0 HIT Standards Committee Consumer/Patient Engagement Power Team Leslie Kelly Hall, Chair Health IT Standards Committee Meeting April 18, 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consumer Engagement is critical to healthcare transformation, and can provide the basis for dramatic improvements in the health of Michigans residents.

Advertisements

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.

Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research

Strategy and Innovation Workgroup October 21, 2014 David Lansky, chair Jennifer Covich, co-chair.

ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting February 20, 2013 Jodi Daniel, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC.

Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,

Capacity Task Force Virginia Health Reform Initiative January 14, 2011

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.

Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.

A Robust Health Data Infrastructure P. Jon White, MD Director, Health IT Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.

PATIENT ENGAGEMENT Meaningful Use and Beyond In Long Term Post Acute Care Hearing.

HIT Policy and Standards Committee Patient Generated Data Hearing Leslie Kelly Hall June 20, 2012.

HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Standards for Consumer Engagement Dixie Baker, SAIC Steve Findlay, Consumers Union April 28, 2009.

September 10, Introductions Steering Committee Members Action Teams Action Plans by teams Group discussion - Comments Networking AGENDA.

Patient Generated Data Hearing Summary of Presentations, Discussions, and Blog Responses.

Patient Engagement Some of the events that will shape your definition. 1.Meaningful Use – strong emphasis on patient engagement w Stage 2 MU 2.Growth.

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of Commerce,

Learning From Patients Engaging Patients in Primary Care Tanya Lord, PhD 1.

Data Intermediaries and Meaningful Use: Quality Measure Innovation, Calculation and Reporting Recommendations from Data Intermediary Tiger Team.

Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.

Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG Roadmap Discussion 1.

PATIENT- AND FAMILY-CENTERED CARE: Partnerships for Safety & Quality Staff Physician & Resident Physician Toolkit.

Interoperability Framework Overview Health Information Technology (HIT) Standards Committee June 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting.

HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup September 3, 2013.

Clinical Quality Workgroup Marjorie Rallins, co-chair Danny Rosenthal, co-chair December 19, 2013.

Recommendations to the HIT Policy Committee on ONC Standards and Certification NPRM May 2, 2012 Certification and Adoption Workgroup Marc Probst, Intermountain.

Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.

HIT Standards Committee NHIN Workgroup Introductory Remarks Farzad Mostashari Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Douglas Fridsma Office of.

Clinical Quality Public Hearing June 7, 2012 HIT Standards & Policy Committees Summary: June 20, 2012 Marjorie Rallins, Clinical Quality WG, HIT Standards.

Stage 3 Update Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup January 28, 2014.

Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.

Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

Information Exchange Workgroup Recommendations to HIT Policy Committee October 3, 2012 Micky Tripathi, Larry Garber.

Nurses At the Table Serving to Transform Health care through Nursing.

HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup April 18, :00 AM– 10:00 AM Eastern.

Quality Measures Workgroup David Lansky, PhD 1. Quality Measures Workgroup 2012 Stage 2 Quality Measure Development Stage 2 NPRM Review Alignment with.

A health department-led initiative to advance and monitor the statewide HIT infrastructure to support public and population health in Minnesota Karen Soderberg.

Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 15 Overview / Introduction to the EHR.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent official policy or position.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Update Paul Tang Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University January 13, 2010.

HIT Standards Committee Consumer/Patient Engagement Power Team Leslie Kelly Hall, Chair Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 27, 2012.

CREATED BY: HOLLY GAGNE ASHLEY GAGNON SARAH JONES JESSICA SNIEGOWSKI Institute of Medicine (IOM)

What Lies Ahead for ONC Meaningful Use and Beyond Farzad Mostashari, MD ScM National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

Helen Johnson Head of Study Abroad, Office for Global Engagement Assessing and Managing Risk for Study Abroad.

Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process

Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.

Draft – discussion only Consumer Workgroup Christine Bechtel, chair Neil Calman, co-chair December 8, 2014.

HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare, Co-Chair Judy Murphy, Aurora Health Care, Co-Chair November 16, 2011.

S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.

HIT Standards Committee Implementation Workgroup Judy Murphy, Aurora Health Care, Co-Chair Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare, Co-Chair September 28, 2011.

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

EHealth Initiative Business and Clinical Motivator Work Group January 21, :00 p.m. EDT.

Patient Engagement Today’s presenter:

David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.

