HOUSTON | GPS September 10-11th, 2015.  Importance of Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
Advertisements

Funding Formula Data Work Session Student Information System Website: ▬►Resources ▬►CompleteCollegeTN.
How College Shapes LivesFor detailed data, see: trends.collegeboard.org. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, 2013, Tables 222, 306, and.
THECB 1/2008 Report on Closing the Gaps Success Progress January 24, 2008.
Welfare to Careers Medger Evers College Metropolitan College of New York Pace University December 2, 2008.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
PLACING IOWA WITHIN THE SUCCESS PARADIGM LINDA SERRA HAGEDORN, PH.D. ASSOCIATE DEAN – COLLEGE OF HUMAN SCIENCES; UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS, TRANSFER, STUDENT.
MUS-DLI Data Link: What can it offer the STEM effort.
Earnings are the Key to Student Debt Mark Schneider President, College Measures Vice President, AIR.
AVATAR and HB 5 Claudette Jenks Assistant Director, College Readiness and Success Presentation to AVATAR Coordinator Regional Meeting, April, 28, 2015.
Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education January 2014.
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
1 Office of Institutional Research and Planning The mission of the Foothill-De Anza Community College District Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
Good News – Access! Record enrollment More African American students More Hispanic students More low income students More first generation student 1.
ILASFAA: 2014 MAP ADVISING RECOMMENDATIONS Background MAP Task Force – Illinois General Assembly – 2013 Concluded that students would benefit from.
Developmental Education Initiative (DEI). What is DEI? o Three-year project aimed at improving developmental education outcomes o Funded by Gates and.
College Completion Reports and Return on Investment March 28, 2014.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
TSUS Education Policy Implementation Center (EPIC) February 21, 2011 Dr. Leslie Huling.
IBHE Presentation 1 Proposed Four-Year University Performance Funding Model Performance Funding Steering Committee Meeting October 24, 2011 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Module 3 1. Using Local Data 2
Julie Johnson Vice President of Strategy. 2 Alliance Member DC  Arkansas  Colorado  Connecticut  District of Columbia  Florida  Georgia  Hawaii.
Why am I in this class?. Who said I have to take it? Senate Bill 1 (2009) legislated the need for schools to intervene on the behalf of students who are.
Data Collection Process: USDOL Data Requirements Colleges must be able to identify grant participants by program (credit & non-credit) I. Initial Point.
UMass Boston Retention, Persistence, and Graduation Rates UMass Boston Advising Collaborative March 28, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Policy.
Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in 2011 Dollars (in Millions), to SOURCE: The.
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO. COLORADO GEAR UP SUCCESS.
Turning the Revolving Door into the Staircase of Academic Success for Basic Skills Students NACADA October 5, 2011 Presented by:  Marti Demarest Assistant.
Identifying At-Risk Students Gary R. Pike Information Management & Institutional Research Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
CONTINUOUS ENROLLMENT BY THE NUMBERS. A 4-year Data Profile THE STUDENTS ENROLLMENT STATUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS BEST PRACTICES ENGAGEMENT.
Draft Draft Recommendations for Measuring Completion: Success is earning the credential sought by the student Completion should be measured both when students.
Central Piedmont Community College 2011 Data Report for CMS High Schools (CMS Graduates Attending CPCC from Fall ) High School Principals’ Luncheon.
Why My Class is so Important COLLEGE STATISTICS. GOING DIRECTLY TO A 4-YEAR COLLEGE? Must meet A-G requirements only 51% graduate within 6 years.
One System…One Mission Florida’s Student Success Dashboard 2011 American Association of Community Colleges John Hughes, Ph. D.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
1. Alliance Member  Arkansas  Colorado  Connecticut  District of Columbia  Florida  Georgia  Hawaii  Idaho  Illinois  Indiana  Kentucky  Louisiana.
ls Vice President Complete College America Dr. Dhanfu E. Elston.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.
Financial Aid Need & Postsecondary Access in Iowa: New Insights into Enduring Issues Anthony Girardi, Ph.D. Iowa College Student Aid Commission April 12,
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for Tracking and Advancing Underserved Students’ Success Key findings from a survey.
Strategic Recruitment and Retention Models ROBIN BOOTH EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER, REGION 6 EDUCATION SPECIALIST, H-GAC PD COORDINATOR ADULT EDUCATION.
Graduation Initiative 09/14/2011NISTS STEM Transfer Success Conference1 Native vs. Transfer Students at the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA):
Data Highlight: 8th Grade Cohort Julie Eklund Interim Assistant Commissioner Strategic Planning and Funding.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
Meaningful Federal Community College Success Rate --A POP QUIZ Utility A.19.8%Federal 150% completion B.38.5%Federal 150% completion + Transfer C.25.1%Federal.
Julie Johnson Vice President of Strategy | Complete College America
2016 AIR Pre-Conference Workshop
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Demographics and Learning Outcomes
The Gateway to the Game Changers
Data Highlight: Student Debt
Student Demographics and Learning Outcomes
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Optimizing Student Progression: Why Personalization is Key
Optimizing Student Progression: Why Personalization is Key
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Student Success Data.
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Student Success Metrics
IPEDS Outcome Measures and the VFA
EOF Appropriations History, FY1968 – 2006
Presentation transcript:

HOUSTON | GPS September 10-11th, 2015

 Importance of Data

 Metrics  Outcomes  Degrees  Graduation & Transfer Rates  Time & Credits to Degree  Momentum points  Remediation rates and success  Gateway completion  First-year credit accumulation  Retention  Data by race, age, gender, income, remedial status  Data by sector & student enrollment status (full/part-time)  Adopted by National Governors Assoc.

On-Time Graduation Rates Why GPS? University of Houston 16% 2006 Cohort, Full-Time Students CCA Median (Non-Flagship) 22% Texas (Non-Flagship) 23%

150% Graduation Rates Why GPS? University of Houston 46% 2006 Cohort, Full-Time Students CCA Median (Non-Flagship) 48% Texas (Non-Flagship) 50% University of Houston Downtown 13%

Transfer Graduation Rates (w/in 4 Years) 44% Why GPS? University of Houston 46% University of Houston- Downtown 61% University of Houston- Clear Lake 2006 Transfer Cohort

On-Time Graduation Rates 3.1% Why GPS? Houston Community College 3.2% Lone Star College System 4.6 Wharton County Junior College 2.8% San Jacinto College 2008 Cohort, Full-Time Students

150% Graduation Rates 8.7% Why GPS? Houston Community College 9.1% Lone Star College System 4.6 Wharton County Junior College 2008 Cohort, Full-Time Students 10% San Jacinto College

150% Graduation Rates Transfer Cohort 11.8 Why GPS? Houston Community College 9.4% Lone Star College System 12.6 Wharton County Junior College 2008 Transfer Cohort 11.5% San Jacinto College

150% Graduation Rates Transfer Cohort 11.8 Why GPS? Houston Community College 9.4% Lone Star College System 12.6 Wharton County Junior College 2008 Transfer Cohort 11.5% San Jacinto College

Time to Degree 4-Year Why GPS? Graduates

Credits to Degree 4-Year Why GPS? Graduates

Story  Entering students don’t always complete  About 50% of transfer students do complete within 4 years  Only a small number of students transfer  Still requires excess time and credits particularly for transfer students

Further Exploration  Differences across demographic groups  What happens once they get in  Remedial enrollment & Success  Gateway Success  Credit Accumulation  Retention  Are their unique circumstances or trends to explore?  What other data may be available

HOUSTON | GPS Memorandum of Understanding  Tracking Student Progression: Data for Project Evaluation – Participating institutions will track the progress and outcomes of cohorts by meta-major using key progress milestones such as rate at which students: complete 15 credits in 1 term, complete 30 credits in 1 year, are retained from term 1 to term 2 and from year 1 to year 2, and complete a credential. – Community colleges will track the rates at which students transfer to a 4-year institution (by receiving institution) and, among those who transfer, the percentage who complete a bachelor’s degree.

Questions? 17