Special Consideration in Public Health Practice & Research Delia Wolf, MD, JD, MSCI Associate Dean, Regulatory Affairs and Regulatory Compliance Lecturer,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Ann Johnson IRB Administrator, IRB Member. Objectives 1. Identify the components necessary for management and oversight of tissue repositories used for.
1 The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep.
HIPAA – Privacy Rule and Research USCRF Research Educational Series March 19, 2003.
Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research Stacey Berg, M.D. Texas Children’s Cancer Center.
Informed consent requirements
Ethics in Field Research Philip Verwimp 27 February, 2014.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Implementation of Privacy Board Reviews at PCMC Mary Thomason, Intermountain Healthcare Privacy Board Chair.
Human Specimen Repositories: Requirements of 45 CFR part 46 PRIM&R May 5, 2004 Julie Kaneshiro DHHS Office for Human Research Protections Phone:
COOL THINGS ABOUT THE GENOME Humans have fewer genes than expected Human genes make more proteins than those of other critters Humans have adopted 200.
Vicki Hammen, Vice Chair, IRB IRB Brown Bag February 9, 2009.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.
Paula Peyrani, MD Medical/Project Director, HIV Program at the 550 Clinic Assistant Director, Research Design and Development Clinical and Translational.
Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics Conference Banking Biological Samples for Pediatric Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, M.D., M.P.H. Professor.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
HRPP Training – Session Two Human Research Protection Program Manager
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Future Use of Stored Samples & Data and the NIH Policy on GWAS and dbGaP NIAID/DAIDS Dione Washington, M.S. -- ProPEP Sudha Srinivasan, Ph.D.-- TRP Tanisha.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
HIPAA and Research Basics for IRB Tim Atkinson Director, Research and Sponsored Programs Director, Institutional Review Board Research Privacy Officer.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations in Research using Residual Specimens Jeffrey R. Botkin, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Pediatrics and Medical Ethics Associate.
H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Privacy vs. Confidentiality.  IRB review of privacy and confidentiality protections is required under the Common Rule and the FDA regulations, as well.
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS & BASICS RESEARCH COMPLIANCE.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
HIPAA and Human Subjects Research IRB Member CE May 2014 Slideshow by Sean Horkheimer.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
5-6-1 Unit 6: Ethical considerations After completing this unit, you should be able to: Understand the basic ethical principles of working with.
Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Research ethics.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA)
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Ethical Principles of Research
The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research
Data Access and Stewardship
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Ivor Pritchard, Ph.D. April12, 2019
Informed Consent Allison Blodgett, PhD, CIP Director of IRB Operations
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
Special Considerations in Genetic Research
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
Presentation transcript:

Special Consideration in Public Health Practice & Research Delia Wolf, MD, JD, MSCI Associate Dean, Regulatory Affairs and Regulatory Compliance Lecturer, Health Policy and Management Harvard School of Public Health KAU-Public Health Ethics Course May 7, 2015

Ethical Frameworks  Harm principle – it is applicable when predictable harm is likely to occur for individuals with infectious diseases, who are untreated may pose harm to communities  Least Restrictive Means – education and facilitation are preferred to interdiction and incarceration  Reciprocity – if restrictive measures are invoked, assistance and protections must be provided to those who are restricted/detained  Discourse ethics –representation of those to be restricted 2

3 Vaccination Programs Mandatory/compulsory vs. voluntary Exemption typology Medical – compromised immune system, allergies, etc Religious – “meddling in the work of God,” some vaccines stem from aborted fetal cell strains Philosophical – government interfering in the private lives of individuals and their families; how healthcare resources are spent, i.e. vaccination vs. improved nutrition and sanitation Personal (particularly on behalf of children) – perceived risks and health concerns

4 Vaccination Programs (cont.) Points to consider Other reasons for individuals’ objecting to vaccination (e.g., the cost of the vaccine, transportation to the clinic, time off work, potential illness) Providing assistance and compensation for sick days resulting from immunization Providing education Vaccine-by-vaccine, population-by-population bases Avoid imposing compulsory vaccination programs on an entire society

5 Genetic Research-Associated Risks psychological risks social risks family discord stigmatization employment discrimination insurance discrimination breach of confidentiality limitations of genetic testing

