CCAT Project Status. The Project: Phase 1: Feasibility/Concept Design Study, $2M, completed and peer reviewed Phase 1: Feasibility/Concept Design Study,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission DG Development EC Responses to Soaring Food Prices Philip Mikos – DG Development Policies for the Sustainable management of natural.
Advertisements

ERA-NET Cooperation and coordination of national research and innovation activities Last call 2005 Deadline September-October.
Restructuring of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) Program Creating New Opportunities for Collaborations and Partnerships in.
Khalil Rouhana Director, European Commission. Purpose of the workshop To explore the potential of data –value creation, business development, economic.
Maryland Higher Education Commission BRAC Higher Education Investment Fund Technical Assistance Meeting June 21, 2010.
GSOE Impact Workshop Impact and the REF 19 th May 2010 Lesley Dinsdale.
1 Working together to strengthen research in Europe Open access and preservation: how can knowledge sharing be improved in ERA? (session 1.5) Alma Swan.
Debris disks with CCAT Jane Greaves: ~2012??
TheEuropean Extremely Large Telescope. The E-ELT 40-m class telescope: largest optical- infrared telescope in the world. Segmented primary mirror. Active.
SOFIA SOFIA Science Steering Committee Meeting Palmdale, Feb 18, 2010 Dietmar Lilienthal / Alois Himmes.
SKADSMTAvA A. van Ardenne SKADS Coördinator ASTRON, P.O. Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo The Netherlands SKADS; The.
Nuclear Physics Peer Review Processes 1.Objectives 2.Types of activities and relevant processes 3.New project /major upgrade 4.Project R&D 5.Exploitation.
1st Workshop European Nanotechnology for Thermoelectrics Cluster Thermoelectrics and nanotechnology: from innovation to industry European projects meeting.
NSF Experience with Management of Research Infrastructure
November 2004 The Research Infrastructures in FP7 DG RTD – Directorate ‘Structuring ERA’
February 19, 2015 Guelph, Ontario. 1. Advisory Committee on University-Industry Grants (ACUIG) 2. Review Process: Things to Focus On 3. Don’t do the Following.
Philip Diamond RadioNet Co-ordinator University of Manchester Jodrell Bank Observatory.
LIGO- G W LIGO Update by Fred Raab Local Educators Network LIGO Hanford Observatory October 27, 2005.
Cornell Caltech Atacama Telescope Project Status Simon Radford 2005 October 10.
The Frequency Agile Solar Radiotelescope Current Status & Plans T. S. Bastian NRAO.
Research Infrastructures The Research Infrastructures in FP7.
Towards a Future Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Bob Wilson Colorado State University CERN Prototype/Beam Test Meeting CERN, 20 October 2014.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
TMT Instrumentation Canadian capabilities and interests David Loop, NRC-HIA June 26, 2010.
1 The Thirty-Meter Telescope (TMT) Richard Ellis, Steele Professor and California Institute of Technology TMT Board member Michael Bolte, Director, University.
GMT Instrument Development Gary Da Costa ANU Representative GMT Science Advisory Committee.
Introduction of Space Technology. The James Webb Space Telescope The James Webb Space Telescope was previously known as the Next Generation Space Telescope.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Enabling a GSMT for the US Community: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom 04 June, 2004 Tucson, AZ National Optical Astronomy Observatory Tucson.
CHIPP Workshop on Detector R&D June - University of Geneva Common R&D for astroparticle physics: Activities of ApPEC and ASPERA Bernard Revaz and.
