk Silicon CCDs, Point Spread Functions, and Photon Transfer Curves: CCD Testing Activities at ESO Mark Downing, Dietrich Baade, Sebastian Deiries, (ESO/Instrumentation.
Advanced Concepts & Science Payloads Office Eddicam/EST MeetingPage 1 CCD Procurement Schedule driven Review off-the shelf availability Specific mode of.
Photon Transfer Method 1. Using two identical flat field exposures it is possible to measure the read noise of a CCD with the Photon Transfer method. Two.
The CCD detector Sami Dib, Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg Jean Surdej, Institut d’Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Liège modified by Martin.
1 COROT WEAEK Meudon May The CCD performances by Miss Pernelle Bernardi Mr Tristan Buey and the CCD team on stage Régis Schmidt, Bertrand le.
Understanding Persistence: A 3D Trap Map of an H2RG Imaging Sensor
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
CMOS Image Sensor Design. M. Wäny Nov EMVA Standard 1288 Standard for Measurement and Presentation of Specifications for Machine Vision Sensors and.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Performances of the COROT CCDs for high accuracy photometry Pernelle Bernardi and the CCD team From Meudon : Tristan Buey, Vincent Lapeyrere, Régis Schmidt,
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
Observational Astrophysics I
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
CCD Imaging in amateur & professional astronomy What is a CCD?
CorotWeek 3, Liège 4-7/12/20021 (working on Saturday!!!) The CCD flight models Miss Pernelle Bernardi Mr Vincent Lapeyrere Mr Tristan Buey and the CCD.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
The Second Generation of IR detectors for WFC3 Massimo Robberto European Space Agency and Space Telescope Science Institute.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
Optical Detector Systems at the European Southern Observatory
Glow Experiment Outline Brandon Hanold. Outline 1.Glow Description 2.Experiment Design 3.Acquisition Loop Variables and Keywords 4.Reduction Results 5.Reduction.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
General detectors. CCDs Charge Coupled Devices invented in the 1970s Sensitive to light from optical to X-rays In practice, best use in optical and X-rays.
February 21, 2002TIPS meeting1 "Data contained herein is exempt from ITAR regulations under CFR 125.4(13) -- data approved for public disclosure." TIPS.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
Cameras For Microscopy Ryan McGorty 26 March 2013.
Application of a Charge Transfer Model to Space Telescope Data Paul Bristow Dec’03
LSST Sensor Requirements and Characterization of prototype LSST CCDs V. Radeka, J. Frank, J.C. Geary, D.K. Gilmore, I. Kotov, P. O’Connor, P. Takacs, J.A.
Comparison of a CCD and the Vanilla CMOS APS for Soft X-ray Diffraction Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, A. Blue a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a,
1 Core Data Processing Software Plan Review – University of Washington, Seattle, WA – Sept th Data Management XXVIII IAU General Assembly.
Focal Plane Arrays and Focal Plane Electronics for Large Scientific Telescopes The HAWAII-2RG (H2RG) is the leading IR focal plane array (FPA) in ground-
Binomial Distribution Possion Distribution Gaussian Distribution Lorentzian Distribution Error Analysis.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Electronics Lecture 5 By Dr. Mona Elneklawi.
TEMPO Instrument Update
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
Charge Coupled Device Advantages
Preliminary Design Review
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Preliminary Design Review
LSST Camera Detector Status
Image calibration Geoff Smith, September 2018.
