A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Slides originally developed by NJDOE A New Vision For Professional Development.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
SAU # WELCOME TO THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Iowa’s Statewide Approach to Performance Evaluation & Compensation Judy Jeffrey, Director.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success MPS Principal Breakfast Milwaukee Public Schools 23 April 2008.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Collaborative Leadership
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education 1

 Overview and update on New Jersey’s PD policies and strategies  Results of the Stanford University study on Teacher Professional Learning in the United States: Case Studies of State Policies and Strategies  PD as essential component of a system of teacher effectiveness for student learning 2

3 Link to be added for short video illustrating job- embedded professional learning

 Focused on specific curriculum content and pedagogy  Collegial design  Intensive, sustained and continuous models  Linked to formative and summative data on student learning  Supported by coaching, modeling, feedback  Connected to the work of school-based teams  Integrated into policy and reform 4

 Professional learning communities have been found to “increase both the individual and group capacity of teachers to improve student learning.”  Student achievement is higher (in mathematics, reading, and science) in schools where teachers report that they have more opportunities for collaborative engagement around school improvement.  Collaborative teams improve instructional practice and enhance teaching effectiveness. 5

 Teacher PD requirement implemented in 2000 Developed for alignment with other state teacher quality initiatives on the teacher professional continuum: strong pre- service, program approval, accreditation, and induction requirements  Continuous cycle of feedback and improvement  PD system tied to evaluation cycle (PDP)  Internal and external accountability  Strong educator involvement in planning and implementation 6

Teachers write individual Professional Development Plans based on their own needs and their schools’ plans. Every five years, teachers must do 100 hours of embedded or external professional development as part of the evaluation process. School Professional Development Committees create plans based on data-driven local needs. District Local Professional Development Committees collect and review school plans, and then create one, combined district plan. County Professional Development Boards review district plans using rubric based on state professional development standards adopted from NSDC guidelines. The Professional Teaching Standards Board in conjunction with the NJDOE’s Office of Professional Standards, Licensing, and Higher Education Collaboration advises the Commissioner to create professional development standards for teachers and leaders and to design a system for accountability and support. The PTSB with the NJDOE’s assistance creates materials and programs to support this work. Other branches of the NJDOE provide professional development opportunities and oversight as well Universities and private organizations supply training and support. 7

 School-based PD planning – added in encourages the seeding of school professional learning communities  PLC structures encourage collaborative planning and collective expertise  Focus on curriculum, assessment, instruction 8

 Placeholder for graphic showing essential elements of school-based professional learning communities 9

 Utilize national expertise to develop processes  Develop strategic web-based tools, guidance and planning resources  Create PLC Lab School Project  Build capacity of state partners to support statewide implementation of PLCs  Coordinate professional development effort with other offices in the DOE  Build on current research such as findings from the Stanford University studies on professional development 10

New Jersey Case Study 11

Three-part study ( ) Phase I: Overview of research about professional development and a look at practices internationally and here in the United States. Phase II: Quantitative analysis of national data on professional development from the Schools and Staffing Survey (2000, 2004, and 2008). Phase III: Case Studies of Four “Professionally Active” States: New Jersey, Vermont, Colorado and Missouri

 Ambitious, new state professional development system using standards based school plans with support for collaborative efforts  Impactful professional development efforts in former Abbott districts including work with Early Childhood Education  Strong NAEP scores both overall and for students from low-income families

 Vermont is a small, local control state with thoughtful vision and teacher leadership. They have solid local initiatives but uneven distribution and no enforcement.  Colorado is also a local control state. Many home grown educational organizations lead to innovation, but the state is looking to bring more coherence through leveraging of federal funds.  Missouri is trying to balance local control with state oversight infrastructure, and for many years, significant funding. System of Regional Professional Development Centers (RPDCs) allows for connection between schools, state and universities.

 Develop a state system of coherent PD policies  Establish mechanisms to oversee and stimulate professional learning at each level of the system  Build PD infrastructure  Cultivate PD leadership at all levels In order to promote access to quality professional development, states can:

 The Office of Professional Standards and the PTSB with the support of State Board and a series of Commissioners have built a comprehensive system requiring districts, schools, and teachers to look at local context in order to develop PD plans.  Over time, the PTSB and state vision has evolved to address new issues as they have developed.  Various professional and academic partners have teamed to create a centralized message.  Resources for collaboration have been developed and provided for districts and schools.

Teachers write individual Professional Development Plans based on their own needs and their schools’ plans. Every five years, teachers must do 100 hours of embedded or external professional development as part of the evaluation process. School Professional Development Committees District Professional Development Committees County Professional Development Boards The Professional Teaching Standards Board The PTSB with the NJDOE’s assistance creates materials and programs to support this work. Other branches of the NJDOE provide professional development opportunities and oversight as well Universities and private organizations supply training and support. 18

 The bottom line for the professional development system is that schools (and teachers) must look at what is happening in their schools and what they need to do to improve.  PD work is overseen by peers and administrators at multiple levels and supported by the NJDOE (and other organizations) with trainings and materials to help the collaborative process.  The balance between requirement and freedom supports autonomy without losing fidelity.  The system is efficient in creating a lot of infrastructure with relatively little expenditure.

 The NJDOE supports collaborative work through national experts, training workshops, and online materials like the Collaborative Learning Tool Kit.  Model programs like the PLC Lab School Program, as well as model leaders like Pat Wright, give examples of the types of work schools can do.  Professional organizations work together to articulate their message and help schools.  There have been efforts to dovetail PD work across NJDOE offices, as in work done by the office of Math and Science Education using the PD system to support standards adoption.

 Placeholder slide for possible graphic showing PD infrastructure 21

 The PTSB acts as a microcosm of the larger system bringing in stakeholders from all areas of the education landscape.  The system itself requires teachers and administrators to take positions of responsibility and leadership in professional development efforts.  State leaders have seen the value of empowering these constituents and have supported this type of comprehensive, research-based work.

Leadership – Shared vision – Strategic use of federal mandates & funds – Value expertise of educational professionals Resources – Money, personnel, relationships & programs – Capacity-building structures Infrastructure for professional development – Role of partner organizations – Role of professionals Infrastructure for professional development Leadership Resources

 Access to high quality professional development is an essential component for improving teacher effectiveness  A systemic approach within schools and across the district will build both individual and team capacity  NJ’s PD framework will integrate well with the proposed statewide system of teacher and principal evaluation 24