Interoperability: Standards and Product – Both Are Important – NOW Please

n Globally recognized trade association n Focused on common business processes, implementation guidelines, education and training n Composed of approximately 1,500 member companies representing major OEMS, suppliers, and service providers n More than 1,000 volunteers participate monthly n Provides opportunity for peer networking and sharing best practices Who We Are

n Profit margins are thin; extremely competitive market – U.S. diminishing manufacturing base n Companies and their supply chains are becoming more global n Standards and products to support deployment are not always available when needed n The Automotive industry wastes $5 Billion annually due to the lack of interoperability* n 30-40% of a company’s IT budget is spent on translation and integration costs** State of the Industry Source: * NIST 2 nd Qtr 2004 Survey ** Gartner 2002

Volunteers Define Best Practices: Solve business problems Develop technical solutions Validate Automotive Implementation Guideline Process Data Formats Technical Solutions Regional Standards and Standards Development Organizations ANSI SASIG OAGi OASIS WS-I International Standards UN/CEFACT ISO ITU IEC WTO WCO Examples: Material Replenishment Ergonomics Safety Warranty Technology - Bar Coding - EDI/XML - RFID - STEP Government Regulation (US, EU, Japan) AIAG Standards Development Model Integration Cost Compliance Costs Trading Partner Collaboration Resources Standards to Run Business Compliance Global Companies

AIAG Collaboration Model Board of Directors Executive Director Member Companies Operations IT Quality Quality Procurement &MaterialsManagement Engineering Engineering Industry Loans/Staff Quality MaterialsManagement Occupational Health & Safety Collaborative Engineering & ProductDevelopmentElectronicCommerce Truck & Heavy Equipment Equipment Steering Committees Projects

B2B Communication Framework – Lack of Interoperability ebXML Messaging, AS1, AS2, WS Authorization, SAML, WS Federation, WS Reliability, WS Reliable Messaging, WS Security, WS Trust, WS Policy, XML Signature, XML Encryption, XACML. SOAP 1.1, 1.2, SOAP with Attachments, DIME, WS Addressing, WS Routing, ebXML Messaging J2EE,.NET APIs R e g i s t r y Profiles&Profiles& PoliciesPolicies Operating System Application Server Transports Base Messaging Infrastructure Definition LanguagesSemantic Definitions Extended Messaging Infrastructure Business Process and Transaction Services ManagementManagement TCP, IP v3, HTTP(S), FTP, SMTP ebXML Registry, CPP/CPA, UDDI 2.0/3.0 WSCI, BPML, ebXML BPSS, WS-BPEL, Business Transaction Protocol, WS-Transaction XML, XML Schema, WSDL 1.1/1.2, XSLT. UBL, OAGIS BODS, UNSPSC, VICS, PIDX, GISB, xCBL, etc. SNMP, JMX, WBEM, note: standards gaps exist in all areas of Change, Operational, Service Level, and Audit Management DOM, Java Beans, JAX(X),.NET, SAX, Portal frameworks and related specs WSRP, JSR168, etc.

Project Management Process Consistent Work Templates Modeling - UML/UMM XML Schema – OAGIS BODs Core Components – ISO UN/CEFACTJoint Automotive Data Model AIAG JAMA/JAPIA Odette STAR POC Testing Environment GEFEG EDIFIX Tool Electronic Commerce Toolkit

Joint Automotive Data Model Alignment of Content CCTS and UML/UMM CCTS and UML/UMM OAGIS 9.0 JADM TBG1 Supply Chain Automotive TBG17 Harmonization OAGi UN/CEFACT

n Flexibility and reusability – need products that are adaptable and agile l Extend current infrastructure and enable innovation l Improve accuracy and reduce latency n Technology products need to be “plug and play” n Rigorous support of business processes to give end-to-end data visibility across systems n Freedom of choice for future investments n Competing standards are confusing – need cooperation among standards groups n More strategic investments n Need to improve the standards development model End User Requirements

Thank You!