1 ASTRONET PROGRAM STATUS as of Preliminary Board 1 st Meeting Paris, 31 May 2005.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Principal Investigators: W. Wild (Instrumentation R&D) M. Hogerheijde (Allegro) M. Hogerheijde (Allegro) NOVA-3 Proposal Advancing Submillimeter Astronomy.
ANASAC Meeting Title North American ALMA Development Program Review Michael Shannon, Program Manager 17 September 2013.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
Advancing GSMT SWG Recommendations: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom AURA New Initiatives Office Presented to the GSMT SWG 12 February, 2004.
LOFAR AND AFRICA Daan du Toit DST – South Africa.
Basic Skills Across the Curriculum Barbara Illowsky, Project Director ASCCC Curriculum Institute, July 2008.
Systems Studies Program Peer Review Meeting Albert L. Opdenaker III DOE Program Manager Holiday Inn Express Germantown, Maryland August 29, 2013.
An I3 funded by the EU through FP6 Alastair G Gunn University of Manchester Jodrell Bank Observatory OPTICON BOARD MEETING – 11 th /12 th October 2004,
Short introduction to IDEAS Programme Maria Koutrokoi Hellenic NCP of ICT, IDEAS and Research Infrastructures Programmes Department for Strategy, Planning.
WFMOS Status Report Doug Simons Gemini Observatory January 2008.
TMT.PMO.PRE REL011 Thirty Meter Telescope Background and Status.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
University of Rochester Technology Development Fund OTT F.I.R.E. Series - March 10, Michael G. Rusnak, Fund Manager Deputy Director New Ventures.
1 R. D. Gehrz 64th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy, Columbus, OH, June 23, 2009 The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.
6/6/08NASA/USRA Management review- SETI TLR - 1 A New SOFIA Science Vision Charter, Progress, and Plans Tom Roellig.
Australia’s Path to a Giant Telescope Matthew Colless MNRF Symposium 7 June 2003.
Norman McCubbin1 Report from the Collaboration MICE Project Board (CMPB) Norman McCubbin Director, Particle Physics Department MICE/UKNF Oversight Committee.
ELT=European Large Telescope Realistic goal: ALMA-like world partnership Unrealistic goal: our own one Unacceptable outcome: the third one, even if ours….
1 ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy.
ASTRONET Board: WP 3.1 Infrastructure Roadmap Progress Report Mike Bode Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool JMU, UK.
What European needs to do to take the lead in Space Astronomy ESO Astronomy Faculty May 2004.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Exec/Board Paris February 2008 WP3.1 Infrastructure Roadmap: Progress Report.
The Square Kilometre Array Dr. Minh Huynh (International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research and SKA Program Development Office) Deputy International SKA.
Jim Bell Cornell University The Planetary Society July 30, 2009 Mars Exploration : Rationale and Principles for a Strategic Program Preliminary.
WREN Spring Workshop Program Evaluation Methodologies, Policies, and Management of R&D Organizations: Where are We Now and Where do We Want to be? June.
ALMA and FP6 Opportunities and strategy Funded project – construction phase FP6 timeframe 2003 – Good timing - first science planned for.
LSST CORPORATION Patricia Eliason LSSTC Executive Officer Belgrade, Serbia 2016.
Presentation to PPAP meeting
ATACAMA CCAT : The Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope
Operations Concept Simon Radford and Operations Committee
Welcome to the 4th NAIC-NRAO School on Single Dish Radio Astronomy
Welcome K. Y. Lo Director, NRAO
ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy
The role of the international department of TurkStat
Scientific Potential Current Design Efforts Complementarity with JWST
Community Investment Grant
Presentation transcript:

CCAT Project Status

The Project: Phase 1: Feasibility/Concept Design Study, $2M, completed and peer reviewed Phase 1: Feasibility/Concept Design Study, $2M, completed and peer reviewed Phase II: Engineering Concept Design, 1-year study, $2M – current work Phase II: Engineering Concept Design, 1-year study, $2M – current work Phase III: Development Phase to FDR, Build and Assemble on site Phase III: Development Phase to FDR, Build and Assemble on site Phase IV: Commission and into service by 2013 Phase IV: Commission and into service by 2013 Total cost $100M (includes first-light instrument budget of $20M) plus operating costs of $5M/y Total cost $100M (includes first-light instrument budget of $20M) plus operating costs of $5M/y

The Review Panel Report: Blue Ribbon Review Blue Ribbon Review Chaired by Bob Wilson Chaired by Bob Wilson Very supportive: Very supportive: –Combined with ALMA, which provides unprecedented sensitivity and resolution to image submm/FIR sources, the CCAT will revolutionize Astronomy in the submm/FIR band and enable significant progress in unraveling the cosmic origin of stars, planets and galaxies. CCAT is very timely and cannot wait.

Project Management: Project Director: Professor Riccardo Giovanelli, Cornell - leading efforts to develop the full partnership needed to complete the Project. Project Director: Professor Riccardo Giovanelli, Cornell - leading efforts to develop the full partnership needed to complete the Project. Project Manager: Thomas Sebring, Cornell Project Manager: Thomas Sebring, Cornell Deputy Project Manager: Simon Radford, Caltech. Deputy Project Manager: Simon Radford, Caltech. Lead development of the Project from an administrative and technical perspective. The science communities of the partner institutions have developed plans for instrumentation, science programs, and collaborations toward the future of CCAT. Lead development of the Project from an administrative and technical perspective. The science communities of the partner institutions have developed plans for instrumentation, science programs, and collaborations toward the future of CCAT.

Partnership Status Cornell University: The Astronomy Department has identified an individual donor who has pledged to provide $10 M of Cornells share. Cornell hopes to have approximately a 1/3 share of CCAT. Cornell University: The Astronomy Department has identified an individual donor who has pledged to provide $10 M of Cornells share. Cornell hopes to have approximately a 1/3 share of CCAT. Caltech: The Chairman of the Division of Physics Mathematics and Astronomy has indicated that Caltech intends to participate as a partner in the Project and will make funds available for Phase II, looking at 20-25% inc JPL. Caltech: The Chairman of the Division of Physics Mathematics and Astronomy has indicated that Caltech intends to participate as a partner in the Project and will make funds available for Phase II, looking at 20-25% inc JPL. JPL: The administration of JPL has indicated intention to continue support development of CCAT. While large investments in ground based astronomy facilities are not likely by NASA, development of instrumentation, focal planes, and other high dollar value elements of CCAT by JPL is under discussion. JPL: The administration of JPL has indicated intention to continue support development of CCAT. While large investments in ground based astronomy facilities are not likely by NASA, development of instrumentation, focal planes, and other high dollar value elements of CCAT by JPL is under discussion. University of Colorado: Intention to become a partner at a level of $10 M, possibility of ZSpeC as day-I instrument. University of Colorado: Intention to become a partner at a level of $10 M, possibility of ZSpeC as day-I instrument. Northwestern: Looking for 5-10% but must involve technology. Northwestern: Looking for 5-10% but must involve technology. Canada: Probably through individual universities such as UBC and Waterloo at the moment – maybe around $5-10M. Canada: Probably through individual universities such as UBC and Waterloo at the moment – maybe around $5-10M.

So what does this mean? Project is short of funding to complete it Project is short of funding to complete it Looking for a big partner rather than lots of little partners Looking for a big partner rather than lots of little partners I have indicated that the UK/Europe would be looking to be partners at the 50% level I have indicated that the UK/Europe would be looking to be partners at the 50% level The big questions are: The big questions are: –From where do we get the funds ? –What are the timescales ?

What has happened so far ? Visit by the CCAT team to the UK and Europe in June 2006 Visit by the CCAT team to the UK and Europe in June 2006 Business meeting at Cornell in July Business meeting at Cornell in July Setting up of a Management Committee and telecons – I am the UK rep on this and one telecon held so far (August) – next scheduled for Sept 26 th Setting up of a Management Committee and telecons – I am the UK rep on this and one telecon held so far (August) – next scheduled for Sept 26 th Scientific meeting of the UK community - today Scientific meeting of the UK community - today Instrumentation working group meeting Caltech in December Instrumentation working group meeting Caltech in December

What do we need to do Now: Be very clear as to the scientific importance of CCAT in the realm of post SCUBA-2 surveys, an LMT of 25-50m diameter, and ALMA mosaicing areas of around 1 sq arcmin Be very clear as to the scientific importance of CCAT in the realm of post SCUBA-2 surveys, an LMT of 25-50m diameter, and ALMA mosaicing areas of around 1 sq arcmin Encourage European scientific support Encourage European scientific support Submit an SoI to PPARC this autumn Submit an SoI to PPARC this autumn Work to get the science case for CCAT on the AstroNet roadmap Work to get the science case for CCAT on the AstroNet roadmap Big question - how do we access Opticon/RadioNet EU FP7 funding sources Big question - how do we access Opticon/RadioNet EU FP7 funding sources Possibility of SCUBA-2 being a day-1 instrument Possibility of SCUBA-2 being a day-1 instrument