Per Gellert 11.11.2010 /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN THE PROVINCE OF LIMBURG (NL) an example of how a PPP can work to the benefit of citizens, local authorities and the market.
Advertisements

Greater Stuttgart Region. Integration area Integration area: 3,012 km 2 Inhabitants: million Employees:0.9 million Cities and villages: years.
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Ticket media Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Use of PT information channels Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
Copyright © D&D Research, 2010 Structured evaluation of the efficiency of POC project Complex quantitative research report March – April 2010.
1 PILOT CASE: Championship for energy saving in public buildings GRANOLLERS-LAG: Local Working Group on Savings and Energy Efficiency (LWG_SEE) interdepartamental.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2013.
SPUTNIC – Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Funded by the EU Project introduction.
Research Methods in Social Sciences
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
September 7 th, 2005 Arjen Stoelinga Tendering in Dutch Public Transport Encouraging Results.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
Public transport framework plan for Buffalo City July, BUFFALO CITY MUNICIPALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT FRAMEWORK PLAN PRESENTATION August 2008.
CITTA 5 TH Annual Conference on Planning Research Planning and Ageing Think, Act and Share Age-Friendly Cities CiViTAS-ELAN Project Development, Implementation,
Experiences of Demand Responsive Transport System (DRTS) in Keski- Uusimaa/Finland.
Promoting Sustainability through Mobility Management Concepts, Belgian Experience Bart Desmedt General manager Traject.
The Business Research Company Understand Consumers.
BEST seminar 2007 Berlin November 2nd
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2014.
BEST Survey 2009 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
The Business Research Company Develop Products and Services.
1 London 10. October 2014 EMTA General Meeting A Danish experience: electronics for transport communication Per Gellert Director Planning.
TOURISM DATA COLLECTION. Data collection Situational analyses – to perform situational analysis should be carried out marketing research to obtain quantitative.
Agenda Development of long distance Coach market in case of Germany APC- 10 year‘s anniversary meeting, Riga, 05. Septemer 2013.
1 Requirements for Long-distance Bus Terminals in Germany Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport BEST BEST seminar 2007 Berlin November 2nd - Completed version1 Common challenges and the possibilities.
Results Third Quarter 2006 Harrie Noy, CEO Analyst Conference Call, November 15, 2006 Infrastructure, environment, facilities.
Monitoring Key performance indicators Ruud van der Ploeg EMTA GM november 2010 Quality in Amsterdam public transport contracts.
Braking borders by working together on the improved hospitality of Delft.
BEST 2011 Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport EMTA & BEST – towards a more complete and interactive benchmarking database Birmingham,
Arriva in Southend Kevin Hawkins Commercial Director.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
The AENEAS project and best practice from SALZBURG Angelika Gasteiner Customer Service & Marketing at public transport company Salzburg - Austria.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2009 Survey.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
1 februari 2007 Martha Brouwer (program manager Traffic Management and Public Transport) Network Operations in the Netherlands.
1 BEST results 2007 for Oslo Svein L. Alfheim Manager for Planning and Development SL (Greater Oslo Public Transport)
EMTA General Meeting in Copenhagen, 19 April 2013 Espen Martinsen, Strategy Manager The Oslo Packages Experiences from tollring & car users contributing.
BEST on Strategic Planning September 2008 Benchmarking Public Transport Strategic Planning Participants Ruter AS, Oslo HKL, Helsinki Movia, Copenhagen.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
1 Trends in urban transport policy in the 21 st century PIMMS TRANSFER MC 2009 Almada, 24 March 2009 Giuliano Mingardo
1 PILOT CASE: Installation of remote control systems for energy management in public buildings participating in “Championship” GRANOLLERS-LAG: Local Working.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager.
3rd Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
The monitoring of Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction survey of HCT BEST-survey Customer complaints.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Urban Public Transport in Europe Market potential and future development? Bård Norheim.
Training for Rebuilding Europe Retrofitting buildings, training and improved skills, and financing energy efficiency in buildings. 10 December 2010 – 10.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport Results of the 2007 survey.
Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014.
 Marketing Information System: A set of procedures and methods that regularly generates, stores, analyzes, and distributes information for use in making.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Private Sector Contribution to Economically Sustainable Mobility David Martin, 2 December 2009.
Introduction to BEST Survey results 2015 Oslo, 8 th of February 2016.
Journal Entry 4 If you were developing a new candy bar, what type of things would you want to know before marketing it?
Incentives in contracts on public transport market in Poland Marcin Wolek, Ph. D. Department of Transportation Market University of Gdansk Prague, ,
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport BEST BEST Seminar 2006 Main results of the seminar evaluation Helsinki, 16th and 17th of November.
/ København Dok.nr. Nordic Cooperation in Public Transport Per Gellert.
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
BEST Special topic 2015 What could make PT more interesting for car users? Stockholm, 15th of March 2016.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST)
Presentation transcript:

Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers

Municipalities and Regions decide local service level Authority to Consultant All public transport tendered to private operators Production to service (Public) transport is a business where customers choose the offer that fits their needs best. If we cannot meet customer requirements we will loose market shares Passenger rights or not ! Movia trends

Understanding the Customer BEST – Benchmarking in European Service of Public Transport interviews (telephone) with citizens aged 15 + Conducted March every year (2001 – 2010) Perceived quality – 10 dimensions (approx. 27 statements) Quality evaluated on a 5-point scale Special questions might be added A database with interviews with citizens in European cities Traffic Supply Reliability Information Staff behaviour Personal safety image Comfort Social image Value for money Satisfaction Loyalty Quality dimensions

Focus on Number of departures Waiting time short at transfers Easy transfers PT runs on schedule Drivers of satisfaction - Copenhagen Travel time Reliability

Drivers of Satisfaction – BEST Cities Copenhagen Number of dept.Runs on scheduleShort transfers Geneva Number of dept.Short transfers Helsinki Number of dept.Short transfersRuns on schedule Oslo Runs on scheduleNumber of dept. Stockholm Runs on scheduleNumber of dept. Vienna Number of dept.Runs on schedule - Travel time and reliability – not a big surprise !

Development of Contracts 1990:Tendering started, focus on price, gross cost contract 1995:Introduction of quality measuring system with bonus and penalties 1996:Bonus max. 1% of total contract sum 1997:Bonus max. 2,5% of total contract sum 2004:Operators bid with quality level. Possible 2 year extension of contract (max. 8 years). Bonus max. 3% of total contract sum 2008:Possible 6 year extension (2+2+2) 2010:Operators bid with max. number of customer complaints. Passenger incentives introduced

Quality Measuring System Topics or questions External cleaning and maintenance Internal cleaning Internal maintenance Temperature Ventilation Noise Precision to time table Driving comfort Drivers service and appearance All in all impression of this trip Problem: Interpreted as customer satisfaction !

Incentives in Contracts – Case 150S Increase in passengers = increased satisfaction ! The agreement Income 10 kr. per customer Quality index < 800 pays 0 kr. per new customer No passenger maximum for bonus Each quarter add up separately New customers finances extra service Arriva/Movia share campaign costs Actions taken Significant increase in number of departures Arriva funds ”stop hosts” and Internet Media campaign to improve image Bikes on the bus Customer involvement (7.000 sms) The driver is captain (improved working conditions)

Incentives in Contracts – Results 150S Lessons learned There has to be a market potential The line should have a high number of passengers Drivers want to contribute Drivers absence due to illness decreases Increasing number of passengers is possible Increasing number of passengers is a target that everybody understands Each campaign gives inspiration for improvements Improvements responding to costumer needs is the key to growth It’s a never ending process

Increase in passengers = increased satisfaction But we need to measure it ! Create the framework for cooperation between PTA, Operator, Municipality Still focus on increase in number of passengers Spread out 150S experiences Adjusted customer satisfaction survey Make it the operators business to attract new customers Operators actions: Reliability Environment Travel time Local business Incentives in Contracts – Next Generation

Conclusions Customer focus is necessary if public transport is to be the future solution for effective and sustainable transport in our cities Measure real customer satisfaction Involve PTA, Operator and local government Focus on solutions that increases services and improves speed and reliability Customer quality incentives in contracts is ”hard work”, but necessary It takes time to change from operation excellence to a real service oriented business Incentives must be sufficient to make operators invest in new business areas