Optical Detector Systems at the European Southern Observatory
IN5350 – CMOS Image Sensor Design
Presentation transcript:

Testing and characterizing the CCDs of the OmegaCam wide-angle camera F. Christen 2, C. Cavadore 1, B. Gaillard, O. Iwert 1, K. Kuijken 2, D. Baade 1, S. Darbon 1 1 : European Southern Observatory 2 : Kapteyn Instituut (Groningen) OmegaCAM will cover the 1deg x 1deg field of view of the ESO VLT Survey Telescope with thirty two 2k x 4k CCDs. Four additional chips of similar type will be used for the auto guiding and active optics control. Since the replacement of a unit detector or a re-arrangement of the mosaic after commissioning are not an option, every detector needs to be fully characterized in advance. These tests need to be carried out under realistic astronomical operating conditions. Introduction The test bench of ESO's Optical Detector Team ( ODT ) provides a platform well suited for characterizing CCDs. However, to make easier the test of more than 40 CCDs for OmegaCAM (including additional CCDs for other instruments), several enhancements were implemented in this set-up to increase its throughput. The last hardware improvements optimized the turn-around time and the precision of individual CCD characterization. Two new detector heads accommodating two Marconi CCDs each have been assembled and adapted. Scripts for a largely autonomous data acquisition and reduction have been written. The implementation of these high-level procedures permits essentially an un-supervised reduction of a complete data set. Finally, comprehensive test reports in HTML and PDF format enable a convenient sharing and comparative evaluation of the results. OmegaCAM Consortium Netherlands : NOVA, Kapteyn Instituut Groningen, Leiden Germany : Universitäts-Sternwarte München, Göttingen. Italy : Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Capodimonte. ESO : European Southern Observatory. OmegaCAM CCD Camera 1 deg x 1 deg field of view Sampling 0.2’’ / pixel 32 CCDs mosaic 16k x 16k (CCD EEV A57) 40 Science grade CCDs ordered Contract with Marconi : CCDs to be tested by ESO 4 auxiliary CCDs (two for guiding, two for image analysis for the active optic control for the VST) Mosaic filling factor 93 % Operating temperature -120°C The Test Bench In 1996, Amico & Böhm [1] designed the new ESO testbench. After several improvements (automatization, high-level scripts) this system is now optimized for mass testing. The main components are shown in the next picture (Fig. 3). The following measurements are routinely performed : Quantum efficiency (QE) Photon Response Non Uniformity (PRNU) Dark (short and long exposure) Bias Readout noise, conversion factor Linearity Dark current Charge Transfer Efficiency (CTE) Cosmetic defects : (hot pixels, very bright pixels, dark pixels, traps, very large traps bad columns and coating blemishes) Capabilities : Long dark exposure time (several hours) Several modes and readout speeds driven by FIERA CCD controller Uniform illumination up to a field of 20cm diameter provided by the integrating sphere Large wavelength coverage ( nm) Good spectral sampling (1nm) All devices can be controlled remotely by software Marconi CCD A57 Thinned back-side illuminated devices 2kx4k 15μm pixels. Single-layer Hf0 2 anti-reflective coating insures optimal sensitivity in the blue and near UV. Two serial read-out registers On-chip Pt100 temperature sensor Invar package providing high flatness level Required flatness : ± 10 mm Time to test 2 CCDs decreased from 2 weeks to 3 days Time to reduce and analyze data shortened from 1 week to 2 days Ability to test 2 CCDs simultaneously 3/4 of the OmegaCam CCDs have been tested Results are generally very satisfactory Conclusion 88 CCDs ordered 40 science grade CCDs - 29 received, 29 characterized 16 engineering grade - all CCDs delivered and tested 32 mechanical samples received Streamlined CCD test procedure Improved reliability Accuracies have been assessed The procedure After the delivery of a CCD, the data sheets and the CCD are checked, and the ESO database is updated. For the ease of reference each CCD is internally assigned a name of a stellar constellation; they are also used below. A standard test cycle is executed and some complementary measurements are carried out to check any particular parameters. Comprehensive test reports are generated semi-automatically. The full report includes tables with the values measured, comparisons with the Marconi measurements and basic statistics. Compliance with the contract is checked for each parameter. Cosmetics of the CCD “Indus II” : The next images are three examples of 2kx4k full frame flat fields. The full test report includes 40 flat field images at different