RHODE ISLAND’S RACE TO THE TOP PRESENTATION TO THE RACE TO THE TOP REVIEW PANEL MARCH 17, 2010 Honorable Donald L. Carcieri, Governor Deborah A. Gist,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
The APS Model for Creating Urban School Principals Kathy M. Augustine Deputy Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Beverly L. Hall, Ed.D. Superintendent.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012.
1 Massachusetts’ Race To The Top Plan Paul Reville, Secretary of Education Mitchell D. Chester, Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Carol.
Brandywine School District Race to the Top Scope of Work Overview Presentation.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Foundations for Success Initial Findings and New Directions Jason Snipes Director of Research Council of the Great City Schools Defining the Achievement.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
December 2014 Supporting Principals as Instructional Leaders.
Effective Principals in Our Schools Takes Commitment and Focus American Association of School Administrators Ann Clark, Deputy Superintendent March 29,
NASDTEC Accelerating Excellence from the Get-Go Portland, OR June 7, 2015 Ellen Moir, Chief Executive Officer When we focus on teachers, our students succeed.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Effective Teachers Core Initiative of the Houston Independent School District Council for the Great City Schools Fall Conference October 21, 2010 Presenters:
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Effective School Leaders and Student Achievement EPLC Conference Presentation March 13, 2006.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application From National Leader to World Class August 11, 2010 Submitted on behalf of 843,861 public school students R e d.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Transformation In Progress Rhode Island’s Phase II Race to the Top August 10, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
Setting the Context 10/26/2015 page 1. Getting Students READY The central focus of READY is improving student learning... by enabling and ensuring great.
Governor Christie’s Educator Effectiveness Task Force Report March 1, 2011.
1 Components Preparation  Traditional higher education  Alternative certification  District-based preparation Sourcing  Marketing  Recruitment  Screening.
Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director Center for Innovation in Education Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Retreat July 21, 2014.
OVERVIEW & UPDATE CADEA/MCEAP Conference: Advancing Leadership Preparation Conversations on Policy & Practice Innovations Joseph P. Frey January 29, 2010Robert.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
Melissa Cropper Teacher and President Georgetown Federation of Teachers Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Catalyzing Reform Presenting Team Bret Schundler Commissioner Andy Smarick Deputy Commissioner Willa Spicer Assistant Commissioner Rochelle Hendricks Assistant.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Principal Supervision and Support Hosted By: John Nori Associate Director of Program Development, NASSP.
New York State Race to the Top Finalist Interview March 16, 2010.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
The Equity Business Case Why Workforce Equity is Good for Business
Success for All Foundation
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Implementing Race to the Top
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Human capital development
Presentation transcript:

RHODE ISLAND’S RACE TO THE TOP PRESENTATION TO THE RACE TO THE TOP REVIEW PANEL MARCH 17, 2010 Honorable Donald L. Carcieri, Governor Deborah A. Gist, Commissioner Thomas M. Brady, Superintendent of Providence Schools David V. Abbott, Deputy Commissioner Mary Ann Snider, Chief of Educator Excellence and Instructional Effectiveness (on behalf of 1,000 educators, students, residents, and experts who helped shape our plan) R e d a c t e d

Rhode Island Is Ready Constituency Support Foundation For Bold Action Strong, Unified Leadership

Rhode Island’s Theory of Action All Students Achieve Effective Educators, Relentlessly Supported Student-Centered Systems and Policies All students will achieve at high levels when:  We have an effective teacher in every classroom and an effective leader in every school. AND  Teachers and school leaders are supported by student- centered systems.

Ready to Act Strength of Regulation and Policy Proven Capacity to Execute A Student Achievement Breakthrough Clarity of Purpose

High-Quality Educators Who Are Well Supported Rhode Island’s Bold, Actionable Goals  Increase high school graduation rate to 87%.  Cut achievement gaps in half.  Ensure that no child will have two ineffective teachers in a row. All Students Achieve Effective Educators, Relentlessly Supported Student-Centered Systems and Policies

Goal: Distribute Effective Teachers Equitably  Districts evaluate all educators annually.  The state sends a list of students in classes with ineffective teachers to every district.  Districts manage teacher assignments tailored to student need and teacher expertise.  The state monitors the extent to which districts use evaluation data to manage their personnel systems. How we achieve our goal of ensuring that no child experiences 2 years of ineffective teaching: Of course, we see this as only a first step toward all students receiving an effective teacher every year, but it is a first step that no state has yet taken.

Our Focus: Great Teachers and Leaders  Ambitious professional development  Supportive leadership  A culture that insists upon effectiveness  Powerful new tools and data Rhode Island is small enough to reach every educator multiple times per year with: The intensive support we will provide to our 11 high- need districts will reach 76% of our disadvantaged students.

Continuum of Professional Support and Accountability Prepare Certify Recruit and Select Induct Support and Develop Evaluate Career Ladder All Students Achieve Stronger candidates Informed by evaluation data Based on student needs Comprehensive support Coherent and targeted Fair and actionable feedback

Supportive and Decisive 1. After 2 years of ineffective evaluations, an educator cannot be retained by the district. 2. After 5 years of ineffective evaluations, the state will not renew certification to practice in Rhode Island. We intensively support teachers and administrators to become highly effective, but if they don’t become effective, we are uniquely empowered to take action:

State and District Actions  Results Example: Statewide Educator Evaluation Uses Data/Feedback Customizes Growth Plan Implements Evaluation Training Collects & Uses Data HR Decisions Co-Designs/ Designs Manages Human Capital System Data System Reporting Standards Co-Design Data System Implementation Support Dramatically Accelerate Student Achievement

Race to the Top in Providence  Demonstrated Capacity to Execute  Aligned curriculum  Competency-based interview hiring  Accelerate and Sustain with Race to the Top  Focus on turning around lowest-achieving schools  Meaningful educator evaluation systems  Significant professional development  Targeted leadership development  Data-driven decision-making

Why Rhode Island?  Bold, Actionable Goals  Strong Foundation  Courage to Act  Model for the Nation All Students Achieve Effective Educators, Relentlessly Supported Student-Centered Systems and Policies