Joint Health IT Committee Meeting Precision Medicine Task Force March 10, 2016 Leslie Kelly Hall, Co-Chair Andy Wiesenthal, Co-Chair.

AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.

0 HIT Policy Committee Governance Workgroup May 11, 2012.

HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,

Joint Health IT Committee Meeting Precision Medicine Initiative Update March 10, 2016 P. Jon White, MD, Deputy National Coordinator for Health IT.

NCQA’s Approach to the New Quality Measurement Landscape

11/7/ :59 PM Pharmacy e-Health Information Technology Collaborative

Health IT Standards Committee Workgroup Evolution Discussion

Health IT Policy Committee Workgroup Evolution

Presentation transcript:

0 HIT Standards Committee Consumer/Patient Engagement Power Team Leslie Kelly Hall, Chair Health IT Standards Committee Meeting April 18, 2012

Charge CHARGE: Assess the Standards and Certification Criteria NPRM and provide recommendations for strengthening consumer/patient engagement components. The Power Team will prioritize recommendations to enable patients to participate as partners in their care. 1

Goal GOAL: Ensure that MU Stage 2 standards meet current opportunities for engaging patients and their families in their care, and anticipate future policy and technology that encourages further engagement. 2

Consumer/Patient Engagement Power Team Members CHAIR Leslie Kelly Hall, Healthwise Jon Bertman, Amazing Charts Hugo Campos, patient advocate John Derr, Golden Living LLC Jim Hansen, Dossia Liz Johnson, Tenet Healthcare Nikolai Kirienko, patient advocate Russell Leftwich, Tennessee Office of eHealth Initiatives Alice Leiter, National Partnership Arien Malec, RelayHealth Holly Miller, MedAllies Sean Nolan, MicroSoft Health Vault Heidi Sitkov, nurse, patient advocate Sharon Terry, Genetic Alliance Judy Warren, University of Kansas School of Nursing 3

Comment Topics Overarching principles Themes Comments for Stage 2 (in combined grid) Frontier issues: borderline Stage 2/3 Directional signposts Appendices: – Complete comments, with general guidance and recommendations for Stage 3 – table of overarching themes – text summarizing key catalysts for patient engagement and health care transformation authored by Jim Hansen based on PE PT discussions and other subsequent input from multiple sources 4

Standards and Policy PolicyStandardsAction ExistsDon’tPatient/EHR developed GapsExistHarmonization ExistsExistPatient/EHR harmonization 5

Overarching Principles Nothing about me without me I am a contributing care team member Many EHR actions have a patient-facing system reaction Patient-facing systems are not limited by legacy systems How does my care compare? 6

Specific Themes (Examples) Understandable to me: plain language, my language CC:Me or my designee(s) I am a health information exchange of one I am a necessary and important safety checkpoint I am a credible source of information and generate meaningful and material data for my care: Clinical information reconciliation needs to include patient as participant VDT in a computable, transferable, moveable way 7

Stage 2 Comments 8 Comments reflect logical outgrowth: – Review identified opportunities

Frontier Issues: Borderline Stage 2/3 Patient access should be flexible and bidirectional- TO THE PATIENT – CC:ME or designee(s) CPOE eRX – Designated proxy – Computable & human readable – On demand – Available as populated 9

Frontier Issues: Borderline Stage 2/3 Patient access should be flexible and bidirectional- FROM THE PATIENT Current medication list Family history Smoking status Medication adherence and experience Experience of care surveys Questionnaires Patient intolerance Patient responses Patient initiated data 10

Frontier Issues: Borderline Stage 2/3 Clinical Decision Support – Include patient in shared decision making Preference sensitive care Patient communication – Should include relevant education Metadata/ raw data any patient data – Computable – Discreet Care Team Roster - Patient Included – Institutional – Community 11

Overarching Principles: Guideposts Nothing about me without me: CC:ME I am a contributing care team member: Patient generates as well as receives data Many EHR actions have a patient-facing system reaction: Patient orders Patient-facing systems are not limited by legacy systems: API How does my care compare? Patient report cards 12

Take-Aways The energy and enthusiasm strong The ability of a brand new group, including patients, to coalesce and to contribute Policy helps innovate standards, but standards help innovate policy Value of extending this type of effort across HITPC and HITSC, jointly or in collaboration 13