wavelengths, light levels and gains. Hot pixels : provide a signal of > 60 e- /pixel / hour. Dark pixels : have 50% or less than the average output for uniform illumination at a flat field level around 500 photo-electrons. Very bright pixels : provide a signal of > e-/pixel/hour. Trap : captures more than 10 electrons, measured with a flat field level around 500 photo-electrons. Pocket pumping acquisition technique is used to trace them. Very large trap : captures more than electrons, measured with a flat field level around 90% of the full well capability. bad column : 10 or more contiguous hot or dark pixels in a single column or a very bright pixel or a very large trap. Linearity The method consists of reading the CCD while it is illuminated with a light source (assumed to be constant on such short time scales), see Fig. 13. Electrical Parameters Conversion Factor (Gain) : derived from the measurement of the mean signal of flat field and its variance. Read Out Noise : spatial rms of the bias measured. Example of an unexpected defect : Parasitic light injected by on-chip ESD protection diodes. Cosmetic Defects : Six different kinds of cosmetic defects : Dark Current : A median-filtered stack of five 1-hour dark frames is used (temperature : -120°C, read out speed : 50kpix/s, high gain mode : 0.55e-/ADU) is computed. The horizontal and vertical over scans pixel are considered to determine the dark current. It is mostly less than 1 e - / pixel / hour (see Fig. 18). Charge Transfer Efficiency : Two methods have been used, one based on the extended pixel response through the image overscan area (EPER), the other used the standard Fe 55 method. Figure 1 : The OmegaCAM Camera Figure 2 : Two Marconi CCDs Figure 3 : The ESO CCD Testbench Figure 4 : Quantum efficiency of 19 CCDsFigure 5 : Photon response non-uniformity of 19 CCDs Figure 6 : Flat field ( λ= 350nm, bandwidth= 5nm, 1500ADU) Figure 7 : Flat field ( λ= 600nm, bandwidth= 5nm, 1500ADU) Figure 8 : Flat field ( λ= 900nm, bandwidth= 5nm, 1500ADU) Figure 9 : Total balance of cosmetic defects Figure 10 : Bias 50kpix/s, binning 15x15, color scale in ADU, gain= 0.55e-/ADU Figure 11 : Bias 225kpix/s, binning 15 x 15, color scale in ADU, gain= 0.55e-/ADU Figure 12 : Bias 625kpix/s, binning 15 x 15, color scale in ADU, gain= 0.55e-/ADU Figure 13: Illumination for computing the non-linearity Figure 14 : Peak-to-peak non- linearity= 1.5%, Rms= 0.4% Figure 15 : Linearity for 19 CCDs, Mean= 0.27% Rms= 0.15% Figure 16 : Conversion factor for 19 CCDs, Mean= 0.53 e - /ADU Rms= 0.03 e-/ADU Figure 17 : Read-out noise for 19 CCDs, Mean= 2.9 e - Rms= 0.4 e- at 50kpix/s Mean= 4.4 e - Rms= 0.7 e - at 225kpix/s Figure 18 : Dark current for 17 CCDs at -120°C, Mean= 0.7 e - /pixel/h Rms= 0.6 e - /pixel/h Figure 19 : CTE for 17 CCDs at -120°C, Horizontal CTE : Mean= Rms= Vertical CTE : Mean= Rms= Quantum Efficiency is measured at an operating temperature of -120°C. These measurements are regularly checked by recalibrations. The repeatability is very good (Error : ± 0.2% max). The QE dispersion from device to device is increasing towards shorter wavelengths. The QE figures in the range of nm are higher than the minimum specification. PRNU is increasing in the red due to fringing effects, and in the blue due to the backside laser annealing (diamond pattern, see Fig. 6) Between 420 and 870 nm the PRNU is photon noise limited. The acquisition of these images has three goals : general appearance of the images, identification of unexpected/expected defects (bright spot, patterns, 512x1K block stitching, scratches) and traps. Finally, all the defects are recorded for compliance with the contract (see Fig. 9). With a mean per CCD of 66 hot and dark pixels (rms: 72), 5 very bright pixels (rms: 4), 3 traps (rms: 3), 1 very large trap (rms: 2) and 2 bad columns (rms: 2), the overall cosmetic quality of the Omegacam device is very well within specifications. Summary of the results obtained to date Conversion factor and read-out noise are measured for the two ports and at different speeds (50 and 225 kpixels/s). The test bench is actually not read-out noise optimized because the objective is to measure relative differences only. [1] Amico, P., Böhn, T. (1997) : ESO’s New CCD testbench. In J. W. Beletic and P. Amico (eds) : Optical detectors for astronomy, Astrophysics and space science library, Vol. 228, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Page After flatfielding ( the test is performed at 600nm where PRNU effects are the lowest), the columns are averaged, applying a median filter. The residuals from a linear least-squares fit to the result represents the non-linearity (Fig. 14). Non-linearities are typically less than 0.3% (Fig. 15). [2] :