Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 1 PAPR in LTF’s in with and without rotation of the upper subcarrier Notice:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1829r1 Submission November 2006 Assaf Kasher et al. (Intel)Slide 1 Heff Defintion Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2013 S. Filin H. Harada, NICTSlide 1 Introduction to Contributions Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1936r0 Submission December 2006 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Adrian Stephens, IntelSlide 1 TGn Proposed Draft Revision Notice Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
Legacy OFDM Transmission on several Antennas
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
Extension Coexistence with OBSS
JTC1 Chair’s Closing Report
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Number of Encoder as a function of MCS
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
November Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
PAPR in LTF’s in with and without rotation of the upper subcarrier
PAPR in LTF’s in with and without rotation of the upper subcarrier
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 1 PAPR in LTF’s in with and without rotation of the upper subcarrier Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone Assaf ntel.com

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 2 Abstract This presentation addresses letter ballot comments with the CID’s in the table on the right: These comments propose to remove the 90° rotation from the upper 20Mhz of a 40MHz channel. These comments should be countered based on the analysis given in this presentation

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide rotation by j does not change the PAPR as seen by the analog electronics delete the sentence "To reduce the pak-to-average …." degree rotation does not help the PAPR as seen by the analog section delete line degree rotation is not requiredremove gamma in equation delete the definition of Gamma degree rotation is unnecessarydelete line degree rotation is unnecessarydelete line degree rotation is unnecessaryremove Gamma degree rotation is unnecessaryremove j multiplication in row 3 cloumn 2 of table n degree rotationin the upper 20MHz band is unnecessary change equation in row 3 column 2 accordingly degree rotation is unnecessarydelete Gamma and the definition of Gamma degree rotation is unnecessarydelete Gamma and the definition of Gamma degree rotation is unnecessarydelete Gamma and the definition of Gamma degree rotation is unnecessarymodify the equation for the tones in the upper band accordingly degree rotation is unnecessarydelete Gamma

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 4 Introduction The 90° rotation of the upper channel has been introduced to reduced PAPR (Peak to Average Power Ratio) in the transmission of the STF and LTF’s. PAPR is defined as:

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 5 PAPR results: L-STF Peak to Average Power Ratio [dB] realimaginaryabsolute No Rotation 40Msps With Rotation 40Msps No Rotation 80Msps With Rotation 80Msps

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 6 PAPR results: L-LTF Peak to Average Power Ratio [dB] realimaginaryabsolute No Rotation 40Msps With Rotation 40Msps No Rotation 80Msps With Rotation 80Msps

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 7 PAPR results – HT-LTF Peak to Average Power Ratio [dB] realimaginaryabsolute No Rotation 40Msps With Rotation 40Msps No Rotation 80Msps (FFT 256) With Rotation 80Msps (FFT 256)

doc.: IEEE /1595r1 Submission June 2006 Assaf Kasher (Intel)Slide 8 Conclusion We can see that the 90° rotation improves PAPR significantly in the L-STF and in the HT-LTF when the sampling rate is 40Msps. There is not significant degradation in PAPR in the other cases. We therefore propose to keep the 90° rotation. We propose removing the sentence “To reduce the peak to average power ratio,” from page 186, line 71. We propose removing the sentence “The 90 rotation helps keep the PAPR of the L-STF in 40 MHz comparable to that in 20 MHz.” from line 14 of page 214.looooon