6 Important Considerations Research using prospectively collected samples Research using existing samples Tissue repository/bank for future genetic research Secondary use of existing samples Recruitment of family members Inclusion of children Disclosure of research results to subjects

7 Using Prospectively Collected Samples Unless the samples are collected anonymously, research involving the prospective collection of coded or identified samples requires subject consent The investigators has the obligation to maintain confidentiality to the extent permitted by local law

8 In addition to the required elements, a consent form should include: What information will result from the research What the implications and limitations are Unexpected findings may result What follow-up information subjects will receive How samples are to be disposed How to withdraw from the study List of regulatory agencies/parties that may review study results Steps that will be taken to ensure subjects confidentiality Using Prospectively Collected Samples

9 If a study asks to storage of samples for future research, subjects need to be informed: Where and how long their samples will be stored; Once the sample is provided, if samples are stored in the anonymous fashion, remove one’s samples from further testing is not possible; and They have the option of being re-contacted to consider use of their samples in future studies. Using Prospectively Collected Samples

10 Using Existing Samples When retrospective research is to be conducted using anonymous or anonymized samples, consent from subjects is not necessary For research using samples that are identifiable, consent must be obtained. In certain cases, where the informed consent process that was in place when the samples were taken does not meet current consent standards for genetic studies, the investigator may seek a waiver of written informed consent and authorization

11 Tissue Repository/Bank All tissue repositories, whether they focus on specific types of diseases, or they serve as a resource for research on any diseases, require IRB review and approval if the repository retains any identifiers. The investigator is required to provide the following information to the IRB: How will samples be obtained How the repository will handle the samples How confidentiality will be protected; and How tissue samples will be made available to other researchers

12 Tissue Repository/Bank (cont.) Investigators must seek informed consent from individuals who are asked to provide sample(s) to a tissue repository. The consent document must include: A description of the repository and how it is operated A description of what type(s) of research the tissue will be used for A list of conditions under which samples and data will be released to recipient-investigators Procedures for protecting the privacy of subjects and maintaining the confidentiality of data.

13 Tissue Repository/Bank (cont.) For recipient-investigator, if one requests unidentifiable or coded samples from the repository and the code is kept by the repository, then that investigator does not need to have an approval from IRB If the investigator requests samples with identifiers, then the recipient investigator must submit the proposed research protocol to the IRB, and the IRB will determine whether obtaining consent from the tissue donor is required, or whether the requirement of informed consent can be waived

14 Recruitment of Family Members Investigator may not directly contact any family members from a list provided by a proband. Instead, investigator must ask probands to initiate contact with family members about research studies To help the probands communicate effectively, investigator should prepare an information sheet that is similar to a recruitment letter. Family members could then contact researchers directly if they are interested in participating in the study.

15 Recruitment of Family Members Deciding whether family members are subjects: What is collected for research? Subjects?What is required? Tissue or blood sample from family members YesInformed consent Review of family members’ medical records YesInformed consent Data obtained from identifiable proband YesUsually waiver of informed consent Data from de-identified proband NoNo consent necessary

Inclusion of Children While the requirements to include children as subjects in genetic studies, in which these children display the phenotype under the study, are similar to these in other studies in which children may be asked to participate, special issues should be considered when children are enrolled not as the direct subjects of investigation, but to provide information necessary to analysis of the family

Inclusion of Children (cont.) Following issues should be addressed in the protocol: Is there a possibility that information would be discovered as a consequence of the study that may impact the health or future family planning of the child? If the child does not display the phenotype under study, what is the likelihood that he/she will eventually develop this phenotype? If there is a reasonable possibility that the phenotype will eventually appear, follow-up genetic counseling and psychological counseling should be made readily available. If the child does not display the phenotype, and is believed to be unaffected, provide justification as to why it is necessary to include the child in this family study. Is there any potential benefit to the family unit by having the child participate? If so, specify. What types of tissue samples would be collected for the study. What efforts will be made to obtain the child’s assent to participate in the study?

Disclosure of Research Results In general, should not disclose genetic research results to a research subject. Disclosure may be approved by the IRB if all of the following conditions are met: The research results are scientifically valid and are performed by a certified laboratory Research results have significant implications for the subject’s or the public’s health A course of action to ameliorate or treat the subject’s or the public’s health concerns is readily available