The Pyramids of Giza A Warning from Antiquity © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Introduction © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Around 12,500 years ago the Earth was devastated by a series of apocalyptic catclysms, apparently of cosmic origin which triggered the end of the last Ice Age.

Around 12,500 years ago the Earth was devastated by a series of apocalyptic catclysms, apparently of cosmic origin which triggered the end of the last Ice Age. Millions of plants and animals, the world over, were laid waste in these cataclysms – some never to recover.

Around 12,500 years ago the Earth was devastated by a series of apocalyptic catclysms, apparently of cosmic origin which triggered the end of the last Ice Age. Millions of plants and animals, the world over, were laid waste in these cataclysms – some never to recover. It seems also, from the evidence of advanced mathematical and astronomical knowledge we find encoded into the groundplan of Giza, that a relatively advanced civilisation existed on the Earth at that time and – as Plato confirms – was completely destroyed.

Around 12,500 years ago the Earth was devastated by a series of apocalyptic catclysms, apparently of cosmic origin which triggered the end of the last Ice Age. Millions of plants and animals, the world over, were laid waste in these cataclysms – some never to recover. It seems also, from the evidence of advanced mathematical and astronomical knowledge we find encoded into the groundplan of Giza, that a relatively advanced civilisation existed on the Earth at that time and – as Plato confirms – was completely destroyed. However, it would seem that the few survivors of this ‘Lost Civilisation’ bequeathed to us a ‘sacred plan’ passed down through the millennia. This plan encodes the dates of these past cataclysms but most significant for us, the plan appears also to tell us that such events are part of some – as yet unknown - cosmic cycle.

The ancient plan encodes these past and future dates in a grand ‘Precession Wheel’ using the Pyramids of Giza, built by the 4th Dynasty Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt, the inheritors of the ancient and ‘sacred plan’. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

The ancient plan encodes these past and future dates in a grand ‘Precession Wheel’ using the Pyramids of Giza, built by the 4th Dynasty Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt, the inheritors of the ancient and ‘sacred plan’. This ancient knowledge has stood at Giza, unrecognised for thousands of years – until now. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

” They [the temples] were built according to an architectural plan which was supposed to have been revealed in a codex that fell from the heavens at Saqqara in the days of Imhotep. ” - Aldred 'The Egyptians', P32 © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Part 1 ‘THE BEACON’ © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

If the Pyramids of Giza were designed as a ‘message’ or ‘warning’ of some kind, it would be logical that its Designers should place within the design – the groundplan – a very clear and unequivocal ‘beacon’ in order to grab our attention in order that we investigate the layout more fully. And it would make sense also that such a ‘beacon’ would be universal in nature – that is to say it would convey some abstract concept that would be understandable to any future like-minded civilisation. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Do we have such a plain and clear ‘beacon’ at Giza? © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Do we have such a plain and clear ‘beacon’ at Giza? It would seem that we do. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

The Satellite Pyramids at Giza have been arranged in such a way as to present the first three digits of the Pi ( π ) constant ( ). © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

The Satellite Pyramids at Giza have been arranged in such a way as to present the first three digits of the Pi ( π ) constant ( ). And it would seem that this arrangement of the satellites has been purposefully devised to create an ‘intelligent beacon’ that would be recognised by a future civilisation (such as ours). © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

© Scott Creighton 2006/2007 A Message from Antiquity – The ‘Beacon’

3 © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 A Message from Antiquity – The ‘Beacon’

3 1 © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 A Message from Antiquity – The ‘Beacon’

3 1 4 © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 A Message from Antiquity – The ‘Beacon’

What is odd about this ‘beacon’ is that it presents Pi as a decimal fraction, a system that was unknown to the Ancient Egyptians (albeit they used a decimal number system). Indeed, we are not absolutely certain that the AEs fully understood the abstract concept of Pi. This is, therefore, a plain expression of knowledge that is clearly out of time and place. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

But surely this ‘beacon’ is the result of simple coincidence? © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

But surely this ‘beacon’ is the result of simple coincidence? This would most likely be the case if the ‘beacon’ did not lead to anything further. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

But surely this ‘beacon’ is the result of simple coincidence? This would most likely be the case if the ‘beacon’ did not lead to anything further. But it would seem that it does. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

What are we to make of this mathematical ‘beacon’? © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

What are we to make of this mathematical ‘beacon’? It is a reasonable assumption that Pi implies a circle. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

What are we to make of this mathematical ‘beacon’? It is a reasonable assumption that Pi implies a circle. Okay, so we draw a circle. But where? © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Since it is the Pyramids themselves that present the Pi constant, it is not unreasonable to further assume that the implied circle should be drawn around the pyramids in such a way as to ensure ALL the pyramids are precisely within the implied circle. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Since 3 non-linear points defines a circle, we must then find the 3 most extreme (outer) points of the pyramids. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

Since 3 non-linear points defines a circle, we must then find the 3 most extreme (outer) points of the pyramids. These are as follows: © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

© Scott Creighton 2006/2007 N The 3 most extreme (outer) points of the Giza Pyramids

1. SW Corner G3c N © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 The 3 most extreme (outer) points of the Giza Pyramids

1. SW Corner G3c 2. NE Corner G1 N © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 The 3 most extreme (outer) points of the Giza Pyramids

3. NE Corner G1a 2. NE Corner G1 1. SW Corner G3c N © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 The 3 most extreme (outer) points of the Giza Pyramids

3. NE Corner G1a Let us now connect these 3 extreme points with a circle 2. NE Corner G1 1. SW Corner G3c N © Scott Creighton 2006/2007

3. NE Corner G1a 2. NE Corner G1 1. SW Corner G3c N © Scott Creighton 2006/2007

3. NE Corner G1a 2. NE Corner G1 1. SW Corner G3c N © Scott Creighton 2006/2007 ALL the Gizamids are now precisely contained within the implied circle.

A closer analysis of this (implied) circle presents some remarkable properties. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

1. Notice how the Great Sphinx finds itself placed precisely on the outside edge of the circumscribed circle.

© 2006/2007 Scott Creighton 1. Notice how the Great Sphinx finds itself placed precisely on the outside edge of the circumscribed circle. 2. Notice how the circle’s centre lies fractionally off-centre from the middle pyramid (Khafre). This off-centre error is in the region of only 0.02%.

It would seem that by acting upon the beacon and circumscribing the 3 most outer corners of the pyramids with the ‘implied circle’ we find that it produces a circle with certain properties that are unlikely to have occurred as a result of simple chance. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

To put this result into some kind of persepective – imagine drawing a circle around the 3 most outer points of New York City. What are the chances of then finding: © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton 1.The centre of the Empire State Building is within 0.02% of the centre of the circumscribed circle. 2.The Statue of Liberty ends up sitting precisely on the outside edge of the circumscribed circle.

The possibility of such an occurrence taking place as a result of simple chance is very remote. Furthermore, that we should find such an occurrence at Giza with so few pyramid structures is all the more remarkable. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

We have to conclude then that this ‘implied circle’ is the desired outcome of this analysis and that the ‘beacon’ was indeed fully intentional in order to ‘facilitate’ and direct us to this outcome. © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

We have to conclude then that this ‘implied circle’ is the desired outcome of this analysis and that the ‘beacon’ was indeed fully intentional in order to ‘facilitate’ and direct us to this outcome. But for what purpose? © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton

End of Part 1 © 2006/2007 Scott Creighton